What happened to British shipbuilding? They just break immediately now.

What happened to British shipbuilding? They just break immediately now.

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Propellers and less often shafts break on all ships of all nationalities the whole time. It'll go in dry dock and be back out at sea in a week or two. Its a class that's proved to be extremal reliable so far so something big was overdue after breezing through trials.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no they fucking don't

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Then why can't you name someone who exports more fag?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Propellers and less often shafts break on all ships of all nationalities the whole time.
      Yeah and your name is Bong, James Bong.
      No they don't. Stop spewing bs to make this situation less embarrassing.
      It goes something like this:
      When something very bad happens just once to the frogs in the very early life of the Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier before being fixed afterwards so it never happens again:
      >AHAHAH FOOK DA FROGS I SAY LMAO BY JOVE WE'RE GOING TO REMIND THE FROGS FOR 25 YEARS ABOUT THIS BLIMEY I SWEAR ON ME MUM
      When something very bad happens to the brits on any of their ships and it keeps happening again and again with extreme prejudice:
      >well... acktchually... It's because... [insert relentless bong BS defending the indefensible and making stuff up instead of swallowing their pride, demanding and finding answers to have an idea of what's going on so they can then ask the people they voted in to do something about it so it doesn't happen again]
      Bong, bong never changes.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just to be clear you're pretending a one off mechanical failure is the same as a design flaw resulting in your carrier for years being limited to 22kts and only now able to hit a very slow 27kts?

        Had you ever been to sea you'd know that propellers and shafts are consumable items and are replaced fairly regularly. We don't even know if it is a mechanical failure, could just be some netting that divers need to clear.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        bongs are arrogant insecure pussies
        every single one of their posts on PrepHole proves it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >When something very bad happens just once to the frogs in the very early life of the Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier before being fixed afterwards so it never happens again:
        Except CdG had an entire lifetime of massive failures in various ways, not a couple of minor faults that ultimately don't really do much.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      FUCKING COPE
      BONGS CONFIRMED TO BE FAR INFERIOR TO CHINESE QUALITY

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Calme toi sur les caps locks, tu es putain d’agaçant à lire crétin.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No preventative maintenance program.
    US ships never work as well (e.g. USS Gerald R Ford) but that's almost entirely administrative and bureaucratic problems that plague the Navy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >No preventative maintenance program
      >Royal Navy

      Literally no one has a better one, that's why our warships are gold on the used market. Have you even heard of Lloyd's of London?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You do know what "preventative" means right? I've talked to enough British sailors to know they don't do shit for maintenance until something breaks.
        If you're a UK sailor would you mind describing your scheduled maintenance system? If I'm wrong then I'll be wrong, but From hanging out with them in port I was shocked when they described what they did for work.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Preventative maintanace doesn't stop a propeller shaft or blade from braking.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Probably not, do you have a link? Reverse image search didn't bring anything up.
            "breaking" is a relative term though, there are many ways shaft line components can fail such as improper gear mesh, wiped bearing, shaft seals fail, shaft sheared, screw fell off...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            xray inspections definitely help

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Preventative maintanace doesn't stop a propeller shaft or blade from braking.

            Underdimensioned subcomponents or poor quality materials do. Britbongistan isnt an industrial knowledge based country any more, its just a third world country with an increasingly third world population ruled by a third world cleptocracy composed mainly by third world people (garden gnomes). And if you ask any britshit, he will tell you that its much better than speaking german as a secondary language.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              And yet we're the most successful military ship designer / exporter on the planet. Its almost like incels from 4chan are retards huh?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >muh T26
                FREMM and MEKO are more popular.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                1. No
                2. Why limit it to a single class? No one is selling more warships than the UK.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Cope

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, I am Royale Navy saylor staying in Portsmouth base. I do never check the boats or do preventing maintenance, unlike mighty Russian Navy. Instead i see Comrade Captain in his new Mercedes after he sold the new parts for the engine.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >youre disagreeing with me so you must ne russian
            Pathetic.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I just refuse to dignify your retarded assertion with a serious answer. The idea that the RN does not at any point conduct maintenance is ridiculous. Even the most basic checks of system functionality would fall under preventative maintenance.

              Instead, I give a stupid answer to mock and ridicule your smoothbrain statement so that someone who is able to conduct basic logical thought may have their day just brightened a little bit by my attempt at humour

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I was only pretending to be retarded
                is this also you trying to be entertaining?
                It aint working. Try being more funny in your little tiff with the other anon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            hello 77th brigade

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The system used is called UMMs, it createa maintenance schedules and lists tasks according to equipment design authority teams based in the main engineering support centre. Idk why you even post shit like that when it's so easily disproven and there are no updoots to gain. Just fuck off back to4chan oblast.
          https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://theforge.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/reliability_centred_maintenance.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiEweyMpuz5AhVRilwKHYddDP0QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2ueGeEXn3ek3yurBqFn-nI

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Take meds.
      The carrier is brand new and one of the propellors is damaged which means it hit something.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bri'ish carrier catacombs when?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    british ships have been complete shit for the last 50 years which is pretty pathetic for a naval nation

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is why you build two, that way if one breaks down you at least have the spare.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >what happened to British shipbuilding
    The arse fell out of it, that's what. Frankly it's a miracle we have any shipbuilding left, what remains survived ruthless culls and is modest but fairly decent. Just look at Barrow being our last sub yard after Devonport shit the bed with the polaris boats.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >deindustrialize your economy
    >can't build shit anymore
    >suprisedpikachu.jpg

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Class has already done a full world tour without any issues
    >Has been in operation for 5 years ago, more including trials
    >Largest, most complex ships ever made by them
    >Worst that's happened is a couple leaks and a prop issue that only delays it by a few days

    >This is somehow a bad reputation

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The details aren't out yet, so we shouldn't speculate. There's only one thing we know for sure

    IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF BREXIT
    IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF BREXIT

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the sewage water released into the ocean have clogged the engine

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The British can't even make an automatic supply of shells to the cannon, they can't make the stabilization of the cannon in the Warrior IFV.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      We made an upgraded warrior just last year that got cancelled because it went over budget @ £3bn.
      Our weapons procurement is 100% money laundering. No way it costs 3bn to design and test upgrades for an ifv.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Brits cant handle shaft area properly
    https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-queen-elizabeth-leaking-due-to-propeller-shaft-seal-issue/

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The front fell off

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    rollll northumbria roll

Your email address will not be published.