The most wasteful and pointless military procurement?

The most wasteful and pointless military procurement?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What sucks is that they're all so tasteless. Like if you're gonna embezzle money to buy a private yacht why not pull out all the stops and have something truly unique commissioned instead of making yet another dime a dozen billionaire boat

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You gotta admit the sailing yacht "A" and motor yacht "A" look awesome.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think they actually are uniquely commissioned anon.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You know what I mean, all of them except A look extremely derivative

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thats because deviating would likely cost a lot more money.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What matters is the interior, not the exterior.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Interiors of those things are more tasteless than exteriors. Exterior is to an degree matter of engineering, interior outside of technical spaces and bridge isn't.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ORR ROOK SAME

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You gotta admit the sailing yacht "A" and motor yacht "A" look awesome.

      >A
      Zumwaltbros we got too cocky...

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Reminder Congress are cowards for not signing Letters of Marque

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Reminder moderns are idiots unsuited to that work. Just because your teenage boymind thinks shit is cool means nothing.

        Those boats aren't Congress problem because the US is not at war and the Russians too have deniable escalation options. They're Ukraine's and perhaps the ICCs issue.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Goes completely against the rules-based order that the US already has in place

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Vladimir Potanin
      fucking walmart ass monke

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    F-35 and its not even close. Biggest boondoggle in human history. Bigger than the pyramids, the Great Wall, all the Cathedrals of Europe, Vietnam, Iraq and Kosovo put together

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Moron, troll, and turd worlder all rolled into one. Bravo.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They managed to make a ramp look good. For such a shit surface fleet they somehow always nail the aesthetics.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lets pool our money and buy that as our PrepHolearrier, dibs on installing bubba weapon systems

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Australia is phasing them out cause they're shit
    >Belgium is phasing them out cause they're shit
    >Norway is phasing them out cause theyre shit
    >Sweden is phasing them out cause theyre shit

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's wasteful about that ship in your picture?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this

      https://i.imgur.com/XWTxwbW.jpg

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its a Thai carrier

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's a glorified royal yacht

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Her entire Harrier V/STOL jet fleet was removed from service in 2006.[2] Although Chakri Naruebet was intended for patrols and force projection in Thai waters, a lack of funding brought on by the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis meant the carrier has spent most of her career docked at the Sattahip naval base
      In short (s)he was built around using a particular harrier variant only Spain produced that neither Thailand or Spain had the materials to keep them airworthy and Thailand lacked money to buy harriers from anyone else

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why did Thailand even need a carrier?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          probably makes it easier to spot for that chinese fishing fleet.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >In short (s)he was built around using a particular harrier variant only Spain produced that neither Thailand or Spain had the materials to keep them airworthy and Thailand lacked money to buy harriers from anyone else
        Nothing in that ship requires that particular Harrier variant. They just originally bought second hand Spanish Harriers as cheap stop gap, then Asian financial crisis hit and they couldn't afford new Harriers or F/A-18's for their air force. Their Hornets were already being built and after cancellation those were diverted to US marines.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Aggregat
    fun fact: it cost germany as much to produce the V2 as it cost america to produce the atomic bomb

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We can go smaller

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck all of you, ramp carriers are soulful.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every single thing the Indian military procures

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's not a fair comparison, since the Pajeet one is based off a Kiev-class escort carrier (smaller and less efficient in terms of internal layout), whereas the Klackon one is a Kuz.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >911 on the side
    insensitive

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Really puts things into perspective when you realize that literally who countries like Spain and Thailand have more functional carriers than Russia.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Indian military procurement is not pointless, but by fucking God their entire procurement process goes out of its way to be as wasteful and inefficient as possible.

    Just read up on the Medium Range Combat Aircraft Controversy that fucking mired India in a 10+ year long Scandal.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Yamato class

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *