Unironically this, they will be the only industrialized nation with significant manufacturing to survive un-nuked and will sell all of the everything for the next decade.
Venezuela's was right-wing (and prosperous) at the time. Hugo Chavez was just a colonel (granted he had already been brain rotted by Communism and was scheming to overthrow the government).
even the most cataclysmic third world war wouldn't have 100% of the world on a side, most of africa and south america would be neutral or busy killing each other while everyone's distracted
the ussr and america were never on the brink of defeat in afghanistan at any point despite the end result. moreover, the puppet regime the ussr propped up had a sizeable military and survived for some years after soviet withdrawal so its safe to assume they would be on the reds side in this scenario.
the map is still moronic but this part makes sense.
>China on Soviet side in 1987 >iran on same side as Iraq >myanmar on Soviet side >finland on western side >yugoslavia on Soviet side >sri lanka on Soviet side
China and Yugoslavia would probably side with whoever they thought was winning
Vietnam and Cambodia would be fighting each other, so one of them is the wrong color
Iraq and Iran would be fighting each other, so one of them is the wrong color
why is india even involved
also various capital cities become fireballs and angry people outside of them support second strike being used to cripple enemy countries
west wins at the cost of a quarter of its population
Finland and South Korea would come out on top, US, Russia and China would be destroyed. South America would not participate but also would not benefit from not participating somehow
ya muddah
'straya
Unironically this, they will be the only industrialized nation with significant manufacturing to survive un-nuked and will sell all of the everything for the next decade.
Australia would get nuked
Significant manufacturing of what? Rocks?
>'87
We actually made shit back then.
Utes stronk
>Iran/Iraq/Yugoslavia/Myanmar/Albaina/China on the same side as the Soviets
>Nicaragua on the Wests side
I don’t get it
Bold of you to think South Africa won’t immediately side with the east
It's 1987 anon, white rule in SA hasn't ended yet.
Eastern Europe immediately defects to the Western world and starts insurrections inside their countries.
me
>Vietnam red
>Venezuela blue
???
Venezuela's was right-wing (and prosperous) at the time. Hugo Chavez was just a colonel (granted he had already been brain rotted by Communism and was scheming to overthrow the government).
After about 1965 the Soviets weren't going to win a land war in Europe.
even the most cataclysmic third world war wouldn't have 100% of the world on a side, most of africa and south america would be neutral or busy killing each other while everyone's distracted
>Afghanistan
>Red
Wasn't the Soviet Union on the brink of defeat in Afghanistan by October, 1987?
the ussr and america were never on the brink of defeat in afghanistan at any point despite the end result. moreover, the puppet regime the ussr propped up had a sizeable military and survived for some years after soviet withdrawal so its safe to assume they would be on the reds side in this scenario.
the map is still moronic but this part makes sense.
>finland
>blue
i know they were nominally independent, but they were 100% in the soviet sphere of influence
Your thread is moronic.
Just read Red Storm Rising and Red Army to have your bases covered.
Team Yankee is a good addition, too.
>China on Soviet side in 1987
>iran on same side as Iraq
>myanmar on Soviet side
>finland on western side
>yugoslavia on Soviet side
>sri lanka on Soviet side
China and Yugoslavia would probably side with whoever they thought was winning
Vietnam and Cambodia would be fighting each other, so one of them is the wrong color
Iraq and Iran would be fighting each other, so one of them is the wrong color
why is india even involved
also various capital cities become fireballs and angry people outside of them support second strike being used to cripple enemy countries
west wins at the cost of a quarter of its population
I think India would simply starve
Finland and South Korea would come out on top, US, Russia and China would be destroyed. South America would not participate but also would not benefit from not participating somehow