strange things are happening in the Russian army command, and apparently Shoigu is fucked

strange things are happening in the Russian army command, and apparently Shoigu is fricked

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Kek, Russia is truly turning in a full on circus.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Oh god, /rcwg/ really is going to become a reality, isn't it?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There is no fricking way Girkin will live long enough to see that

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If they kill the last honest Russian, they kill Russia with him.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >last honest Russian
          Girkin was on multiple occasions accused of selling off heavy machinery from Donbass in 2014-2015(it was moved to Russia and he was defense minister of Donbabwe at that time, so he had hand in it for sure). And stealing donations for soldiers in 2022-2023, that homosexual is not honest at all

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Girkin isn't exactly completely honest and has lied many times before. The last honest Russian should probably be Zinin.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            denis nikitin still exists

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Russia is dead.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >honest Russian

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >FSB spook
          >honest
          As honest as a Russian can be, I suppose.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >strelkov
          >honest
          lel

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >honest Russian

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He not last honest russian, but he is honest. Honest as delusional madman, which speak out and share all his delusions honestly and plainly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If Girkin took over after a bloody civil war I'd actually be scared of Russia again.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I'd actually be scared of Russia again
        Why scared of it? You're a baltBlack person?

        Can't wait to see what happens to russian nukes after this
        Their previous collapse in the 90s was handled pretty smoothly

        NATO NEST teams are more than capable of securing whatever 3 digit number of Russian Nikes that have survived 30+ years of deferred maintenance. Tricky problem is going to be other CBRN weapons

        just imagine parachuting in, and fultoning out loose warheads.

        Kek. You better worry about what to do with the Ukrainian drones, it has to do with our reality.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Why scared of it
          not him and not scared of it either, but no one has cried >NOOK harder than strelkov

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >but no one has cried >NOOK harder than strelkov
            Huh? Where? He's against using nukes against the ukraine.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The dude is incompetent. If Russia goes into an actual struggle among the boyars & wannabes (really, really not likely), the CIA, MI6, and Mossad are going to be murdering the ones they don't like while they're still basically bandits, not statemen.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Omsk starting the great trial when?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the text is surprisingly well written

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'd genuinely love a grand strategy game in this setting.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Strelkov is forgotten by everyone, there was his chance when Prigozhin offered Strelkov a place in Wagner, but he did it in a rude way (Prigozhin wanted to piss on his face) and Strelkov was forced to refuse

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >there was his chance when Prigozhin offered Strelkov a place in Wagner
        how the frick it was his chance? Prigozhin offered him to be stormtrooper that would be thrown at Ukrainian trench the moment he joined Wagner

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >be the person with the most experience fighting Ukraine that Russia has available
        >get completely sidelined, told to shut up for doomposting, and inevitably get pushed out a window
        I don't feel bad for Strelkov, but I do understand any seething he may experience.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        does his head look tiny to anyone else?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Can't wait to see what happens to russian nukes after this
      Their previous collapse in the 90s was handled pretty smoothly

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Every single relevant power in the world will do all they can to secure those nukes. Absolutely nobody who is currently in power benefits from random nukes spreading across the world. Hopefully the Russians themselves are smart enough to accept blue helmets around their nuclear silos.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Hopefully the Russians themselves are smart enough to accept blue helmets around their nuclear silos.
          >Russians
          >smart enough
          Heh.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            A man can dream, can he not?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Russians will sell their mothers for a sensible price, given the chance. If there is nobody to punish some random general for selling the nukes under his command to US he will do that in a heartbeat.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I guess that's a solution too. China and US buying the whole functioning nuclear arsenal so it doesn't end up in Jihadistan, or whatever.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Honestly, all Russian nuclear sites should be destroyed if/when the current state collapses. So long as there is no unified command, they cannot be launched.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That isn't enough to stop a potentially catastrophic nuclear proliferation problem.
          R*ssia already lost a frickton of spicy nuclear material (RTGs), they better not lose actual nukes.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Iran doesn't have to develop anything; they just have to wait.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        NATO NEST teams are more than capable of securing whatever 3 digit number of Russian Nikes that have survived 30+ years of deferred maintenance. Tricky problem is going to be other CBRN weapons

        just imagine parachuting in, and fultoning out loose warheads.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          My buddy, my pal, that's gonna be a 4-digit number. That's a lot of weapons-grade fissionable material. That shit doesn't decay in 30 years. Doesn't fricking matter if they don't have launchers. Doesn't fricking matter if they're unmaintained. The moment you have a critical mass worth of angry rocks unaccounted for, you have A Big Fricking Problem.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        wikl be interesting. why should Russia/Novgorod get all the nukes? Russia has also demonstrated it will invade ex-satellite states at will too, so these shithole countries will want to keep nukes

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I want to play this game so damn bad.
      Yes I know it's not a game but somebody needs to make it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why would you choose anyone other than Far Eastern People's Republic, unless there is a timed invasion from some meme faction from beyond the map?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Russia might actually end up nuking itself.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the main argument against nuclear proliferation is that any WMD is infinitely more likely to be accidentally or intentionally used on the country that built the WMD than on the enemy.

        Sword of Damocles moment.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There is a real saying
        >The Russian army akways wins. And when there are noone to fight they split in two and still win.

        A nice hab at always near-civil war in rusdia, 1917 revolution and 90s cope and the realities of russian politics

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The best Twilight 2000 setting never written.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      im pro russia but the writing here is Kino.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >im pro russia
        But why?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          theyve been very good to my thirdie shithole

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They're not doing it out of the goodness of their hearts, Bangladeshbro.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        homosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is there a less blurry version?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      R3ddit fanfiction

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    demon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i sentece you to an eternal alcoholic stare

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's the Miami mutilator!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >when the Russians in Hotline Miami are just the Russian government/state post-Cold War

        Its like how one of the whole themes of GTA IV is that the Russians and their KGB bullshit are replacing the Italian Mafia as the premier criminal organization in the world.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Strange things afoot. Hadn't thought Pigozhin would have the brass balls to hire a general to join his outfit, not with Vaginer on the cusp of complete destruction in Bakhmut.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >it's fricking happening

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Vaginer taking over the government
      the tens of thousands of glowies and all of Rosgvardiya would soon put paid to his delusions.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Rosgvardia are numerous but spineless. The only ones that would stand up against the brigand king are the FSB and the regular army who must be tired of the bald bonobo getting preferential treatment and getting credit for their work.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        One functional brigade will destroy all of rossgvardian sissies.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Guys like them got butchered outside of Kyiv and no one even bothered to bury them. Dogs and birds cleaned them up.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    which weapon is being discussed here?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Soldiers are military equipment.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The member we use to rape other men

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Sentient weapons made of flesh and bone.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Biorobots

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like it's Prigozhin that's fricked by getting saddled with this moron.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    circlejerk thread lol imagine supporting nwo

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, its either russia/china or america. The alternative is not any better and the world is better off than the "multipolar" world that was the 18-20th century.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Russia China is it then, I do not want to worship Black folk and frick trannies

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          rshtb

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, russia/china literally imports muslims and africans of their own. They also ally themselves with african countries and offer citizenships to them. You obsessing over homosexuals/Black folk showcased your inability to realize the other side is worse. Terrible economics, terrible trade, terrible diplomacy and more and more foreign wars over territory. Along with placing more emphasis on bringing in more immigrants from africa/asia. You think laws about homosexuals are bad? How about a culture of homosexuals that rapes or solicits you into sex traffic despite the laws saying otherwise? The west, you have a choice. In china/russia, you do not have a choice.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >The west, you have a choice
            Good, I chose the side who kills homosexuals and trannies

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So, not russia? Russia actively encourages that shit on a cultural level.
              >b-but muh laws
              Do not mean anything on a cultural level.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty sure they do not.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yea, I am sure encouraging prison culture on the population is not them encouraging. Along with them being the potential factors in why their HIV levels are high(asode from drugs).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                dont play dumb

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                kek reminds me of that vatnik in /chug/ fully laying bare just how incredibly homosexual the Russian army/prison/mafia culture is BUT ITS NOT GAY OK YOU JUST DONT UNDERSTAND THE CULTURE! FRICKING A MAN IN THE ASS IS NOT CONSIDERED GAY etc lmao. I think I have the screenshot somewhere

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's too late to sugar coat me, the goverment you work for should have done that sooner. Now die gays

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >you work for
              I do not work for the russian government.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Everyone here know you gays work for dod including janny and mod
                What are you trying to play here as? Fellow PrepHoleners?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How would you know that I work for the government? Whats next, going to say that I live in your walls?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >DOD
                Dod would actively shill for russia because thats they thrive off of making russia the big bad. Making russia seem bad/weak is the opposite of what they want because that would mean less money for the defense budget. You scream shills, but do not realize how they do their shillings.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                This is the biggest moronic shit I have heard. It was in news that dod is spending up to billion for Internet propaganda. This site has severes in california and main mod rapeape is veteran.
                No shit this website is swarming with feds who are being trained in online shilling such as you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The amount of spells mistakes shows you are malding, quite possibly even seething.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Im not, just slightly drunk. Had sex with your mom

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >you will never have your balls obliterated by a petite little girl
                life is Hell

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, the dod would not make their enemy seem weak. You do realize america actively hypes their enemies up? Unlike China/russia where they actively downplay their enemies. The dod shilling campaign would result in the DOD in shilling russia's capabilities rather than downplaying them. If they don't, they wouldn't have enough justification to keep their military budget close to a trillion.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                My logic here is that they need to downplay Russia strength because right wingers would join them

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Flawed logic because america's way of seeing things is always on the pessimistic side. They have to hype up their enemies to prepare for the worst and also justify the defense budget. If they don't, congress will cut their fundings and the DOD will have less money than they do before

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They show congress the truth and people lies. You do not need average Joe who work in coal mines to know what's happening behind doors. To make Russia look weak in people eyes will make people like russia less.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, it will make people think russia is not a threat, moron. Making your enemies weak is a good way to trick uour population into thinking they are not a threat. Congress gave the DOD funds because of how much of a threat their adversaries are. If they are not a threat/weak, congress will cut those funds. Percieving russia as weak is the opposite of what the military and the DOD wants.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Then why the frick do they spend so much resources into online shill campingto make look Russia weak.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They don't? At best, they just create fake accounts on Facebook to boost enlistments. Majority of their shilling campaign is mainly ads for people to join the military. They rarely directly talk aboht what adversaries they are facing in the ads, but they always assume their enemies are powerful and competent. Making russia weak is the opposite of what the military wants because it will reduce fundings.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I want proof from someone who works in dod. My assumptions are always correct

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >an institution would rather risk their annual fundings just to appeal to classical liberals/libertarians
                Anon, they prioritize money to keep their shit going. Appealing to a political spectrum is below their priority list.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Bullshit, no one will cut fundings because poop people became weaker. Usa is global superpower with lots of military bases across world. The money needs to be constantly pumped in to keep status

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, they literally cut fundings after the collapse of the USSR and also during the obama administration.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're trying to trick me

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Does this take in inflation?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >percent of GDP
                anon...

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I do not understand the chart all I know usa has more weapons than 20 years ago

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Percentage of GDP means how much of their GDP they are willing to spend on the military. After the cold war, the fundings dropped dramatically from 8% to 3-4% right now.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Okay since you are not angry little man and you arent calling me names I trust you

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, if the U.S. were to have the same fundings as it did in the cold war, they would be having an annual budget of 1.7 trillion dollars per year.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't they have 7 trillion or something? Or did I misread some news?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No, the U.S. is spending like 842 billion for its defense budget this year, which is like 3% of its GDP.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Thats pretty rough, sorry ameribro.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Uhh no? What's bad about it? it should be 5% of GDP as far as I'm concerned.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Inflation would mean that even if the US budget is nominally bigger, it's in fact less than they used to spend

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The Seawolf program was slashed all the way down to three, and two of those were essentially bailouts for the MIC because the sub companies were completely dead without that contract. They still downsized so much that there are echoes of it to this day. The old farts that were too senior to be laid off back then are finally retiring, bringing the average experience level of the workforce down by over a decade. The Soviet Union collapsing was the worst thing to happen to military spending since the end of WW2.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm English and just hate Russians. Feel free to post the thousand butthurt about Churchill memes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it was in news that dod is spending up to billion for Internet propaganda
                Kek holy mother of esl. What are you, paki? brazilian?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                shit and this whole time I've been shitposting for free, where can I collect my check

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Notice how the man from the USSR is always standing in front of the Asian one? How he is slightly taller? That's puccian "friendship" for you.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Frick off there right now.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >t. picrel

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        unipolarity is the worst of all

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No, not worse than multipolarity that the russian and Chinese envisioned(although their versions of multipolarity is essentially unipolar in a way)

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Hey, the only losers in that scheme are the irredentist shitholes who don't want to play ball.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Frick off. The best choice is to burn off the israelites and then deal with the chinks later. Russia barely has enough population for HALF the fricking land they have. The chinks can't play an away game for shit. Just burn this shit down and start fricking over.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Guys, what happens if Russia truly is fricked and somehow overextended? Is Putin just gonna snap and hit the big red button if he can’t have Ukraine?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Putin doesn't have a big red button to press.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Don’t they still have nukes? Even a Cold War era nuke would really kick the hornets nest of NATO

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Real life is not a fricking cartoon m8

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I don’t mean fricking literally hit a big red button. I mean would Putin get desperate enough to just launch nuclear weapons because a loss of this magnitude could undo everything Russia has built on in the past decades?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You silly little child, the launch decision is not his alone.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >just launch nuclear
              He literally cannot do that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Launching nukes isnt done by anyone pressing red button. It requires sizable political will and power. Unthinkanble for it to be used in an offensive war where ukraine is not stepping foot on russian soil and therefore not threatening their existence

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They don't have functional nuclear warheads. Even the US's strategic stockpile's in a pretty shitty state. If it's not on a plane or in a submarine, it's only got about a ~40% chance of working correctly. Now make that a fraction of a fraction of that percentage for the Russians.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I hope so. It would certainly make things interesting.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    how would a respected russian officer, a man born in the ussr, follow the orders of this dude

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If Russia were to collapse and fragment into different states, it is difficult to predict what would happen to its nuclear weapons. However, there are a few possible scenarios:

    1. The nuclear weapons could be taken over by a successor state or a newly formed state. Depending on the stability and governance of these states, the nuclear weapons could either be safely secured and maintained, or they could fall into the hands of extremist groups or rogue states.

    2. The nuclear weapons could be dismantled or destroyed. This would require a coordinated effort by the international community and would involve significant logistical and political challenges.

    3. The nuclear weapons could be left unsecured and potentially become a danger to the region and the world. This is the most concerning scenario, as unsecured nuclear weapons could fall into the hands of non-state actors, terrorist groups, or other rogue actors.

    It is important to note that the likelihood of any of these scenarios occurring is highly uncertain, and it is impossible to predict with certainty what would happen to Russia's nuclear weapons in the event of a collapse or fragmentation. However, it is clear that any disruption to the secure storage and control of nuclear weapons poses a serious threat to global security and stability, and it is essential that all efforts be made to prevent such an outcome.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks, ChatGPT.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I am pleased to hear that my generated content was helpful to someone on the /k/ weapons board. I strive to provide accurate and informative responses to all users who engage with me, and I am always here to assist with any questions or concerns related to weapons or any other topic. Thank you for your feedback and support!

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Wagner is going to be a Ukrainian unit fighting against the Putinites by this time next year.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Prigozhin hires some guy who got fired from the MoD
    >"Shoigu is fricked"
    Not necessarily an ideal situation for ol' S.S., but "is fricked" seems like wild hyperbole.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Heh my boy Shoilingz

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well, since the thread got killed and this is a Wagner themed thread, I guess I might as well share what Anon made here so that it may live on.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Defenestration soon?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >apparently Shoigu is fricked
    His stockpile of carefully curated woods will keep him safe.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    1917 SPEEDRUN LETS GO

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    more spring offensive not actualyy happening kraine!!!!

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I bet many have already asked similar questions, but how do we know Wagner will actually leave on may 10? Maybe this is a psyop?

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Shill thread

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Utkin is still around?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *