Would Russia nooook over Kherson?

Kherson is the gateway to Crimea and the Russians have clearly put more effort into holding this important strategic objective than anywhere else in the Donbass by keeping their best troops there. If the Ukrainians close in on Kherson and basically start threatening Crimea's water source along with Crimea itself, do you think Putin will nooook? No amount of cope would be able to explain losing Kherson.

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No.
    /thread

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Next slide thread pls.
      This one's broken.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      fibbitybippity

      https://i.imgur.com/aGhPA6t.jpg

      Kherson is the gateway to Crimea and the Russians have clearly put more effort into holding this important strategic objective than anywhere else in the Donbass by keeping their best troops there. If the Ukrainians close in on Kherson and basically start threatening Crimea's water source along with Crimea itself, do you think Putin will nooook? No amount of cope would be able to explain losing Kherson.

      >No amount of cope would be able to explain losing Kherson.
      lol
      >gesture of goodwill
      >regrouping for bigger push later
      >didnt want anyway
      >if you disagree with any of the above you go to gulag
      stop pretending you are not a country of serfs who will obediently accept whatever your tsar tells you vatnikop

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They most likely won't nook, period, but especially not over Kherson which they didn't control all of to begin with (and nothing at all pre-war). At least with Crimea Poo-Pootin apparently claimed he would nook but he won't even make this meaningless bluff about Kherson.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not even the Russians are dumb enough to use nukes. I think only the North Koreans are actually stupid enough to mess with nukes.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They would, but they can't. russia tries to conduct an undergroun nuke test for two weeks already and keeps failing.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They might do a nook test

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    daily reminder

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That you are russian subhuman

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >russian subhuman
        Insectoid drones, as the cartoon suggests

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I fucking hate hornets/yellow jackets/wasps they are assholes and it's my property gtfo.
      >daily reminder... that vatnigs can't meme
      yeah we know

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      fixed

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        shit, fixed2

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          do a monke edit

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >zelensky attached russia
      braindead thirdie chugger or actual shill?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The Russian cries out in pain as he strikes you

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We'll see by the end of the week.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    there's only one way to find out: legalize man on man hardcore anal in oinkrainy.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No. Nukes are the final step. You use them when all other means fail. They haven't even done full mobilization and switched to war economy.

    Using nukes in this point means they've exhausted conventional means. This means after the Armageddon enemy tanks just rolls in and force you into century of slavery restoring their destroyed civilization and cleaning up contamination.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Nukes are the final step.
      >You use them when all other means fail
      You mean like when we dropped two of them on Japan?

      Nukes are always the get out of a jam quick card. They get played when one side thinks they can get away with it and shorten a war that's already cost a lot of lives, money, and unrest at home.

      They might not straight up nuke them but they might conduct a nuclear "test" right at the border to attempt to scare them into submission. They might even announce that they are going to do so, just to make it sound like everything is upfront and the US won't just go full scale escalation, but after that Ukraine might be under a great deal more pressure to come to peace terms, because at that point the implication will be clear.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Nukes are always
        You say it like we use them regularly 😀

        I see only two scenarios where Russia might use them.
        1 - Winning strike that lets them achieve all objectives ( Annexation up to Dniepr or more, Russian government in Kiev, joined Transnistria and probably Moldova ). So no show strikes, or demo maneuvers. They bite the bullet and do a full scale decisive strike with multiple modes ( Kinjals, Kalibrs, maybe even ICBM ) to ensure absolute victory knowing they can manage the consequences.
        2 - A loosing strike that saves face and safeguards Kremlin. They know that not striking is an absolute loss while strike means saving something (e.g. 2014 borders or Crimea) and cementing Putins regime due to western response, isolation and chance to go full NK authoritarian. This OTOH might be a demo strike as it's mostly needed to produce strong enough western response to loose physically, without backing down and cause enough danger to consolidate power.

        In the meanwhile the Russia itself was never and still isn't in any existential danger. So this must not be considered from the point of defense of Russia. Everyone has stated that as soon as Russia withdraws most sanctions can be lifted except where directly related to war effort and talks about acceptable security arrangement can be had. Only danger there is is for Kremlins regime, so any action will follow the logic of their survival.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >You say it like we use them regularly 😀
          If the only historical precedent for them is what I said then it is indeed the case that they are always used that way. You will have to forgive me for lacking the crystal ball that can foretell me every atomic weapon detonation that will ever happen in the universe.

          >Only danger there is is for Kremlins regime, so any action will follow the logic of their survival.
          Indeed. It has already reached disproportionate response levels of weird for how much effort is being thrown at taking such a minor territory.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    puccia nukes = they get rolled by NATO
    it is known

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they will:
    kvetch
    whine
    cry
    seethe

    not in this particular order

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They wouldn't even nook over crimea. They know very well they can't.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    no, it's just am annexed territory. but i'm 90% sure putin would use nukes if ukraine retook crimea.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *