They'll buy wheeled equipment. They'll buy whatever they can afford that looks shiny. They don't know what to do with tanks so they'll be better off with armored cars carrying cannon and ATGW or homebrewing technicals.
They're literally being used against Boko Haram my guy I don't think they'll have much of a tank fleet themselves. Call it "chinkshit" but it almost definitely offers better protection than T-72s
Honestly for 3rd worlders investing in modern at weapons is probably a better idea than buying shitty bargain basement tanks,that cost money to run and require trained crews.
That and Toyota's travelling at high speed can pass through mine fields. Also I'm sure the fuel consumption for a hilux is significantly less than a t-72.
I don't think they do. They rolled out T62s instead of older homogenous turret T72s. I think the reason for this is that the T62 was, relatively speaking, an export failure. It's far more lucrative to steal T72 parts from a boneyard than T62s. And I think it's for that same reason we won't see T55s.
The T62 and T55 essentially had the same capabilities after 100mm APFSDS, the Bastion GLATGM, and applique armor kits.
Wheeled APCs instead of tank, drones instead of most of their air force.
That's what they're thinking after seeing all the javelin and bayraktar videos.
They'll just buy a bunch of Javelins (or the Chinese copy), hoping to make their enemy's tank force completely irrelevant. And in a conflict between third world countries, they're not even wrong.
They will also field no tanks for the same reason.
Thirdies are fighting insurgents most of the time too, they basically have been switching to APCs and IFVs for a while now for that reason. Also terrain and shitty infrastructure. The middle east and Africa has been wheel pilled for a long time before ATGM vids started coming out of Syria, Iraq and now Ukraine.
Wheeled APCs instead of tank, drones instead of most of their air force.
That's what they're thinking after seeing all the javelin and bayraktar videos.
They'll just buy a bunch of Javelins (or the Chinese copy), hoping to make their enemy's tank force completely irrelevant. And in a conflict between third world countries, they're not even wrong.
They will also field no tanks for the same reason.
Nothing suppresses populations and rills weak neighbors like tanks though. Thirdies want tanks
Senegal, Gabon, Ghana and Gambia have no tanks. There's probably more but I can't be bothered doing further research.
The Central African Republic had 3 T-55s a decade ago, which are thought to now be out of service due to ongoing civil war/usual lack of maintenance.
Rwanda only has a couple dozen ancient T-54s, while Uganda next door has a whole bunch of T-90s, Type 85s and probably the largest remaining force of T-54s in the world, with 173 in service. If I was Rwanda I'd probably want to replace my tank force eventually, as a precaution.
Togo may as well have no tanks: 4 T-54s and 7 T-34 (!!!)
because tanks are absolutely expected to take hits (despite this being not "officially" the case) and thus it makes every bit of sense to protect them that way
IFVs and APCs are held much, much more conservatively and cannot fulfill the role of tanks.
The third world still has them, same with AKs. That's why Russia Donbabweans and Lugandans have to use moist nuggets and Russia has lost over half their operable tanks and have started using T-62s. Imagine having flooded the third world with so much old crap, and then finding out you ended up needing it. Be hilarious if they end up trying to buy them back.
They haven't lost that much yet, they just need to get their stockpiles battle ready. But you have to remember those export tanks have been mostly fricked by other conflicts and neglect.
China has been the go to for at least the past decade, if not since year 2000.
What was the last major sale Russians made prior to the war and deliver upon?
Su-34s for themselves?
Consider the following: >You're a third world nation that frequently wars with a neighboring third world nation. >Your neighbor has 100 tanks. >How many ATGMS do you need to buy to effectively neutralize an armor advance?
Atgms require skill that 3rd world shitholes dont have.
Consider the following: >You're a third world nation that frequently wars with a neighboring third world nation. >Your neighbor has 100 tanks. >How many ATGMS do you need to buy to effectively neutralize an armor advance?
>How many ATGMS do you need to buy to effectively neutralize an armor advance?
Don't forget to factor in that your soldiers are monkeys who can't read.
Probably chink versions of Soviet tanks. You have to consider that the third world isn't just buying based on price but politics. Certain materiel suppliers will not sell to you if those politics. General Umbuktu of the Rape All Children The Next Village Over tribe is not going to be buying from Germany, or probably even Korea. That leaves only the subhumans, and the French are too expensive.
None.
Even garbage export tanks like the chinese VT-4 are still half the price of a new Abrams but are significantly less capable.
The Soviet Union is gone, no one is pumping out cutting edge tanks at communist slave labor prices. Buy German or American, or if you're politically isolated, buy French or Korean.
Everything else just isn't worth it and will only be purchased in cases of corruption.
Chineseium
No tank. Everyone (except a few israelites) is getting poorer, and there isn't enough surplus production to squander on destabilizing 3rdies.
You can destabilize thirdies with drones alone, fool. A single attack basically incapacitated Iran.
3rdies wanna buy cheap equipment anon
They'll buy wheeled equipment. They'll buy whatever they can afford that looks shiny. They don't know what to do with tanks so they'll be better off with armored cars carrying cannon and ATGW or homebrewing technicals.
ZT-4, explicitly made for foreign markets and Nigeria has already purchased a few.
>chinkshit
Gross but fun to see explode i'm sure
They're literally being used against Boko Haram my guy I don't think they'll have much of a tank fleet themselves. Call it "chinkshit" but it almost definitely offers better protection than T-72s
>but it almost definitely offers better protection than T-72s
Yeah im gonna bet against that.
Have fun losing your bet then
>cheap dirtbike
>rpg-7
>lv iii plate
Honestly for 3rd worlders investing in modern at weapons is probably a better idea than buying shitty bargain basement tanks,that cost money to run and require trained crews.
Isn't this is the reason Chad beat Libya?
That and Toyota's travelling at high speed can pass through mine fields. Also I'm sure the fuel consumption for a hilux is significantly less than a t-72.
how can they pass through minefields at high speeds? Cause that sounds cool as frick
Libya has always been a joke and they were using mines that didn't flat out didn't work if you went fast enough to not trigger it
Yeah but its the 3rd world, they don't do that.
3rd world countries can and do have the money for modern technology brainlet. Having clean running water isn't always a deciding factor
So then tanks
Chinese tanks or more realistically the Toyota Hilux with steel plates bolted on.
Russia still has T-55's it hasn't dipped into yet.
Inb4 T-55B Obr. 2022
I don't think they do. They rolled out T62s instead of older homogenous turret T72s. I think the reason for this is that the T62 was, relatively speaking, an export failure. It's far more lucrative to steal T72 parts from a boneyard than T62s. And I think it's for that same reason we won't see T55s.
The T62 and T55 essentially had the same capabilities after 100mm APFSDS, the Bastion GLATGM, and applique armor kits.
They will.
>T-55B3M TURMS "Black Eagle" Obr.2077
drones
TAMs
>cheap
>powerful gun
>really that`s it
they`re thirdies. They are gonna sell the spare parts for drugs so who cares
t.argie dumbass
No way you guys can manufacture enough for the thirdies
Wheeled APCs instead of tank, drones instead of most of their air force.
That's what they're thinking after seeing all the javelin and bayraktar videos.
They'll just buy a bunch of Javelins (or the Chinese copy), hoping to make their enemy's tank force completely irrelevant. And in a conflict between third world countries, they're not even wrong.
They will also field no tanks for the same reason.
Thirdies are fighting insurgents most of the time too, they basically have been switching to APCs and IFVs for a while now for that reason. Also terrain and shitty infrastructure. The middle east and Africa has been wheel pilled for a long time before ATGM vids started coming out of Syria, Iraq and now Ukraine.
Nothing suppresses populations and rills weak neighbors like tanks though. Thirdies want tanks
No, they don't and you're just making shit up. WHY are you making shit up?
What third world militaries do you know of that don't have tanks?
Bhutan
So a country that uses India's military protection is your answer?
Senegal, Gabon, Ghana and Gambia have no tanks. There's probably more but I can't be bothered doing further research.
The Central African Republic had 3 T-55s a decade ago, which are thought to now be out of service due to ongoing civil war/usual lack of maintenance.
Rwanda only has a couple dozen ancient T-54s, while Uganda next door has a whole bunch of T-90s, Type 85s and probably the largest remaining force of T-54s in the world, with 173 in service. If I was Rwanda I'd probably want to replace my tank force eventually, as a precaution.
Togo may as well have no tanks: 4 T-54s and 7 T-34 (!!!)
You don't understand thirdies obviously
Why do tanks try their damn hardest to be flat and unnoticeable as possible but IFVs not give a shit?
IFV's carry seated infantry
because tanks are absolutely expected to take hits (despite this being not "officially" the case) and thus it makes every bit of sense to protect them that way
IFVs and APCs are held much, much more conservatively and cannot fulfill the role of tanks.
Instead of APCs, some sort fo wheeled IFV with a light gun/howitzer/mortar and a machinegun.
The third world still has them, same with AKs. That's why Russia Donbabweans and Lugandans have to use moist nuggets and Russia has lost over half their operable tanks and have started using T-62s. Imagine having flooded the third world with so much old crap, and then finding out you ended up needing it. Be hilarious if they end up trying to buy them back.
They haven't lost that much yet, they just need to get their stockpiles battle ready. But you have to remember those export tanks have been mostly fricked by other conflicts and neglect.
>spend millions on a tank that can be easily destroyed by one man shooting a 75k missile
Why?
>spend thousands on a dude that can be easily destroyed by one man shooting a $0.5 bullet
Why?
who has won the turret tossing competitions?
Africa has been developing their own local replacements
Its amazing how good digital restoration can make a picture look. Here is the original from 1991.
Probably whoever that came up with 21 century version of AMX-13 or M41
China has been the go to for at least the past decade, if not since year 2000.
What was the last major sale Russians made prior to the war and deliver upon?
Su-34s for themselves?
Lots of Chinese IFVs and drones.
"cheap" tanks are obsolete and the choice of a loser. You can buy alot more atgms for the same price of a t-55/72 and they will kill them easily.
Atgms require skill that 3rd world shitholes dont have.
So do tanks moron
Consider the following:
>You're a third world nation that frequently wars with a neighboring third world nation.
>Your neighbor has 100 tanks.
>How many ATGMS do you need to buy to effectively neutralize an armor advance?
>How many ATGMS do you need to buy to effectively neutralize an armor advance?
Don't forget to factor in that your soldiers are monkeys who can't read.
Probably chink versions of Soviet tanks. You have to consider that the third world isn't just buying based on price but politics. Certain materiel suppliers will not sell to you if those politics. General Umbuktu of the Rape All Children The Next Village Over tribe is not going to be buying from Germany, or probably even Korea. That leaves only the subhumans, and the French are too expensive.
None.
Even garbage export tanks like the chinese VT-4 are still half the price of a new Abrams but are significantly less capable.
The Soviet Union is gone, no one is pumping out cutting edge tanks at communist slave labor prices. Buy German or American, or if you're politically isolated, buy French or Korean.
Everything else just isn't worth it and will only be purchased in cases of corruption.
T-24's
Tanks remanufacture very well. It will be T72s with a few new parts, from somewhere. Work done quite possibly in Russia(Ukraine)