If you are forced to fight against F22 and F35, would you rather be in Typhoon or Rafale?

If you are forced to fight against F22 and F35, would you rather be in Typhoon or Rafale?

  1. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I'm fucked regardless, idk how to fly a fighter jet

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      You could watch a few YouTube videos and be good. Operating modern fighters are equivalent to playing a Nintendo wii.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        My Wii doesn't pull 9.5gs

  2. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Which one has the safest ejection seat system?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      They both use Martin Bakers and the Rafale has successfully accidentally ejected at least one improperly harnessed civilian frenchman with only minor injuries, so either should work fine

  3. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Rafale
    It looks cooler
    Typhoon looks like a failed abortion

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Shut the fuck up frog.

  4. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Both at once? I wanna be in this instead. How would I do?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Do I get a wingman for this 2 on 1 or a squad even? I mean in a real sortie I won't even know either of them are there. If they were nice enough to let me get to visual range with them I would probably just eject.

      AIM-260 fries you

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >phaser mogs your planet
        >teleports behind you
        >nothing personel,,, kid

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          This but I'd just remain in high Earth orbit the entire time. What're they gonna do? Plink the deflector shield? Can they even manage that?

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            They could ASAT you I guess, wouldnt scratch shields, could just tractor it as it gets close. Don't even need to waste power consumption on shields tbh.

  5. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Rafale, it looks cooler and isn't out of character when I flee.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      French didn't flee in WW2, that's the british so you should get a typhoon.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        The difference between the British retreat at Dunkirk and the French is that the British didn't surrender. In before your insurgency cope

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          I'd have liked to see how Britain would've fared if it shared a border with Germany.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            We would fight the bitches on the beaches, for King and Cum Tree.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              God save the King eh ol' chap? I'll never get used to that.

  6. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    You'd lose your plane and have no idea why with either.

  7. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Su-57 because T I G E R S or something

  8. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Close the distance and fight like mad.

    At the end of the day the pilot matters.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      F-22 will pull some thrust vectoring bullshit on you and then dump its shit all over you

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Close the distance on a plane you'll never see before getting shot down

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        relax, he watched a bad movie from an actor that needed more money to donate to his cult and thinks that air combat as it was in 1990 is the same as it is today

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >close the distance
      >f22 TVs and gets his nose inside you before you’re halfway around the first circle

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Close the distance and fight like mad.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous
        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous
          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous
            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous
              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous
    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >they don't put the scrubs in Raptors

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >close the distance
      >on an f22
      Hope you have fun with that, because it's the last thing you'd ever do.

    • 5 days ago
      Anonymous

      >fight me like a man in melee and not at distance, then we'll see who's the boss

  9. 7 days ago
    Anonymous
    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous
      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >The eternal kraut and his cope picture
        The Rafale was acting as a plastron

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Typhoon which their whole purpose is interceptor mission is not even good in DCA.
      What the fuck?

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        they never got midlife upgrades because of politics. the only country pushing forward with major improvements to modernize it is the UK and they're doing it as a testbed for their 6th gen program

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Soulless eurotrash delta wings

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous
        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/IiiHgyk.jpg

          uhh

          >Um, sweetie, look at these designs from multiple generations ago!
          >Sure makes it seem cooler that we keep pumping out failed designs just like them in the present, right?
          Do eurotards really?

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        uhh

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >several medium and low effectiveness for Eurofighter
      Is this because of their horrible radar or is there something else?

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        It's because frog hands made that spreadsheet

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          It was made by the Swiss, fragile britboi

  10. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    rafale, it has aesa unlike the eurofighter so i get only some time off before im forced to jack out from an aim120 headed straight to my ass, maybe if im lucky enough ill be able to land a shot with a meteor.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Rafales radar is fucking tiny

  11. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    The latest eurofighter would trash both wouldn't it?

  12. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Typhoon (Eurofighter)

  13. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    which one has the better ejection seat?

  14. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    One Rafale would beat both.

  15. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Eh.. probably the Rafale because better radar. I'm assuming that I am acting in a defensive role and at least have some idea of the general direction they're inbound from. Maybe I could stay low and terrain mask until they're close enough for IRST or a visual sighting. Otherwise I guess i'd have to rely on getting some idea of where they are from my RWR if they spike me and try to avoid a lock until I can close in to heater range.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      I heard Rafale has good ECM but are they better than Eurofighter and comparable to F35?

  16. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Whichever has a better radio in the hopes that they here my surrender message before they launch.

  17. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Rafale.
    >"Iz not ze plane, Jacques, iz ze pilote."

  18. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    rafale is better until the UK completes their modernization plan in a few years and then it might be better

  19. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Typhoon w/ AESA and Meteor. I mean, I'd still lose, but I might get off a MRAAM or two before eating an AMRAAM.

  20. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    This thread again?
    This video again.
    Cope & seethe.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Canned dogfight
      >Luneberg lens equipped
      >Rafale only won 4 of 14 engagements

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >those delusional frogs in the comments

        As expected, more seethe.
        Luneberg lenses useless in dogfight and against IR missiles brainlet.
        Only 6 engagements 1 win on both sides and 4 draws.
        No delusion I just like to make you tards cope.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Only seething here is you and having to hang onto that minor training victory as "proof" of superiority when it was literally designed to give the Rafale pilot a chance of an engagement that wasn't "he got you" after flying completely unaware.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >Only seething here is you and having to hang onto that minor training victory as "proof" of superiority
            I don't want to prove anything just to make drooling idiots seethe.
            >when it was literally designed to give the Rafale pilot a chance of an engagement that wasn't "he got you" after flying completely unaware.
            BS both jets started neutral in every engagement.
            A Mirage 2000-9 scored a sucessful gun kill on an F-22 too during the same ATLC 2009 exercice.
            But why does it matter? Why is any of this relevant? Why would this demonstrate superiority? F-22s getting virtually gun killed happens all the time in the US with F-16s, F-18s, and even T-38s.
            However for any reason you just can't say "okay cool" and go on with your day, you have to cope about it.
            That's why I post this stuff. Just so you fucks reveal how much vatnik-like hypocrisy you deploy when somebody dares to mention a single crack in the might of the powerful american military industrial complex.

            OP asked in which aircraft one would take less risks. I provided real life actual footage showing the Rafale would have some chances in a certain context. Make of it what you will. In no case this means any superiority or whatever.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >I provided real life actual footage showing the Rafale would have some chances in a certain context
              That context being a canned training engagement that removes all of the advantages either stealth plane has in real life.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Can you stp being dense, read the OP again, and deal with the facts at least once?

              • 5 days ago
                Anonymous

                That's pretty hilarious coming from someone who thinks a Rafale stands any chance in a real-world fight with an F-22.

            • 5 days ago
              Anonymous

              >But why does it matter? Why is any of this relevant?
              I'm completely incapable of severing the connection between my nationality and my own personal identity, in fact, the former essentially makes up the latter, so if my nation's plane loses then I lose as well and I don't want that, it's simple really.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >those delusional frogs in the comments

  21. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't matter.
    >fly to the nearest city
    >eject and parachute down
    Anons this is how you fight asymmetric warfare.
    >blend in with locals
    >wait for shit to calm down
    >find pilots mom
    >seduce her
    >I am his dad now
    >son you're grounded

  22. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Launch an AIR-2 Genie and hope for the best

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Best answer so far. Pretty much the only solution that doesn't involve running, immediately ejecting, or getting your body painted across the sky with an AIM-120.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Launch an AIR-2 Genie and hope for the best

        >Genie's operational range: 6 miles
        >AIM-120D's operational range: >86 nautical miles
        Nah you're fucked harder than a roofied college freshman in a room full of drunk frat boys.

  23. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Rafale because I like the look of the intakes more

  24. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    rafale, so i can be in a cooler looking jet when i get shot down

  25. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    both would shoot you down before they had crested over the horizon

  26. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    rafale so that when I get shot down there is one less frenchie dirtying the world.

  27. 6 days ago
    Anonymous
  28. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    fighter jets are obsolete

    • 5 days ago
      Anonymous

      And a new competitor for "dumbest meme said so far."

      • 5 days ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't know

        • 5 days ago
          Anonymous

          Drones are several decades from being able to replace human pilots, and likely never will.

          • 5 days ago
            Anonymous

            >Cars are several decades from being able to replace horses, and likely never will.

            • 5 days ago
              Anonymous
  29. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    In a Gripen looking for nearest patch of dirt road or grass to land.

  30. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    American F-22 is vastly overrated and would easily be shot down by Su-27

    • 5 days ago
      Anonymous
    • 5 days ago
      Anonymous

      Would get deleted by a fox 3 before it gets to see the F22 on radar.

      • 5 days ago
        Anonymous

        R-77 missile is dual infrared/radar retard, American operation paperclip nazi stealth tech cant block infrared

        • 5 days ago
          Anonymous

          First the Su-27 has to get radar lock to fire that. F-22 will have had it locked up for miles before that.

        • 5 days ago
          Anonymous

          Good luck ever getting an F-22 into a lock to fire it.

          And even if you did, Russian missiles have a 3x greater fail rate than western ones.

  31. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    Would you rather be in a stealth plane and have a chance at BVR engagements or a garbage 4th gen with the RCS of a bus?
    Can you stop memeing your garbage euro dogshit? Send them to Ukraine already so they can get shot down by Soviet AA and prove how useless non-stealth planes are.

  32. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    The one with the better ejection seat and parachute

  33. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    The F16, Eurojank, Rafail, Cucken are all about the same when it comes to being dogshit and useless.
    They would all eat a Fox 3 against the F22 or F35 with no way to retaliate. Cope seethe dilate.

  34. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    How do you confirm a BVR kill?

    I mean, dogfight kills are confirmed by gun cameras and HUD tapes. How the fuck do you confirm a BVR kill?

    It goes off the radar and you wait for dudes on the ground to see the wreckage???

  35. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    Jas 39 Gripen

  36. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    J-20

  37. 5 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Choose either
    >American jet runs passive while receiving contact info from AWACS & ground radar systems
    >Get slapped from 100+ miles out
    Just give me the most expensive one so I can defect.

Your email address will not be published.