Sup?

Sup PrepHole, can anyone give me a QRD on ITAR?

I've developed something that I think would be useful for the trench-style warfare in Ukraine. I would like to give it to the Ukrainian military. Does this violate ITAR? It is drone-related but is not itself a drone. It is software-related but is primarily a hardware product driven by software. I am an Amcit but don't live in the U.S., and all development was done outside the U.S.

Pic unrelated but BOOBA

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if all women looked like this there would be zero (0) wars

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AI generated image
    your parents don't love you.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the feeling is mutual rest assured

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >seething over title
      Don't you have some minor anatomy errors to be searching for?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol drawslave mad

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        people who draw are slaves? slaves to fucking what? as opposed to brain damaged coomers like you who masturbate to software generated mutants with big tits? are you being contrarian on purpose or are you actually this mentally degenarated?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Go back to drawing smut for 20 bucks a picture slave. You are an uncreative bore in a creative field.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            says the brain damaged coomer posting AI generated monstrosities with big tits, and browsing said smut artists 24/7. I don't even draw you fucking fag, and i wouldn't draw generic shitty porn even if I did you have no argument, consoomer

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The only person who posted AI BOOBA is me, the OP.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                prompt?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is AI Booba covered by ITAR? Russians could be downloading this as we speak.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Join usss

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Masturbate to big tits.
          Yes. Yes I do. That's me, it's what I do.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what else are you supposed to masturbate to? lmao

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The ones actually made by the artist and not ones stollen by an AIArt fag

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                As soon as I bust my nut to either, they're equal in value to me. Who cares?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Of course. Let's see some of your art anon so we can show you support

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you must be an artist chud
          nothing else would explain the amount of retarded sperging that you are doing right now
          ywnbaw

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is just pathetic, you've already lost dumbass. You've already been replaced by code. You're worthless now, sorry you wasted all those years drawing stupid shit for nothing LMAO! Get a real job.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AI generated image
      Yes, so? I've been astounded by the creativity going on in the /b/ AI deGenerated Art threads. One guy has spent weeks posting erotic sheep made of donuts and frosting and other confectionary stuff. Furry? No, IT'S CAKE.

      I'd post one but blue board blue balls.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      at the very least these AImorons toned it down, their dopamine brains already succumbed to the novelty. it's funny how you can see the difference between having a creative hobby versus one based on pure consumption

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They're techbros that make any new tech thing into an ideology.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is where you gave the game up. Literally nobody but leftist Twitterbrained morons use techbro as an insult. It's an attack conceived of pure seethe and the inability to say anything actually offensive.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      here's your human commissioned, human created "art" bro

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why must AItards ways argue in bad faith? Is it because the thing they put their personality in is being attacked? Or is it because they get laughed at for having no talent?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why do you have no argument against the ugliest, most soulless art currently in existence being entirely human created by the "artists" you're defending against the beauty of code?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Tell me why AI art generators use art from the same people you proclaim to be terrible. You're a joke who can only argue in straw manning and acting so stupid.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not obligated to do anything for you. You decided to derail the thread to cry about AI so I derailed it right back. Take your meds, artschizo.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you keep projecting and pushing blame onto others?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is projection the only word Reddit taught you? I can't even reply to your identical Corporate Memphis cocksucking screeds as fast as you're making them, see

                https://i.imgur.com/0a5CLWY.jpg

                [...]
                You keep making the same reply over and over and expecting a different result, what's the definition of insanity? I'm not engaging your bad faith argument.

                Don't worry though, here's some really good wholesome human made art for humans, the kind you prefer.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Tell me why AI art generators use art from the same people you proclaim to be terrible.
              They don't, though. They can use art of any style and era. I believe this Pepe is in the style of the French impressionists. Not being an artfag, however, I could be mistaken.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >They don't
                >They do
                you are genuinely retarded

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You wrote that they use art that "you" (meaning the other guy you were replying to) deemed "terrible". I pointed out that they can use art of any style, including the good old stuff that modern shit artists refuse to use because "lol ain't nobody got time fo dat".

                Monet = good, Warhol = shit, Yoko Ono = fungus-covered dogshit

                You really are complete shit at arguing. You just repeat yourself, take posts out of context, and probably don't even realize that I'm a different person from the one you were trying to pick a fight with.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >moron argues that all real art is shit because corporate canser exists
                >he gets an answer that by that logic AI art must also all be shit because he uses real art as reference
                >"uh, no, ackshually AI can use any art as reference"
                anon, your fucking reading comprehension reps

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was pretty obvious that he was pointing out that modern "artists" and the "art" they "produce" are what suck, not old masters like Rembrandt, Renoir, van Gogh, hell even Vargas.

                You're either disingenuously arguing in bad faith or are just a complete moron.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It was obvious that he used most ridiculous and dumbest bullshit imaginable to simply bait for replies. No he wasn't pointing on modern artists vs classic, stop being autist anon, you're on basketweaving forum, shitposters exist.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >complains about arguing in bad faith
          >has done nothing other than bitch because someone made a sexy pic with fat titties

          You need to get laid bro

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You need to get laid bro
            he's ngmi

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not him but this is just disingenuous
        you post exactly the cancer that provoking AI art boom, as corporate, templates based unimaginative consumer product
        I hate AI art exactly because in its core it is the same as your pic, and it will be used extensively to create picrels very, very soon

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >actually this beautiful, detailed, near photo realistic art is the exact same as this horrifically ugly, transparently Semitic propaganda garbage
          This is your brain on drawslave logic, go do an app store commission

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You keep projecting what ai art already does. Your own mind is poisoned yet you scream at anyone who tells you otherwise

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why do you project what you yourself are creating? With AI art you are propping up spurless corporatized slop. Not the buzzword but actual slop that no one cares about.

              You keep making the same reply over and over and expecting a different result, what's the definition of insanity? I'm not engaging your bad faith argument.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I say it over and over again because it's what you keep doing. You are saying that actually drawing shit is soulless and corporate yet what you defend is the antithesis of soulless and corporate.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You can keep being mad all you want. The AI models have leaked and can't be censored now. It's over for you ten cent app store "artists".

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are the one who keeps cherry picking shitty art and proclaiming it to be all hand drawn art is.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/iRgdGAy.png

                Is projection the only word Reddit taught you? I can't even reply to your identical Corporate Memphis cocksucking screeds as fast as you're making them, see
                [...]

                Don't worry though, here's some really good wholesome human made art for humans, the kind you prefer.

                https://i.imgur.com/rregF9b.png

                This is what you're defending. This was the dominant art style pre-AI. This is what you're fighting to preserve. This is "the human touch" you think so highly of.

                https://i.imgur.com/zlQrSsG.png

                Why do you have no argument against the ugliest, most soulless art currently in existence being entirely human created by the "artists" you're defending against the beauty of code?

                https://i.imgur.com/eoNUdce.jpg

                COMES OUT AND GET YOUR CORPORATE MEMPHIS!

                https://i.imgur.com/262AHU5.png

                here's your human commissioned, human created "art" bro

                This art style with the big bodies and tiny heads is based. My fucking sides kek. The only thing I care about anymore is whether something is funny or not

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not good at all but it is funny.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Funny = good by default. Comedy is the only thing that matters in an absurd, meaningless world. Take the absurdism pill. Read Camus

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the fucking dance the cartoon in the middle does fucking KEK

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      your time has come to an end artcel

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Look who's talking

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      COMES OUT AND GET YOUR CORPORATE MEMPHIS!

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What are you even trying to say at this point?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is what you're defending. This was the dominant art style pre-AI. This is what you're fighting to preserve. This is "the human touch" you think so highly of.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you project what you yourself are creating? With AI art you are propping up spurless corporatized slop. Not the buzzword but actual slop that no one cares about.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Art by NPCs vs "art" by AI which steals from actual artists? How about they both suck? This isn't a binary choice.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You're talking to someone who cherry picks everything and thinks ai art is freeing while actually drawing is corporate slavery. Even though it's the opposite way around

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's corporate slavery to let people have fun doing what they want to do!
                >it's totally freedom to force people to put up with shit art designed by communists

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But that's what you are doing.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_Regulations#Exporting_Defense_Articles

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doesn't address the issue. I am not in the U.S., none of the development has taken place in the U.S., so there is no "export" from the U.S.

      Is an American citizen who has developed a technology outside the country, independently, required to get permission or can I just turn it over?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "export" for this purpose just means "transfer'. You are a US citizen. You are transferring it to a foreign person. Your item is defense-related (perhaps). Ergo, it falls under ITAR. See also the example:
        > A foreign person is any person who is not a lawful permanent resident of the U.S. and includes foreign governments and organizations.[8]:§120.16 This means that, for example a foreign person who is visiting the U.S. will remain a foreign person for the purposes of ITAR and any export of USML items to them ***inside the U.S.*** must be subject to an export authorization.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Also fyi the American government is loves to swing its big dick around even regarding issues that are not geographically located inside the US (see "universal jurisdiction", taxation of US citizens living abroad, H.R.4775, "extraordinary rendition", etc.). Obviously they're not going to care about you, a random PrepHole shitposter, but legally they definitely could.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Also fyi the American government is loves to swing its big dick around
            LOL. Yeah, I know. I've had to deal with the tax nonsense for years. Half the reason I like living outside the U.S. is the freedom.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >perhaps
          definite, trust me bro

          But the example once again says "inside the U.S." (which you have highlighted). I'm outside the U.S. and have not been inside the U.S. for years. Any transfer would also happen outside the U.S.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/FxPqZBD.jpg

        Sup PrepHole, can anyone give me a QRD on ITAR?

        I've developed something that I think would be useful for the trench-style warfare in Ukraine. I would like to give it to the Ukrainian military. Does this violate ITAR? It is drone-related but is not itself a drone. It is software-related but is primarily a hardware product driven by software. I am an Amcit but don't live in the U.S., and all development was done outside the U.S.

        Pic unrelated but BOOBA

        Real answer meet with and ask the military attaché in the nearest US embassy and get them to greenlight it and give you a contact.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Problem is that if it falls under ITAR I have to pay something like $2500 to "register". I don't really have $2500 to waste on bureaucracy.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have to do a bunch of gay paperwork about software I write and maintain related to encryption, because of ITAR. So that’s my input: it’s gay.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But you're in the U.S., right?

      This isn't cryptography, (un)fortunately.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    milk truk just arive

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just give it to them lol

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I want to. I just want to help them kill Russians. I want more hilarious videos of Russians dying while big-booba Ukrainian pop singers are singing perky tunes.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >SauceNAO’d this image
    >FurAffinity link shows up
    What the fuck?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's from one of the /b/ AI art threads; nearly all of the images there were generated just for posting there.

      you should give it to us

      Who's "us"?

      prompt?

      Dunno, I just snarf them from the threads. 🙂

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you should give it to us

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ITAR
    If you are legally able to live and do business outside the US you are mostly clear of ITAR unless your product is a)on the U.S Munitions List or b) your services would fall under the Defense Services category in which case you'd need DDTC authorization to work with a non-US govt or defense contractor no matter where you live.
    If your product is not specifically and explicitly for weapons manufacture or defense services but could have other uses, your easiest route is to sell it/license it to a defense contractor to put to use, or get a job with said same, your foreign employer then is responsible for ITAR not you
    In any case you should shell out for at least a consultation with an intl trade lawyer before getting started since violating ITAR can get you stripped of citizenship, put under interdiction, tried for espionage/treason, etc etc. It is quite literally SRS BSNS

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's funny how good AI generated art has gotten but it still absolutely shits the bed when it comes to hands exactly like a ton of human artists, maybe the machines aren't that different from us after all

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >actual schizo
    lmao
    you will never be an artist

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pathetic, can't even keep the argument going. moron

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You'll have to check the CCL and see if what you're making falls into any of the categories. Chances are, if it's a weapon, it will. If it's something that isn't primarily a weapon but can be "repurposed" it probably won't.

    Even if you don't physically export something to Ukraine, it can still be controlled if it's online. I'd be careful what you do publically.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks. I could transmit the whitepaper and the CAD diagrams online but it's a physical item.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    when will AI finally figure out how to do proper human hands...

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It already can, it just takes multiple tries. The technique is called "inpainting" and you just keep erasing any bad spots and regenerating them until the AI gets it right.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Here's better question - when will it figure out how to draw actions and interactions.
      Maybe I even stop hating it so much when it starts to create passable porn.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Don't forget the hands it can't ever draw.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >
    >still cant not fuck up the fingers

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does all AI art have the exact same fucking style, I don't even need to look for fucked up fingers or weird garment issues literally just the coloring is enough to know that it came from SD

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      trained on a big pool of images from an artist.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ITAR

    What is ITAR?

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >6 fingers

    Must be a witch but imagine the hand jobs.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *