Reportedly, a photo of Zircon hype-sonic missile just dropped. Could it be Patriot interceptor instead?

Reportedly, a photo of Zircon hype-sonic missile just dropped

Could it be Patriot interceptor instead?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it looks like a bunch of kevlar, but it's obviously been blown the frick out.
    Also no, Zircon doesn't exist, it's a marketing ploy to sell two-stage AShMs to the indians.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >moronic and the bait post are separated by a minute
    organic

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    another part

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Shouldn't the thing be utterly obliterated at impact if it indeed goes mach 9?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it doesn't

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It technically did about 11,000 KM/h based on when the launch was detected and when it reached Kyiv

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I doubt it goes Mach 9, but at any rate it was shot down by a Patriot so it didn't hit the ground at hypersonic speed anyways.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >it was shot down by a Patriot
          Where's the warhead?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Somewhere else. The pic looks like the ass end of the missile. It stands to reason it would have broken up after getting hit. So its likely in many little pieces.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              How do we know it's not a stage that got discarded on its flightpath?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well a boost stage would have been discarded pretty early on. Its meant to get it up to speed so the scramjet can work. It wouldn't have made it all the way to Kyiv. Second,

                https://i.imgur.com/wS1txIF.jpg

                another part

                doesn't look like a solid rocket motor to me.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is the scramjet part used including during the terminal phase, or is there another separation? I'm asking because there's so little info on this missile available.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah info is really lacking. From what I can see, it looks to be a 2 piece design. The booster and the rest of the missile. Not many pictures exist. Most pictures labeled Zircon like

                https://i.imgur.com/8l5sllJ.jpg

                nevermind there is a picture of its first stage booster

                there are also titanium alloys that have being proven at re entry speeds too

                Are actually the Boeing X-51. There is promotional material that makes it look roughly similar to one though.

                homie the whole thing is 9 meters even if we assume that the second stage is 4.5 meters that still cant bring a building down just by its debris get real here

                I don't know what point you are trying to make.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                we literally have pictures of the demolished building
                we have ukraine saying that the building belonged to the sbu
                nothing else has being reported as hit
                and yet here we are with you claiming that they got intercepted while clearly they werent

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And I'm sure you can prove that

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes you can scroll up and see kyiv post picture

                we also have you posting faked infographics

                where did you saw ME posting fake infographics?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/8l5sllJ.jpg

                nevermind there is a picture of its first stage booster

                there are also titanium alloys that have being proven at re entry speeds too

                >no it's not ME, it's that other semi-literate poccnr fanboy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it's fake because I say so OK???
                no, not ok

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and yet here i am

                https://i.imgur.com/MOlQFoU.jpg

                [...]
                they literally look alike how am i suppose to know

                saying that they look the same but you somehow forgot to mention this

                I think there needs to be a warhead/relevant crater found to conclude that this was a shot-down missile.

                dont tell this to me they are the idiot that claim that the building was in such poor condition that debris from a 4.5 meter missile somehow demolished the whole thing

                in any case
                https://www.kyivpost.com/post/30030

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Article says they were shot down. We then see pictures of never-before seen boosters/rockets clearly shot down

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                explain the leveled building

                Not according to russian milbloggers

                https://twitter.com/tweetforAnna/status/1771922035360330208

                >Not according to russian milbloggers
                >no links no nothing
                >sat picture from hours later shows the craters and no ship in danger

                gee i should believe the ukranians once more

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Read the article Vatnik. They shot the missiles down and falling debris hit buildings. SAM's aren't made of antimatter. The debris has to fall somewhere. If its over the city its going to hit the city.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                homie you do realise that you are actually claiming that falling debris from a 4.5 meter missile somehow LEVELED a building

                am i correct on what you are claiming?
                you can SEE ON THIS VIDEO
                https://t.me/vitaliy_klitschko
                that parts of the structure Columns ARE reinforced
                so explain to me again how falling debris managed this
                and i wont even mention the building code here

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >am i correct on what you are claiming?
                No sars please dont redeem. One of these days you morons will learn how to speak english.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you must be american i can smell the basic vocabulary from the moon

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yup, guilty as charged. I'm a white American. Keep seething.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Cope more homosexual, there's 3 separate sources that 3 ships were hit:

                > https://twitter.com/RifatGalip/status/1771669319916675443/video/1 video of 2 russians literally talking about the ship in front of them having it's rudder fricked and the whole thing having caught fire

                > https://twitter.com/tweetforAnna/status/1771922035360330208 Russian blogger thirteen crying in an audio message that ships were sunk

                > A russian media outlet also confirmed it. "The 312-foot-long Ivan Khurs reconnaissance ship was ‘hit by two missiles at once’ in the annexed naval port Sevastopol and heavily damaged, according to Russian media outlet ASTRA."

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In all the past hits on ships we got next-day sat pictures from pro-ua OSINT guys clearly showing holes in the ships / them being partially submerged.

                Why is there no such thing for this instance?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you some type of moron or something? The satellite photo shows scorch marks on the pier, the other ship is clearly listing, and multiple Russian media reports have confirmed the Ukrainian claims of a hit. Also there's other satellites showing damage.

                [...]

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dude please stop not a single missile hit the ships nothing is listing the landing ship was inside the smallest drydock and we know this because the drydock lifted all the sand around it
                jesus fricking christ give a rest already

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://twitter.com/Aviation_Intel/status/1771971180460912930

                please tell us where the frick any ship is listing here

                unless you think that the shadow of the ship is somehow making it list

                We aren't even sure if the satellite images themselves are showing the Yamal, which is the claimed to be hit. Also where is the Ivan Khurs in this image?
                >There are some unconfirmed suggestions that the image above shows the Azov being moved into dry dock, while the other vessel is another Ropucha class landing ship, the Konstantin Olshansky. That leaves the status of the Yamal unclear.
                https://www.twz.com/news-features/ukraine-situation-report-claims-swirl-around-strikes-on-landing-ships-in-crimea

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lol so the image that ziggers are passing off as proof of the ships not getting hit is from a completely different part of the port, and likely shows at least one ship that's not even the one of the two Ukraine claims to have hit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://twitter.com/Aviation_Intel/status/1771971180460912930

                please tell us where the frick any ship is listing here

                unless you think that the shadow of the ship is somehow making it list

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The Kyiv post article doesn't say that the sbu building was hit. The picture shows an apartment that was damaged

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Typical Zigger BDA:
                >There's a hole somewhere in Ukraine so the strike must have hit the target
                But we know they're fans of the idea that "any hole's a goal"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Russian munition CEP

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Typical Zigger BDA:
                >There's a hole somewhere in Ukraine so the strike must have hit the target
                But we know they're fans of the idea that "any hole's a goal"

                as i said here

                [...]

                he literally made his location visible by mistake

                >one ship visibly listing to starboard being moved to a drydock
                >other has a huge crater in the dock next to it that a bunker-buster probably penetrated through on its way to strike the hull

                which ship is listing anon?
                >ship has a huge hole 5 meters from it therefore its sinking and in bad shape

                are we going to disregard that the drydock has a HUGE crater and missed the ship or not?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >ship has a huge hole 5 meters from it
                Storm Shadow's warhead is literally designed to penetrate more than 5 meters of reinforced concrete never mind a flimsy floating jetty
                Pic related is how these jetties are constructed. It's a hollow steel structure

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no thats taurus with its 2 stage warhead

                in any case you can see that the crater is huge and spherical so the damage to the ship isnt significant since the pier absorbed all of the energy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                storm shadow uses the BROACH warhead, which is also two stage, the main benefit with taurus is the fusing options and a few other things

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >no thats taurus with its 2 stage warhead
                Congratulations, you've outed yourself as not knowing what the frick you're talking about
                We all suspected that was the case, but thanks for confirming it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                we also have you posting faked infographics

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think there needs to be a warhead/relevant crater found to conclude that this was a shot-down missile.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Right now the official word is one was shot down, and another hit a different building but the SBU was targeted. Nothing I said is inconsistent with that.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              homie the whole thing is 9 meters even if we assume that the second stage is 4.5 meters that still cant bring a building down just by its debris get real here

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It flyes at ~M 4.5 according to ukies radars. An intercepted missile loses most of its energy in a few hundred meters.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if it indeed goes mach 9?

        it's probably well under mach 5 by the time it reaches terminal

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > Assembled with flat head screws.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >flatheads

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Zircon hype-sonic missile
    Doubt, carbon fiber resin isn't going to play nice with 1,000c+ temperatures.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    this:

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous


      why do i feel nothing when i see this

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Either you have been desensitized by exposure or you think they want to be there thus deserve it.
        I still feel bad for mobiks because they chose none of this.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know, man. Believing in the innocence of Man only goes so far. If these people don't start looking around them and acting beyond petty self interest or aloofness, they're going to start getting treated like animals, because what's the difference? It's not like the outcomes of following the rules and playing hero differ, either.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The same could be said about us several times in the last 50 years.
            >invaded Vietnam
            >invaded Grenada
            >invaded Panama
            >invaded Iraq
            >invaded Afghanistan
            >invaded Iraq
            If invading places is only bad when you take heavy casualties then invading isn't morally wrong.
            If everywhere we invade has is coming and everywhere Russia invades doesn't you have brought into propaganda.
            If we aren't having a civil war to stop our government invading places you can't expect others to.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >we
              who you trying to fool with this "wot about usa" bullshit?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                lmao there it is
                >WHUDDABOUT

                I get your gut reaction is "it's different when we do it" but it isn't. We invade places to replace governments with ones that are willing to meet our demands and Russia does the same.
                >but we don't annex them
                It doesn't make a functional difference to the outcome and makes for better optics with people like you that would rather not think about it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >We

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >we

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Black person, when usa annexed an occupied territory of a sovereign nation?
                when usa tried to eradicate a whole nation?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ignore it, it's using whatboutism to validate its own barbarism. Next he'll start talking about how native Hawaiians or the Cherokee are proof America is just as evil and twisted.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i oppose both. what's your point?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are one of the good ones anon, I have no problem with you.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Vietnam and Iraq 2 had massive sustained protests that DID ultimately result in a change of government. Now, Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama did not exactly live up to expectations. But Americans did change their government in response to those issues, and foreign intervention remains a controversial topic

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't expect non Americans to understand American talking points. Funny how he conveniently ignored your post.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lmao I think you got your presidents mixed up there with Jimmy Carter, my American friend.

                https://i.imgur.com/3Nfh0s7.png

                this is relevant in every single thread

                You could make it a Canadian and a Brit, Irishman or Australian and it would also be perfect.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Canadian
                already on the left?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They're both Canadian. Really would explain the leaf seethe over America tbh.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Black person you do get why no one b***hed when the first chechen war happened?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I guess ppl that time considered its an internal incident.
                On top of that during that time Economy for many countries were picking up those that left the USSR becomes hot targets for western powers, China just opened its doors and the huge vaccum in power influence left after USSR desolved.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >missing the point this hard
                it's maybe the only war russia has fought during its entire existence as a sociopolitical institution that has been morally defensible.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              lmao there it is
              >WHUDDABOUT

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >invaded Vietnam
              Uh. We were invited to South Vietnam. SEATO.
              Might as well add ROK, Saudi Arabia, Australia, and pretty much every other US base we use as part of foreign security arrangements too if you are gonna count that one.
              Now Laos otoh...

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The option to decline the obviously strategically indefensible Viet Nam war existed. Read about Matt Ridgway and why Ike didn't take the bait.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >us

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              this is relevant in every single thread

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >If everywhere we invade has is coming and everywhere Russia invades doesn't you have brought into propaganda.

              very organic poster here, totally not stuck in some shithole in india being paid to troll

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >everywhere we invade
              don't recal when Pussia invaded Grenada, Panama, Iraq

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The US didn't invade jack shit in Vietnam you worthless fricking /leftypol/ frick. It was the wonderful liberators who invaded South Vietnam and then went ahead and imposed concentration camps and purges around the country.

              Also learn to type english before posting here you swarthy frick

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > WHATTABOUT MUH STRAWMEN??!
              > WHATTABOUT MUH FALSE EQUIVALENCIES ???!!!
              Go. Frick. Yourself.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No we wanted to annex all those countries. Luckily they stopped us. It is not a false equivalency.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > "annex"
                (You) don't know what this word means. Stop using it, and go repeat your ESL certification.

                Also,
                > Panama
                (You) fricking moron. Panama was a U.S. territory for 99 years, and then the U.S. helped them become fully independent and sovereign under treaty obligations ... after constructing the Panama Canal and giving it as a gift to Panama.

                (You) *REALLY* are one stupid poostain.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Panama was never US territory. We leased the Canal Zone.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              At least three of those had culture-defining protest movements and the others were quick slam dunks

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I still feel bad for mobiks because they chose none of this.
          A-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha, no. Most are there voluntarily in one way or another. No, saying "waaah, they said they'd beat me up if I didn't go" is not an excuse.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I still feel bad for mobiks because they chose none of this.
          They, and the rest of the Russian populace, didn't choose to change their system and their rulers. I have no sympathy for them.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Coerced action remains a choice. Even the Soviet Union Putin adores had dissidents who chose Gulag over bending the knee. Armed men in particular have choices.

          A Muslim would fight. A Muslim would do Green on Blue and resist unto death. Russians just submit.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I feel bad for the better mobiks that are truly conscripted into being there. The ones who are 40 to 50 years old and are mobilized because they were conscripts decades ago when they were 18 and could easily just frick off to some dump deeper into Russia to dodge it I don't care about.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They are LITERALLY invading the sovereign, foreign soil of another country and using military weapons to murder the people who live there.

          Yeah, they deserve it. Most of them don't suffer enough, but so long as they end up dead that is at least a small consolation.

          T Z D
          Z
          D

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They could have longsince stages a mutiny, yet they have done frick all. Turns out mighty Puccians are all just a bunch of submissive pussies. Sheep willingly going to the slaughter house.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because they're russian. No one cares about russians dying, not their government, not even their fellow countrymen, or their supporters. Hell, not even their families do. They are worthless cattle, bred to be sent on meatwaves for their dictator, as it's always been the case. Russian lives do not matter.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >That fricking "sassy nigress" dance
          We can only hope she was among those slain by ISIS.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Speaking of, does anyone know the gender ratio of the victims of the Crocus attack? How many vatBlack person incubators got misogyny'd to death?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >>That fricking "sassy nigress" dance
            >We can only hope she was among those slain by ISIS.
            That's he FSB branch of ISIS is it? The KGBISIS run by mullah putin?
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deaths_related_to_the_1999_Russian_apartment_bombings

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't care who kills her but SOMEONE has to do it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                She will loose he daughters as well as her sons before she dies alone.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I would disown my mother if she started posting shit like this

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I feel groovy, i love prodigy

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          had this on when i opened the link

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        same with me, 2 years of dead Russians.

        I used to be a Khorne berserker, Blood for the Blood God!
        Now, I'm dead inside

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Growing up is accepting that Malal is the best choice out of all of them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        this:

        this shit has successfully demoralized me out of reenlisting. modern war is the total humiliation of man, where a $150 unfeeling machine dissects you on camera live for others enjoyment. while you crawl and struggle and scrabble around in the dirt with your guts falling out. all of these people had people that loved them and loved others and now this. its disgusting.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Just don't be infantry and you can enjoy the mecha stand battle future

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Those drones cost thousands of dollars each, and that's before you include the munitions, ewar and custom software
          Yeah that's still cheap, but let's not get ahead of ourselves and pretend they are cheaper that artillery shells or anything like that

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Those drones cost thousands of dollars each
            They are Black person-rigged alibaba drones with a HEAT or an experimental HE warhead, most likely recycled from EoD stashes.
            The thousand dollar drones are the ones flying and recording your death and struggle for survival in 4K and even then, they don't last for long (Estimated 4-10 missions before they are lost).
            >pretend they are cheaper that artillery shells
            They unironically are. They have less risk, more precision and more uses than a shell fired from a stationary or S&S artillery piece. You use the shells to stop an attack, you use the drones to clean up the poor souls that would've lived to write a book.

            Modern warfare sucks. Can't tell if I should be blaming the U.S or the muzzies for this fricking fiasco.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >They are Black person-rigged alibaba drones with a HEAT or an experimental HE warhead, most likely recycled from EoD stashes.
              Yeah, and they cost thousands of dollars each
              A single Shahed is 200k american for fricks sake and its literally just a lawnmower engine, a 3d printed copy of a drone body from 1970s Germany, and a raspberry pi

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >200k
                No that’s what the per-unit cost was of one order from Iran. The mass-produced ones made in Russia are going to be much less.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The mass-produced ones made in Russia are going to be much less
                Year ago I was told that Iranian Shaheds cost $10k. Now I'm told, while Iranian Shaheds cost $200k, Russian Shaheds will cost $10k

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Yeah, and they cost thousands of dollars each
                The FPV drones are not that expensive anon, why the frick do you think they're mass produced?
                They cost 5k at most and that's for the top tier stuff.
                Seriously, what fricking type of tech do you think they have? They are mostly home-made shit, with a b***hass OS and a wire that detonates the warhead.
                You really have to be mentally ill to not comprehend just how cheap these things are.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Modern warfare sucks
              I'm absolutely sick of drama prostitute Black person homosexuals like you. No, dying in chlorine gas is not better than FPV drones, starving to death is not better than FPV drones, dying from cholera is not better than FPV drones, dying from arrows is not better than FPV drones

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah but it was kino for a moment between the dirty old days and modernity

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >dying in chlorine gas is not better
                Hasn't been used in eons and you can at least do something to survive such an attack.
                >starving to death is not better
                You are fricking moronic. Passing out from exhaustion and succumbing to the elements is a fricking great way to go compared to getting your head caved in by a drone and slowly bleeding to death while your eyes bulge out of your skull.
                >dying from cholera is not
                >Cholera being an issue
                We are not in 1910s trench conditions anon and even then you often got swapped or died in a charge before you even knew you had cholera.
                >dying from arrows
                Honestly, I'd rather die from being pelted by arrows than this bullshit. At least you HAD (medieval times) a chance of surviving said attack.

                You are a moronic fricking Black person and I hope you get castrated by a fricking home-made drone.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thousands instead of hundreds doesnt exactly make me feel better about the prospect of getting eviscerated by one

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You're 10x less likely to be eviscerated by one.
              Unless you're a particularly juicy target that skews the statistics.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >amble about aimlessly
        >lie down
        >die
        russians do not show even the faintest spark of human consciousness, or hell - even basic animal self preservation instincts. they wander around, they stare dumbly at the drones above them, they literally shrug at the grenades that land on their bodies, and then they die.
        they need to be dispassionately and systematically eradicated like you would a wienerroach infestation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      actual nightmare fuel. i cannot imagine the political or social uproar if at any point in the 30+ years of desert wars a NATO and NATO allied group of soldiers were slaughtered this way on a daily basis.

      wild that russians don't care.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >wild that russians don't care
        They haven't ever cared how many of their countrymen die.
        It's what they do.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >wild that russians don't care.
        You're looking at a country that has had a secret police for 500 years that tortures and kills you for caring
        I don't like everything the US does and the attitudes they export but still worlds better than fricking Russia

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Russia leads the decadent West in self-cremating dead soldier technology

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the flinch right before impact

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      damn that's a sick ass Firestarter remix

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >That one at the end where the man burns to death from the inside out.

      Frick, well that's a new one.
      Is it just me, or have they started to focus on munitions that just outright kill the Russians now instead of just wounding them with shrapnel?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >outright kill the Russians now instead of just wounding them with shrapnel?
        To be fair, wounding a mobik with shrapnel is almost a death sentence

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      0.29

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    zircon
    well basicly all the high hypersonic missiles are flat (high=above mach 5)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Mach 5 is generally considered the lower limit of hypersonic not high hypersonic.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i said above for a reason tho
        i could argue that it might be its booster but we havent seen apicture of its booster yet

        but its scary really to think that zircon actually works
        so they can launch it from the other side of the black sea to achieve its maximum speed of mach 9 and still they wouldnt be able to do shit about it
        the total failure of arrw programme shows that usa must catch up quickly to the russians

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I doubt it's zircon and if it is it's not capable of hypersonic cruise.
          500 F is considered high temperature resin and the carbon fibers themselves will oxidise at about 1,600 F.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well russia doesnt have anything that could reach kiev from crimea in mere minutes
            you could say kinzhal or whatever its name is but its not really a true hypersonic its basicly supersonic at its final stage

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >in mere minutes
              Are you just assuming that timeline or has Ukraine released radar track data?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                osint defender confirmed it nobody he asked were able to confirm that the sirens were in use when the missiles striked

                so yes it was to say the least below 7 minutes(thats my calculation that i assume a mach 5 from the furthest point of crimea to kiev)

                it was an opportunistic target

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Or maybe their radar just never saw it or the chain of command was slow in getting the sirens on this time.
                I don't think "it's a hypersonic made of materials that can't handle hypersonic termps" is the Occam's razor here.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >made of materials that can't handle hypersonic termps" is the Occam's razor here.
                what?

                what kind of materials you think they made them lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Inconel X, the thing that has been proven at hypersonic temps.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nevermind there is a picture of its first stage booster

                there are also titanium alloys that have being proven at re entry speeds too

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nice boeing waverider render you got there

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                also the top right is literally on the air force website kek
                https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104467/x-51a-waverider/

                they literally look alike how am i suppose to know

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They look nothing alike are you fricking blind?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                do a 180 on the pic and call me back

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/RHrafB0.jpg

                nice boeing waverider render you got there

                also the top right is literally on the air force website kek
                https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104467/x-51a-waverider/

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they even managed to attach it to a B52.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/syJBN3z.jpg

                osint defender confirmed it nobody he asked were able to confirm that the sirens were in use when the missiles striked

                so yes it was to say the least below 7 minutes(thats my calculation that i assume a mach 5 from the furthest point of crimea to kiev)

                it was an opportunistic target

                >it's a "anon learns that Patriots can be set to automatically engage any target fitting a criteria" episode
                the fricking sirens are different holy shit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >osint defender

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I live in Kyiv, the sirens were turned on ~10 seconds before the first intercept

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i mean your buildings are pretty decent interceptors i must say

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You know that the missiles fell onto Boychuk art academy and someone's backyard, right? Either they were intercepted, or ru missiles literally can't hit the broad side of a megapolis

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the missiles fell onto Boychuk art academy and someone's backyard
                uhmmm, piggies? lawn status?*~~*~~*~~

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                in the ass

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >ass status?
                Grass.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I noticed lately that the narrative shifted from "Russians are indiscriminately bombing civilian targets" to "our AA is successfully intercepting missiles and the damage to civilians is caused by falling debris". I wonder why that is. maybe because the Russians were already established as monsters and now the authorities want the citizens feel secure and that the government is capable of protecting them from barbaric Russian attacks

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                because they DO bomb civillian targets. But at the same time missiles DO get intercepted. You just don't know how a proper impact looks like

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >narrative shifted
                Nah, you're just a homosexual. Both points are valid.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you don't use accurate munitions to bomb indiscriminately
                both statements can coexist

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                3 minutes since launch to Kyiv

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I wonder who's behind this attack. let's not jump to conclusions

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if I had a dollar for every time kiev was "successfully" struck by hypersonic missiles, I'd be richer than the average oligarch

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Ukraine did not confirm the Russia ships are sunk, see, Ukraine failed as you were told!

    Russian losses last 24 hours and totals,personnel is Russians killed and does not include wounded
    25.03.2024
    Tanks — 6887 (+11)
    Armored fighting vehicle — 13183 (+25)
    Artillery systems — 10877 (+22)
    MLRS — 1018
    Anti-aircraft warfare — 726 (+3)
    Planes — 347
    Helicopters — 325
    UAV — 8539 (+29)
    Cruise missiles — 2010 (+18)
    Ships (boats) — 26
    Submarines — 1
    Trucks and fuel Tankers — 14454 (+47)
    Special equipment — 1785 (+7)
    Military personnel — aprx. 437390 people (+640)

    Also so what if this is Russian missile? Who cares, accident, if Russia wanted Warsaw they would just take it, simply.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      considering all the evidence, i think we can say - in all honesty and despite all objections - that the ass is indeed located in the ass

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ships are sunk
      Well, one of the ships is currently slowly capsizing while russians are trying to pump out water from it waster than it gets there. Another one is trying to get towed to a drydock. Both ships as fricked beyond repair.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But the Ukraine did not say it was sunk as it is demonstrated

        considering all the evidence, i think we can say - in all honesty and despite all objections - that the ass is indeed located in the ass

        >

        considering all the evidence, i think we can say - in all honesty and despite all objections - that the ass is indeed located in the ass


        >that the ass is indeed located in the ass
        That is obvious! But the ship is fine and on its way into port as was shown.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thx for the update

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        none of the missiles hit their targets quite literally

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not according to russian milbloggers

          https://twitter.com/tweetforAnna/status/1771922035360330208

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Vladlen Tatarsky
            That homie died like two years ago.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/kDRDBKB.jpg

              That guy's been dead for almost a year.

              someone else took over his channel soon after he died i'm pretty sure

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                By the way, have we seen WarGonzo lately?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The ass is not more in the ass

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That guy's been dead for almost a year.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >one ship visibly listing to starboard being moved to a drydock
          >other has a huge crater in the dock next to it that a bunker-buster probably penetrated through on its way to strike the hull

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if Russia wanted Warsaw they would just seethe impotently, like me
      FTFY

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > "The Ukraine"

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Daily reminder that no footage or evidence other than Russian state media exists of any Russian missile traveling at hypersanic speeds

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kinzhal is hypersonic as was the V-2, Russia uses the fact their missiles break mach 5 to pretend they have anything like the manuvering hypersonic cruise missiles the west and china are developing.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Kinzhal is hypersonic
        The last Kinzhal intercept by Ukraine was calculated to be at 3.5 Mach, or, somewhat faster than the jet it was launched from. Not hypersanic.
        >no footage or evidence other than Russian state media exists of any Russian missile traveling at hypersanic speeds

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >3.5 Mach
          That's 'near' its target (impact velocity is even lower), the iskander is similar. Speed just after its engine burn out is hypersonic but russia is lying by using the most favorable info + an extra.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >by Ukraine was calculated to be at 3.5 Mach
          Hits caught on camera look way faster than that, shit glows red hot, idk how fast you have to go to heat up like that but it ain't 3.5 mach.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lol isn't Zircon the "unstoppable" hypersonic missile India was buying the designs off Russia to make their own?
    I wonder if Pakistan's Chinese AD is as good as Patriot

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All I know is that I heard the sirens a few seconds after the first detonation. All detonations by the sound of it were at an altitude, which is pretty much confirmed by the local media. Falling debree, business as usual. I didn't even look away from my eggs and bacon brekkie 😉

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    sorry jeet, I don't speak moron. Please rewrite your post if you want an answer

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nah we both know you understood quite well you just cant gaslight anymore since your own fricking goverment contradicts itself

      your own fricking soldier pulled a reddit squad 2.0

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you understood
        nope. fr, your post is hard to read

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can anyone tell my why every time I see a vatnik claim that they hit ukranian military officers or some NATO-filled building, I only see footage of some residential building collapsed, and rescue workers pulling babuskas from the rubble?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      VatBlack folk lie as naturally as they breathe.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Probably because russia has not hit any military targets ever, and if they did, it was through sheer luck and/or incompetence from the ukranian AA side

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They want to terror-bomb the civilian population but they don't want the optics of openly doing so, instead just flagrantly lying about aiming at strategic targets in civilian centres.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Poojit shills are fuming about this because their government spent BILLIONS buying this hypersonic tech from Russia

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Love to see the scammers getting a taste of their own feces for once.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i bet all these "hypersonic" missiles just cruise in-atmosphere at blackbird speeds. zircon's advertised capabilities are most unbelievable of all.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sirs, how many decades does this put back the plans for Superpower status?
    China has such a massive technological advantage in Asia it's unreal

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So the ships really did get a royal asspounding with cheese if I read the incessant shilling about a "leveled" building right.

    How many Boris Johnsons died this time?

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Zircon being fake

    No one is saying its fake just that Russia has grossly exaggerated its capabilities like they normally do. I wouldn't be shocked if its only hypersonic after launch and below mach 5 during the termional phase. They did the same shit with the Kinzhal. Turns out its terminal phase is under mach 4.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I wouldn't be shocked if its only hypersonic after launch and below mach 5 during the termional phase.
      Guess someone will be able to calculate real speed based on today's launches. They were launched from Crimea and hit Kyiv seconds after the air alert was announced due to a "ballistic target in the direction of Mykolaiv"

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukrainian military journalist says it's real

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A real threat is something that can cause a good damage/cost ratio.

      People don't seem to understand that in ww2 the V1 & V2 attacks on London damage was exagerated because it was so shit relative to strategic bombing and it helped by redirecting german funds to a rocket and not to a heavy bomber in the late war.

      The fact that both nato and vatnik side fricked up the idea of strategic bombing by not investing in research in modern ways to do it is a miracle for the planet.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >both nato and vatnik side fricked up the idea of strategic bombing by not investing in research in modern ways to do it
        ww2 and vietnam showed that strategic bombing does frick all. the "modern" method would be spamming cruise missiles or tossing a nuke; you'll never see B-52s or Tu-95s doing massed carpet bombings

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is the concept of a variable fuse such an outlandish concept to you Black folk that you can't imagine that a weapon system can simultaneously be able to explode a specific distance in front of the intended target as well as 5m inside reinforced concrete?

    Let me guess, the high price point of these systems has nothing to do with their capabilities and is all about scamming teh guberment for shareholder profit?

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    3M22

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Zircon
    Can someone remind me what type of magical puccian wunderwaffle is that? They have so many of them I lost count.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IIRC it's their AShM """hypersonic""".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cut down Kinzhal as a booster, with a scramjet airframe strapped on the front carrying the warhead

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its a true hypersonic
      aka its hypersonic till the terminal phase
      not like iskander that is hypersonic till its apogee and goes to supersonic during impact

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's the one they never show pictures of.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >PATRIOT shot down a hypersonic
    uhhh. MAD bros???????

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    thank god they censored jamal's busted-ass fence and gravel roadway, otherwise this very special defense information would be compromised

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russians are firing everything they have Ukrainians. They had around 800-900 missiles a week ago. They are burning through everything. Maybe 100-200 left.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why can't the US make one?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We made one 15 years ago. And unlike this cope zircon shit it actually worked. We didn't actually need a hypersonic missile at the time so the program ended there.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this looks like a tree wrapped in a rug from a meth house

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine says they’re going to make a MILLION drones this year. If they do hit that number and they can’t turn the war around then we’ll have pretty conclusive proof that drones aren’t the new kings of war. The huge majority of drones don’t kill anything, we just get the highlight reels. No one outside of Ukrainian high command knows the actual ratio but get ready to accept that less than 10% of drones are effective at doing something and 90% fail for some reason — shot down, malfunctions, jammed, operator errors, and simply running out of juice before doing anything. Instead of buying a million shells they’re buying millions of drone components so maybe they’re in fact more useful than artillery but it’s hard to judge what’s going on with such tight information lockdowns. I’m definitely going to read the books which are sure to be written about this war and hopefully a real military historian will uncover all this stuff in the future.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      most likely they will not reach production targets
      always how it goes everywhere

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If they do hit that number and they can’t turn the war around then we’ll have pretty conclusive proof that drones aren’t the new kings of war.
      Motherfricker, they are one of the most effective tools and weapons a soldier can have on the modern battlefield. A group of 3 guys can take out a tank out of commission from 5km away, behind a hill, sipping on a cup of tea, while doing recon at the same time.
      It's fricked. You are fricked. We are all fricked.
      >The huge majority of drones don’t kill anything
      This is fricking cope and you know it.
      >shot down
      Unlikely, they either fly or never take off. They've been constantly doing basic b***h EW for like a year now.
      >malfunctions
      Good thing they are not expensive and you have a shit ton of them at your disposal.
      >operator errors
      Very minimal when all you have to do is land near your target or scout them from above.
      >simply running out of juice before doing anything
      Also unlikely, most drones are reported to have an hour to two hours of flight before they are gone for good.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The one coping is YOU. Last year RUSI put out a study in which they said Ukraine was LOSING approx. 10,000 drones MONTHLY. Read: https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/meatgrinder-russian-tactics-second-year-its-invasion-ukraine
        You have a skewed view of reality, you think the highlight reels posted in /k/ is an accurate description of reality. The REALITY is that Russian EW — which isn’t even that sophisticated, just relatively plentiful — is stopping that many drones. READ: one major EW system per 10km of front is responsible for stopping 10,000 drones every month. It’s just not reality to you because you DON’T see the hundreds of videos which are just the camera fuzzing out and going blank. That’s the reality of these shitty alibaba specials. I don’t know if the ratio is still that bad since they’ve had a year now to deal with the EW, but the FACT IS that drone production in Ukraine is going WAY WAY up, but kill feeds aren’t anything remotely like the numbers of drones being produced, are they? Just use common sense stop being a willfully ignorant sucker.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The wars of the future with be fought with AI controlled drone swarms. EW will be required for advancement. AI drone swarms WILL be used to control civilians.

      You know that meme that an airplane or tank can enforce law if the government wanted to take over? Drones can.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Drones are a scouting unit, a harassment tool, and a way to pick off isolated units after a break in an offensive. Drones are basically the unmanned modern version of light calvary

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like US gear they love woven carbon fiber, kevlar and aramid and it also looks too expensive for ruskies. Stuff also doesn't look fast, epoxy resin would just burn up.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *