I hate how movies convinced people all over the world that assault rifles are spray and pray guns to the point where my dad thinks that the main difference between pistols and rifles is that rifles are full auto
I hate how movies convinced people all over the world that assault rifles are spray and pray guns to the point where my dad thinks that the main diffe...
5.56 is a subpar rifle caliber and is better used as an SMG
It's light, tight groups, but lacking in kinetic power
Makes sense when you are carrying a bunch of other stuff
But it's not enough power, so the 6.8 is the middle ground really
Yeah. 6.8 in a short stroke piston system
6.86x51mm is way too close to 7.62x51mm. It's hardly a middle ground.
It's not even a real Intermediate round, and is dimensionally similar to 6.5x52mm Caracano that Italy used and the 6.5x50mm Arisaka that Japan used during and before WW2.
>But it's not enough power, so the 6.8 is the middle ground really
>6.8x51 mimics .270 win from a full length barrel
>3000 ft lbs
>middle ground
Frick off sigger
Literally does not matter what small arms your guys use
I hate how movies made people think they're action heros
I hate how movies have enabled an industry that, due to its history of covert libertine sexual attitudes (e.g. buttfricking), has turned into a system that abuses and exploits large amounts of children.
Video games are honestly much worse for this. Short of movies that are non stop killing with little plot like John Wick or involve machine gunning groups of enemies, they tend to be much more reasonable with the amount of killing that a single character might do relative to video games where that's where the game play is and every situation typically needs to be crazy and over the top with the number of people you kill. Open world games are particularly bad for this since the action can happen anywhere and developers will throw situations at you like multiple guys with rifles trying to rob you who will of course fight to the death, while a level based game would typically at least give those guys a better reason for engaging you. Not to mention the min-maxing that video games brought to the shooting community that only really reached its current state in the past decade.
>every situation typically needs to be crazy and over the top with the number of people you kill
games with a small number of very strong enemies are rare, this is because
1. damage sponge enemies are not fun to fight
2. therefore you should be able to kill them fast
3. therefore to maintain challenge they must also be able to kill you fast
4. therefore gameplay basically devolves into "if you make more than 1 or 2 mistakes you're dead", if you don't make mistakes then the level is over in less than 5 minutes
having large numbers of weak enemies means more degrees of mistake are permitted - in Doom, levels are relatively long and test your attention and endurance, assuming you don't know them ahead of time, you are looking for secrets, and you don't save between fights. If you frick up one fight, you'll probably survive, but the punishment is that now you can't make as many mistakes in the future and still survive. The hardest levels are the ones where the fewest mistakes are permitted, due to limited ammo and health pickups or areas where damage is basically unavoidable. There are levels that mix it up by having smaller numbers of stronger monsters, therefore one serious mistake can kill you, but these are rare.
tl;dr large numbers of weak enemies are better for gameplay than small numbers of strong enemies. Of course exceptions exist, like fighting games, where you only have to win like 7 or 8 fights to win the story mode typically.
I know why games work like they do. I'm just pointing out why they're been much worse for causing morons to think that over the top fantasy situations are completely possible. I personally quite enjoy stuff like Doom that doesn't try to remotely come off as realistic.
>4. therefore gameplay basically devolves into "if you make more than 1 or 2 mistakes you're dead", if you don't make mistakes then the level is over in less than 5 minutes
There's always the option of having more to gameplay other than just pure combat. Not having your character be massively overgunned would help a lot for portraying less extreme scenarios as well. You'd still end up killing a lot of people over the course of the game because it's a game, but the individual scenarios could be made a lot less over the top.
Deus Ex (the original) is still magic to me decades later. It's still so flexible, gives you so many tools and approaches. You can be an absolute killing machine, but it's also possible to beat the game with just one single kill (yeah technically possible to bypass that too but not without exploiting bugs). And even that one can be done with dialog vs fighting. Has some fun dialog effects early on too.
Man now I want to reinstall.
It's also crazy how it was right about everything.
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Number one: it's called consolidation.
>but it's also possible to beat the game with just one single kill (yeah technically possible to bypass that too but not without exploiting bugs). And even that one can be done with dialog vs fighting.
How far can you go without cheesing the game though? I've heard about people doing pacifist playthroughs of games before, but they usually rely on doing silly immersion breaking stuff to avoid needing to kill people.
I hate how movies made people think there is going to be some hero who comes to save them
I don't think you should care. Hang out with your dad and be glad neither you or him will ever have to see combat.
I hate how movies made people think they will fall in love one day
That's true but
isn't true which means you have to suffer
That does happen, the movie lie is that if you love the other person enough they'll reciprocate, regardless of your social standing, or any physical or mental disabilities.
Movies make people think every engagement is within 10 meters. It's funny.
>Movies make people think every engagement is within 10 meters
AA cured me of that.
It taught me that the battlefield is peering at iron sights at a blip peeking over a rock 200m away and then holding my breath while I am and then suddenly exploding because someone had pre-sighted all the likely sniping locations and was lobbing m203 grenades on them with blind fire as if they were mortar shells.
Damn, didn't realize how hardcore AA meetings are.
Probably meant Armed Assault, usually called ArmA. Playing Arma Reforger as a console kiddie who grew up on COD and Halo taught me things I almost wish I never learned. Operation Flashpoint DR was kino though
frick off armatard / glowie screecher
>glowie screecher false flagg post
Yikes.
>flagg
nice try, vatnik
Armatard = Armata + moron, newbie
you would know this if you were here at any point since 2014
Armatard and glowie screecher. It's just some nonsense made up by a schizoposting yuropoor who thinks he's engaged in some imaginary information war with Russia. Ascribing certain types of posts to one person is just a tactic he's adopted, and it's hilariously transparent.
The worst part about it is that there indeed was an actual Armatard with a distinct posting style, but now every vatBlack person posts the same shit as him so we don't get hilarious meltdowns like picrel anymore.
Care to explain what in
is actually supposed to be from Armatard and why this post
isn't an obvious false flag?
Armatard= the obnoxious vatnik shill who changes his posting style depending on his current mental state and meds status or how useful he thinks using sock puppets are
Glowie Screecher=dumb moron who said so much and often dumb shit he got confused for Armatard and is now on a life long crusade against anyone who says anything against Armatard. He also likes to falsely accuse normal posters like
to be Armatard or himself, because he wants to convince everyone who stupid everyone is who called him Armatard, he's a lolcow and schizo.
>lolcow
>obsessed over by one schizo moron
pick one.
Glowie screecher got his name because he seethed so much about glowies when he defended a tom of Armatards threads in 2021, he did it for hours and days, no wonder he got confused with Armatard. Eventually he realized no one was believing his bullshit, so he started to make false flag post like
to convince everyone how unreasonable Armatard's haters are, lying and false flag posting is fair game for him, more a common trait than an exception.
I didn't get into guns until 2022.
Your answer seems to be a bit out of place, what are you trying to say?
How could I have been posting on /k/ in 2021 if I didn't come here until 2022?
Why did you call
Armatard/glowiescreecher? Because you thought Armatard had anything to do with Arma?
What else would it mean? Like I said, I didn't get into guns until 2022, so if "Arma" also refers to some kind ruski gun then I'll admit that I'm ignorant to it.
Armata moron is the actual long version, initially it was the mock name for a whole group of vatniks pestering /k/ in 2015 with how awesome the new russian T-14 Armata tank was, but then it turned out most of them was just one schizo vatnik with too much time, so everyone just called him that. It has nothing to do with the game Arma.
What about "glowie screecher"? I see lots of people using the term "glowie" all over the internet.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Glowie
Yes, I know what it means. Is everyone who uses the term referred to as 'glowie screecher'?
He's just a schizo who stood out with it, often when he lost an argument or people said something he didn't like he started to call them his current flavor of the month glowie. There is a whole list in the archive, i might as well update it:
Here we go again.
>it's CIA
>it's Earnest Voice
>it's the state deparment
>it's Langley
>it's bots
>it's MI-6
>it's Shareblue
>it's an indian call center
>it's a nigerian sweat shop
>it's Israel
>it's jannies
>it's bots run rampant across the internet
>it's polish and ukrainian workers shitposting after they got off work
>It's DOD shills
>it's the shill
>it's a polish descent in the US eastern time zone
>it's estonian shills
>it's ukranian shills
>it's people making up a new boogie man cartoon character
>it's oinker
>it's British, likely government affiliated, shills
>it's a schizoposting yuropoor
Does anyone else post about this guy, or just you?
You get two (possibly three) non-lethal weapons at the very beginning of the game, and they can carry you through to the end.
No, i'm not the only one, he pissed off a lot of people over the years with his seething over glowies and his falseflagging.
If you say so.
You want to say something, then say it.
You just seem a little obsessed, is all.
He says, replying after a little bit more than a minute, and i'd d wager if i kept talking to you, you would reply to me for the next few hours. It's one of those oddities, when glowie screecher gets called a lolcow or something similar unappealing but true.
It's actually closer to 7 yds, according to FBI statistics
>movies aren't realistic at all
who would have guessed
Heat is.
Burst fire, double taps, semi auto
Just mag dumping is not very accurate, semi auto is slower
And you need physical strength to hold tight burst groups with juicy bullets
>And you need physical strength to hold tight burst groups with juicy bullets
And you need skill to fire burst consistently in full auto mode, without a burst fire selection
The answer is practice and training
Congratulations. Your dad has accepted the propaganda. Try and convert him without calling him a moron, it's almost Father's day.
The whole class of weaponry was literally invented because recruits couldn't be trained to competently use a handgun in a reasonable time frame.
everything is misconstrued
i thought i could get buff as frick in a simple montage but it didn't work
How much money you got and how big you want your clit senpai?
>dragon-pharma steroids
I had to check what board I was on.
gay
>apricot kernel oil
what?
>assault rifles
What about them?
i can't afford a real one
Is your dad terminally moronic? They have some obvious physical differences.
My dad thinks that 556 can blow a man and half and that the army removed full auto from the m16 because "no man is strong enough to control 556 in full auto." Despite the fact that he's seen me bump firing a 556 20" ar and I'm a manlet.
>assault rifle
>barrel is not rifled and they are not used in assaults
>barrel is not rifled
which gun are you talking about?
You ever tell your dad he’s a fricking idiot?
>the main difference between pistols and rifles is that rifles are full auto
That's true though.
>where my dad thinks
isnt it embarrassing to be spawned by such a cuck?