Oi dey mighta got anudda

How does this keep happening to us

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what are those red circles for?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's so we can see it clearly

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ones for sneedin ones for feedin

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They're identifying features of AWACS airframes.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >identifying features of AWACS airframes
        The radar dome and the wienerpit?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Training wheels. They are running out of air crews.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      To show the docked UFO and the jousting lance

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Counter to the red arrows on the map.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Possible Sadam Hussain locations.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The video was made by Hamas.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      zones where the ukrainians MIGHT touched the plane inappropriately

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's from a top 5 Youtube video thumbnail.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The almighty Algorithm demands red circles for maximum exposure, which means people watch videos with red circle thumbnails, which teaches the Algorithm to reward even more red circle thumbnails

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just replace algorithm with audience and you are on the money

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Aliums.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They were lovingly added in mspaint for the sole purpose that you could ask about it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Optical illusion. They're just two hula hoops on the plane.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Zoomers get confused if there's no circles and arrows

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      they help reduce drag and improve lift.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's fifth in total, right? Two destroyed on the ground by locals and three shot down?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How many do they have?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Like 8 in total, but they have a frick ton of il-76s. But I doubt most of them are serviceable.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >a frick ton of il 76
          They need Wectern electronics to make those into A-50s

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Big if true, russia probably can't maintain a 24 hour front coverage anymore with these losses. Hopefully the pre-F-16 handoff shaping operations will be done soon so we get to see fighter kino

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's two confirmed, one potentially admitted by Russian MOD and a further one claimed.

      The big news is drone bombardment of Beriev Aircraft Plant which not only conducted repairs (the one admitted + one claimed) but is also for refurbishment and modernisation. Russia can't really build new A-50s but it does have spares it can reactivate - which it will need to do as it's now expected that Russia doesn't have 24-hour coverage.
      https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/03/09/first-ukraine-shoots-down-two-of-russias-a-50-radar-planes-then-russia-prepares-a-replacement-a-50-so-ukraine-targets-the-replacement-at-its-factory/

      >Ukraine
      >yeah we're totally hitting these with 50 year old SAM's and totally not AMRAMS from F35's
      Yep. Totally.

      The A-50 is an old aircraft that's noisy as frick. Yeah you absolute can shoot it down with stuff made in the disco-era.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't Prigozhin also shoot one down or was that a different kind of EW plane?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Think that was an IL-22 command post wasnt it? Cant remember.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I think you’re right iirc, not an A-50.

      • 1 month ago
        Caius

        yes

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      An EW helicopter got Patriot'd when they first started to use it as an offensive weapon a while back. Maybe you're thinking of that one?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A crime! A crime occurring during a war!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Like a warcrime or somesuch? Should the warcops be called?

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What sources do you have?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not getting my hopes up until I see the evidence. I have trouble believing the Russians were stupid enough to leave yet another of these things vulnerable, they have so few left.

      This. OP is not giving any sources. Not even a link to the original article.
      This smells like a slide/bait thread.
      Disregard until at least ONE piece of evidence is produced.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Shut the frick up you fricking moron, first of all it's speculative second of all the l*nk is in the picture as is the name of the channel you fricking russoid dunce. Holy shit you people are fricking moronic

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The link is cut off in the title.
          And I'm not Russian.
          And you are a moron for jumping on bandwagon without a source.
          You need to relax more, friendo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ok since you're slow I'll help you out
            Type "reporting from Ukraine" into YouTube. Click community tab, click the link. Problem solved my "not vatnik" friend

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Why don't you post it here. I'm not your butler.
              And I don't go on youtube.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well I'm not yours either b***h and if you're too lazy to type 3 words into google that's a you problem. The conclusion is not confirmed, but there is evidence and you're just too lazy to make a simple Google search

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hmmm. Looking kinda sus to me.
                I'll wait for some evidence thanks.
                In other news, if you're into rumors and conjecture, a Russian command and control ship has been hit.
                I'd post source, but you don't need that. YoU'vE gOt YoUtUbE...

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Russian command and control ship
                Holy shit it's real! General Teplinsky is dead!

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >"NO! YOU NEED TO GO VERIFY WHAT I AM TELLING YOU AND PROVIDE THE PROOF OF MY ARGUMENT FOR YOURSELF, AND IF YOU ASK ME FOR A SOURCE I WILL ACT LIKE A PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE LITTLE homosexual
              lol. pussy.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm ringing the bell go get it for yourself.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                yeah? and is ringing that bell making you feel hungry, dog?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >dog
                POST LINK SARR!!!1

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >i dont understand that when i claim something - it is usually expected of me to provide my own proof as a basis for my claims
                >i literally have the attitude of a fricking moronic dipshit reddit atheist

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                dude, we're not here to spoonfeed you. educate yourself, use google, etc.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                keep replying moron lmao. im right.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That wasn't me you fricking idiot kek people are just pointing out how moronic you're being. And in the time you've been crying 'no link" your paki ass could have read the article 100 times by now, or at least once given the fact you're most likely barely literate

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What part of 'awaiting confirmation' didn't make it through the google translator?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukraine
    >yeah we're totally hitting these with 50 year old SAM's and totally not AMRAMS from F35's
    Yep. Totally.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Please let this be true because it would be so funny if F35s are just flying around out there picking stuff off

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I thought Russian S400 was an anti stealth radar? Why are they just letting F35s fly around with impunity? How many A-50s must be lost before the mighty bear awakens?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I thought Russian S400 was an anti stealth radar?
        Do you think the russians actually thought this or just were trying to hype their shit?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Would Russians lie?
          Are you really asking this question?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I believe the Russians who aren't engineers are fully capable of falling for their own propaganda.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wtf is anti-stealth radar
        radar waves are radar waves
        at some point the radar section of an object is similar to that of a bird or even smaller, it doesnt matter how good your radar is or how much anti-stealth computation you do

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Radar waves are radar waves
          Don't be a dumb Black person and learn how to use google & maybe you'll figure out how stealth is optimized to certain radar bands and can be tracked (poorly) by bands outside of that spectrum.

          How do you think Serbs hit an F-117 with a missile from the 1950s?

          Stupid homosexual

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >How do you think Serbs hit an F-117 with a missile from the 1950s?
            theres a whole story how they did it and the guy who managed to do it was an absolute madlad
            it is incredibly unlikely this could be repeated on a larger scale or with any regularity
            in this case the radar was basically below the airplane to be targeted... and yes, then you can pretty much shoot a sparrow

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >How do you think Serbs hit an F-117 with a missile from the 1950s?
              by being lucky to have the radar on when the nighthawk had the bomb bays open, which was the one flaw that ruined its stealth signature.

              >Finally, on the third try an S-125M battery locked onto Something Wicked when it was just eight miles away. Dani claims the window of opportunity came when the F-117 opened its bomb-bay doors to release weapons, causing its radar cross-section to briefly bloom.

              https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/stealth-down-how-serbian-forces-shot-down-american-f-117-1999-173664

              >F-117s fly predictable path every night
              >Shitty old LF Soviet radar can occasionally get blips off of stealth fighter
              >Not enough to actively track, but enough to know roughly where one is
              >Fire missiles into vague space where stealth fighter is, get lucky and have proximity fuse get close enough to detonate and shred one
              Clear enough for you morons?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The funniest thing is that F-117 missions continued after that shootdown, and that particular plane was destroyed when the US "accidentally" annihilated the Chinese embassy. They didn't even get the pilot.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The pilot was picked up by PJs before daybreak

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The pilot was picked up by PJs before daybreak

                my favourite detail about the F-117 was that the pilot when he took cover in a irrigation ditch to hide from the serbs he could feel the ground shaking a like a series of mini earthquakes.

                It was being Belgrade being hit by full loads of 2000lb bombs from multiple B-2 Spirits (each one can carry 16x 2000lb bombs or 16 cruise missiles). Puts the shootdown into perspective.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >How do you think Serbs hit an F-117 with a missile from the 1950s?
            by being lucky to have the radar on when the nighthawk had the bomb bays open, which was the one flaw that ruined its stealth signature.

            >Finally, on the third try an S-125M battery locked onto Something Wicked when it was just eight miles away. Dani claims the window of opportunity came when the F-117 opened its bomb-bay doors to release weapons, causing its radar cross-section to briefly bloom.

            https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/stealth-down-how-serbian-forces-shot-down-american-f-117-1999-173664

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >How do you think Serbs hit an F-117 with a missile from the 1950s?
            A F-117 flew by a SAM site that was presumed to be abandoned, and within 8 miles the SAM managed to track the F-117. By outright coincidence the F-117 managed to stay within 8 miles but beyond the 5 mile minimum engagement range during the
            Lock was dropped twice, and when third time was the charm, the first missile still lost track and missed.
            How did they hit a F-117? Stealth is based on the inverse square law. Distance being squared means radar energy loses power quickly at range. Less distance, less loss of power.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              *during the flyby

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Thanks for posting the insight of "if you get closer to something it's easier to be seen".

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well, people whack off to theories of open bomb bay doors and modified radars that used SUPERIOR ANTI STEALTH WAVELENGTHS so it turns out that "stealth doesn't work at point-fricking-blank range" is the kind of insight morons need explicitly told to them

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >How do you think Serbs hit an F-117
            By knowing when it took off, which flight path it would take and catching it with it's bomb bay open.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If they shoot down one more A-50 the mighty Russian Bear will raise it's eyebrow and the West will get it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Two, but russia only has one left

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What exactely would stop someone from hitting a slow non-evasive plane with old AA missiles?
      >EW
      Maybe, maybe not. It's not like flares or chaff is a guaranteed lifesaver either

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I would imagine not putting them in range of enemy assets does the trick generally.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Well yes, but that doesn't do much for the argument that an older AA system wouldn't be able to hit it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >and totally not AMRAMS from F35's
      Now this is an Ace Combat game I would buy

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Ace Combat
        i'm glad i got into it with 7, absolutely great game.
        they could integrate a stealth mission in a future title where you have to pick off enemy fighters without being detected by enemy radar because your country isn't officially at war or something

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      AWACS like that are just fat juicy targets which cannot function without being major emitters.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      would be especially funny if it was an F-117 pulling the Ol' red storm rising.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Tom Clancy's coffin is going to emerge from his grave lifted by his throbbing erection.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I fricking wish my dude
      It's only fair considering that the USSR was pulling the exact same shit in Korea and Vietnam

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >F35's
      Aren't the F22s the air superiority fighters?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That F-35 pilot's name? Boris Johnson

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you can hit it with an F-35, you can hit it from the ground with a similarly-capable missile.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Do something about it then Igor. Or is NATO too scary?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      S200 or even Guideline could hit that plane. Its not like it could stop them.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not getting my hopes up until I see the evidence. I have trouble believing the Russians were stupid enough to leave yet another of these things vulnerable, they have so few left.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      dubs and we will see a eternal flight message today

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Haven't they been very good with shoot down claims? I recall many that have turned out to be false. There's that much shit watching and scanning the skies out there they can probably just ask some NATO for confirmation if they aren't 100% themselves.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I don't recall many
        Is what I meant to say

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I have trouble believing the Russians were stupid enough

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They're going to have to borrow Kamov Ka-31's off the Russian navy at this rate of attrition.
    To be fair though, its not like their Navy is using them.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      what a cute helicopter

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      is

      is that piece of metal hanging off the side, completely ruining the helicopter's center of mass, a fricking directional radar

      smekalka I KNEEL

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, its not a good angle, its mounted center mass and spins as you would expect. It folds up sideways so its "facing" the fuselage longitudinally when the heli wants to land.

        >Ka-31
        wait they actually made a awacs helicopter? lmao

        For the Navy, yeah. Only originally served on the mobile smokescreen carrier they have, but now operates on their Mistrals.
        Hilariously both India and China operate far more of them.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Russia never got the Mistrals, and Egypt doesn't operate the Ka-31.

          Only the Chinese & poos seriously operate them.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Some posts say that the 2 Ka-31 the russian navy has are deployed to northern fleet, there are only a handful of ships in the northern fleet that could carry both of them at the same time, so they likely have them split up if they're deployed on an active ship at all.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Wikipedia says they have a radar ceiling of 3500m so they aren't going to be great at AWACS regardless. Maybe OK for spotting sea skimmers but certainly not any airborne control duties. Airframe is too small to have actual battle controllers. I wonder if they can even offload radar data to a ground station, or if it has to be data linked to a ship?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Wikipedia says they have a radar ceiling of 3500m so they aren't going to be great at AWACS regardless. Maybe OK for spotting sea skimmers but certainly not any airborne control duties. Airframe is too small to have actual battle controllers. I wonder if they can even offload radar data to a ground station, or if it has to be data linked to a ship?

              They're for spotting large ships, 3rd gen planes and incoming ASMs. They probably can't even see the floaty drones honestly, wave interference and all that. They're certainly not able to spot anything like an F35.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Correct. Calling them AWACS is a huge misnomer. They are not even close to filling the capability gap caused by losing an A-50

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why not just standard circular radar disc on top to act as props and radar? It would look better and save money.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            that radar disc is very expensive and the rotating radar carries high centrifugal force which small airframes can't handle

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What? On TOP of the propellers? It would frick with airflow if you made it large enough to be useful as an AWACs.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          How much does a big spinny airfoil frick up the flying characteristics of a helicopter

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A fair bit, but the bigger deal is getting a helicopter to an altitude where its radome is even remotely relevant kills the endurance and range of the aircraft pretty dramatically. It's better than nothing, but not very much better.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              They're not really there to cover too much further, they're just there to cover the immediate sensor gap all ships have because of the immediate horizon, realistically if you've only got a few you want them hovering relatively close to your ships so range is less important. The wect uses helicopter awacs as forward radars, equipping them with ASMs, but not Russia so much, its mostly just for defensive purposes to cover the sensor gap.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Ka-31
      wait they actually made a awacs helicopter? lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Brits did too, with a Merlin iirc.

        Thirdie navies can't into catapult launched AWACS planes

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Sea King AEW. It was introduced after the retirement of the Fairey Gannet (and the Fleet Carriers in the late 70's) and the issues that naturally arose around Airborne Early Warning during the Falklands.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Warriortard can't help but out himself in every thread
          Christ dude.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Or alternatively maybe refurbish the old Tu-126's that they've not used since the 80's. Maybe they've one or two kicking about in a hangar somewhere, however I doubt they would have survived the fall of the Soviet Union. Someone probably sold the aluminum for scrap in the 90's.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >still smells of conscript rape from 60 years ago

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          as opposed to conscript rape from 60 minutes ago in the a50

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No one cleans the walls cumrag, it smells of shit and goon cave

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If they're gonna refurbish anything it'd be more A-50s. They actually have quite a few, but most of them aren't flying and weren't modernized to the A-50U standard. I think those are the only ones Russia has been actually using.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          no big deal, some paint and they are as good as new

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Storing aircraft outdoors in places with winter is amazingly stupid. Those are heavily cannibalized as missing engines and cowling indicate so the interiors with delicate electronics will have been stripped earlier to put more parts into supply (if not that's even worse since refurbishment requires cores).

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I wil never forgive these animals for storing the Su 47 outside in the rain instead of a fricking museum.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        that'd be kino. Those planes are very pretty.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I wonder how noisy they are inside though?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How in the frick did they fit their huge-ass awacs operator stations inside that thing? They're struggling to fit them in the A50.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They didn't, they offloaded it to the ship the Ka-31 would operate from.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Neat. It's starting to sound like a cool concept if I think of it as a range upgrade to the carrier's radar.

          What if a ship used a swarm of drones to lift smol radars and networked them in software... hmm, there's definitely potential there.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >What if a ship used a swarm of drones to lift smol radars and networked them in software
            This is essentially how the US envisions f-35 sensor fusion working

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              that's not "sensor fusion" per se

              sensor fusion means combining the massive array of sensors the F-35 has into one single HUD blip (for example) with all the relevant information for the pilot
              as opposed to the current setup when pilots may have to refer to two or three screens for different data

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Nope, it's not.
              It's got nothing to do with radar aperture synthesis. You don't use a bunch of F35s in carefully controlled formation to make a bigger software radar.
              It just aggregates data from multiple sources so everyone in the network has a more complete tactical picture.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I just spent a week learning about radio & antennas because I liked it enough to see it through, then start to nooootice posts like this all over, and saw someone mention 4chinz has a lot of EE types...
                ... it must be true.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That used to be literally everyone on the internet. Internet was a place for technically minded people, not accessible by normalgays. Letting them in ruined everything.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, I recently listened to a biography of Lowtax, by Null from Kiwifarms, and he described how before his time, as AOL launched, all the original VBS users then lamented "The Eternal Summer" now upon them.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Eternal September, in reference to the influx of college freshmen gaining access to the internet for the first time.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why it carrying a piece of corrugated zinc roofing?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Is radar:
        https://www.redstar.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3082:e-801-airborne-radar&catid=467&lang=en&Itemid=534

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    2000 pows inside this one

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      2000 Azov tattoo skins will confirm this, unless Moscoq says Russia shot it themselves.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is this NOT the same plane as the one that was in that airfield they hit a few days ago?

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    AW-ACK!

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    HOLY SHIT A DOWNED A-50 JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How much of it?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Seven of them, downed by the Ghost of Kyyiiv, of course.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Seven of them
          Fake, there aren't that many left.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Ghost of Kyyiiv
          some /misc/tard will be in the nursing home 80 years from now with Alzhiemers, unable to remember his family, own name, or even how to operate a door knob.
          But his last memory will be the “GHOST
          OF
          KYIEEEEEEEEEEEEEV,” which he will shout constantly, increasingly agitated with every hoarse bellow, until the kindly orderlies show up and inject the thorazine.
          80 years of mind-breaking obsession, all from one tweet. Amazing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was still all in one piece, but the piece was on fire.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        About tree fiddy

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Merely friendly fire accident. The enemy has nothing to do with it.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    explains the uptick in russian propaganda on other boards

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Very weak bait.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Total Phoneposter Death

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    piggies still Not over their Patriot loss

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sar isn't it bedtime for you?

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah so the Yooks are 100% about to bust out the F-16s and/or start hammering the frick out of their cities with drone strikes right?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What happens when this number is 0

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      significantly more dead russians every day i hope

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They claim they replaced them with new generation stealth AWACS and that's why there is none in service.
      No you can't see it, is too powerful Russian stealth tech for hato piggy eyes to comprehend ok

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Russia still got ground based radars, so it's not fully blind. But the ability to detect low flying objects would degrade substantially.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Some Ukrainian official said the AWACS attacks are in preparation for F-16s. If there's no aircraft to spot them from afar, they'll be lobbing AGM-88 HARMS at their ground based radars and really blind them, making Ukrainian drone and ballistic missile attacks more successful.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody's surprised really
          Also, ground based radar is terribly vulnerable to terrain masking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The F16 finally becomes non-obsolete by flying at tree top level (cope level)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You get a spongebob popsicle

        u mad lol

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You get a spongebob popsicle

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I get a feeling you're fat and lonely anon.
    I've been there. Just work put and lose weight. It's a completely different life I swear.
    .t nta

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Oh boy brace yourselves for another wave of "xoxol abrahahamic tank destroyed*~~*~~)* spam again.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What’s going on with that new A-50U that just came out of the factory like a few days ago?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      sauce or GTFO

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >A-50U
      >new

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        lol, damnit ivan, you could have moved the tarp a bit or something.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        lol, damnit ivan, you could have moved the tarp a bit or something.

        Crazy how people meme that uralvagonzavod does nothing while the same time acknowledging that ukies kill a dozen zigger tanks every day, including new ones.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I would assume they're still working through their pre-war stocks, no?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No. Ukraine destroyed Russia's pre-war stock ages ago.
            On top of that, very few tanks from storage could be reactivated and directly sent to the front without extensive maintenance and/or partial rebuild.
            Most zigger tanks currently in Ukraine had to came through those assembly lines. Whether it's a T-90M or a T-55 Obr. 2024.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              ...I'm sorry, but are you saying that the Russians are making NEW T-55s?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                no, he's saying that the T-55s first have to undergo
                >extensive maintenance and/or partial rebuild

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          They do make piece of shit metal coffins for ziggers to get turned into paste inside.
          So I wouldn't say nothing.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Uncle Sam is really looking out for those F16s, huh?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *