Imagine having the top tier of your $2kk USD MBTs killed by a disposable $4k USD AT4.

Imagine having the top tier of your $2kk USD MBTs killed by a disposable $4k USD AT4. Do MBT even make sense anymore or is it a Russian thing?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares. Russia has so many T-90Ms they're also giving them to Wagner lmao.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia has so many T-90Ms
      like 40?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Shut the fuck up
        It's 50

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          50 on paper, 40 in reality, 10 in general corruptovich's yacht fund

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Cope.
        They just sent 200 brand new T90M to the front.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Russian army says...
          >According to the Russian MoD...
          Ok.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          What happened to the Indian tanks?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            They're in India.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          good joke anon

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh wow so many, huh. Is that why they're digging out their old as shit t-62s?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You mean Wagner can afford to buy them while the Russian army cannot

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They have so many that it took them 2 months to finally show up in Ukraine

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >da inspektor, we havings the 5000000 t90m in storage here in vavlagkagjdllabalpolv-вpaньё-base-of admiral-great-leader who ran a gulag 60 years ago
      >ok good jobs commisar vodka i report to putin news
      Oops no t90ms better send bmp2 and t72 with ERA replaced with cardboard becauae we sold the real stull

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a russian thing
    Do you even need to ask??

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Do MBT even make sense anymore or is it a Russian thing?
    Nowadays, nothing makes sense if it's not supported by another thing

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Nowadays, nothing makes sense if it's not supported by another thing

      /thread

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >or is it a Russian thing

    It's a Russian thing.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn't one of those Israeli active point defense systems save a tank from these simple AT missiles or are they just memes?

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >$2kk usd
    two million dollars dollars?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >lone $ means dollars and not Spanish American Pesos
      Is it American ours already?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He's talking about the kk, esl.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    BigC

    >Do MBT even make sense anymore or is it a Russian thing?
    No, but not because of AT launchers, but because of drones, of which there is not defence against for a MBT.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what if tanks had their own baby drones?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        better off having a dedicated drone support vehicle so the tank crew can focus on tanking

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The commander's job is already maintaining situational awarness, this is another tool.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yes and it's only adding to his workload. he should be focused on things and ground level, not fussing around with a drone on top of everything else he has to do. a separate vehicle for drones or adding a drone op to the tank itself seems more sensible

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Drone and ECM is a reason to have an extra seat in the tank. All this crap about two man tank crews when it takes four guys to reasonably fix a thrown track.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it has an additional crewmember for that
          where the fuck were you when it was shown off?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        dude take off your shoes before getting on my tank

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      so what will fill in the niche left over by tanks

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Do MBT even make sense anymore
    No. They are a meaningless deathtrap now. Artillery is the only force that matters in any modern conflict.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    According to /chug/, Snowmalia already won. I don't what is this.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >this obsessed
      They really are only hiring retards now as shills aren't they.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Combined arms needs the rest of its components to work eg tanks support infantry; infantry wouldve screened out the guys with at4s by either shooting them or fixing them (for the tanks to shoot). Ideally you would want some sort of organic shorad to help counter drones, in conjunction with organic artillery, but eh cant ask anything from the russians

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To be honest, any combined arms that doesn't include drones and air support is just asking to be merked at heavy weapons range. Your carbine going pop pop pop ain't gonna keep no shitheads down.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't look like it's damaged beyond repair

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it's OK our most advanced hardwares are supposed to get knocked out by the cheapest NATO weapons

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sends in tanks with no aerial or infantry support
    >gets picked off
    >sends in human cannon fodder with no armored support
    >dies by the (hundreds of) thousands
    Just a russian thing

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine showing a picture and making up a story to go along with it.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I yet have to see evidence that this was done by an AT 4.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      first T-90M was defeated by Carl Gustav.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You mean the one where there's literal video of the tank behind it shooting into it?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i dont remember seeing anything like that

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous
        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Carl Gustav disables T-90M and Russians had to finish it so it doesn't fall into Ukrainian hands
          >this story is made up and what actually happened is that moronic Russians blew up their own T-90M because they are morons and Russians

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Carl Gustav disables T-90M
            It must be true because hohols said it.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              so once again, you're saying that Russians are such retarded morons that they blew up their own working T-90M with another T-90M because they are retarded morons? Yes?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, the tank was obviously denied. What led up to it, we can't tell.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >it wasn't Carl Gustav
                >why?
                >because we don't know what disabled it

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >everything the hohols say is true
                >no matter how implausible
                Or do you consider a possible mobility kill as 'defeated'?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Our tank failed
              >But it was our own fault
              This isn’t the own you think it is, dumbass.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I remember Vatniks coping about that video. They said the T90 is so advanced that it's protected against Javelins and NLAWs, and being destroyed by a Carl Gustav was a good thing because it meant the Ukrainians had to get close to it.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              juat because the turret ring didnt reach low earth orbit doesnt mean it wasn't disabled

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    where armata
    deploy armata, putin

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What are post-sanctions T90-Ms like anyway? From what I understand the M variant was basically just upgraded with western parts that Russia can't produce itself, so what the fuck are they putting in the new versions?

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    achtually is was a $50K 155mm deployed mining submunitions

    Mech-cucks are in hardcore denial that they're days are over (and have been since ASSAULT BREAKER)

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can I now call every Abrams and Leo useless because they were disabled by rpgs at point blank range?

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >$2kk

    The US uses double dollars?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *