What is the tactical advantage of blowing up a schoolbus full of civilians?
https://nitter.net/TWMCLtd/status/1554205767015727105#m
What is the tactical advantage of blowing up a schoolbus full of civilians?
https://nitter.net/TWMCLtd/status/1554205767015727105#m
A distraction with the bonus of eliminating annoying civilians!
That's an HIMARS full of azov super soldiers.
why does it look so fake
Preventing the escape of civilians and further use them as a human shields.
>civilian car
>ukraine
no such thing. russia has rights and means to destroy whatever is moving.
>means to destroy whatever is moving
So hohols outplayed the vatniks by not moving the HIMARS?
Wait a second...those are new RPGs only Russia has
russia has lost plenty of these during the initial kievkharkov rush.
Nice plebbit post u/Brzezinski94. Now, go back.
jesus frick is this guy a shill.
like 20 post in a single day.
You won't mind when it happens on your soil then. Good.
Noooo, faaaaake. There are no red zZZzzzz. This is xoxol car. Xaxaxaxaxa
the only right that russia has is to GTFO of ukraine
preferrably in coffins.
indeed
but with the way this is going they're going to earn their country a biblical war crimes tribunal, with their online brigades tracked down as collaborators in war crimes as well
Agree like the Americ**ts, Israelis and Saudis.
Goes both ways, vatniks were using cities as human shields in dombabwe before too.
Denying transportation and elimination of future combatants
>Pigger cope
That's the HIMARS weapon system. I am Jhonny America I work in 82nd American motor rifle air born brigade and see it many times. Now I am retire from army and live in state of the Kentucky oblast and do not want expensive war we want infrastructure and universe health system
oh yes, we americans need to mind our own business and focus on things that matter such as potato harvest, and lack of pancake shovels in school cafeterias
Apparently there's Telegram users posting pics of a destroyed ambulance Humvee claiming it's a HIMARs.
What is the tactical advantage of trying to declare war on an enemy over ten times more capable than you are, and that's just in economics?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62389537
well, you should ask the third reich or the imperial japanese
>we're going to continue with our impotent seething cause that's all we can do
it's hard being russian
>us approving targets for himars
Slander! Everybody knows himars operators receive the coordinates for the next strike by divine revelation in their dreams.
The Bongs also supplied at least 3 to Ukraine, why aren't they at war with UK too? If the argument is
>Well USA designed them (and even then I doubt ALL parts were USA designed)
Then that can apply to so many countries that Russia should be fighting dozens.
>The Bongs also supplied at least 3 to Ukraine, why aren't they at war with UK too?
They're afraid of shuffling off this mortal coil.
This.
If Russia tries attacking NATO I give it two weeks (two more weeks) before we get a fall of Saigon reenactment with an Abrams tank, British infantry, and the Baltic troops committing war crimes off camera.
They're going to sink Great Britain with their nuclear tsunaZ
I accuse Russia of direct role.
The Russians are really banking on the Republicans winning and stabbing the Ukrainians in the back.
Inb4
>B-but whatabout America
What about America?
>In response to the events at Abu Ghraib, the United States Department of Defense removed 17 soldiers and officers from duty. Eleven soldiers were charged with dereliction of duty, maltreatment, aggravated assault and battery. Between May 2004 and April 2006, these soldiers were court-martialed, convicted, sentenced to military prison, and dishonorably discharged from service. Two soldiers, found to have perpetrated many of the worst offenses at the prison, Specialist Charles Graner and PFC Lynndie England, were subject to more severe charges and received harsher sentences. Graner was convicted of assault, battery, conspiracy, maltreatment of detainees, committing indecent acts and dereliction of duty; he was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and loss of rank, pay and benefits.[8] England was convicted of conspiracy, maltreating detainees and committing an indecent act and sentenced to three years in prison.[9] Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, the commanding officer of all detention facilities in Iraq, was reprimanded and demoted to the rank of colonel. Several more military personnel who were accused of perpetrating or authorizing the measures, including many of higher rank, were not prosecuted. In 2004, President George W. Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld apologized for the Abu Ghraib abuses.
When will Russia pull off something like this? They don't even have free press there!