They did it. They have begun to pont00n. Queue the artillery strikes.

They did it. They have begun to pont00n
Queue the artillery strikes.
https://nitter.it/TpyxaNews/status/1551587468692099073

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    where is that vatmoron ffrom yesterday who said.

    >Hato 150K missle vs 50 dollar cement
    >Bridge is good as new.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They found more shit in the cart for the shill to consume.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      someone stole a few bags of cement

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was that retarded namefag

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he probably tried to cross that bridge after "repairs"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >HATO 150k missile cuts off logistics, causing millions in equipment damages and hundreds of casualties worth of second-order effects

      Absolutely worth it, even if we ignore that HATO can spend a hundred dollars for every dollar the russhits spend and come out the winner.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The drugs these guys are on must be some real good shit.
    No way I'd be doing that shit. There has been a pattern to these pontooning events..

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Book of doctrine says to pontoon. And pontoon we will, because, i, i must ... PonTOOOOON

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'M
    I'M
    AAAAA UGGGGGH
    I'M PONTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if they're building pantoon that probably means the bridge is not safe for armor rn

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russian media saying it is safe for vehicles under 10tons

      https://smotrim.ru/article/2859075

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Guess your mum can't cross it anymore

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ohnonononono

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So dump all the ammo and gas, peel off any removable armor - I don't see a problem here.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, no problem with using your engineers limited manpower to strip down and the ifvs, haul it across on trucks then double the invested time by having to refit it.
            Not like russian tanks have issues where they have been abandoned due to lack of available maintenance or anything.
            Not like that's ever happened

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >peel off any removable armor
            So dont drive with troops
            understand

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Real life isn't a button you click on your game to add extra armour or add extra cost to your unit and it gives you better stats because you 'researched it'. It takes time to do all that. If you spend the time doing that, you're not denazifying Ukraine.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              proofs?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Was joke suggestion m8.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          BMPs are amphibious, friend. They hold both sides of the river, they don't need a pontoon to get them across when they can freely prep the beaches for crossing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >BMPs are amphibious,
            supposedly if they are well maintained. Having seen pics of the state of their aircraft. I would not put any money that they keep their bmps any better maintained.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            BMP-2 hasn't been amphibious since armour upgrade given around 1982.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Is submarine now.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I can't find a source for the surface current at the mouth of the Dniper, but it's a 1km wide crossing in a BMP with a maximum speed of ~7km/h in water on a good day. Even if all of Russia's BMP-1 and BMP-2s were factory new, and even if they hadn't been uparmored to the point of negative buoyancy which they have, they'd STILL just float harmlessly out to sea and sink. It would be comical.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              inb4 Ivan the Pirate, raiding coastal Crimean villages in his rusty BMP

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I love morons like this dipshit who are told XYZ "is amphibious" and think that now means they could take a fucking BMP on a nice leisurely river cruise down a fast moving 1km-wide navigable river

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >BMDs swept out to sea
              >founder above the wreck of Moskva
              >another successful VDV operation

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Better hope they're fully sea worthy because the current is going to drag them into the ocean. Actually, given it is Russia, this will probably happen.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          shame they dont have anymore of the vdv bmps anymore

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            BMD FUCKING BMD. VDV ONLY USE THE BMD. GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULLS. BMD BMP BTR MTLB BRDM THEY ARE ALL MARKEDLY DIFFERENT AND EASY TO TELL APART. FUCK

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              im sorry anon i didnt realize there was someone with your level of autism in this thread
              >GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULLS
              also no

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Just how many ways can you define fucking 1000 kg?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            1 tonne = 1,000 kg
            1 short ton = 2,000 pounds = 907.18 kg
            1 long ton = 2,240 pounds = 1,016.047 kg
            Imperial was a mistake.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ok i understand the short ton because thats just a nice round number, but a long ton is pure arbitary shit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >A long ton is 20 hundredweight (cwt), each of which is 8 stone (1 stone = 14 pounds). Thus a long ton is 20 × 8 × 14 lb = 2,240 lb.

