Sup /k/, can anyone give me a QRD on ITAR?
I've developed something that I think would be useful for the trench-style warfare in Ukraine. I would like to give it to the Ukrainian military. Does this violate ITAR? It is drone-related but is not itself a drone. It is software-related but is primarily a hardware product driven by software. I am an Amcit but don't live in the U.S., and all development was done outside the U.S.
Pic unrelated but BOOBA
if all women looked like this there would be zero (0) wars
>AI generated image
your parents don't love you.
the feeling is mutual rest assured
>seething over title
Don't you have some minor anatomy errors to be searching for?
Lol drawslave mad
people who draw are slaves? slaves to fricking what? as opposed to brain damaged coomers like you who jerk off to software generated mutants with big breasts? are you being contrarian on purpose or are you actually this mentally degenarated?
Go back to drawing smut for 20 bucks a picture slave. You are an uncreative bore in a creative field.
says the brain damaged coomer posting AI generated monstrosities with big breasts, and browsing said smut artists 24/7. I don't even draw you fricking gay, and i wouldn't draw generic shitty porn even if I did you have no argument, consoomer
The only person who posted AI BOOBA is me, the OP.
prompt?
Is AI Booba covered by ITAR? Russians could be downloading this as we speak.
Join usss
>jerk off to big breasts.
Yes. Yes I do. That's me, it's what I do.
what else are you supposed to jerk off to? lmao
The ones actually made by the artist and not ones stollen by an AIArt gay
As soon as I bust my nut to either, they're equal in value to me. Who cares?
Of course. Let's see some of your art anon so we can show you support
you must be an artist troony
nothing else would explain the amount of moronic sperging that you are doing right now
ywnbaw
This is just pathetic, you've already lost dumbass. You've already been replaced by code. You're worthless now, sorry you wasted all those years drawing stupid shit for nothing LMAO! Get a real job.
>AI generated image
Yes, so? I've been astounded by the creativity going on in the /b/ AI deGenerated Art threads. One guy has spent weeks posting erotic sheep made of donuts and frosting and other confectionary stuff. Furry? No, IT'S CAKE.
I'd post one but blue board blue balls.
at the very least these AIBlack folk toned it down, their dopamine brains already succumbed to the novelty. it's funny how you can see the difference between having a creative hobby versus one based on pure consumption
They're techbros that make any new tech thing into an ideology.
This is where you gave the game up. Literally nobody but leftist Twitterbrained Black folk use techbro as an insult. It's an attack conceived of pure seethe and the inability to say anything actually offensive.
here's your human commissioned, human created "art" bro
Why must AItards ways argue in bad faith? Is it because the thing they put their personality in is being attacked? Or is it because they get laughed at for having no talent?
Why do you have no argument against the ugliest, most soulless art currently in existence being entirely human created by the "artists" you're defending against the beauty of code?
Tell me why AI art generators use art from the same people you proclaim to be terrible. You're a joke who can only argue in straw manning and acting so stupid.
I'm not obligated to do anything for you. You decided to derail the thread to cry about AI so I derailed it right back. Take your meds, artschizo.
Why do you keep projecting and pushing blame onto others?
Is projection the only word Reddit taught you? I can't even reply to your identical Corporate Memphis wienersucking screeds as fast as you're making them, see
Don't worry though, here's some really good wholesome human made art for humans, the kind you prefer.
>Tell me why AI art generators use art from the same people you proclaim to be terrible.
They don't, though. They can use art of any style and era. I believe this Pepe is in the style of the French impressionists. Not being an artgay, however, I could be mistaken.
>They don't
>They do
you are genuinely moronic
You wrote that they use art that "you" (meaning the other guy you were replying to) deemed "terrible". I pointed out that they can use art of any style, including the good old stuff that modern shit artists refuse to use because "lol ain't nobody got time fo dat".
Monet = good, Warhol = shit, Yoko Ono = fungus-covered dogshit
You really are complete shit at arguing. You just repeat yourself, take posts out of context, and probably don't even realize that I'm a different person from the one you were trying to pick a fight with.
>Black person argues that all real art is shit because corporate canser exists
>he gets an answer that by that logic AI art must also all be shit because he uses real art as reference
>"uh, no, ackshually AI can use any art as reference"
anon, your fricking reading comprehension reps
It was pretty obvious that he was pointing out that modern "artists" and the "art" they "produce" are what suck, not old masters like Rembrandt, Renoir, van Gogh, hell even Vargas.
You're either disingenuously arguing in bad faith or are just a complete moron.
It was obvious that he used most ridiculous and dumbest bullshit imaginable to simply bait for replies. No he wasn't pointing on modern artists vs classic, stop being autist anon, you're on basketweaving forum, shitposters exist.
>complains about arguing in bad faith
>has done nothing other than b***h because someone made a sexy pic with fat breasts
You need to get laid bro
>You need to get laid bro
he's ngmi
not him but this is just disingenuous
you post exactly the cancer that provoking AI art boom, as corporate, templates based unimaginative consumer product
I hate AI art exactly because in its core it is the same as your pic, and it will be used extensively to create picrels very, very soon
>actually this beautiful, detailed, near photo realistic art is the exact same as this horrifically ugly, transparently Semitic propaganda garbage
This is your brain on drawslave logic, go do an app store commission
You keep projecting what ai art already does. Your own mind is poisoned yet you scream at anyone who tells you otherwise
You keep making the same reply over and over and expecting a different result, what's the definition of insanity? I'm not engaging your bad faith argument.
I say it over and over again because it's what you keep doing. You are saying that actually drawing shit is soulless and corporate yet what you defend is the antithesis of soulless and corporate.
You can keep being mad all you want. The AI models have leaked and can't be censored now. It's over for you ten cent app store "artists".
You are the one who keeps cherry picking shitty art and proclaiming it to be all hand drawn art is.
This art style with the big bodies and tiny heads is based. My fricking sides kek. The only thing I care about anymore is whether something is funny or not
It's not good at all but it is funny.
Funny = good by default. Comedy is the only thing that matters in an absurd, meaningless world. Take the absurdism pill. Read Camus
the fricking dance the cartoon in the middle does fricking KEK
your time has come to an end artcel
Look who's talking
COMES OUT AND GET YOUR CORPORATE MEMPHIS!
What are you even trying to say at this point?
This is what you're defending. This was the dominant art style pre-AI. This is what you're fighting to preserve. This is "the human touch" you think so highly of.
Why do you project what you yourself are creating? With AI art you are propping up spurless corporatized slop. Not the buzzword but actual slop that no one cares about.
Art by NPCs vs "art" by AI which steals from actual artists? How about they both suck? This isn't a binary choice.
You're talking to someone who cherry picks everything and thinks ai art is freeing while actually drawing is corporate slavery. Even though it's the opposite way around
>it's corporate slavery to let people have fun doing what they want to do!
>it's totally freedom to force people to put up with shit art designed by communists
But that's what you are doing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_Regulations#Exporting_Defense_Articles
Doesn't address the issue. I am not in the U.S., none of the development has taken place in the U.S., so there is no "export" from the U.S.
Is an American citizen who has developed a technology outside the country, independently, required to get permission or can I just turn it over?
"export" for this purpose just means "transfer'. You are a US citizen. You are transferring it to a foreign person. Your item is defense-related (perhaps). Ergo, it falls under ITAR. See also the example:
> A foreign person is any person who is not a lawful permanent resident of the U.S. and includes foreign governments and organizations.[8]:§120.16 This means that, for example a foreign person who is visiting the U.S. will remain a foreign person for the purposes of ITAR and any export of USML items to them ***inside the U.S.*** must be subject to an export authorization.
Also fyi the American government is loves to swing its big dick around even regarding issues that are not geographically located inside the US (see "universal jurisdiction", taxation of US citizens living abroad, H.R.4775, "extraordinary rendition", etc.). Obviously they're not going to care about you, a random PrepHole shitposter, but legally they definitely could.
>Also fyi the American government is loves to swing its big dick around
LOL. Yeah, I know. I've had to deal with the tax nonsense for years. Half the reason I like living outside the U.S. is the freedom.
>perhaps
definite, trust me bro
But the example once again says "inside the U.S." (which you have highlighted). I'm outside the U.S. and have not been inside the U.S. for years. Any transfer would also happen outside the U.S.
Real answer meet with and ask the military attaché in the nearest US embassy and get them to greenlight it and give you a contact.
Problem is that if it falls under ITAR I have to pay something like $2500 to "register". I don't really have $2500 to waste on bureaucracy.
I have to do a bunch of gay paperwork about software I write and maintain related to encryption, because of ITAR. So that’s my input: it’s gay.
But you're in the U.S., right?
This isn't cryptography, (un)fortunately.
milk truk just arive
Just give it to them lol
I want to. I just want to help them kill Russians. I want more hilarious videos of Russians dying while big-booba Ukrainian pop singers are singing perky tunes.
>SauceNAO’d this image
>FurAffinity link shows up
What the frick?
It's from one of the /b/ AI art threads; nearly all of the images there were generated just for posting there.
Who's "us"?
Dunno, I just snarf them from the threads. 🙂
you should give it to us
>ITAR
If you are legally able to live and do business outside the US you are mostly clear of ITAR unless your product is a)on the U.S Munitions List or b) your services would fall under the Defense Services category in which case you'd need DDTC authorization to work with a non-US govt or defense contractor no matter where you live.
If your product is not specifically and explicitly for weapons manufacture or defense services but could have other uses, your easiest route is to sell it/license it to a defense contractor to put to use, or get a job with said same, your foreign employer then is responsible for ITAR not you
In any case you should shell out for at least a consultation with an intl trade lawyer before getting started since violating ITAR can get you stripped of citizenship, put under interdiction, tried for espionage/treason, etc etc. It is quite literally SRS BSNS
It's funny how good AI generated art has gotten but it still absolutely shits the bed when it comes to hands exactly like a ton of human artists, maybe the machines aren't that different from us after all
>actual schizo
lmao
you will never be an artist
Pathetic, can't even keep the argument going. Black person
You'll have to check the CCL and see if what you're making falls into any of the categories. Chances are, if it's a weapon, it will. If it's something that isn't primarily a weapon but can be "repurposed" it probably won't.
Even if you don't physically export something to Ukraine, it can still be controlled if it's online. I'd be careful what you do publically.
Thanks. I could transmit the whitepaper and the CAD diagrams online but it's a physical item.
when will AI finally figure out how to do proper human hands...
It already can, it just takes multiple tries. The technique is called "inpainting" and you just keep erasing any bad spots and regenerating them until the AI gets it right.
Here's better question - when will it figure out how to draw actions and interactions.
Maybe I even stop hating it so much when it starts to create passable porn.
Don't forget the hands it can't ever draw.
>
>still cant not frick up the fingers
Why does all AI art have the exact same fricking style, I don't even need to look for fricked up fingers or weird garment issues literally just the coloring is enough to know that it came from SD
trained on a big pool of images from an artist.
>ITAR
What is ITAR?
>6 fingers
Must be a witch but imagine the hand jobs.