How would you rank the top military powers of the world? pic related is my list, rate it

How would you rank the top military powers of the world?

pic related is my list, rate it

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Turkey
    Roachfucker/10

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lol India is only a military power on paper, they are barely able to operate the nice stuff they buy, chinks at least have a military industrial complex.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Source: My ass

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China is only impressive in numbers, the only reason people take them seriously is cause the US overestimates all its enemies

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    china
    usa
    russia
    turkey
    all of europe

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      chinks above the US? what are you smoking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is the only true and definitive answer.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia in top 10
      Found the retard.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They still are, not matter how you meme American vassal states.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You have to meme pretty hard to put that shithole above anyone with functioning army.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Do you think UK, France, Germany or Turkey could wage such a long and sustained war?
        Not him.
        The answer is no.
        They will need to be bankrolled and sent stuff from USA and their other allies.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >such a long and sustained war
          It's been 6 months...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            France, UK and Germany would be out of missiles by now.
            Especially precice ones.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You mean like Russia did months ago?
              You mean like they would be also firing anti air missiles at ground targets like Russia too?
              Get the fuck out of here

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Russia has never had precice missiles tho.
                So they can't run out of them, since they never had them in the first place.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They've been firing hundreds of missiles per month and are still doing it to this day retard. It's the only way they could hit targets deep inside Ukraine given they can't use their air force due to Ukranian AA.

                The euros only have on average 200 tanks which half probably aren't even ready to be used. The Ukies and Russians lost that amount each month in the begining

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nah, they really don't. They are doing the poor fag cobra rocket moves from hinds and su24s Russia run out of PGMs along time ago and have resorted to wasting S300s on land targets because well let's be honest, they aren't hitting air targets any time soon.

                >Quality > Quantity
                Look at the effect of modern western intelligent weapons in Ukraine, its clear the old doctrine of 100 grads doesn't work anymore.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/rOynNX2.jpg

      This is the only true and definitive answer.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Russia #1

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like a pretty good ranking in my opinion.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Poland should be in place of france.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1# North Korea.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Juche is unironically based and what America wishes it still was.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Go live there

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Something you put together on a cheap version of powerpoint is as retarded as you gay

    https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.php

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >globalfirepower

      the most retarded ranking website ever

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not perfect but there is no other credible rankings that even comes close

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Your retarded, consider education.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Lmfao cock gobbler detected

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Says the guy who thinks Global firepower is an accurate website. Christ what a dumb fuck.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Get off your bf's cock for a few seconds and find a single other source then gay

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Go on each nations military website then cross check that with other reliable sources you insufferable gay. It's wildly inaccurate.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >credible
          In what world?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It is not retarded but just missused. Its name is "Global Firepower" and it shows firepower pretty well, though dumb morons think it's the only factor that matters and use it as a "who's better" list, ignoring other 99% of shit that makes armies good.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >though dumb morons think it's the only factor that matters and use it as a "who's better" list, ignoring other 99% of shit that makes armies good.
          So literally what that anon just did

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >calling OP a retard then cites GFP
      Why are you a hypocrite

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Like this for instance. GFP isn't perfect but it's better than the lists with Turkey top 5 or South Korea above India lmfao. Those are genuinely retarded and people are trying to be contrarians to make themselves look smarter.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    US
    France
    UK
    China
    SK

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      UK is above China.
      France is above Turkey
      Japan and India shouldn't even be on there.

      Imagine unironically thinking France and the UK are above China. They aren't even above India anymore lmfao. China is leagues beyond either of them and China is closer to the US than France and the UK are to China.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what experience does china even have you retarded moron gay? france and the foreign legion have doctrines they've tried and tested, the chinks doctrine hasn't

        judging by chink videos its all fluff and show of force, would probably collapse like a building made of match sticks

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Muh experience!
          Post WW2, most nations outside the US haven't gotten much experience. This is your only cope against the reality of Chinese dominance. China has more of everything including an economy that is nearly 6x larger than either of them. UK and French soldiers having a bit more """experience""" from WW2 is not going to help them defeat a country that is leagues beyond it. It's like comparing an ant to a boot. Economic strength is and has always been the best indicator of military strength because countries with high GDPs have high tax revenues to sustain wars. And in the case of China, their massive manufacturing base means they can manufacture a lot of the weapons they need in short order.

          gays like you just don't want to admit that the West sans the US is not very strong anymore.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Adding onto this, if you were to simply rank the countries by nominal GDP, by PPP, and by military budgets, you'd come up with 3 lists better than what most of the bozos on here come up with. Japan is the only country that would be overrated by this measure because their Constitution forbids them from having a true military.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            For decades the main enemy of the west has been Russia, they are infinitely more experienced than the Chinese and arguable had better equipment and tactics.

            Right now they are stalled a few miles into what was poorest country in Europe.

            What chance in holy hell does China have? Its the most accident prone nation on the planet.

            Bongland gave you too much opium

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              China has a much stronger economy, a fact which a lot of you don't seem to fully comprehend. Assuming China continues receiving oil from Russia and the Middle East, they would be able to totally crush a country like Ukraine. Russia's GDP is a pathetic 1.5 trillion. China's GDP is 20 trillion with the highest manufacturing capacity on the planet. They'd be able to fund their war and blitzkrieg a country like Ukraine with overwhelming numbers and finances. In short, China > Russia in 2022. Russia is a paper tiger on its way out. The only ways it can stay relevant are nukes and oil+gas revenues.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Assuming a country like Ukraine is on their borders ofc. Taiwan is going to fall to China inevitably because we simply can not stop them right in their neighborhood so close to their mainland.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Lol do you realize that China is going to be broken up into about 30 countries soon

                Think of it this way, the Uighurs, Tibetans, Mongols, Manchus, Wu ethnic group around Shanghai, Maio peoples of southern china, cantonese, fujianese, etc. are going to be on the side of the west when this happens and they will be rewarded with being another US colony

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Unreal levels of cope. The US is more likely to break apart than China.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Lol do you realize that China is going to be broken up into about 30 countries soon
                Fox News boomer cope

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                China is like 90% Han and the Han are actively culturally genociding the remaining 10%

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong stay mad retard

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They have literally 10 times the population of Russia. That alone lets them mog them.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Don't forget more than 11x the GDP. The extent to which China mogs Russia is lost on people. Russia's tech and existing equipment is the only reason you can argue them over China. But 10 years from now, the difference between Russia and China will be so vast it'll be laughable.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't mean shit, China is as fragile as well China. Your mentally ill if you think they could survive

                I have a properly inflated sense of superiority, I think you can guess.

                this scenario.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        In reality China would struggle in a real war against a country like Thailand or the Philippines and this is no exaggeration, they simply do not have the genetics for combat

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The Chinese military may be big, but they're basically just a glorified military police force at this point. The one thing that made them a terror in Korea - being used to such shitty conditions that they could march through mountains with a full pack on a single bowl of rice a day - is no longer something they can do. The only part of the Chinese military that is potentially threatening is their nuclear arsenal, and I'd be interested to see how their literally 'made in China' tier missiles preform outside of carefully scripted PR stunts.

        The threat from China to the west today is economic and political, not military.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Are you crazy, Slovakian army is shitty

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    UK is above China.
    France is above Turkey
    Japan and India shouldn't even be on there.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    US
    China
    UK
    Japan
    SK
    France

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe China has more naval tonnage but the UK can move its carrier groups to anywhere in the world and has done so in previous wars. Until we see China take Taiwan, we can only assume their air and ground forces are equipped with Chinesium and would fold against their battle tested and experienced English counterparts. Point is, the UK rates above China.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Fair point, but it is hard to ignore the sheer fucking number of shit they have and are capable of spewing out. As you say it could mean nothing if it is indeed chinesium (99% chance it is)

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It sucks everything on China is speculation. It's a dirty mentality, but I want to see them put everything they have on paper to work, and Taiwan is the only situation where that would occur.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Turkey

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. USA
    2. UK
    3. France
    4. Japan
    5. South Korea
    6. Australia
    7. Israel
    8. Poland
    9. Turkey
    10. Germany

    If your top 10 includes China or Russia you're objectively wrong, btw

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Say the one that includes fucking Germany out all nations.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Your point? They have the economy and industry to fuck up your mongols

        Finland should be on that list, and Germany should not.

        That works for me

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Finland should be on that list, and Germany should not.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'd easily put Turkey above Australia, they have shown they can manage large scale conventional fronts in Syria and are well acquainted with counterinsurgency at home. What has Australia done besides tag along with American coalitions?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm willing to concede on pretty much most of that list except top 3 and that russia/china do not deserve top 10

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Israel mogs Australia anyday.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      t. Aussie
      Your diggers arent worth shit

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nuclear powers:
    US
    Russia
    China
    UK
    France
    India
    Israel
    Pakistan
    North Korea

    Land:
    US
    SK
    Russia
    Poland
    Turkey

    Air:
    US
    SK
    UK
    Japan
    Israel

    Sea:
    US
    UK
    France
    Japan
    SK

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Rating South Korea so high
      Why?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Land: obvious
        Air: based on # of operational F35s or F22s, nothing else really matters anymore
        Sea: based on # of modern acc, subs, and destroyers, could be higher in a few years as they are developing a nuclear sub, also brazil could join this list soon as they are also developing nuclear subs

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Land: obvious
          Not really? They have a large amount of old equipment. By that thinking Russia should be a superpower.
          >Air: based on # of operational F35s or F22s, nothing else really matters anymore
          Well then your ratings are totally fucked, look at the amount of F-35s delivered.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >nuclear submarine operated by brazilians
          Well that's a horrifying thought

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not the author, but it’s a large, Western-style military.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      SK shill. They produce some good cheap stuff but it's questionable if they can use it. They should be 3 places lower in every area.
      Also Turkey should be above Poland in the Land area. Hell, Poland shouldn't be there at all.
      Other than that, the most adequate rating ITT.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Israel far above Japan in air. No question

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Turkey
    >France
    >India
    >China
    >NUMBER BIG SO AUTOMATICALLY GOOD
    >WHAT IS FORCE PROJECTION????????
    >DOES IT MATTER WE RELY ON OTHER NATIONS TO DO OUR SHIT ABROAD????

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      France hasn't needed to rely on anyone for their African operations and can likely sustain themselves further if they needed. It wouldn't be on the scale as the UK or the US, but compared to the other countries at least they could show up to the fight.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >France hasn't needed to rely on anyone for their African operations

        I guess your new here.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >It wouldn't be on the scale as the UK
        What makes you think the UK would have done better than france? They've been doing jack shit since iraq

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Hmm maybe because France had to rely on the UK to carry its African operation from 2013 until they left? Both strategically and tactically? Also the UK has a giant fleet auxiliary that France doesn't have.
          Do you live under a rock, new or just retarded?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            france essentially relied on the US, the UK were pretty irrelevant in comparison but that's not my question. now calm down and read the posts seething britboi

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >just the US now maybe abit of the UK
              So we can agree they cannot manage there own operations and logistics then?
              >But that didn't answer my question
              UK had the only heavy helicopter airlift in all of the Mali operation, the fact the UK has never needed to use any French logistics proves they are the more capable nation.
              >Britboi
              Sorry to hurt your fragile feelings frogger

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >So we can agree they cannot manage there own operations and logistics then?
                >there
                cringe
                also never said they could, i was just asking the other poster what made him think the UK could do it alone. if only you could just read instead of instantly pissing your pants because france is mentioned.

                >the fact the UK has never needed to use any French logistics proves they are the more capable nation.
                UK hasn't been an active military since Iraq.

                >Sorry to hurt your fragile feelings frogger
                German. It's just funny how rent free the frogs live in britbois heads.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Are you retarded or somthing if nation x cannot manage its own logistics but nation y can then by logic nation y would fair better in the conflict by itself. Oh your German, no wonder you haven't a clue about a working military.

                The last UK military activity was Afganistan, you thinking it was Iraq only further proves your lack of knowledge. Also the UKs deployments are huge compared to Frances.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Are you retarded or somthing if nation x cannot manage its own logistics but nation y can then by logic nation y would fair better in the conflict by itself.
                You still haven't read my question and you're still acting like an angry gay.

                >The last UK military activity was Afganistan
                Hiding in your base isn't military activity, I know you know.

                Why do brits get so angry and insecure when france is mentioned?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not him, but you know the UK has done larger foreign deployments than France has? Why are you seething so much about the UK?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >you know the UK has done larger foreign deployments than France has
                when? with no foreign support?

                >Why are you seething so much about the UK?
                why are brits seething so much about france?
                what i don't like is how brits act so arrogantly when it comes to french army when their respective armies are basically 1:1 and brits are literally the only one to do that

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Iraq 1, Iraq 2, Afgan, Sierra Leone, N.Ireland, Falklands etc etc
                We handle our own logistics and for 10x the size of Mali, don't drag us down with your shitty rep

                No one's seething, you just need putting in your place now and again.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not only did the UK benefited from huge logistical support by the US during those latest conflicts (Iraq and Afghanistan) but the UK hasn't been on a foreign intervention by itself for decades. You don't even compare.

                >don't drag us down with your shitty rep
                Again, I'm German. What's up with brits who can't fucking read?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You don't even compare.
                Why? I mean their military is built to do it better than France's. I don't get this anti-British seething you French do.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I mean even today in the Nato Deployment the UK has like 90 tanks deployed, France and Germany have maybe 12 combined?

                It's pretty sad you have to blow the French horn (literally) because you are so substantially pathetic you aren't recognisable as Germany any more.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Nato Deployment
                Is that supposed to impress anyone?

                >It's pretty sad you have to blow the French horn (literally) because you are so substantially pathetic you aren't recognisable as Germany any more.
                I'm not a country, i'm a person. Real life isn't countryballs you retard.
                What's sad is seeing britbois getting anally blasted by the sole mention of the word "france" for some reason

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No it's not its supposed to show how pathetically unprepared for combat you both are when an island is more capable and prepared for a land war than nations that aren't far from Russias borders. You can deflect all you want though it's pretty cringe.

                Your not a person your a sad, sad shadow of your former ancestors.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >when?
                2001, 2003, 2018 I guess, I don't follow the British military so could be more.
                >with no foreign support?
                I guess last time with no support was 1983.
                >why are brits seething so much about france?
                I followed replies and it seemed to start

                >It wouldn't be on the scale as the UK
                What makes you think the UK would have done better than france? They've been doing jack shit since iraq

                with French seething

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I followed replies and it seemed to start

                >It wouldn't be on the scale as the UK


                What makes you think the UK would have done better than france? They've been doing jack shit since iraq (You) with French seething
                That's my post and I'm german. As I fucking stated 3 times.
                The French REALLY do live rent free in british heads

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >B-b-but I am German
                No one cares, fuck off loser we occupied you for decades. Probably pissed in your people's gardens and smashed up your local boozer while you stood helpless.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >That's my post and I'm german
                I think you are deflecting and French. Why else would you get bothered by the British doing something better than the French?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sorry my superiority has triggered the continental gaylords once again.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                digits confirm butthurt eurofags

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >no, in fact, you're the one who's mad haha!
                Can't read a question, can't answer to one. Can barely spell. Embarassing.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >What makes you think the UK would have done better than france?
          Larger logitics? Why would the UK do as well as France?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            neither could do this kind of military operations without us support

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Why?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                neither france or the uk have the logistic capabilities

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                While France did need support, it wasn't do or die support. The could have done it without any assistance just not as well.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not true at all. They required support from Canada Denmark US UK, it ranged from C17s to Chinooks to medium helicopters. Its really really embarresing from a military point of view you need that level of help in Strategic and Tactical areas.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This. France needed alot more support not only from the US and UK but many other nations.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >This.
                How can you even tell? The UK has never been in this situation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >UK sails 10k troops 13000km, conducts Amphibious landings without air supperiority against an enemy with a 3:1 advantage, loses all helicopters so has to march all over the island kicking the shit out of the Argies all the way. Conducts the longest bombing run in history, becomes the only nation to sink a ship with a nuclear submarine btfos conventional military in 2 months

                >France, can't deploy 5000 soldiers 3000km away without help from tens of friendly nations logistical help, gets bullied and has to leave years later

                We are not the same.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                A 40yo conflict where you got your ass handed to you by fucking argentinians of all things, Maggy had to threaten to nuke buenos aires because your ships were getting rekt by (french) exocets missiles
                glorious indeed lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks for the concession, hopefully one day both Germany and France can surpass the Polish military again until then you are both barely relevant.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Thanks for the concession
                Running away from the conversation doesn't make you win but bravery isn't a british trait after all.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I mean your resorted to sperging out about Margaret thatcher like your a labour party member or somthing you hardly deserve a structured reply do you?

                >Bravery
                >Be France, lose entire nation in a few weeks
                >Forever laughed at for being cowards, surrender monkeys etc etc

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Bravery
                >Be the UK, lose the war on the continent on a few weeks
                >Run away like a bitch while the french cover your ass in dunkirk
                >hide on your island and wait for years while the USA and the USSR are doing the work

                Impressive!
                Sometimes I wish the UK had been in the place of France instead of cowering behind the sea.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I could correct this but your information is so incorrect it'd take multiple posts.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Just sit on your ass and seethe about instead
                gay brit

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Does it hurt on the annual ww2 remembrance days when you have to sit it out and look at all the big dicks who saved you?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >whataboutisms
                The crying continental has transcended into armatard

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >NOOOOO YOU CANT DO WHATABOUTSISMS!!!!!! IM THE ONLY ONE WHO CAN NOOOOOOOOOOOO
                Retard.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So have you said a correct thing today yet?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Tell me you know nothing about UK logistics without using that phrase.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        France couldn't manage a tiny deployment to Africa by themselves, a token force of only 5000 could not be sustained without foreign intervention.

        A nation so incapable of such a small mission cannot be regarded as a world power.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          France only had 5000 troops in Mali? Wow the way they talk about it, it sounded much bigger than that. That's not impressive at all.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          France only had 5000 troops in Mali? Wow the way they talk about it, it sounded much bigger than that. That's not impressive at all.

          We sent what the mission required. You're both huffing that refined copium.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The mission failed, maybe send more than a token force next time you want to be relevant. You think France would have learned its lesson since the tiny gulf war contribution.

            neither could do this kind of military operations without us support

            Which kind of military operation? 5000 troops to Mali kek? We could do that with a 2 C17s and a few Chinooks.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >We could do that with a 2 C17s and a few Chinooks.
              An actual retard typed this post.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Oh no no no don't say that frogbro you'll anger the b*ngs.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    numbers to matter to a certain extent, having a extremely modern yet tiny military should not put a country on the top 10 list in my opinion

    aka
    >Israel
    >Finland
    >Germany

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Swap Turkey and UK and put South Korea in Japan's spot, and it's breddy gud

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the amount of people making rankings based upon how much they like and dislike a country is amazing

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. USA
    2. China
    3. UK
    4. France
    5. Russia
    6. Japan
    7. Turkey
    8. India
    9. Israel 🙂
    10. South Korea

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    USA
    Russia
    China
    >>>>>
    Everyone else

    Nukes exist, get over it already. Sniff your copium and cry in a corner that you're relevant if you're not one of the big three.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nukes won't ever be used in a war. Cope seethe etc.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They're already in use.
        That nuclear power plant in Ukraine is one big nuke that both sides want to use without making it go boom. The question is which side will go full retard first.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >nuclear plant is one big le nuke
          get lost reddit

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Chernobyl wants a word with you.
            Zaporozhye is bigger, too.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The UK alone could wipe out Russias air and sea forces

      Really the ranking is:

      USA
      China
      UK/France

      The rest

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >The UK alone could wipe out Russias air and sea forces
        Anyone could do that.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        UK can't wipe its own arse without daddy USA. Go back in the corner.
        > we were empire once
        Were. Past tense.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Bongs and Frogs have nukes too, as do Pakis and Norks

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They lack quantity AND quality.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Everyone who matters has nuke already dumbass, and comparing chinas to uk’s nuclear arsenal is like comparing a Chinese car to a British one. Enough said

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        China has the world's largest automotive industry, the British automotive industry collapsed 4 decades ago.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >can’t even grasp the point
          Why do I bother even pissing your way

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Nukes are a deceptive metric, a lot of US allies are covered under the US nuclear umbrella but if they wanted to could easily produce more nukes than the total in the world combined today, think if SK, Germany and Japan were no longer covered by the US nuclear umbrella, they would have 100k+ warheads inside of a year

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          SK would
          Krauts would not because they fear nuclear energy, they will not build nukes
          Japanese might if they ever revoke article 9

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Take out nukes and the UK and France are probably barely top 10 maybe not even top 10

    China is worthless, they can have a trillion "soldiers" but other than bullying India they can't do chit particularly against a modern military

    Russia has a decent mentality for fighting wars in that they dgaf and way more likely to find typical russians willing to pick up a rifle and fight with far more frequency than in the west but they are monkey level iq from a command and control perspective and also can't compete against a modern military

    Other than the US the only country that have a full combined arms military system on a MODERN level is South Korea, full stop, period, finito, hasta la manana, sayonara, gays

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > take out nukes
      Stop reading there. 1 nuke in the middle of Seoul and your beloved South Korea is GG no RE.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That is why one nuke from NK takes out London, Paris or LA, three nukes from Russia sinks Britain into the atlantics, see how I did that to gay?

        This is why nuclear weaponry is the ultimate determinant of national power and precisely why SK mogs every nation other than the US, China/Russia/India have nukes but their quality is so bad its just as likely they blow themselves up, Israel would get jumped by 90%+ of the world if they ever used nukes in an offensive scenario, UK/France have very dated technology and no ability to produce advanced weapons in any meaningful numbers

        There's nobody else that is even close to the above

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          > three nukes from Russia sinks Britain into the atlantics
          Yes, please!

          > nuclear weaponry is the ultimate determinant of national power
          Correct.

          > SK mogs every nation other than the US
          SK can't mog even NK, the laughing stock of the entire planet.. Not to mention the constant american reassurance that if something happens, US will help. It's not even regional power.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Cool, when was the last time South Korea projected force... anywhere?

      They can't even protect themselves from the North without American help

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Lol are you kidding? Not including the US, SK is the only nation other than Australia that has deployed over 200,000+ combat troops since WWII

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          > citation needed

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Most US operations are supplemented by US combat troops, you can google it yourself, started with Vietnam where over 200,000+ combat troops deployed and had a kill ratio more than 3x US troops, it was pretty brutal stuff and the UK even has a statue in the UK to memorialize all of the unfortunate atrocities committed by the SK marines

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              So, literally ONLY Vietnam?
              > they did 3x better than US
              Kek.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The only combat effectiveness metric that is not debatable is kill ratio, in Vietnam the SK military had a better kill ratio than the US military, also there were over 325,000+ SK combat troops deployed in Vietnam

                Others:
                Iraq: 20,000
                Afghanistan: 5,000
                Lebanon: 4,000
                Somalia: 4,200
                East Timor: 3,300
                Angola: 600
                Western Sahara: 550
                South Sudan: 300

                There are a lot more but other than the US there is no modern country that even comes close to post-WW2 combat deployments

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Counting your KDR against your own civilian population doesn't count Kim

                [...]

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_South_Korea

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Da fuk you sucking on cum guzzler?

                Kill ratio is combat troops only and we don't fuck around, pull something like a jan 6 in SK and see how well that works out for the deplorables lolol

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >pull something like a jan 6 in SK and see how well that works out
                It already happened, and you let Nork commandos make their way entirely to your white house and then only managed a 1-1 KDR
                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_House_raid

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Israel has a tested modern combined arms system, the only one other than America. The UK as well. Japan low key as well (they can take SK). You don’t know squat, retard

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Israel is not even top 10 and if the US did not secure their interest it would be erased inside of a few weeks even western europe is not necessarily a real trusted ally for Israel + Israel is fighting against ragheads who are notoriously bad at war, that said Israel should stand ideally forever, its among the few nations keeping the sandmonkeys in check

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1 US
    2 China
    3 Russia
    4 India
    5 France
    6 UK
    7 Israel
    8 Pakistan
    9 North Korea
    10 South Korea

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >(You)

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Anglosphere, Nordic countries, and Israel are the only competent combats on earth. China and Russia are a joke as are the rest of the world.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    True rankings just dropped based on 100% objective criteria:

    1 South Korea
    2 US
    3 Rest of the world combined

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      true, SK is so far ahead of anyone else it is not even funny

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      true, SK is so far ahead of anyone else it is not even funny

      isn't SK military just build for one thing
      Full blow war against North Korea
      Like NK builds something, SK builds a weapon against it

      I have no doubt about their strength outside of this scenario but they'd probably rank lower because of their current "single threat" military

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        SK primary mission is NK but its far more complicated than that, in reality its also a forward combat force for the US coalition in the Pacific + SK focused on having the strongest military in the region in the event things start to get really crazy

        But even the NK focus should not be understated

        The Korean peninsula is about the size of the British island, 85,000 square miles compared to 84,000 square miles

        However as a single data point, there are 9,000+ main battle tanks on the Korean peninsula. In comparison there are 9,000 main battle tanks in ALL of Europe to include Ukraine, Germany, Poland, UK, France, Sweden, Netherlands, Italy, Portugal, Greece, Hungary, Switzerland, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Belarus, Moldova, Croatia, Slovenia, Austria, Czech, Slovakia, Bosnia, Albania, Macedonia, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Ireland, etc.

        The US has 6,600 main battle tanks.

        That is just main battle tanks as a metric, a similar trend is with other weapons systems. In reality the Korean peninsula is the greatest concentration of firepower in the history of humankind and its not even close.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/irjcl4O.jpg

          SK is easily also the most competent in actual combat

          In this incident Somali pirates hijacked a Norwegian owned ship, SK deployed their commandos supported by helicopter gunships with an end result of 100% Somali pirates killed, 100% crew freed, 0% SK casualties, this kind of stuff happens every day

          No one cares about SK you idiot go back to making TVs

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Go back to getting butt plowed by your bbc gay, EVERYBODY cares about SK its the truth and even a homo like you knows it deep down in your buttvag you fucking fag

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Nope they don't, sorry. Most of their stuff is old ass shit and steel helmets, they are Iraq 1991 tier

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not sure who you are talking to but in the mic industry SK stuff is the hottest topic for the past few years, you are living under a rock or an internet fanboy if you don't know this

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I don't give a flying fuck about SK. Their porn is kinda shit.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Because you are a chud and love cock, /k is for weapons and military stuff

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. the United States of America

    2. the People's Republic of China

    3. the Russian Federation

    4. the Republic of India

    5. the Republic of Turkey

    6. the Republic of France

    7. the United Kingdom

    8. the Empire of Japan

    9. the Republic of Korea

    10. the Republic of Italy

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > Turkey
      Get nukes first and then we'll talk. You have no place in top 8.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'd put France def before Turkey and maybe even on par with China; lots of combat experience and the only other country after the US with a complete combat proven arsenal
    Japan is kinda hard to judge, because while their military is superb, just like South Korea, they are kind of single purpose

    I wouldn't put Turkey this high
    while they have lots of experience, they lack modern equipment and their logistics isn't properly sized

    Honorable mentions for the next ~5 places would be
    Pakistan - nearly on par with India
    Israel - comparable small but probably one the best trained and equipped standing forces AND reserves
    Germany - not necessarily in a solo country vs country war but they have a HUGE pile of modern next gen weapons (like bunker busting missiles and THE best SHORAD) and probably the best logistics after the US

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The only nations that have deployed more than 200,000+ combat troops post WWII other than the US are South Korea and Australia, as the US knows whenever they call on SK for combat support their kill ratio far exceeds the US, no other modern nation has any meaningful combat heritage or experience

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >vatnik cope in this thread
    Russia would get annihilated in days by every modern industrialized military
    They have literally zero counter play against Precision-guided munition
    Their Anti Air defense Systems are so outdated that almost every modern aircraft has enough defense mechanism against it
    And half their stockpile isn't even working

    The only positive about them is manpower, domestic oil production and theoretical technological advantages (if their systems would actually be build instead of trickling money into corruption)

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There is no fucking way India and Turkey are above the UK

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >thread about military rank
    >bong seeth about frog for no reason
    every fucking time

    anyway here's mine
    1. US
    ------------
    BIG GAP
    ------------
    2. UK
    3. France
    4. China...?
    ------------
    smol gap
    ------------
    5. Russia (pre war)
    6. Israel
    7. India (in def war)
    8. SK...? (maybe AUS)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Frog spergs
      >Bong bullies him
      It's perfectly natural

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >US
    >UK
    >China
    >Japan
    >SK
    >India
    >France

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    SK is easily also the most competent in actual combat

    In this incident Somali pirates hijacked a Norwegian owned ship, SK deployed their commandos supported by helicopter gunships with an end result of 100% Somali pirates killed, 100% crew freed, 0% SK casualties, this kind of stuff happens every day

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What were South Koreans even doing down there near Somalia anyway?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        SK military forces all over the world playing the good guys

        Your welcome Norway

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If this kind of stuff happens every day why is the single (1) example you point to as an example of combat prowess going overkill on some somali fishermen 11 years ago
      >The operation was seen as a huge success by the media, who noted the strong response to the pirates in contrast to the South Korean government's response to several North Korean provocations that had occurred in previous months such as thebombardment of Yeonpyeong
      Hahahahaha there it is, you cucked out to the Norks and had to flex on some guys in a dhingy to save your pride, lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        There are over 1,000+ similar incidents that are public on google, in reality the true numbers are probably a lot more

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >pull something like a jan 6 in SK and see how well that works out
        It already happened, and you let Nork commandos make their way entirely to your white house and then only managed a 1-1 KDR
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_House_raid

        This has chink or nip hands all over this seethe cope, sorry chink/nip you are npcs and not even considered human by the world, everybody considers it morally justified to nuke chinks/nips lmfao

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Brazil
    Afghanistan
    Papua Guinea
    Rhodesia
    USA

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. USA
    2. Free Space
    3. Bugmen
    4. Eurocucks
    5. Snowmorons
    6. Poos
    7. Sandmorons
    8. Latinxers
    9. Wakanda

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The UK should annex the Isle of Man and Ireland and buff the British military tbh

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    USA
    UK
    China
    Japan
    France
    SK

    Asking the question could X defeat Y if that was an objective and given a few years prep like Russias war on Ukraine. No nukes on cities, but the defender if have they them can use Vs a fleet or tacticaly.

    The rest are either land armies militia, without power projection, or very niche defensive power like Finland.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > UK at #2.
      lol, retard detected.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'd put the UK as second as well. Nuclear subs just go hard, and the British ones are top shit. UK military intelligence is first rate as well. Air force is competently run with modern missiles, ground forces have good training and equipment.
        If Ukraine taught us anything it's that quality of equipment, doctrine, training, and intelligence kick the shit out of sheer numbers.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The only reason why the UK is top 5 is because of the nuclear subs, UK intel is effectively a forward listening post for the US intel network, its all controlled by the US and the UK is no different than any other US colony, air force is only decent because they are finally buying the F35, they are trying to get rid of the eurofighter as quickly as possible and the tempest meme program is just their way to ask the US for more F35s, ground forces are a joke, not even top 30 and countries like Turkey and Poland would steamroll UK in a ground war

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I feel bad for you bro, clearly you are upset.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              > I feel bad for you bro, clearly you are upset.

              Dumbass, I'm laughing at you monkeys thinking anybody believes you have a real military, you can't even protect your own women from the shitskin grooming sex slave gangs gay lol

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Clearly to have those images saved you must find yourself feeling threatened quite alot. Are you a victim? You seem like a victim.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Now that you have conceded defeat and acknowledge the inferiority of your "military" its time for you to go back to cum guzzling and stuffing bbc in your "boi" hole these are your true talents

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >, I'm laughing at you monkeys thinking anybody believes you have a real military, you can't even protect your own women from the shitskin grooming sex slave gangs gay lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry for invading your country at some point LMAO

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Its ok you are now a colony of my country now so know your place

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I rank Japan pretty high because they are an island nation with a god tier navy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Japanese subs don’t even have missiles, torpedos only lol

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Damn I guess the Japanese Navy is truly not one of the best in the world

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Correct.

          Subs with no missiles.

          Aircraft carriers that are converted helicopter carriers.

          Decent destoryers though.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >still more and better subs than most countries
            >still more and better carriers than most countries
            >way better destroyers than most countries
            Name 10 countries with a better navy.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. USA
    2. China
    3. South Korea
    4. Japan
    5. France
    6. UK
    7. Turkey
    8. Poland
    9. Russia
    10. Germany

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No way China is that high, China is below Russia and Japan is below China, Turkey is underrated and probably between France and UK, otherwise fairly accurate

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    In some respects China is far more advanced and capable than America. (e.g., its industrial supply chain is 100x more robust and much larger, it has more high-IQ manpower and less "diversity," etc.)
    In other respects, America still has the clear advantage.
    A war between the two is impossible to predict or simulate. One can only speculate that China would have the edge in the eastern Pacific. (If the war expands, it inevitably goes nuclear, so there's no use speculating on a Chinese attack on the American mainland, or vice versa -- the scenario can only be a limited engagement around Taiwan.)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      China loses because it cannot feed their people or their machines without imports. NEXT

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cope. China has an extremely robust overland supply chain for food, and it's more self-sufficient than you realize. Besides, the USA just forced Russia and China into a shotgun wedding.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >10% to 15% maximum land suitable for agriculture
          >for 1.4 billion people
          >"self sufficient"
          Yeah after about a billion of their people starve they should be good to go. Until then, they're no where near capable of being self sufficient. Cope.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is not 1970s anymore moron.

        China is #1 producer in almost every agricultural output item

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, they can feed their people but they lose because they historically absolutely suck and war, probably only better than India, that is why these nations or billions can’t succeed in even a single war

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      implessive

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We don't really know where China is at the moment until they start shit over Taiwan. We were all over rating the Russians 6 months ago.

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So many retards putting China as 1 or 2 when they have not been in a serious military conflict in recent history.
    Where are you drawing this conclusion from?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Chinese propaganda

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This, Russia would probably mog China in a war and Russia can’t even take Ukraine, let that sink in

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They beat the USA in Korea the 1950s, contrary to everybody's expectations.
      They beat Vietnam through the 1980s.
      They are adept at attaining all of their geopolitical objectives.
      > B-but they didn't get their asses handed to them by Talichads over the past twenty years!
      Cope bro.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        yeah you dont know anything kid

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That’s a really bad example that makes your argument worse.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          yeah you dont know anything kid

          The Chinese under the CCP haven't lost a conflict. The US keeps losing.
          > B-but muh experience!!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It completely ignores the nuance of those conflicts. It’s gamblers fallacy. It’s like saying “sports team A has won more than sports tram B, therefore, when sports team A plays sports team B, sports team A will win” without looking at anything else. Bad analysis. The kind of linear thinking i would expect from a slant-eyed, straight-pubed, mongoloid.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The "nuance" is that the CCP Chinese literally don't know defeat. They fight until they win. The Americans, in contrast, don't know how to win. They fight until they get bored or distracted or fed up, and then quit in disgrace.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hahahahahaha

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >They beat the USA in Korea the 1950s,
        Didn't happen. SK still exists and has grown into a close and powerful US ally.
        >They beat Vietnam through the 1980s.
        Also didn't happen. They failed harder than the US did.
        >They are adept at attaining all of their geopolitical objectives.
        Taiwan is right there bro, just take it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Also didn't happen. They failed harder than the US did.
          Holy cope. They lost less men, they attained their objectives, and they permanently gained territory. (Which they still hold and never plan on giving back.) Also, Vietnam has been permanently cucked as a potential rival or strategic threat. Basically, it has become a Chinese client state.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Didn't happen. SK still exists and has grown into a close and powerful US ally.
          Please explain the UN having nearly all of the Korean peninsula under control prior to Chinese intervention lmfao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Size. Technological advancement and number of various weapons. Manufacturing and logistics capability. Remember China has like 5 times as many people as the US and are the world's preeminent manufacturing power.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. Canada
    2. Mongolia
    3. Russia
    4. USA
    5. Iceland
    6. India

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. US (king of logistics and systems, command and control, and special operations, nukes)
    2. UK (highest trained standard infantry in the world with highest per-solider spending by quite some margin, nukes and a small but potent navy and air force)
    3. FRANCE (always seems to get a lot done on the cheap, plus they have a higher operation tempo than most others, nukes and a small but potent navy and airforce)
    4. China (completely green and inexperienced at all ranks, huge number of soldiers and materiel, fastest growing navy in the world, nukes, up and coming air force)
    5. Doesn’t matter if the aforementioned are involved.

    As far as best of the rest go, Finland, Denmark, South Korea, Turkey, Canada, Italy all have decent equipment and training, I just doubt their ability to stick it out in a large conflict on their own for more than a year. Russia doesn’t make the list because they’ve shown to be very incompetent. India doesn’t make the list because everything they do is a farce or pretense combined with being completely green like china, but with atrocious training standards and garbage equipment (except for a handful of units).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Agreed 100%

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So what do you use as a general guideline for military strength? Raw numbers? Raw funding? Projection capacities? Personally I think average funding per soldier is a good general metric for how shit an army is

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      My criteria are

      1. Does the country have a self sufficient military industrial complex?

      2. Does the country have a modern military?

      3. Does the country have allot of professional troops?

      4. Is the country overal developed/industrialized?

      5. Can the country hold it's own in a war?

      6. (bonus) does the country have a full scale modern era combat experience?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So why is China #2 and why is India even on the list?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          China marks allot of those check marks, but now to think of it India does not really belong in the top 10..

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    US
    China
    UK
    Turkey
    South Korea
    France
    India
    North Korea
    Russia

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. United States of America

    2. China
    3. Russia

    4. India

    5. UK
    6. France
    7. Pakistan

    Those are the top 7 and I've separated the different tiers. Mfs just try to disagree with this to try to be different. BTW GFP's rankings are mostly pretty good considering that they account for a variety of factors, including economic might. I still think they over-rate Japan and SK though.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >BTW GFP's rankings are mostly pretty good
      post discarded

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Actually retarded. You're trying to disagree with GFP for the sake of being different and making it seem like you know more because you don't use the normie ranking. The people who are citing GFP have better lists than the mfs with Turkey in their top 5.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >You're trying to disagree with GFP for the sake of being different
          Does anyone use it? PrepHole sure as shit doesn't

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't know North Korea had the 5th strongest navy in the world and the 11th mightiest air force and a stronger tank force than China. GFP rankings is shithole cope that doesn't reflect reality.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          For

          Actually retarded. You're trying to disagree with GFP for the sake of being different and making it seem like you know more because you don't use the normie ranking. The people who are citing GFP have better lists than the mfs with Turkey in their top 5.

          1. United States of America

          2. China
          3. Russia

          4. India

          5. UK
          6. France
          7. Pakistan

          Those are the top 7 and I've separated the different tiers. Mfs just try to disagree with this to try to be different. BTW GFP's rankings are mostly pretty good considering that they account for a variety of factors, including economic might. I still think they over-rate Japan and SK though.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This. GFP over-ranks the thirdies way too much but memes aside North Korea has a shitload of submarines, they are not going to launch an invasion against a modern military but there's no way to deploy forces on North Korean soil without comically high levels of casualties

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >there's no way to deploy forces on North Korean soil without comically high levels of casualties
            It's called an air force. Does your country have one?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Spam transport planes at hostile nation
              >They all get shot down
              >Lose comical amount of soldiers
              What shit hole are you from

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I have a properly inflated sense of superiority, I think you can guess.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Retard, North Korea has more air defense assets than all of europe combined, they also have nukes and with their fleet of submarines can launch them at any country in the world in a kamikaze scenario

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >North Korea has more air defense assets than all of europe combined,

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                They have more tanks that all of Europe combined if Ukraine is not counted so despite probably have thirdie tier equipment this could be true

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >They have more tanks that all of Europe combined if Ukraine is not counted so despite probably have thirdie tier equipment this could be true
                What are yon own about..,are you seriously shitting out North Korean statistics on what they call 'tanks' and trying to imply one of the most insane despotic failed states on earth armed almost exclusively with ancient soviet rubbish with carboard cut out body kits can somehow magically rival western European shit made by Rheinmetall? Nice B8 but retarded.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >air defense assets primarily supplied by the soviet union
                >brown water subs
                lol

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You know, I never thought about that.

                If Soviet equipment works as well in Nork hands as it does in Russian hands, they would do well not to make any trouble.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The only reason NK still exists is because it's so close to SK that they could cause massive civilian deaths and immense infrastructure damage before getting shat on. Not to mention it'd be the greatest humanitarian crisis on the planet with the sheer number of backwards, low IQ, starving, diseased North Koreans. Imagine trying to assimilate them into SK. Just ignore them, the problem will eventually kill itself.

            They've been firing hundreds of missiles per month and are still doing it to this day retard. It's the only way they could hit targets deep inside Ukraine given they can't use their air force due to Ukranian AA.

            The euros only have on average 200 tanks which half probably aren't even ready to be used. The Ukies and Russians lost that amount each month in the begining

            He said precise. Russia has no precise missiles, that's why they can't hit shit meanwhile Ukraine has superior Western missiles and can actually hit shit like ammo depots and air fields.

            >Didn't happen. SK still exists and has grown into a close and powerful US ally.
            Please explain the UN having nearly all of the Korean peninsula under control prior to Chinese intervention lmfao

            Please explain the goal of UN intervention being to save SK and how SK being saved is a loss. It was a draw for everyone except NK.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Please explain the goal of UN intervention being to save SK and how SK being saved is a loss.
              Pic related, keep coping the UN got btfo by 300k peasants despite overwhelming advantages in air, artillery and heavy equipment.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You could argue Pakistan isn't top 7 but the top 6 at least should be pretty clear.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No way China or India are top 6 let alone top 10, there could be an argument to place them somewhere 10 to 20, but realistically China and India are both outside of the top 20

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If you want to troll, make your take more believable.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This is the latest advanced technology that China is capable of a main battle tank that they claim is among the best, they aired this on national tv and the type 90s were literally breaking apart live, the level of panicmode was epic lol

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      russia is barely in top 10, and it's very generous of me

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dumbass. If anything Japan and South Korea are underrated and all of the thirdie nations are overrated. The biggest gripe with GFP is that it counts an F22 the same as some cheapass Chinese/Russian/Indian crap that would not even be considered operational by 1950s US standards

      The true rankings

      1. US

      2. South Korea
      3. France
      4. UK
      5. Japan
      6. Germany
      7. Turkey
      8. Poland
      9. Australia
      10. Italy
      11. Netherlands
      12. Spain
      13. Canada
      14. Sweden
      15. Denmark
      16. Norway
      17. Finland
      18. Austria
      19. Belgium
      20. Switzerland

      Then countries like China, Russia, India

      Then everybody else

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >France 3rd
        >Sk 2nd
        >German 6th
        >Finland bellow Norway
        You have to go back

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Norway has F35s operational, Finland still waiting on delivery

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So your telling me a few F35s will make up for the 935,000 man power gap that Norway has?

            Have you escaped a lunatic asylum?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yes.

              This is not WW2, a single F35 fully armed could take out 100,000+ people on one sortie and anything that is being targeted by an F35 is basically goldfish in a pond

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Are those 900k people going to stand on each other's shoulders until they can reach the F35 and bat it out of the sky? A single F35, with working logistics, could kill an infinite amount of people.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        One edit, Israel is somewhere between 16 and 20

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I've never seen anything more retarded.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >2. China
      >3. Russia
      >4. India

      >7. Pakistan
      Retarded brown and yellow people thinking they are just as good now as their former colonial masters via lists. India has one of the most retarded air forces in existence. China is soviet crap with body kits and Pakistan is literally left6 over western commuter models. Very funny but for your own sake don't try anything or there will be a lot of dead brown and yellow people and a lot of laughing French or UK people. Any western European nation or the USA can switch off India and kill 50% of its population before they have had breakfast and then go on and do a regular workday. This is why they don't have endemic leprosy or cruelly execute children for insufficient love of Mohammed. They don't have bodies drifting in rivers or illiterate village idiots without toilets cooking dogs alive. These are real first world places with high percentages of white people. They only reason they are not occupying China, Indonesia, India, Pakistan etc is because they got bored of war after ww1 and ww2. Not because brown and yellow people made them bored of war, they were just bored of playing it against each other, If brown or yellow people have somehow managed to convince themselves that they are now mighty warriors that are able to fight these people they have gone insane based on any empirical observation possible. Its very funny and evrything until millions of brown or yellow people are dead because some stupid brown or yellow person started really believing this. Look at them with their second hand soviet communist crap and commuter model French and American planes. It is so funny and cute. Look at China with its body kits like some retarded 21 year old with his first car sticking dumb spoilers everywhere. Look it made a Disney cruise ship flat and called it an aircraft carrier. For fuck sake brown and yellow people, get a grip and don't piss of the Americans or Europeans or you may wind up colonised. Again.

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. United States Airforce
    2. United States Navy
    3. United States Army
    who cares about the rest lmao they cant even match up to one branch of the US military

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    China
    Europe
    Maybe US
    Who cares about the rest

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    UK navy would shit all over Chinese "navy"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Uk navy is a joke that would get blown up if the USA didn't literally carry it and protect it. Stfu

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Just delusional. lol. China has orders of magnitude more of everything, and a vastly greater ability to replenish losses.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Russia vs Ukraine is a good example. Or India vs Pakistan. As you can see if you have w pervading culture of pretense within your military, it doesn’t fare well against a determined opponent in should, on paper, be an easy campaign.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          > As you can see if you have w pervading culture of pretense within your military, it doesn’t fare well against a determined opponent in should, on paper, be an easy campaign.
          The Chinese are better off right now than the American military, which ritually abases itself before the dregs of society, ultimately harming morale and recruitment.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          India vs Pakistan helps his case. India has crushed Pakistan in every war they've had despite the copes of Pakis. When the Pakis tried to invade, the Indians stopped them at the Line of Control. When the Pakis started genociding the Bengalis, the Indians btfod them and ended the war in a matter of weeks.

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Uk navy is a joke that would get blown up if the USA didn't literally carry it and protect it. Stfu

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you think otherwise you're 100% a deluded Brit, it's not the 70's anymore grandpa

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/5O6MU1u.png

        They beat the USA in Korea the 1950s, contrary to everybody's expectations.
        They beat Vietnam through the 1980s.
        They are adept at attaining all of their geopolitical objectives.
        > B-but they didn't get their asses handed to them by Talichads over the past twenty years!
        Cope bro.

        You can tell how much someone understand how wars *actually* work based on where they rank China and especially India. If they rank them low, then they're probably brainlets who don't understand the extent to which raw economic might predicts military power. A country's GDP per capita can be piss poor, but if their total manufacturing capacity and total GDP is high, then they will be able to buy and produce more equipment than other countries. Countries that grow fast economically can expect to keep increasing their military budgets with time and have a lot more room to approve drastic increases to the budget in times of war. Not to mention that since costs of living are so much lower in India and China, they don't have to pay their troops as much on a per person basis while also benefiting from cheaper costs to maintain those troops' necessities (food, clothing, etc).

        You can argue India 7th at worst and China 3rd at worst. 99% of the people who put them lower than that are coping Eurofags who are mad that their militaries wouldn't be able to compete.

        But why did they put the ships doors on backwards?

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You can tell how much someone understand how wars *actually* work based on where they rank China and especially India. If they rank them low, then they're probably brainlets who don't understand the extent to which raw economic might predicts military power. A country's GDP per capita can be piss poor, but if their total manufacturing capacity and total GDP is high, then they will be able to buy and produce more equipment than other countries. Countries that grow fast economically can expect to keep increasing their military budgets with time and have a lot more room to approve drastic increases to the budget in times of war. Not to mention that since costs of living are so much lower in India and China, they don't have to pay their troops as much on a per person basis while also benefiting from cheaper costs to maintain those troops' necessities (food, clothing, etc).

    You can argue India 7th at worst and China 3rd at worst. 99% of the people who put them lower than that are coping Eurofags who are mad that their militaries wouldn't be able to compete.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This post displays such a delightful ignorance of history.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dumbass brainlet and why you chinks are the worst in war, it takes a million chinese to equal one western soldier in real combat.

      If china was even a top 10 military picrel would never happen. The US and the entire world knows china is about as much of a threat as any rando thirdie like pakistan or vietnam, the US fucking controls the waters immediately on chinese soil lmfao

      Btw, chinese media absolutely seething about this but there ain't shit they can do and the chinese people are increasingly realizing their eternal role as defenseless bugs

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        China is in economic turmoil right now so they can't risk a war that would lead to the deaths of soldiers and possibly more economic pain if the world tries to sanction then. Once they get past their financial crisis of this year, they'll invade Taiwan and they'll be unstoppable there. The US will get BTFOd in that scenario esp since the average American isn't going to want to pay for another foreign war.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Keep telling yourself that gay, let me guess two more weeks?

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The "nuance" is that the CCP Chinese literally don't know defeat. They fight until they win. The Americans, in contrast, don't know how to win. They fight until they get bored or distracted or fed up, and then quit in disgrace.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He's not wrong on that part though US > China still

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    America
    China
    Everyone else doesn't matter besides nukes

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone not putting Russia 2nd is blinded by Amerimutt propaganda. As they've shown in Syria they can project significant power to the edge of their regional sphere of influence and accomplish their goals on a shoestring budget. They also shown they can more or less engage a higher level adversary, that being NATO, on a peer-to-peer level and trade blows in Ukraine. This is all while withstanding sanctions, lulzy logistics fuckups that result from being poor, the woes of a conscript force, and the combined glowbrotry of the western world sabotaging them at every step of the way. If we're being honest this is the only form of conflict that matters outside of MAD dick swinging, and the fact they're proving themselves victorious while still being on a shoestring budget is commendable.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Russia lost to fucking Ukraine with some Western MANPADS lmao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wow

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >As they've shown in Syria they can project significant power
      How much did they project? A dozen aircrafts?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So you rate Ukraine as number 1 then? lol

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine is currently losing a war despite having more manpower and a higher military budget than Russia thanks to NATO aid

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, yes. Ukraine is looooooosing, we get it vatnig.

          https://i.imgur.com/CjiJzGj.jpg

          This is the latest advanced technology that China is capable of a main battle tank that they claim is among the best, they aired this on national tv and the type 90s were literally breaking apart live, the level of panicmode was epic lol

          Don't forget their shiny new rifles all keyholing. China can't even make a rifle in 2022, they are a third world country.

          https://i.imgur.com/PPbaB9a.png

          >Please explain the goal of UN intervention being to save SK and how SK being saved is a loss.
          Pic related, keep coping the UN got btfo by 300k peasants despite overwhelming advantages in air, artillery and heavy equipment.

          >goal was to restore SK's border to the 38th parallel
          Which was accomplished. BOOM. Thank you, I win.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Initially
            Nice way of showing you can't read

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That gif proves his point, Russia still owns over 20% of Ukraine and the Ukies haven't been able to push them out via counter offensives

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, the gif proves his point that Russia is winning by losing half of what they initially held and being forced into WW1 trench combat. Remind me again what happened to Imperial Germany in WW1. They were "winning" vs France so I'm sure something good happened to them.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Modern Russia is no where near comparable to Imperial Germany in terms of contemporary military power, The Argerntina of ww1 would be a better comparison (has military, had navy, air force army, has no hope against any of the major world powers and has a relatively small and insignificant economy). However the Argentina of the early 20th century probably had less social issues and drug addicts etc than modern Russia. How about modern Russia is comparable to Turkey in 1925? Post imperial collapse, staggering politically economically and diplomatic, previous empire despised by all its constituent peoples, has a military but it is shit, has an airforce but it is shit. Largely armed with leftovers of the Ottoman Empire.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Anyone even considering Russia in the top 50 military powers of the world is blinded by orc propaganda. As they've shown in Syria they can project limited power they are incapable of sustaining outside their sphere of influence, failing to accomplish anything without massive assistance from local despots. They also shown they have to retreat immediately when engaging a higher level adversary, that being Ukraine, a nation a fraction of their size and economic weight; in an engagement with NATO they would crumble in the first few minutes. Despite years of preparing for sanctions and manipulating their currency and trade in creative ways, their constant logistic fuckups, their poverty, their unmotivated and poorly trained slave soldiers have resulted in casualties that have effectively crippled their ability to make decisive gains. If we're being honest Russia is a failed state bleeding to death while it flails its severed limbs at its enemies, the fact they've lied constantly about the intent of their war and failed to achieve any of their stated objectives or even the new ones they've made up along the way shows that they areas unimpressive and backward militarily as they are culturally.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >As they've shown in Syria they can project limited power they are incapable of sustaining outside their sphere of influence, failing to accomplish anything without massive assistance from local despots.
        Russia completely cockblocked the US's attempt to pull a Libya 2.0 in Syria, with both ISIS and the FSA getting blown the fuck out. The war is basically over and the Assad regime has survived against all odds

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          True, but they did this with espionage by placing their asset in the white house to give them all the military and political concessions they wanted in Syria. It has nothing to do with the competence of their army.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Trump was a Russian asset
            Fuck off back to plebbit moron

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >War is over
          >Barely controls 50% of country
          So the combined power of Syria and Russia cannot even manage to take back its own country? I see...

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My God it is some idiot from China who does not realise how the USA and the EU or NATO are vastly vastly more powerful that China could ever be. Why bother? I mean it is not like the aud9icence for this propaganda, half-witted Chinese speaking only impoverish slaves in China are on chans anyway. China is nota military or economic rival to the EU, it is not a military or diplomatic rival to NATO, it is not a diplomatic or economic rival to the G7. It is not a competitor with the USA. We had all this shit from Russia for years and years. China is the same worthless retarded propaganda for the domestic audience bullshit. Stop and consider how many retarded soviet commie weapons China uses. Even the retarded Russian air defense crap. Consider the EU or even the UK with modern NATO standard aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines western elite light infantry like parachute regiments and the FFL, SAS, KSK etc etc Western artillery, satellites, missiles, Eurofighters etc etc etc. All this bullshit about how China is going to rival the USA. China is never ever going to rival teh EU let alone the USA and never ever ever ever the USA and EU or something like NATO. It is sickening watching this shit coming from Chinese belligerents given the only reason they are not starving on a maoist collective agricultural farm is that the westa dn America in particular decided to try and elevate them to democracy via economic prosperity and made china a preferred trading partner. The reason china is less shit today than it was in 1980 is ENTIRELY due to the USA. Chona has learned nothing though it has not adopted the democracies, rule of law, freedom of expression and property rights that make western nations so successful and prosperous and powerful. China has made it self repugnant to its sponsor the USA and it not going to be let rot under its nasty squalid dark ages style tyranny. China is a military threat only to its own civilians

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. USA
    2. China
    3. Russia
    4. India
    5. Pakistan
    6. France
    7. UK
    8. Israel
    9. North Korea
    10. Egypt

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fuck off, turkmoron.

  58. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >not posting a template
    For shame.

  59. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Can Northern-Cyprus beat Southern-Cyprus in a war?

  60. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    1. Afghan insurgents
    2. Vietnamese insurgents
    3. Iraqi insurgents
    4. Somali insurgents
    5. United States

    6. rest

Your email address will not be published.