                Anglos are fucking retarded

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              We need a binary ton, 1,048,576 grams.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the Mebigram (MiG)
                For when your armored vehicles are gram-addressable

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Also depends on what you are dealing with. Ton changes for precious metals.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >10tons
        AHAHAHAHAHHAHHAA
        >Just pour cement Dima, will fix bridge no problem

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the only vehicles that adhere to that weight limit are early BMDs, MRAPs and light trucks
        anything else will sink that bitch. Even BTRs are too heavy.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russian media saying it is safe for vehicles under 10tons
        Translation:
        don't go onto that bridge if you value your life

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it might be accurate, actually.
          The Ukrainians would know about the strength of the bridge. Any civil engineer worth a dick would be able to say what parts to target to leave it standing for foot traffic and civilian cars, but collapse if you tried to drive a platoon of T-62s across.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >HIMARS is accurate enough to provide planned demolition at range
            Neat

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              3-5M CEP will do that to a mf

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So one truck can cross at a time?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, is anyone stopping them from building the pontoon?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ideally you wait until the pontoon bridge is built and has vehicles on it, or is just about to finish being built, to cause the maximum loss of committed effort and equipment.
      You don't really wanna blow your wad on the first section of pontoon

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That sounds absolutely retarded.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Right because destroying 16 sections of pontoon - or otherwise rendering the 16 section long pontoon bridge useless - is retarded, while destroying 1 section of pontoon is wise and based

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I have to presume you're the kind of defender who'd fire on the first guy in the stack

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You sound absolutely retarded, that's like warfare 101.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, you sound fucking retarded.

            Right because destroying 16 sections of pontoon - or otherwise rendering the 16 section long pontoon bridge useless - is retarded, while destroying 1 section of pontoon is wise and based

            Why even destroy the bridge in the first place then? They could have all gathered there until the end of time on it.
            Sounds like cope for not being able to hit them. Letting people build up and amass on your lawn is fucking retarded.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              are you daft?
              Damaging the bridge sufficiently means you can move men across it, and light vehicles, but almost definitely not APCs, IFVs and tanks. In other words an entire Russian force could retreat from Kherson and have to leave their heavy equipment behind. And the bridge could later be repaired.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Letting them build a pontoon bridge but not cross it means they get bombed before they can reach your lawn, brainless.

                This doesn't make sense either because vatniks are still marching across the bridge.
                Why allow this for some genius plan to hope they all just bunch together more than they already are? There's no reason for this.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Marching troops... sure
                But not driving tanks or artillery or AA across it.
                Otherwise why build a pontoon bridge

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Letting them build a pontoon bridge but not cross it means they get bombed before they can reach your lawn, brainless.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Because HIMARS is such a notoriously inaccurate system

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Jesus fuck, I can't believe you're arguing this lol...

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If they can stop a concentrated effort by the Russians after the pontoon is built, why are they even in this position to begin with?
                This isn't winning. This is loser cope for why the enemy is holding ground.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >why are they even in this position to begin with
                For a concentration of armor to occur? Are you retarded? And what the fuck do you mean "if they can"? Have you been in a coma for the past week?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Just let your enemies build up guys lol it's called winning.

                wait for them to cross and then strike

                They are already amassing, does their capability to hit targets somehow stop at the rivers other bank?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >just let your enemy build 15 of the required 20 segments of pontoon before firing your predicted himars and m777 at them
                Vs
                >just let them build up
                Oversimplifying it just shows you're arguing in bad faith.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you wait for them to cross then cut their supply routes and finish them
                they would have no way to get those vehicles back and they would have to walk to original bridge to get back

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I fucking hate shitbulls so much it's unreal. They're just piranhas with legs.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That tire barely resembles a toddler.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Close enough

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I bet you don't even bitemaxx anon

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                every example of this dog breed should be destroyed, with anyone found to be breeding them fined 10000 usd for every animal

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Pibbles?
                You just have to show them who is in charge.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i hope their shitty little swing breaks

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I would love to empty a 12-guage into each one of them.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I’m just amazed they aren’t biting each other and starting fights.
                Shitbulls have better self control and EQ than morons LOL

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >not winning
                No it's wearing them down you fucking fag, kinda like how your low iq takes are doing me in this thread.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Why even destroy the bridge in the first place then?
              To make the enemy unable to get heavy equipment across the bridge and also expend energy on building a pontoon?

              This isn't hard.
              Is the next question
              >Why destroy a pontoon bridge?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, you sound fucking retarded.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lets say you were constructing a house of cards and someone came and knocked it over for a laugh; would you be more angry if: you just started, or if you were almost done?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. Get lined up from a few angles. It's a bottleneck. Classic ambush tactics.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why didn't they do it with the regular bridge then?
        Should have shelled it when it was full of military vehicles to maximize the effect.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Partially cos they only got himars and m777 recently, and the heaviest concentrations in kherson occurred in months 1 and 2.
          Time is linear, y'know

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >linear
            Time is a flattened encirclement.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wait until they begin crossing operations so you get the poontoons, vehicle crossing and vehicles staging to cross.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >poontoons
          Yes please

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            AAAAAAAAAARGH IM POONTOOOOOOOOOOONINGGGGGGGG

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're partially right, what's more important is destroying bridging equipment and injuring or killing the engineers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Give it a few hours anon

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      HIMARS

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wait for them to cross and then strike

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Strike it when they’re crossing and sink their shit.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dear diary,

    Yesterday my bridge was blown up by enemy artillery.

    Today I will build a pontoon bridge to replace it, at a distance of several hundred feet from the first one, under the watchful gaze of civilians who relay my every move to the enemy.

    I hope they don't get it this time!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >under the watchful gaze of civilians who relay my every move
      Nonsense, the civilian population of ukraine greets russia with flowers and dreams of liberation. They would never help ukraine against russia

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >When I first came here, the hohols HIMARS'ed the bridge. Everyone said I was daft to pontoon on the same spot, but I did in all the same, just to show them. It got HIMARS'ed. So I pontoooooooned a second time. That one got HIMARS'ed. So I pontoooooooned a third time. That got HIMARS'ed, fell over, then sank into the Dnieper. But the fourth one stayed up. And that's what you're going to get, privates, the strongest pontooooooon in all of Kherson.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How come the Pontooner is never actually around his pontoon whenever it gets hit?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He gets paid to put down the pontoon, not to cross it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Cross that thing? Oh, he wouldn't go near it lol

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          too busy pontooning somewhere else

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Or is the pontooner also an abandooner? Multi tasking.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He know the guy building it doesn't know what he's doing.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Eventually you create a bridge of wrecked armor that you can just drive over. Sorry NATO, real military tactics at play here

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the pontoon eventually gains immunity to HIMARS
        >soon ammo warehouses will be built entirely out of offsprings from these immune pontooons
        out-strategized once again

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I now imagine the sir lancelot running scene to the castle under the drum music with a himars.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Oh the year was twenty twenty-two. How I wish I was in Moscow now. A letter of draft came from Putin, to the current hell I'm residing in. God damn them all. I was told we'd cruise the roads to a glorious win. We'd fire no guns, shed no tears. Now I'm a broken man, on an Kherson pier, to the sound of Ukraine's laughs and jeers."

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The song I'm paraphrasing:

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The song I'm paraphrasing:

            lel

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        build up your resistance to HIMARS strikes by pontooooning to draw smaller HIMARS strikes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      My grandad was a engineer during WW2 and he told me once they had to build a new pontoon bridge almost each day for a month. Build during the night and the germans will blow it up during the day.
      And the way you build during the night with no light is by sticking your fingers in the bolt holes to see if it lines up. Should a shell hit the water everything moves and your finger gets ripped off.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What about just putting a stick in the hole?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's a shame you weren't there, anon. So many fingers could have been saved...

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >put dick into hole
          >artillery hits
          >over 9000 expert jelq sessions in one swift motion
          >instantly max out gains for both length and girth
          >problem nazis?
          >use new massive cock to destroy Hitler

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >And the way you build during the night with no light is by sticking your fingers in the bolt holes to see if it lines up.

        You're grandad must've known you are retarded.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >a quick special military operation is equivalent to ww2 for the Russians now
        What went wrong?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not *again*

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The webm of that is even better.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/Lg0KWPf.png

          comedy skit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Your granddad liked to tell you stories because of how fucking retarded you were lmao

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >sticking your fingers
        >sticking
        If only there was a better way

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if only they had something finger like, cylinder shaped made to be put in holes to connect stuff but out of metal so it doesnt shear under load.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The bridge in my city was built by the german troops during ww2.
        It still stands.
        All the repairs they have ever done were cosmetic on it and added a red light that doesn't work.
        Balkans btw.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Sehr geeherte Damen und Herren,
          enjoy the bridge. 🙂
          Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
          Hans Gutmann

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Some Russian told me that the only bridge who where still standing and didn’t fall apart after 30 years due shit building where the German one. Not just in West Russia, even in Siberia which where build by Germans POW. Russians are a special breed of human

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          German bridges are something else.
          picrel is the "Doitsu-bashi" (literally "German Bridge"). Built during WW1 by German PoWs that got taken in by Japan when the Japanese aided the British in conquering a German colony in Asia. That bridge is over 100 years old now and it's still as good as new. Even though the German defenders were only a few thousand civilian militiamen headed by a couple hundred professionals against thousands of Brits and Japs, the Japs were pretty impressed by the Germs and asked the Brits if they could house the PoWs.

          Those PoWs, what with pretty much all of them being nothing more than civilians, were pretty allowed to walk around freely outside their prison camps, visit nearby japanese villages, freely interacted with the locals and only ever had to go back to their cells to sleep. They proceeded to pretty much conduct the first real western cultural exchange in centuries by holding concerts, making german cheese and teaching the Japs all the details of advanced western baking. And that's one of the reasons why the Japs like the Germs so much to this day. It's not because of that stint in WW2, it's mostly because those PoWs imported the finer points of German culture for several years while being defacto funded by the government, which fed them and paid the volunteer workers a salary. Several of those men remained in Japan even after the war saw the release of the prisoners.

          http://www.travel-around-japan.com/k82-09-oasahiko-shrine.html#:~:text=One%20is%20Doitsu%2Dbashi%20(%E3%83%89%E3%82%A4%E3%83%84,the%20height%20is%203.2%20meters.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            German colonial autism never ceases to amaze me. Tsingtao, the city those POWs were captured in, was so efficiently built and managed that even fucking Mao decided it was best to leave it be. There's still a brewery that was set up in imperial times that was the only industry in Communist China that wasn't seized after the civil war. In my opinion it's also the only beer in Asia that doesn't taste like pond water...

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Americans were hugely impressed by the Germans during the occupation, too. Enough that the military got scared that fraternization would compromise the occupation.

              The French, meanwhile, were widely perceived as lazy, dirty, and cowardly.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The French, meanwhile, were widely perceived as lazy, dirty, and cowardly.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              China's a special case. They absolutely loved the Germans there. Not only were several of their units trained by Germans, but even their generals followed the advice of german advisors who basically worked out their entire defence strategy, which became instrumental in holding off the Japanese.

              Meanwhile, during the Nanjing Massacre (also known as 'The Rape of Nanking') a German ambassador also saved over 500.000 chinese civilians after the Chinese government and the president fled the city, leaving the fate of Nanjing to an International Committee led by John Rabe. Rabe proceeded to run outside his office and bodily put himself in the way of the guns and tanks of various japanese units while frantically waving around his Nazi credentials to try and stop them from slaughtering civilians. Usually, that only delayed the inevitable massacre, but he apparently still managed to allow hundreds of thousands to escape unharmed.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a weird fucking day when a Nazi is objecting on moral grounds.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not that weird at all. The Japanese did some truly, truly horrifying shit that even shocked German diplomats and advisors.
                Unit 731 and biological warfare, mass rape, etc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not that weird at all.
                This. If he were back in Germany, he'd also be horrified of the gestapo and SS purges of civilians, the killings of all deemed unfit, holocaust, etc.
                A properly educated nazi would just call it nature taking its correct course as Hitler's ideology was all about brutal civilisational darwinism. The stronger civilisation beats and enslaves the weaker one. Th subdued people are no different than cattle or horses. To be used as needed and discarded once not.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >only beer in Asia that doesn't taste like pond water
              Japanese is pretty good as well e.g. Asahi
              Also IIRC Tsingtao brewery is owned by Asahi now.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anti-air must have been boosted m beforehand. How in the hell do you think this is going to turn out otherwise?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Damn. Didn't know Russian AA can intercept artillery shells. I kneel

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love how within 48 hours of the whole "we'll just patch the bridge, no problem!" thing, they immediately gave up on the idea and probably realized there's no way the bridge is structurally sound enough to move anything heavier than a truck across

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The ones coping were not the people on the ground.
      The people on the ground almost immediately said the bridge is space tech to them and they will start hunting any ukkie civilians with relevant knowledge.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are likely correct, but we saw "repair teams" pouring concrete into the holes and someone high up gave the orders to shill the "we'll just fix it easily" line on social media

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I feel like dumping concrete into those holes, which expands while curing, is not gon.a help them at all. In fact, it's introducing stresses in directions the bridge was never intended to experience stresses from.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That was the Ukrainian plan all along. They know the Russians are shit at repairing things. In trying to "fix" the bridge, they made it worse.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dang 1.79 per gallon gas? Why aren't we just sending hoards of morons to their death, we have more than Russia?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >1.79 per gallon gas
        It's only 15% gas, 85% vodka..

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does no matter

    Now Russia know there are himars in area

    So S-400 and other air defense will be placed so no worries

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As though russia didn't already know himars and m270 were now in theatre and shooting at them?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      S400 don't exist.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >s-400
        >hitting anything but civilian airliners

        If S-400 doesn't work

        Then why hasn't himars destroyed all of Russian forces?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          he hasn't yet fully raised his eyebrow is all

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If S400 were real then why isn't every HIMARS destroyed?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If they flew like American pig dogs they would

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          4 himars
          Many Russians ( > 4 )
          I'm not good at maths but I think ti will take time.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >s-400
      >hitting anything but civilian airliners

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hey now, they're at least good enough to shoot down su-34m

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They had S-400’s in the area prior but failed to nail all of the launched rockets…
      If the Slavs cross they will repeat the same fucking mistakes in the East.

      Proof of S-400 failures.
      https://defence24.com/technology/s-400-helpless-against-himars

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No mention of the 9M96. Why?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      correct, our S-300 intercepted 4 of them

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        S-200 JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. We also bagged a M270 the other day. Cope hohols, your wunderwaffles are doing jack shit. Maybe you Volkssturm can save the day with Steiners counter offensive kek.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nice Command and Conquer sprite edits lmao

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nice Command and Conquer sprite edits lmao

          Original link of this, or is it meant to be a joke?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It was meant as a shitpost after /chug/ tried something of similarly poor quality.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Should be the job of Pantsir and Tor, but yes go ahead intercepting rockets with your most important AA asset. Gonna be hilarious when in a couple months Crimea gets airborne assaulted with a bunch of Airbusses simply because Russia ran out of AA missiles.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        To be fair, if S-400 worked against GMLRS rockets why wouldn't they use it? Maybe there's an expense mismatch, but those M31's are about the most dangerous threat the Russians have to deal with right now. Each one is just about guaranteed to obliterate exactly what it's fired at, so each interception would be an unqualified win.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Traditional fallacy of missile vs interceptor value once again rears its ugly head.
        Fun fact - the cost difference between attacking rocket and your intercetor does not matter much.
        What matters is difference of cost between your intercetor and target thats going to be destroyed if the attacking missile is not intercepted.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >S400 this, S400 that
      S400 is for shooting down airliners and old fighters that dont have proper EW modules to warn them of S400 radars, its a huge system that takes a while to shoot a salvo for, considering the fact that Oh-Hi-Mars rockers pop up for around a few minutes at most youre better of using shitstirs and tors to try and shoot them down near the target, because at that point there is a chance of missiles actually intercepting the rockets iron dome style

      Heres how its possible in THEORY to intercept rockets with AD systems:
      >Have an elevated search radar linked up with the AD system sitting IN the target zone
      >Search radar detects something going your way
      >Have a secondary search radar IN the target area scan the incoming threats with doppler filters optimized for shit that is INCOMING your way to get filter out as much ground clutter as possible
      >Shoot everything you got, best case when the missiles have onboard radar that can filter for blueshifted Doppler returns so you dont have to do individual engagement radar locks. alternatively use AESA to lock multiple threats at the same time
      Surprisingly none of the slavshit AD systems apart from maybe shitstirs and some hypermodernized bucks have radar datalinking

      I swear, missile kinematics, space and time are unfathomable concepts to vatniks how did they come up with proper AD systems is a mystery, the lead designers for S series systems were probably ukrainian.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >We got fucked in the ass, again
      >But we learned this time!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >no worries

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        title should read "logistics" instead of "US HIMARS"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Only Russian jets need to be worried if Russian air defense is in area

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But the HIMARS rockets are smaller than Malayasiam Airlines planes. That is why Russian have trouble intercepting them.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I pity you shills. I hope Putin pays you enough to make a living.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      S-400
      >500million USD.
      >Four Rockets.
      HIMARS
      >5.5 million for the launcher.
      >3-5 million per rocket pod.
      >6 rockets.
      Even if the S-400 was accurate enough to swat bumblebees out of the sky, you are still going to lose.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    uhm vatnik bros i thought the bridge was fine ??? and you just had to fill the holes with fresh concrete (please ingnore the damaged cables 🙂 )

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wtf is that real?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      bridge made it back to port under its own power, HATO shill

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Queue
    While I guess this is grammatically correct, you mean cue.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No the artillery forms a queue. When one fires, it moves away and the next one moves up to fire.
      God don't you know ANYTHING about artillery?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are the Russians reinforcing Kherson or fleeing it?

    I don't think they'll be able to handle the losses if everything west of the Dneiper gets cut off

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I doubt they know themselves.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Darivka
    I want to see them try on the Dnieper though

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    retard here: why are Ukrainian air defense working but not Russian ones? Aren't they using the same systems?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukrainian air defenses are working as well as the russian ones, the russians just don't have himars

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        On that topic, are russian radar systems even able to be updated to add new signatures to them? I assume their hardware and software is roughly 80s tech like all their technology is, so I assume they're not getting live updates of new radar signatures to match all the new arms being used against them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot my pic

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        4 Ukraine AA missiles neutralized haha

        And given Russian accuracy, that's honestly probably more than if Ukraine ignored them

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They are pretty accurate at hitting malls and schools, not so much military targets though.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >PrepHoleope claims Russia is running out of precision missiles

        t..two more weeks!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >they're firing off more than they can produce
          >they're not running out tho
          Absolute dombass.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      NATO AWACS providing 24/7 data on literally everything the Russians do 3 feet from the ground

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can even track vehicle movement on the ground through trees using radar believe it or not

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      MLRS rockets are difficult to intercept because of their low-ish RCS coupled with short flight times and fairly low trajectories, so the interceptor has to be nearby and at high readiness.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      now thinking about it, russian aa is really a mystery: on the one hand they shoot at everything that comes on their washingmashine radar and probably got more friendly kills than ua.

      and on the other hand they couldnt protect 3 ships and cants hoot down some second world budget drone

      ???

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The systems are very user unfriendly. We're talking about looking at ye olde radar screens for the slightest bit of noise for hours on end. A tired or inattentive operator fucks the whole thing up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Ukrainians were both the brains and the brawn of the Soviet Union, while the russians (outside of their two major cities, the citizens of which were never drafted into the army) were always some mystery meat illiterate mud hut inhabiting alcoholics.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      MLRS rockets are difficult to intercept because of their low-ish RCS coupled with short flight times and fairly low trajectories, so the interceptor has to be nearby and at high readiness.

      And this also assumes the Russian's radar operator can ID that they're MLRS fast enough since normally the Ukrainians fire some other rockets to act as decoys, so by the time they figure it out, it's too late.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Should we warn the Russians?
    They are being sent to their deaths.
    https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/russias_pontoon_crossing_failure_is_a_symbol_of_military_command_disaster-2943.html

    Same tactic killed 400 soldiers and over 60 armored vehicles.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they know, they just want to die. it's better than to live in russia after all.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm so excited for the sequel bros

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >implying the russians will ever learn from their mistakes
      theres a reason there has never been a successful russian state

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If Ukraien can just hit the bridge itself how much does this really change things for the Russians besides having to waste time building a bridge before getting blown up

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't change much. Just adds to the list of wasted lives, equipment and resources

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It threatens their position in Kherson if they cannot retreat or receive supplies.
      I feel like the hits so far were just warnings, we can hit your escape, leave Kherson.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I can't believe I didn't even think of something that obvious

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they even only struck the in-going lane of traffic IIRC

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well, they can't really do anything else.
      If Ukraine hits the bridges and the russians don't do anything about it, then kherson gets isolated and it becomes only a matter of time before the russians have to surrender it.
      So they build pontoons and hope that they'll manage to keep supplying kherson. Maybe they hope to stall the ukes until western support dries out, maybe they're waiting for reinforcements, maybe Ivan was told to pontoooon and he pontooooned because that's all he can do.

      Hope the ukies have a bunch of drones in the air when those crossings will be utilized.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They really have no real plan, do they? What IS their general strategy even supposed to be at this point?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They have been winging it since the "three day plan" crashed

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Concerning russian pontoooning operations see pic related.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the Russian military is so predictable, random PrepHolearians can accurately guess their next move

      not sure if hilarious or sad

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That one Ukranian soldier was not wrong when he said the Russians are so stupid its amazing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Saved
      New prediction: it gets blown up and they try again on the opposite side of the original bridge

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i concur

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wouldn't they try building on top of the sunken tanks first?
        why are such big river being pontooned and military doesn't have rapid ferry for that instead?

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh my god.
    The Ukrainians are going to push Kherson.
    They kept the damaged bridge somewhat intact for light vehicles, but may blow it if the Russians retreat.
    This is setting up to be a bloody massacre and the Slavs are getting trapped.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      More like left the vatniks for a way to escape by ABANDOOONING. Not smart cornering any animal, including vatniks.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine needs to begin cutting off all the roads from Kherson. Make sure NO supplies reach it anymore. They want the enemy weak.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      THey've already struck 2 out of 3 bridges across the Dnieper

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I mean the actual roads on the opposite side of the bridges. I don't even want Russian traffic to be able to get near the fucking bridges.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Zelensky said something about GTFO Kherson if you're Ukrainian so maybe they want to let civilians leave the city before they attack.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't even want Russian traffic to be able to get near the fucking bridges
          No one does but allowing it is apparently winning.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The civilians need to be let out first.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They also hit the bridge at Darivka crossing the Inhulets river. Its part of the highway from nova khakovka to Kherson. So even if they cant sufficiently damage the dam bridge supplies can still be cut off from kherson itself

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Eveything that happened until now is preparation for the pontooner's masterwork. That's how they will reach Odessa. Not with the bargain D-day PrepHole yearned for, but with the longest pontoon in history, between Sevastopol and Odessa itself.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia pulling the Caligula card? Well, they do always say they're the new Rome so I guess it fits.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia pulling the Caligula card

        I look forward to the day when Putin triumphantly parades through Moscow with piles of stolen grain and banana and declares that he defeated Satan in single combat and has taken the nazi gold for his people.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Trips and it gets blown up at night but only if you say HIMARS blow vatmorons

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      HIMARS blow vatmorons.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      HIMARS BLOW DEM VATmoronS
      HIMARS BLOW DEM VATmoronS
      HIMARS BLOW DEM VATmoronS
      HIMARS BLOW DEM VATmoronS

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I remember arguing with shills on here and on 4chan mere days ago who refused to believe that the bridge was compromised. All they did was endlessly rattle on about muh HIMARs tiny holes. Even when I tried to explain to those gays about the snapped cabling compromising the entire bridges overall structural integrity, they STILL chose to believe the psyop images of concrete being dumped in the holes.

    You may now lick my boots and grovel at my feet, you pathetic fuckers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, russians are like garden gnomes, why do they lie so much? because it's free.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh for fuck's sake.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Theoretically, what would the environmental impact be of building a dirt dam in the Dnieper to drive across?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Widespread flooding and then the damage collapses

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its a fucking river, millions of gallons of water would just wash over the dirt damn because its a fucking river

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The water would harmlessly seep into the ground and that would be that.
      Vatniks would still die however, because that is their lot in life now.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      russia isn't based enough.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i dont think they have enough troops anymore
        or a corps of engineers

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They can’t repair a bridge and now they are going to build a kilometre long dam? Ignoring how retarded making it out of dirt would be, not going to happen

      So one truck can cross at a time?

      I feel like people are sleeping on this, it’s not just that heavy equipment can’t cross, it’s that NOTHING can cross quickly. You’re looking at sending one truckload of soldiers across at a time

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    boy, they most be real desperate to pull that stunt again

    specially because, unlike last time, theres exactly 0% change the ukis dont know what they are doing

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's a trap to catch a PzH2000!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they are going to catch a 155mm shell FROM a PzH 2000

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's about as close as they got with the Sims 3 = 3 Sim cards, so sounds about right for the way this is going.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wait, if it save for vehicle with weight of 10 tons to cross a bridge, how much does an MT-LB weight?

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians are gathering on pontoon boats, having a nice day out with the senpai

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    do they have Luigi Cadorna in charge or are they just this retarded?

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would build the pontoon further away from civilians who can record it on their commute

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looking forward to watching the kino footage on Pon Hub

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >100% Live Girls Pontooning NOW
      >hot 'toon to 'toon action

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Wherever Russia goes
    >They must pontoon

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'M GONNA... PONTOOOOON!!!! AAAAAAHHH!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        jesus fucking christ, is that for real ? I knew they fucked up their previous crossings, but I had no idea it was THIS bad

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You new here?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yes, you can look up the siversky river crossing

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn't collapsing a bridge mean that you don't expect to use it anymore/in the foreseeable future, and in an attempt to stop enemy advance?
    Similar to the Rail Plough in WW2?
    Are they doing it to weaken response to a coming counteroffensive on their side of the bridge?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They are cutting the Russians in Kherson and generally Northwest from the river from being supplied. It will make Ukrainian own advance slower later on (they can still cross through Zaporizhzhia iirc or pontoon themselves if they feel in control), but right now it dooms all those Russian forces to rout or surrender. It pays off.

      Russia also destroyed bridges when they advanced on Sievierodonetsk, to cut the Ukrainians and force them to abandon it.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >They have begun to pont00n
    Is it vatnik mating season again already?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Vatniks love to ponTr00n.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good luck to the driver that goes first.

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    BRIDGE HIT AGAIN
    >https://nitter.eu/loogunda/status/1552025055122653188
    >"Eyewitnesses claim that the explosions in Kherson occurred in the direction of the strategically important Antonivka bridge"

Your email address will not be published.