Propellers and less often shafts break on all ships of all nationalities the whole time. It'll go in dry dock and be back out at sea in a week or two. Its a class that's proved to be extremal reliable so far so something big was overdue after breezing through trials.
>Propellers and less often shafts break on all ships of all nationalities the whole time.
Yeah and your name is Bong, James Bong.
No they don't. Stop spewing bs to make this situation less embarrassing.
It goes something like this:
When something very bad happens just once to the frogs in the very early life of the Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier before being fixed afterwards so it never happens again: >AHAHAH FOOK DA FROGS I SAY LMAO BY JOVE WE'RE GOING TO REMIND THE FROGS FOR 25 YEARS ABOUT THIS BLIMEY I SWEAR ON ME MUM
When something very bad happens to the brits on any of their ships and it keeps happening again and again with extreme prejudice: >well... acktchually... It's because... [insert relentless bong BS defending the indefensible and making stuff up instead of swallowing their pride, demanding and finding answers to have an idea of what's going on so they can then ask the people they voted in to do something about it so it doesn't happen again]
Bong, bong never changes.
Just to be clear you're pretending a one off mechanical failure is the same as a design flaw resulting in your carrier for years being limited to 22kts and only now able to hit a very slow 27kts?
Had you ever been to sea you'd know that propellers and shafts are consumable items and are replaced fairly regularly. We don't even know if it is a mechanical failure, could just be some netting that divers need to clear.
>When something very bad happens just once to the frogs in the very early life of the Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier before being fixed afterwards so it never happens again:
Except CdG had an entire lifetime of massive failures in various ways, not a couple of minor faults that ultimately don't really do much.
No preventative maintenance program.
US ships never work as well (e.g. USS Gerald R Ford) but that's almost entirely administrative and bureaucratic problems that plague the Navy.
You do know what "preventative" means right? I've talked to enough British sailors to know they don't do shit for maintenance until something breaks.
If you're a UK sailor would you mind describing your scheduled maintenance system? If I'm wrong then I'll be wrong, but From hanging out with them in port I was shocked when they described what they did for work.
Probably not, do you have a link? Reverse image search didn't bring anything up.
"breaking" is a relative term though, there are many ways shaft line components can fail such as improper gear mesh, wiped bearing, shaft seals fail, shaft sheared, screw fell off...
>Preventative maintanace doesn't stop a propeller shaft or blade from braking.
Underdimensioned subcomponents or poor quality materials do. Britbongistan isnt an industrial knowledge based country any more, its just a third world country with an increasingly third world population ruled by a third world cleptocracy composed mainly by third world people (jews). And if you ask any britshit, he will tell you that its much better than speaking german as a secondary language.
Yes, I am Royale Navy saylor staying in Portsmouth base. I do never check the boats or do preventing maintenance, unlike mighty Russian Navy. Instead i see Comrade Captain in his new Mercedes after he sold the new parts for the engine.
I just refuse to dignify your moronic assertion with a serious answer. The idea that the RN does not at any point conduct maintenance is ridiculous. Even the most basic checks of system functionality would fall under preventative maintenance.
Instead, I give a stupid answer to mock and ridicule your smoothbrain statement so that someone who is able to conduct basic logical thought may have their day just brightened a little bit by my attempt at humour
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I was only pretending to be moronic
is this also you trying to be entertaining?
It aint working. Try being more funny in your little tiff with the other anon.
The system used is called UMMs, it createa maintenance schedules and lists tasks according to equipment design authority teams based in the main engineering support centre. Idk why you even post shit like that when it's so easily disproven and there are no updoots to gain. Just frick off back to/misc/ oblast.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://theforge.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/reliability_centred_maintenance.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiEweyMpuz5AhVRilwKHYddDP0QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2ueGeEXn3ek3yurBqFn-nI
>what happened to British shipbuilding
The arse fell out of it, that's what. Frankly it's a miracle we have any shipbuilding left, what remains survived ruthless culls and is modest but fairly decent. Just look at Barrow being our last sub yard after Devonport shit the bed with the polaris boats.
>Class has already done a full world tour without any issues >Has been in operation for 5 years ago, more including trials >Largest, most complex ships ever made by them >Worst that's happened is a couple leaks and a prop issue that only delays it by a few days
We made an upgraded warrior just last year that got cancelled because it went over budget @ £3bn.
Our weapons procurement is 100% money laundering. No way it costs 3bn to design and test upgrades for an ifv.
Propellers and less often shafts break on all ships of all nationalities the whole time. It'll go in dry dock and be back out at sea in a week or two. Its a class that's proved to be extremal reliable so far so something big was overdue after breezing through trials.
no they fricking don't
Then why can't you name someone who exports more gay?
>Propellers and less often shafts break on all ships of all nationalities the whole time.
Yeah and your name is Bong, James Bong.
No they don't. Stop spewing bs to make this situation less embarrassing.
It goes something like this:
When something very bad happens just once to the frogs in the very early life of the Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier before being fixed afterwards so it never happens again:
>AHAHAH FOOK DA FROGS I SAY LMAO BY JOVE WE'RE GOING TO REMIND THE FROGS FOR 25 YEARS ABOUT THIS BLIMEY I SWEAR ON ME MUM
When something very bad happens to the brits on any of their ships and it keeps happening again and again with extreme prejudice:
>well... acktchually... It's because... [insert relentless bong BS defending the indefensible and making stuff up instead of swallowing their pride, demanding and finding answers to have an idea of what's going on so they can then ask the people they voted in to do something about it so it doesn't happen again]
Bong, bong never changes.
Just to be clear you're pretending a one off mechanical failure is the same as a design flaw resulting in your carrier for years being limited to 22kts and only now able to hit a very slow 27kts?
Had you ever been to sea you'd know that propellers and shafts are consumable items and are replaced fairly regularly. We don't even know if it is a mechanical failure, could just be some netting that divers need to clear.
bongs are arrogant insecure pussies
every single one of their posts on /k/ proves it
>When something very bad happens just once to the frogs in the very early life of the Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier before being fixed afterwards so it never happens again:
Except CdG had an entire lifetime of massive failures in various ways, not a couple of minor faults that ultimately don't really do much.
FRICKING COPE
BONGS CONFIRMED TO BE FAR INFERIOR TO CHINESE QUALITY
Calme toi sur les caps locks, tu es putain d’agaçant à lire crétin.
No preventative maintenance program.
US ships never work as well (e.g. USS Gerald R Ford) but that's almost entirely administrative and bureaucratic problems that plague the Navy.
>No preventative maintenance program
>Royal Navy
Literally no one has a better one, that's why our warships are gold on the used market. Have you even heard of Lloyd's of London?
You do know what "preventative" means right? I've talked to enough British sailors to know they don't do shit for maintenance until something breaks.
If you're a UK sailor would you mind describing your scheduled maintenance system? If I'm wrong then I'll be wrong, but From hanging out with them in port I was shocked when they described what they did for work.
Preventative maintanace doesn't stop a propeller shaft or blade from braking.
Probably not, do you have a link? Reverse image search didn't bring anything up.
"breaking" is a relative term though, there are many ways shaft line components can fail such as improper gear mesh, wiped bearing, shaft seals fail, shaft sheared, screw fell off...
xray inspections definitely help
>Preventative maintanace doesn't stop a propeller shaft or blade from braking.
Underdimensioned subcomponents or poor quality materials do. Britbongistan isnt an industrial knowledge based country any more, its just a third world country with an increasingly third world population ruled by a third world cleptocracy composed mainly by third world people (jews). And if you ask any britshit, he will tell you that its much better than speaking german as a secondary language.
And yet we're the most successful military ship designer / exporter on the planet. Its almost like incels from /misc/ are morons huh?
>muh T26
FREMM and MEKO are more popular.
1. No
2. Why limit it to a single class? No one is selling more warships than the UK.
Cope
Yes, I am Royale Navy saylor staying in Portsmouth base. I do never check the boats or do preventing maintenance, unlike mighty Russian Navy. Instead i see Comrade Captain in his new Mercedes after he sold the new parts for the engine.
>youre disagreeing with me so you must ne russian
Pathetic.
I just refuse to dignify your moronic assertion with a serious answer. The idea that the RN does not at any point conduct maintenance is ridiculous. Even the most basic checks of system functionality would fall under preventative maintenance.
Instead, I give a stupid answer to mock and ridicule your smoothbrain statement so that someone who is able to conduct basic logical thought may have their day just brightened a little bit by my attempt at humour
>I was only pretending to be moronic
is this also you trying to be entertaining?
It aint working. Try being more funny in your little tiff with the other anon.
hello 77th brigade
The system used is called UMMs, it createa maintenance schedules and lists tasks according to equipment design authority teams based in the main engineering support centre. Idk why you even post shit like that when it's so easily disproven and there are no updoots to gain. Just frick off back to/misc/ oblast.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://theforge.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/reliability_centred_maintenance.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiEweyMpuz5AhVRilwKHYddDP0QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2ueGeEXn3ek3yurBqFn-nI
Take meds.
The carrier is brand new and one of the propellors is damaged which means it hit something.
Bri'ish carrier catacombs when?
british ships have been complete shit for the last 50 years which is pretty pathetic for a naval nation
This is why you build two, that way if one breaks down you at least have the spare.
>what happened to British shipbuilding
The arse fell out of it, that's what. Frankly it's a miracle we have any shipbuilding left, what remains survived ruthless culls and is modest but fairly decent. Just look at Barrow being our last sub yard after Devonport shit the bed with the polaris boats.
>deindustrialize your economy
>can't build shit anymore
>suprisedpikachu.jpg
>Class has already done a full world tour without any issues
>Has been in operation for 5 years ago, more including trials
>Largest, most complex ships ever made by them
>Worst that's happened is a couple leaks and a prop issue that only delays it by a few days
>This is somehow a bad reputation
The details aren't out yet, so we shouldn't speculate. There's only one thing we know for sure
IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF BREXIT
IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF BREXIT
>the sewage water released into the ocean have clogged the engine
The British can't even make an automatic supply of shells to the cannon, they can't make the stabilization of the cannon in the Warrior IFV.
We made an upgraded warrior just last year that got cancelled because it went over budget @ £3bn.
Our weapons procurement is 100% money laundering. No way it costs 3bn to design and test upgrades for an ifv.
Brits cant handle shaft area properly
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-queen-elizabeth-leaking-due-to-propeller-shaft-seal-issue/
The front fell off
rollll northumbria roll