What is the tactical advantage of blowing up a schoolbus full of civilians?

What is the tactical advantage of blowing up a schoolbus full of civilians?

https://nitter.net/TWMCLtd/status/1554205767015727105#m

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A distraction with the bonus of eliminating annoying civilians!

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That's an HIMARS full of azov super soldiers.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    why does it look so fake

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Preventing the escape of civilians and further use them as a human shields.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >civilian car
    >ukraine
    no such thing. russia has rights and means to destroy whatever is moving.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >means to destroy whatever is moving
      So hohols outplayed the vatniks by not moving the HIMARS?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Wait a second...those are new RPGs only Russia has

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        russia has lost plenty of these during the initial kievkharkov rush.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nice plebbit post u/Brzezinski94. Now, go back.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        jesus frick is this guy a shill.
        like 20 post in a single day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You won't mind when it happens on your soil then. Good.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Noooo, faaaaake. There are no red zZZzzzz. This is xoxol car. Xaxaxaxaxa

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      the only right that russia has is to GTFO of ukraine
      preferrably in coffins.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        indeed
        but with the way this is going they're going to earn their country a biblical war crimes tribunal, with their online brigades tracked down as collaborators in war crimes as well

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Agree like the Americ**ts, Israelis and Saudis.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Goes both ways, vatniks were using cities as human shields in dombabwe before too.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Denying transportation and elimination of future combatants

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Pigger cope
    That's the HIMARS weapon system. I am Jhonny America I work in 82nd American motor rifle air born brigade and see it many times. Now I am retire from army and live in state of the Kentucky oblast and do not want expensive war we want infrastructure and universe health system

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      oh yes, we americans need to mind our own business and focus on things that matter such as potato harvest, and lack of pancake shovels in school cafeterias

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Apparently there's Telegram users posting pics of a destroyed ambulance Humvee claiming it's a HIMARs.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What is the tactical advantage of trying to declare war on an enemy over ten times more capable than you are, and that's just in economics?
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62389537

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      well, you should ask the third reich or the imperial japanese

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >we're going to continue with our impotent seething cause that's all we can do
      it's hard being russian

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >us approving targets for himars
      Slander! Everybody knows himars operators receive the coordinates for the next strike by divine revelation in their dreams.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Bongs also supplied at least 3 to Ukraine, why aren't they at war with UK too? If the argument is
      >Well USA designed them (and even then I doubt ALL parts were USA designed)
      Then that can apply to so many countries that Russia should be fighting dozens.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The Bongs also supplied at least 3 to Ukraine, why aren't they at war with UK too?
        They're afraid of shuffling off this mortal coil.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This.
          If Russia tries attacking NATO I give it two weeks (two more weeks) before we get a fall of Saigon reenactment with an Abrams tank, British infantry, and the Baltic troops committing war crimes off camera.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        They're going to sink Great Britain with their nuclear tsunaZ

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I accuse Russia of direct role.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Russians are really banking on the Republicans winning and stabbing the Ukrainians in the back.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Inb4
    >B-but whatabout America
    What about America?

    >In response to the events at Abu Ghraib, the United States Department of Defense removed 17 soldiers and officers from duty. Eleven soldiers were charged with dereliction of duty, maltreatment, aggravated assault and battery. Between May 2004 and April 2006, these soldiers were court-martialed, convicted, sentenced to military prison, and dishonorably discharged from service. Two soldiers, found to have perpetrated many of the worst offenses at the prison, Specialist Charles Graner and PFC Lynndie England, were subject to more severe charges and received harsher sentences. Graner was convicted of assault, battery, conspiracy, maltreatment of detainees, committing indecent acts and dereliction of duty; he was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and loss of rank, pay and benefits.[8] England was convicted of conspiracy, maltreating detainees and committing an indecent act and sentenced to three years in prison.[9] Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, the commanding officer of all detention facilities in Iraq, was reprimanded and demoted to the rank of colonel. Several more military personnel who were accused of perpetrating or authorizing the measures, including many of higher rank, were not prosecuted. In 2004, President George W. Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld apologized for the Abu Ghraib abuses.
    When will Russia pull off something like this? They don't even have free press there!

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *