Russian Sources are claiming that the Explosions at the Rail Yard near the City of Pavlohrad were the result of a Missile Strike against 2 Divisions of up to 16 S-300 Launchers including Ammunition that was heading towards the Front; so far there is No Visual Evidence of this.
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1652768007788134401
https://twitter.com/johnspectator/status/1652767109141655554
(either bait or ukies are the same level of moronic as the russians)
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1652765799705083904
If true that's very, very unfortunate. S-300 launchers are kinda hard to come buy and although in the long term the US/friends could pull more Patriots/THAAD/SM-6/SM-3 for Ukraine, in the short term those assets aren't replaceable. Although some part of me questions how many of them were decoys lmao.
I'm also seeing on twitter that apparently 17 Tu-95Ms are in the air? One girl I follow who is actually reputable put it at 10 about 45 minutes ago.
>If true that's very, very unfortunate
I really doubt they destroyed that many. But yeah, as Ukraine prepares for the counter-offensive, their S-300s become more exposed, which is definitely a problem they help with asap
>If true that's very, very unfortunate
when did Russians ever said the truth?
>I'm also seeing on twitter that apparently 17 Tu-95Ms are in the air?
i've got a friend over there and he says russian air strikes are increasing due to a lack of uki anti-air
Ukrainian AA has never been able to hit Russian bombers or fighters sending standoff strikes over their own territory. Lack of anti-air changes nothing in that equation. The lack of SEAD/DEAD and proper allocation of consistent CAS shows AA is very much a threat to Russian aircraft inside Ukrainian airspace, bombing has picked up because Russia figured out it's discount JDAMs are superior for leveling key buildings in Bakhmut that their artillery isn't as efficient at dealing with. Those planes still fly low to avoid medium and long range systems.
i mean in the end we can dumb it down to this
how many aircrafts russia lost so far?100? in the grand scale of things its 1/12 of their total air power
and that while im removing the 92 old su 24 models that doesnt have rwr and they are practicly a shooting target
the real question is how many pilots have being killed so far
for fixed wing craft there's around 80 visually confirmed but some of those are damaged like those bombers so it's up in the air if they return to service or not. Russia still retains a lot of it's air capability and they do make attempts to rescue pilots. No idea what their kill count is, but you could make the argument based on flight hours and experience losing Russian pilots sucks but probably doesn't hurt as badly as losing western once. There is a very discernable difference in skill between Russian pilots and western pilots. Pilot skill really really matters so by that metric Russia kinda already is a bit fricked even with zero losses kek.
Russia is not doing any air strikes that would be prevented by AA. Neither they are doing any strikes that would be prevented by AA
> If true
>Russian sources
It isn’t.
Not that you’re probably not just a concern trolling samegay anyway lol
I posted that before it came out that it was probably just a chemical plant, moron.
So you’re easily and immediately influenced by cartoonishly obvious Russian active measures.
And you’re calling other people morons.
Yeah, I was maybe wrong for about 45 minutes then revised my opinion after new evidence came out. How long have you been moronic for anon? 28 years?
>"n-no you!"
Ukraine is able to manufacture launchers, it's the missiles that are the problematic part. Luckily, russians blew up just a bunch of old Ukrainian ICBMs on Pavlohrad chemical plant
>Although some part of me questions how many of them were decoys lmao.
I'm leaning towards all decoys. Remember that Russia has destroyed hundreds of himars as well.
>If true
who the frick listens to russians and hears anything but lies?
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1652762469025169409
I guess related to this. Hard to imagine they didnt move the launchers
There's already a thread anon
This one actually makes sense and has sources anon. I skipped over the first one (I'm not OP) because it just looked like another bait thread.
finally air superiority will be coming in 2 weeks
I doubt Ukraine even had 16 S-300 launchers left before this strike
nononononoNONoNoNoONONONONONONONONONONOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
the videos on the telegram channels claims he lives 10km away from the station and all the windows blew up
whatever the russians hit was really REALLY big in order to make such damage
What the frick is the AFU strategy in this war anymore? Sit on their asses and get pummeled but 60's and 70's Soviet tech?
What choice do they have when the west won't supply them with meaningful amounts of weaponry
you are forgetting that they are also slavs
They are literally 1 step removed from being actual russians.
it has been reported (mainly by finnish observers and volunteers) that the ukranians are very, VERY bad at soldiering. It's just that the russians are even worse.
They were embedded into the TDF remember, those guys at least at the start of the war had literally 0 training.
Just goes to show how shitty Russian training is.
>no videos
>the same one image everywhere
>russia making moronic claims
yeah
what video you want anon? join the telegram channel and see for your self stop being an asshat
what channel you fricking moron
https://t.me/dneproperatyv
>telegram
>spynet
found the signal user
not joining your spynet
post webms or frick off
>join the telegram channel
let me guess, may facts western media tries to supress?
muncho bliged cumdribbler
munge oblerged
Post webm or gtfo
mucho obligado
So no proofs?
mucheau obligaux
Ah yes, very proof, much convinced. Spasiba, tovarish
(Although in all fairness, Russia's such a pathological liar that if they said the sky was blue I'd be convinced it was green)
many oblong, compatriot.
>Russian Sources
discarded
No source is reliable in this moronic war.
The UKranians are pretty reliable and we know that because their daily tally on Russian losses predicted obsolete armour in use my Russia and mobilisation. Meanwhile Russia even has a linguistic subculture based around lying.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vranyo
>2 Divisions of up to 16 S-300 Launchers including Ammunition
Also killed three HATO field marshals, and injured two Zelensky
Anon S-300s are thin skinned, they have "armor" in the sense that they're chonky trucks but nothing otherwise. One going off in a motor pool with ammo loaded would kill everything around it and the videos available seem to indicate at least one went off.
are you implying Zelensky is better armored than an S-300?
video
https://twitter.com/johnspectator/status/1652771110063071233
It's just another terror bombing wave. Godspeed Ukraine
is this second time the russBlack folk used their cruise missiles on military targets?
If S-300 Launchers and ammo were hit Ukraine was getting sloppy 🙁
>If S-300 Launchers and ammo were hit Ukraine was getting sloppy 🙁
Maybe they got sloppy with opsec, or by having too many of them at the same place, but they really don't have the option of not risking those systems to some degree. They need those AA closer to the frontlines to provide cover for the counter-offensive
yes, I meant that they shouldn't have so many launchers and their ammo bunched op but I'm only an armchair general, hopefully they will be able to learn from this
There's a rocket fuel plant in Pavlohrad. It's literally just a chimpout retaliation from Monke because of of the oil depot. Stop slurping fake news from Russian "sources"
homie none of the op's and telegram sources are pro russia
stop being an idiot
The claim of build up of s300 batteries only come from Russian telegrams
no it came from this one
Днeпp OПEPATИBHЫЙ
but he also states he lives far enough from the station
so....
You do realise there are people pro Russians in Ukrainian held areas anon. Kherson, Kharkiv, Kyiv.
No, they've been genocides by tranyz Nazi NATO corps
I wish
Come to Europe and remove the local diaspora here too if you can.
>Initial Reports by Ukrainian Officials that 2 Russian Submarines have been observed leaving the Port of Sevastopol towards the Black Sea.
While I can buy the idea of ukes getting fricked because that's war, the idea of being bigger than the beirut blast sounds like BS. That shit was picked up thousands of miles away, one of the biggest booms that was not nucelar in human history
no it wasnt beirut explosion was powerful but NOT THAT powerfull.....
the honga tonga volcano explosion was the one that got picked up literally everywhere in the world
and that was a vei 6.5...nothing man made can even come close to this
Are you sure anon? Russia told everyone that they had destroyed all Ukrainian air defenses on the first day of their invasion. Something doesn't check out.
Frick off then
No I don't think I will, and you burying your head in the sand won't unroast those piggies. Just cope and seethe.
>We won't actually see any spring counter-offensive anytime soon, will we?
it only means they need to start it sooner you moron
>no I won't link them
ok moron
https://twitter.com/sentdefender
Lmao that's the quality of spreading propaganda you get for rubles? Are they really hiring some Indians to do that now?
Well anon they're Russians, it's not like they have doing a good job as part of their culture. You get what you pay for and what you pay for is always multiplied by 0.25 when it comes to how well things are done, for some reason lmao.
They have been trying hard to destroy as many Ukrainian AA systems as possible since that Pentagon leak
Too emotional, a real person wouldn't be this panicked
you can hear explosions on this multistream but i cant figure out the city
>Witness reports - initial blast larger than Beirut one
Lots of Lebanese immigrants living in Pavlohrad?
Kek this will be excuse once the mud dries up
Frick off Marche.
>Reports suggest that this is possibly another Ukrainian Arms Depot.
Was there any other attack against Ukrainian ammo depots recently?
Isn't this Pavlograd chemichal factory?
both railroad and chemical factory are very close to each other. Better wait for images from where it happened to know
The explosions and smoke looks like solid fuel burning, it's probable.
https://www.unian.info/society/why-russia-is-afraid-of-ukraine-s-neptune-missiles-11028884.html
>russian sources immediately know it's S300
sounds fake
Those white flares look very similar to all the footage of destroyed SAMs we've seen so far.
that's true, but what's more likely, russians hitting static infrastructure with old ICBM boosters because putin knows they're there and could make a big boom for domestic TV consumption? Or the Ukies suddenly went so moronic that they left 16 sam batteries in the same place for no reason and lost more on one day than the rest of the war, which would be a russian hallmark move? They're definitely projecting.
I'm not saying is definitely true, the number of destroyed S-300s claimed in the OP seems way too high for a single attack. But, if they were S-300s there, they probably attacked that location because they knew beforehand that Ukraine had S-300s at that place
Only russians would think that Ukrainians are moronic enough to keep that many S-300s in one place, because that's something russians would totally do
16 isn't a lot
The number in the OP seems inflated, but if they hit any AD ammo depo or S-300s, it's a painful loss for Ukraine. They did hit something, now we have to wait for official reports about what exactly was hit
Ukraine would reasonably try to minimize and hide their losses so don't be so sure about it
Ukrops anhillated! 2 more weeks and bakhmut will fall!
these threads are very organic
didn´t it already happen on the 24/02/23?
lol
LOL indeed, you'll be laughing all the way to defeat.
>79 posts
>30 posters
Ah yes, I am so demoralized by this entirely organic shocking wave of news from my fellow Ukrainians.
I've made several posts myself and I'm pro-Ukraine. What's your point? People often engage in long arguments in threads like this and a single person makes multiple posts. What do you think? That people post once and then close the tab?
He originally came to shill /misc/, threads there move so fast having little posters is a red flag. Most of shills Ukrainian or Russian don’t the understand the culture differences between boards.
>'m pro Ukraine but that's more believable than all the delusional mud cope that's been regurgitated for months
I share your feelings. Tho in this case, I wouldn't say that Ukraine is out of AD, they are running low and it's something they can't afford to lose in significant quantities, but they are not out of AD, yet
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1652774027063115778
its def a depot or s300 or another AA as he said multiple cook off are visible
>its def a depot or s300 or another AA as he said multiple cook off are visible
Nothing in the video corroborates this. You're just echoing Rus botnet propaganda. Wait till the morning.
So osint defender and noel are rus propagandia bots now? That's some epic copium
>So osint defender and noel are rus propagandia bots now
>Russian Sources are claiming
they are saying that Russian sources reporting S-300 explosions
Russian sources have already confirmed that you'll never be a real woman.
>The zigger can't live without thinking about trannies.
I haven't said it. Learn to read
so he is pro russian now? make up your fricking mind morons
define western..
besides the greeks in europe at least nobody comes close to their flight hours by a wild margin only israel do
the majority of the pilots in europe do not fly so many more hours than a russian one to justify this at all (im talking about real flight hours not the bullshit they are trying now to mitigate it via simulator)
(you)
>so he is pro russian now
>Russian sources are claiming
gee, I wonder if russian sources are pro russian
Ziggers and hohols are opposite sides of the same coin.
Le both sides are the same. The Russian MOD said they destroyed a HIMARS on the 3rd floor of an apartment building, but the holhols said they destroyed 20 BMP's (but they actually only destroyed 15!)
>le both sides are the same
>https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1652774027063115778
that is not cook off seems like burning parts of building been thrown up, cookoff you will see rocket trails blazing off.
they also got the fire within control in 3 hours
>2 Divisions of up to 16 S-300 Launchers including Ammunition
>on one train
yea sure there's explosion, but theese "facts" can wipe my ass. This is HATO cybor tier dumb.
What's more likely,
>The Russians, who have proven they can't hit the broad side of a barn, have both coincidentally predicted or become aware of a concentration of mobile ukrainian equipment, and then hit it.
OR
>they bombed the stationary soviet-era rocket fuel plant in Pavlohrad that they would know where it is and would frighten the local populace
You raise a good point, but even the most moronic, drunken, recently-bumraped stopped clock is right twice a day.
I'm white, Black person. Frick off you braindead subhuman.
>I can see le ips and I know that this is not an organic post because the number of posts is not equal to the number of posters. I need to tell them how smart I am
GOOD MORNING SIR
https://twitter.com/Faytuks/status/1652784882597220354
well after sevastopol russia had to do something lol
and theyve been saving up cruise missiles for 6 weeks now
I think Ukraine stores all its old Soviet SS-24 awaiting decomission in Pavlograd.
Ukrainian telegram channels Legitimny and ZeRada report that, in addition to ammunition, tanks with fuel, which is intended for refueling equipment, caught fire in Pavlograd.
>Ukrainian telegram
> Legitimny
>ZeRada
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
THERE IS LITERALLY NO WAY ANY FUEL WAS IGNITED IN THIS FIRE, TO SUGGEST OTHERWISE IS TO ENGAGE IN RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION
Those channels are all pro-Russian so, take it with a sprinkle of salt.
yeah bro just ignore the fire lol must be cgi
Just like Sevastapol, nothing happened 🙂 It was just a little fire that was put out within seconds 🙂
>I CAN MAKE THE SAME ON STABLE DIFFUSION
Stfu botBlack person
t.vatnik
Ukrainian environmentalists are raising the alarm - the remains of nuclear rocket fuel with an expired storage period at the Pavlograd Chemical Plant in Pavlograd represent a monstrous threat on an international scale.
The warehouse, with its expired containers, could explode at any moment. At the same time, the explosion would flatten the city, turning the surrounding area into a lifeless wasteland. Toxic fuel compounds also threaten neighboring regions and other countries, according to Kiev media
Usual Russian projection of 'We pile all of our equipment and ammo in one place so it's believable that they do it too.'
In actuality they probably just hit an unremarkable ammo dump that may or may not have had an S-300 or two present.
The Russians likely theorized that hitting the ICBM depot would destroy the rail yard as well. And a depot full of fukhueg Soviet ICBMs is much easier to hit than a rail yard.
>ICBM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT-23_Molodets
They just had a massive ammo dumb explosion like yesterday and now “Russian sources” are doing a No Ukraine today.
Pretty predictable tbphwyf
>There is no chemical hazard in Pavlograd , local authorities report
>Don't panic.
https://twitter.com/johnspectator/status/1652780246091874307
>so far there is No Visual Evidence of this.
tryhard american
Rip those systems are irreplaceable, cost like 115m and months to make. No way its 16 ukies cant be that moronic
S-300s move by road, the fricking thing is on wheels ......
we found the american guys
>we found the american guys
My thoughts is
>A: Mass loss of S-300 that for whatever reason were massed at one place, needlessly close to the area they intend to cover, that somehow all simultaneously failed at air defence while an air raid alert is active: Delusional cope of the highest level.
>B: Himars for whatever reason chilling next to a high priority target despite its primary benefit being that it requires no extensive infrastructure to load up: Pure cope.
>A massive stockpile of SS24 rockets with a shitton of rocket fuel: Plausible
>It being one of several distribution points for ammunition supplies to the Zaporiznia front: Plausible.
At this point, figuring out the truth is pretty pointless. The Russians once they realized that A and B is fricking moronic will say its D even if its C, and the Ukranians will say its C even if its D. Big boom happened. Buildings got fricked. Go back to shleep.
you realize they're all slavs, right?
The thing is though, we've seen so many actual ammunition depots go up in flames and this one looks really different. It looks like rocket fuel from those s300 and s400 missiles. Given that the Russians probably didn't hit any build of ukie air defence its most like option C
Ukraine doesn't have any S-400 missiles so if Russia somehow blew up the S-400s Ukraine doesn't have, what Russia sold them to them?
Russia's claiming S-300s because it would be the most damaging piece of news after the leaks.
Without the leaks Russia would have claimed it was an entire division of HIMARs
>It being one of several distribution points for ammunition supplies to the Zaporiznia front: Plausible
Whatever exploded it was solid rocket fuel, not ammunition, neither it was lone HIMARS.
So either A or C
>Mass loss of S-300 that for whatever reason were massed at one place, needlessly close to the area they intend to cover, that somehow all simultaneously failed at air defence while an air raid alert is active: Delusional cope of the highest level.
It is possible that it was an S-300 MISSILE storage facility. During Operation Allied Force there were quite a few static SA-6 missile storage depots that went up while the actual SA-6 batteries were far removed and completely fine.
HIMARS is fricking ridiculous since there's only like 20 of them in the country but the rockets are possible, but why would they be there of all places?
Some old Soviet rockets that nobody had the money to dispose of, that were also too risky to actually use against the Russians, is a pretty good explanation. After all we saw just how negligent some people can be after the Beirut explosion.
The wiki page for the RT-23 Molodets (SS-24) was just updated with the info that 38 of them were destroyed in a Russian attack.
It was most likely the chemical plant which is not militarily important. That's it, enough with the cope wars
AAAAAAAAH SAVE ME ZELENKSY!
Well, they hit something, that's for sure, remains to be seen if it was actually a bunch of S-300s
I've seen similar trails when a gas bottling plant went up near my house once, honestly I couldn't say.
Random Twitter account #2948 is claiming that it was mothballed SS-24 ballistic missiles
A pity Imagine if Ukarine had managed to get those babies working somehow.
Imagine Moscow getting hit by old ICBMs without warheads
>imagine launching icbm's towards a nuclear state
ah yeah such a pitty
It'd end the war wouldn't it?
It's old ICBMs and rocket fuel from the Soviet era that are useless without warheads and unmaintained anyhow. Russia fired at a target that would make a big boom in order to have something to show in response to the oil refinery. Shit has been there to hit, it's militarily useless though.
>Ukraine too poor to decommission rockets
>Russia does it for free in a gesture of goodwill and provides free fireworks show
How is Russia the bad guy here?
You don't know that you're just guessing to cope
NTA, but it's a fair guess. Even if it turns out to be wrong, it is not a crazy assumption by any means
>Massive rocket fuel explosion
>Was it the old Soviet rockets we have newspaper articles of enviornmentslists complaining about as a fire hazard from before the war or did Ukraine decide to park a significant amount of their air defense assets all together next to a fire risk for ICBMs they were too poor to decommission, which officials knew about.
It's on the site of the rockets so if S-300s got hit it means they parked them next to a bunch of rocket fuel.
Or more plausibly, Russia looked for something flammable to hit because they were butthurt over looking unable to defend themselves from attacks due to the oil tank hit.
It's not a guess, it's pretty much where OSINT artists are geolocating it to be
48.5776765903307, 35.88423444118801
This solid fuel dump was a well known problem, article from 2020 about it:
https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-51220344
>russians are the first to claim it was S-300
only a moron would believe this
It probably was the chemical/rocket fuel plant like other anons are saying, but, if hypothetically they hit a bunch of S-300s, the Ukrainians wouldn't be the first ones to come out and happily announce it. Their air defense is a weak point and it wouldn't be reassuring to anyone to hear that they lost multiple S-300s or a bunch of missiles in a single attack
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAH
/chug/ got so excited and it turned out to be another moronic absolute fail from Russia.
Aren't those spastics tired of being humiliated yet?
So let's hear your proofs back argument for what you believe it was then
you are a worthless moron
impersonating people now moron?
because russian shills said so
You seemed busy, so I was helping with the load. You can't possibly get round to every moronic post on /k/. nobody could.
Idk man. The explosion happens to be in the same are where there's a plant with old rocket fuel. You can't say that it's not a reasonable hypothesis
Why would Ukraine put 16 S-300 right next to each other though?
They do S-300 drag racing sometimes
>why would you storage an amount of something together?
COPING THIS HARD
>Vehicles
>Being stored at vehicle depots
>After having their weapons systems removed
>Well away from the front line
>In a completely different conflict fought using completely different tactics
>"Yeah that's the exact same thing as sticking a bunch of missile trucks in striking distance at an old chemical plant"
>why would you storage an amount of something together?
Can you get a refund on your ESL classes?
>the Russian doesn't understand the difference between storing things in and out of enemy range
Even your cargo cult nation managed to figure out that ammo dumps need to be dispersed and moved out of enemy range.
There are places in Ukraine outside of enemy range?
Doubling down on your idiocy doesn’t help
Why is pro russian propaganda so moronicly easy to spot?
It's obvious bait
>when they tried to launch an amphibious assault against ZNPP.
Holy frick there are vatniks that still believe in the barge cope?
>Holy frick there are vatniks that still believe in the barge cope?
No, he's right in that instance, that actually happened. The ukes tried to swift boat several hundred troops into the powerplant, but the vatniks had filled the buildings with gun emplacements, so they were forced to withdraw after the fireworks started.
Thanks for your shilling, it is very entertaining. Did they pay you enough to afford a toilet yet?
It was reported in The Times: https://archive.is/3a5b4
>Kyiv has never acknowledged attacking Europe’s largest nuclear power station
>but Ukrainian special forces, military intelligence and navy personnel involved have revealed
The good old "anonymous sources claim" fake news click bait
OPSEC eventually leaks out, anon. The important part is leaking well after the fact, so it's useless to the enemy.
Plus it corroborates with all the vatnik ordnance hitting the plant. The morons called artillery support in danger close distance (a tried and true vatnik tactic) to repel the uke assault.
>Did they pay you enough to afford a toilet yet?
He's paid in rubles....so, no, of course not.
>Were they nexto 50 HIMARS as well?
50 //GORRILION// HIMARs, and 60 //GORILLION// HATO Generals!
Xaxaxaxaxaxa!
This isn't what you think it is, ziggers 😉
>Russian submarine destroyed by Ukrainian missile
Bro if the Ukrainians/US get a fricking sub kill before this wars end I would coom so fricking hard.
>another missile chimpout for their May 1st holiday
It's literally nothing again, except all the civilians having to suffer. Godspeed Ukraine
How many NATOs and Boris Johnsons destroyed?
https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-regions/2823472-na-pavlogradskomu-himzavodi-kriticna-situacia-z-utilizacieu-raketnogo-paliva.html
Article from Nov 2019 about a storage facility for rockets and fuel, could be unrelated but it would make sense. Funding for disposal supposed to run out in 2020, can’t find any articles since then about refunding the program. Can’t say for sure but chemical plant storing the fuel/rockets in the article is in palvograd
BREAKING +++ Zelensky requests 1 Million Dollar +++
So nothing happened?
3missles hit, nothing but the tactical targets of toddlers and grandmothers
>16 S-300s
Were they nexto 50 HIMARS as well?
So conceivably, why would 16 S-300s be within missile ranges of each other? Wouldn't they be deployed elsewhere?
It's fake. There are no reports of anything important being hit.
hmm yeah i bet the russians totally destroyed like 38 patriot batteries and maybe around a gorillion s-600s. or maybe s-700s, thats 100 more better.
Why isnt the Ukrainians dabbing on the vatniks by showing pics/footage of the trainstation where the vatniks claimed they did a missile strike destroying s-300 systems.
News only shows destroyed houses, but nothing of the train station
>why don't they disprove vatnik schizo claims
Russians are claiming that the area is used to move Polish mercenaries.
Also it's likely there's some damage at the station from the blast.
Russia claimed they destroyed s-300 systems there, if they want to disprove it they can just show footage of the scene.
I think the vatniks were right on this one
>people have to actively provide evidence that disproves vatnik claims
moronic or pidor? Next you'll be asking to prove that it really was a Russian missile that hit that commieblock, or that the Moskva really did sink, or that MH17 wasn't a CIA op, etc etc
Someones scared of the vatniks being right like when they claimed taking down the gepard and s300 systems, the ua mod denied it until the videos popped up
There's no evidence
>yes, I am
>Gepard gets the paint scratched
>Xaxaxaxa it's destroyed
I don't get it
Lancet 3 uses a heat round, the inside is destroyed
proof?
UA caught one that didnt explode https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1636029568946413570
not proof it uses a HEAT round, proof the gepard is ruined, moran
>if they want to disprove it they can just show footage of the scene.
>provide the enemy BDA because of some bullshit on the internet
are you moronic
We're not doing battle damage assessment for you. Invest in better satellites pidor
Why would you do free BDA for the Russians to salve the egos of losers on the internet. If Russia thinks it hit 16 S-300s let them. During WWII they used to report the impact of V2 missiles incorrectly so the Germans thought they were hitting London when in realitly they were targeting empty fields to the east
We have video of a bright and gigantic explosion. Something big went off, and a whole bunch of rockets or rocket fuel in one place is plausible.
Because otherwise they repeat that moronic shit until people start believing it.
But who cares? Why confirm or deny anything? It only helps the enemy.
It's vranyo.
The russians know they are lying so if you tell them they hit some s-300, they know you are lying, too.
The train network is not reporting any interruptions to services.
The geolocation of the explosion is basically right where the old SS-24 rockets were stored.
The Russians may be dumb enough to give the enemy free bomb damage assessment photos, but most countries aren't that moronic.
>russian sources
Stopped reading the fanfiction there
yes ofc nobody else confirmed that a hit happened surely its science fiction
>2 Divisions of up to 16 S-300 Launchers including Ammunition
When will Russians learn that they need to come up with at least somewhat believable lies if they want to demoralize the West? Sure, claiming to have killed 4 NATO generals and Boris Johnson on Snake Island may be okay for a domestic audience (they either believe literally anything or play along), but not for Western export.
>ukraine ammo already reportedly running dry
>lose a shit ton more
gg fellas
you're behind the times Black person, they didn't hit any ammo
https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1653008025123209219
we dont know what they had there....
Its a publicly known storage facility for old Soviet ICBM boosters who never got decommissioned due to lack of funds
If you maybe did alittle bit of research instead of always having shit spoon fed to you then you would know that too
cut the bullshit sir
>its publicly known
as if ukraine wouldnt store anything else there in times of war or relocate nothing
NOOOOOOOOOO
its just a hydrazine storage...
russian thinks storing valuables next to explosive hazards is something normal people think about
Not even russians would store shit next to ICBM boosters
Theres also no evidence that those boosters were ever relocated but your free to prove me wrong
Matter of the fact is that russians claimed they hit 16 s-300s at the trainyard yet the explosion didnt happen there at all
So obviously the russians are lying
https://nitter.it/AndrewPerpetua/status/1653088392760946688
Even Puccia tried to spin it as "we blew up those old rockets on purpose" after the entire internet laughed at them.
you are a worthless moron
Is this retaliation for the tiny bit of Bakhmut the Ukrainians managed to recover?
It seems every time Putin catches something on the news that his 'Inner Circle' wasn't able to properly "filter" for him he throws a hissy for and orders another round of strategically irrelevant shelling in Ukraine.
Probably for that oil depot in Sevastopol. As usual, Ukraine blows something relevant to war efforts, ruzzia goes for a big explosion of long decommissioned hardware
how do you people wake up and dont even bother to see the dates?
like for real
so vatniks are still pushing the "I can tell there are 16 S300 launchers burning due to the shape of explosions" narrative here?
Their also now claiming it was a s-300 factory
BREAKING NEWS 9 zelenskys and a WHOPPING 24 boris jhonsons hit in EPIC STRIKE BY RUSSIA
Is there yet 1 photograph of even a few s300s? I'll give vatniks some leeway; you don't even have to show me all 16. Just show me like, 5.
>Russian Sources are claiming
ah, so literally the opposite is true, then.
I'd be willing to believe that the russians blew up some of their own missiles tbh
>Russian Sources are claiming
>so far there is No Visual Evidence of this
Yawn.