If it was a shaheed it's possible. Those things fly low and slow, slower than WW2 fighters and MG ground fire was known to destroy them so it's quite possible.
I mean, seems so logical - if the drone is on the low pass and the unit is aware of it's route - get a Special Sergeant Andrei with a AA-12 or a Benelli M4 with bridshot just to frick with the stabilizers and flaps.
Dude, it's flying at 118mph top. That's slower than a motorbike AND most cars. That's a heavy machine gun.
In WW2 ground based .50s were shooting down planes flying at 500mph+. It was one of the reasons for having .50s on Shermans that could elevate that high.
I really can't understand the people being surprised by this.
>tracers are nowhere near the explosion
Yeah it certainly wasn't intercepted by a MANPAD from 5 miles away and this is unrelated coincidentally timed video or anything.
I don’t think anyone disputes that, there’s plenty of footage of Russian shit getting fricked. It’s just doubtful that someone shot down a missile with a rifle. Reminds me of when people claimed that some guy with a shotgun downed a Russian jet or something.
>Reminds me of when people claimed that some guy with a shotgun downed a Russian jet or something.
I like how every certified Russian shill has to mention that. The old dude shot with his rifle at Russoid plane exactly when Ukrainian AA eternally flighted that flying tincan, he was awarded medal for his bravery not for shooting down a plane. I also love how there's fricking video evidence of shot down by machineguns but seething "IT DIDN'T HAPPEN, IT WAS ACTUALLY STEALTH MANPAD, THEY HID THE EVIDENCE"
3 months ago
Anonymous
> he was awarded medal for his bravery not for shooting down a plane.
No shit he didn’t shoot it down, I’m saying that tons of news articles and people on /k/ initially claimed that he did, when it should have been obvious that he didn’t. >russian shill
Bro, come the frick on, not everyone who doesn’t buy into moronic propaganda is a russian shill. I’m 100% pro self defense, for both individuals and countries, Ukraine absolutely has the right to frick up russia and I would donate money to Ukraine if I wasn’t so poor that I’m shooting steel case out of a PSA, but I just don’t think it’s likely that someone shot down a missile with a rifle.
3 months ago
Anonymous
[...]
qui qui qui qui
3 months ago
Anonymous
Those places are citing other places, they even say that.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Bro, come the frick on, not everyone who doesn’t buy into moronic propaganda is a russian shill
First act of Russian shill: always mention Ghost of Kyiv, Snake Island or this old dude as proof that whatever is being discussed as false, literally seen that done several hundred times on /k/ and /misc/, actually every time news about downed(including il-22m and a-50) netrooolers come out screaming how it's false because media claimed that this dude shot down Russian aircraft.
Second: you're literally watching video of M2 browning intercept flying object and start screaming how it didn't happen, the most common Russian shill tactic
So if you act like a duck, talk like a duck and walk like a duck, the frick are you beside a duck?
If it was a shaheed it's possible. Those things fly low and slow, slower than WW2 fighters and MG ground fire was known to destroy them so it's quite possible.
Black person.
Shaheds fly at 150km or 118mph for our yank friends. We've seen video of them very low as well.
I reckon this is very possible. The hard counter to shahed spam is probably just AAA spam. Don't even need the all singing all dancing western ones either, probably a WW2 bofors twin mount on a truck will do nicely.
>tfw no webms of a quad mount bofors turning a zigger treeline into fine mulch with bits of meat in it
Are we gonna reach the point where Ukraine is killing ziggers with actual WWII surplus?
>For some reason /misc/ thought Shaheds cost $50
I still love how there are people that believe that Shaheds cost 10k $ while recovered engines from Shaheds alone cost 20k $
Technically Shsneeds cost $500k due to the amount of aircraft Russia gave to Iran in exchange. Except, of course, they haven't. They totally will though. Haha. Totally.
>and that the Ukrainians would be exclusively firing $2 million PAC-2 interceptors against them.
It happened once though, during the summer.
Something like 30-40 patriot launches one after another during one of the attacks, and no reports of kinzhal intercepts the next day, a lot of shaheds and some Kh-s if I recall correctly.
And I'm certain it was patriot, it was the same dense earth-shaking roar and large bright orange lights rapidly going up and to the side in the sky before disappearing, as with the first intercept of kinzhal in may, which I've seen with my own eyes(yeah im going to a balcony of my apartment instead of a shelter during attacks).
Also after all that the air stank somewhat of a burning plastic, but somehow worse.
Ukraine's been using machine gun trucks against Shaheds for over a year now. And I remember a video from 2022 of four or five guys with AKs managing to plink one.
puccia's probably getting ready to officially announce gerasimov's death
Nah yeah nah it's actually a 200iq play by gerasimov whom faked his own death similar to pringles. So now with their asses combined their ass status will include putin's ass in their ass, the last remaining puzzle piece once his ass is in his ass it shall be peckered and measured, and all ass status will be all known.
He is >being raped every day in Putin's private dungeon
https://i.imgur.com/nBJMAxF.jpg
I always see people say "y not gib soldiers 12g shodgums to just shot down drone???", which is moronic for reasons people reply with every time, but I do wonder if you could take that idea and scale it up to a vehicle-mounted automatic shotgun to actually make it practical. IIRC western nations are developing airburst weapons specifically for fricking up drones, but it seems like a cheap, (by military procurement standards), mounted gun firing dirt cheap 12g shells to just put up a wall of pseudo-flak against incoming drones or missiles might have some use alongside it since cheap FPV drones would be disabled by even a single pellet of buckshot clipping a rotor and Saheds are slow as frick (by missile standards)
Cannon do a far better job
The problem however is not the fricking ordnance, it's with detecting, classifying and cueing the weapon onto the threat
>puccia's probably getting ready to officially announce gerasimov's death
and they are going to hide it by posting slide threads? are you fricking moronic?
Have you not noticed that they spew endless slide threads for literally every single humiliation they suffer? It's well within the realm of reason that they'd spam and slide for this as well.
Yeah man, several different threads of >Is it OK for browns to own guns? >Is it OK for transgender to own guns? >Is it OK for Asians to own guns?
Was a PURE coincidence.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>>Is it OK for Asians to own guns?
Only the men. The asian women are for gentle lesdom by huwhite women :3
When Ukies fwacked the radar intel/recon forces HQ in Crimea. Base commander was confirmed killed, and a VIP was airlifted to Moscow. Word on the street is that that was Gerasimov, but we don't know. Neither side has said anything after the base commander was ETERNAL FLIGHT'd
They're already coping by having people go >Well he's gone missing/AWOL before, so he's totally fine and Russia went OTT to disprove Streklov was dead
The issue, being obviously, that Streklov Weekend At Bernie'd was immediately forgotten and he hasn't been seen since. This is the ultimate thing about all the guys claimed to be whacked. We've not seen them since outside of Russia going 'he is totally alive, here is phonecall of him'. Nothing else. Months past and we never see them again. It's ignored by both sides and memory holed. But their point of Kremlin going OTT to say Streklov wasn't dead lands credence to the theory Gerisamov isn't... Or there would have been more attempts to disprove it like every other high ranking thing. Now, of course, this doesn't mean he is uninjured or not in a coma... Hell it doesn't even mean he is not dead. Russia might simply be avoid mentioning he is dead/injured because they don't want to reinforce the idea that Ukraine is successfully hitting their high command AND to make it less likely Ukraine will try to whack them again. After all, they're already dead, right?
Thousands of missiles. Hundreads of thousands of soldiers. Random chance.
I'd rather ask how much ammo has been wasted uselessly or done damage to ground if they do this often enough to finally score a hit and what other wasteful practices they dont irradicate while asking for gibs.
>cost of Kh-101 >13 million dollars >cost of .50 cal ammo >3 dollars
so unless they "waste" 4 million .50 cal ammo to shoot down one rocket it sounds like good trade
Do we know it was an X-101?
You’d also have to factor in the cost of gun barrels, .50 bmg returning to the ground and ruining something, etc
You also want to compare the price to the reduction in damage dealt by the X-101 as opposed to its price. Russia loses the X-101 either way, the “gain” is from destroying ukrainian targets
In every conflict since men stopped standing in the open waiting to get shot, the number of bullets fired is always comically higher than the number of bullets that actually hit something they're supposed to.
I always see people say "y not gib soldiers 12g shodgums to just shot down drone???", which is moronic for reasons people reply with every time, but I do wonder if you could take that idea and scale it up to a vehicle-mounted automatic shotgun to actually make it practical. IIRC western nations are developing airburst weapons specifically for fricking up drones, but it seems like a cheap, (by military procurement standards), mounted gun firing dirt cheap 12g shells to just put up a wall of pseudo-flak against incoming drones or missiles might have some use alongside it since cheap FPV drones would be disabled by even a single pellet of buckshot clipping a rotor and Saheds are slow as frick (by missile standards)
Fun fact, soviets had a shit-ton of high-caliber, radar-directed flak cannons errywhere. But then Burgers started flying over their frozen swamp with impunity with superior high-altitude planes so the soviets put all research points into missiles.
To give you an actual answer, no, because buckshot isn't aerodynamic enough. It loses energy way too fast when attempting to fire it at distant targets, and scaling up the gun doesn't help the problem much.
See: Tanks that have a canister shell munition. Their effective range typically tops out at 750 meters on a good day. That's nowhere near enough to be effective AAA.
To solve the problem you need an aerodynamic spinning projectile, and at that point you have a rifle, and if you're building a rifle to shoot at flying shit you may as well make it a fused shell.
Anything's possible in the fantastical land of imagination called Ukraine. If you can't prove it didn't happen, it happened. What are you, an anti-Semite?
>show flying_car.mp4 to zigger >n-no that's fake
i mean everything is fake if your ego doesn't allow it to be true zigger, video is in the thread if you dare to look at it.
It's obviously theoretically possible.
Extremely unlikely, though, because human reaction speed and precision cannot match a machine's.
This is just really stupid and lucky CIWS.
if you have infinite chances everything is possible
so possible? - yes
does it mean now half of missiles will be shot this way? - no
possibly more missiles were lost in collisions with birds...
They make up shit like this a few times a year to nuke their own credibility. Reminds me of this story
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11181503/Ukrainian-pensioner-shoots-74million-Russian-Su-34-jet-RIFLE-awarded-medal.html
As this war goes on the more I 100% believe that story more and more.
You know 100% that those pilots were barely flying treetops that early in the war over a ton of residential area's, and those things are frickhuge and can't take bullets for shit.
>Puccia claims to do X >the only proof is a brown twitter account posting a screencap of zigger Telegram channel >a few weeks later fighterbomber or rybar starts doomposting and casually mentions that people who still believe in X are moronic shills
>Ukrainie claims to do X >15 minutes later HD footage is posted
Assuming it happened, then it'd be a classic example of the "golden BB". If you fire rifle-caliber bullets at low-flying aircraft, some of them will hit. If you fire enough bullets at enough aircraft, eventually one of them will hit something important; i.e. you are not immune to groundfire.
>They downed something in that video
There's at least 3 videos ITT of a munition flying over ukraine being downed by men with AKs and/or M2s
>What was it, though.
Some are clearly Shanseeds being illuminated by searchlights, but if you want to go full BUT WHAT WAS IT clown-mode, we can play that game and say it is possible an Iskander was downed by an AK.
cruise missiles travel at less than 600 mph and often low to the ground, so it doesn't seem outrageous to me that someone shoots it down with a machine gun
Is just propaganda for people who doesn´t know the different between a drone a rocket and a missile.
/k/ is a weapon board, whoever believe this is just a tourist.
Why did 8-10 thread made in the last 5 minutes? Whats going on?
GOOD MORNING SIR!!
Turns out russia's latest missile strike didn't hit anything of importance (again) so the shills have to work overtime to compensate
It has to be more than that. Them missing everything of importance is pretty much par for the course at this point. I guess only time will tell.
>It has to be more than that.
Agreed; they're only ever this riled up when a new reason to point and laugh is immanent.
well, two substations denazified themselves in Vladivostok last night.
Ooh, that's pretty far. Wonder if it's partisans or just plain entropy this time?
Just plain entropy according to sources on the ground.
Russian fire season. Natural phenomenon. It has been observed to track insurance rates in the wild.
Russian insurance must be a nightmare, for so many reasons.
Just civilians
Because it most probably didn't happen.
If it was a shaheed it's possible. Those things fly low and slow, slower than WW2 fighters and MG ground fire was known to destroy them so it's quite possible.
Black person.
considering each time such comment appears in threads about destroyed Russian equipment it turned out that it exactly what happened, I believe in it
You Black person
Damn, hell of a shot
this was Russian M2 Browing and hohol Storm Shadow
Give that mofo an air defence medal, a years worth of premium vodka, early access to Stalker 2 and a Buhanka onahole warbride.
>and a Buhanka onahole warbride.
I'm not into aids
Here's your Buhanka-chan, bro
>still no good buhanka guro
Someone webm this so I can save this.
Streamable links live forever, but Black personbox vids get removed quickly.
Just fricking download it no?
frick, I haven't right-click saved videos since imbedded porn mp3s. I forgot that was an option.
>Duck Hunter: Ukraine
Coming along nicely, let me know it's out of early access
Anon, you cant hunt ducks with an ak, you need shotgun for that.
I mean, seems so logical - if the drone is on the low pass and the unit is aware of it's route - get a Special Sergeant Andrei with a AA-12 or a Benelli M4 with bridshot just to frick with the stabilizers and flaps.
Its got to be computer vision assisted.
It HAS to be
Could be just luck.
Dude, it's flying at 118mph top. That's slower than a motorbike AND most cars. That's a heavy machine gun.
In WW2 ground based .50s were shooting down planes flying at 500mph+. It was one of the reasons for having .50s on Shermans that could elevate that high.
I really can't understand the people being surprised by this.
what is he using to hone in the shot? looks like a smartphone but like... wtf.
some kind of thermal camera, I'd assume
looks like thermal camera for building inspections. May be even one of the cat smartphones
Fricking beautiful
could have been anything exploding in the air, probably NATO drone they shot
is that dude using an iphone as a sight?
Yes, Adequate NV. Lmao don't tell me you're one of those idiots who spent thousands on nodz?
Well I'll be.
Now imagine if some durka shot down a JASSM with a DShK in the sandox, its that bad.
>tracers are nowhere near the explosion
Yeah it certainly wasn't intercepted by a MANPAD from 5 miles away and this is unrelated coincidentally timed video or anything.
So you do admit that Ukraine shot down a Russian missile after all then
I don’t think anyone disputes that, there’s plenty of footage of Russian shit getting fricked. It’s just doubtful that someone shot down a missile with a rifle. Reminds me of when people claimed that some guy with a shotgun downed a Russian jet or something.
>Reminds me of when people claimed that some guy with a shotgun downed a Russian jet or something.
I like how every certified Russian shill has to mention that. The old dude shot with his rifle at Russoid plane exactly when Ukrainian AA eternally flighted that flying tincan, he was awarded medal for his bravery not for shooting down a plane. I also love how there's fricking video evidence of shot down by machineguns but seething "IT DIDN'T HAPPEN, IT WAS ACTUALLY STEALTH MANPAD, THEY HID THE EVIDENCE"
> he was awarded medal for his bravery not for shooting down a plane.
No shit he didn’t shoot it down, I’m saying that tons of news articles and people on /k/ initially claimed that he did, when it should have been obvious that he didn’t.
>russian shill
Bro, come the frick on, not everyone who doesn’t buy into moronic propaganda is a russian shill. I’m 100% pro self defense, for both individuals and countries, Ukraine absolutely has the right to frick up russia and I would donate money to Ukraine if I wasn’t so poor that I’m shooting steel case out of a PSA, but I just don’t think it’s likely that someone shot down a missile with a rifle.
qui qui qui qui
Those places are citing other places, they even say that.
>Bro, come the frick on, not everyone who doesn’t buy into moronic propaganda is a russian shill
First act of Russian shill: always mention Ghost of Kyiv, Snake Island or this old dude as proof that whatever is being discussed as false, literally seen that done several hundred times on /k/ and /misc/, actually every time news about downed(including il-22m and a-50) netrooolers come out screaming how it's false because media claimed that this dude shot down Russian aircraft.
Second: you're literally watching video of M2 browning intercept flying object and start screaming how it didn't happen, the most common Russian shill tactic
So if you act like a duck, talk like a duck and walk like a duck, the frick are you beside a duck?
Damn that's frickin' rad
awesome
That was some fancy shooting, he's pretty good.
here,'s one better
Hope he got a medal for that. What a badass.
I spent a lot of middle school in the late 2000's trying to do this shit in video games and this man pulled it off in real life.
was probably just a shitty shasneed flying at 50 mph over the ukrainian countryside
Shaheds fly at 150km or 118mph for our yank friends. We've seen video of them very low as well.
I reckon this is very possible. The hard counter to shahed spam is probably just AAA spam. Don't even need the all singing all dancing western ones either, probably a WW2 bofors twin mount on a truck will do nicely.
>tfw no webms of a quad mount bofors turning a zigger treeline into fine mulch with bits of meat in it
Are we gonna reach the point where Ukraine is killing ziggers with actual WWII surplus?
They've been using Maxim guns since 2014, so we're already past that point
>WWII
holy shit, it's the maxim perosa.
Maximmaxing
beautiful enough to put a tear in ol' Luigi's eye.
I'm still annoyed there aren't more videos of Shilkas being used to pre-cube tenderise Vatniks.
Those things are slower than a fricking motorbike lol. And /misc/ was calling them a war winner last year
For some reason /misc/ thought Shaheds cost $50 and that the Ukrainians would be exclusively firing $2 million PAC-2 interceptors against them.
>For some reason /misc/ thought Shaheds cost $50
I still love how there are people that believe that Shaheds cost 10k $ while recovered engines from Shaheds alone cost 20k $
Technically Shsneeds cost $500k due to the amount of aircraft Russia gave to Iran in exchange. Except, of course, they haven't. They totally will though. Haha. Totally.
>some reason
it's always Global Southerns and their tendency for magical thinking
>/misc/ is moronic
>and that the Ukrainians would be exclusively firing $2 million PAC-2 interceptors against them.
It happened once though, during the summer.
Something like 30-40 patriot launches one after another during one of the attacks, and no reports of kinzhal intercepts the next day, a lot of shaheds and some Kh-s if I recall correctly.
And I'm certain it was patriot, it was the same dense earth-shaking roar and large bright orange lights rapidly going up and to the side in the sky before disappearing, as with the first intercept of kinzhal in may, which I've seen with my own eyes(yeah im going to a balcony of my apartment instead of a shelter during attacks).
Also after all that the air stank somewhat of a burning plastic, but somehow worse.
Ukraine's been using machine gun trucks against Shaheds for over a year now. And I remember a video from 2022 of four or five guys with AKs managing to plink one.
See
>150kph.
Dude, I could probably intercept one of those with a hockey stick.
LMG spam could absolutely take one out then.
We're getting alot of spam at the moment
puccia's probably getting ready to officially announce gerasimov's death
Or that Pringles is still alive
Nah yeah nah it's actually a 200iq play by gerasimov whom faked his own death similar to pringles. So now with their asses combined their ass status will include putin's ass in their ass, the last remaining puzzle piece once his ass is in his ass it shall be peckered and measured, and all ass status will be all known.
He is
>being raped every day in Putin's private dungeon
Cannon do a far better job
The problem however is not the fricking ordnance, it's with detecting, classifying and cueing the weapon onto the threat
>puccia's probably getting ready to officially announce gerasimov's death
and they are going to hide it by posting slide threads? are you fricking moronic?
Have you not noticed that they spew endless slide threads for literally every single humiliation they suffer? It's well within the realm of reason that they'd spam and slide for this as well.
rent-free
Yeah man, several different threads of
>Is it OK for browns to own guns?
>Is it OK for transgender to own guns?
>Is it OK for Asians to own guns?
Was a PURE coincidence.
>>Is it OK for Asians to own guns?
Only the men. The asian women are for gentle lesdom by huwhite women :3
You must be new. Welcome new friend.
Wait when did Gerasimov get supposedly whacked this time?
When Ukies fwacked the radar intel/recon forces HQ in Crimea. Base commander was confirmed killed, and a VIP was airlifted to Moscow. Word on the street is that that was Gerasimov, but we don't know. Neither side has said anything after the base commander was ETERNAL FLIGHT'd
Do you guys think Gerasimov will be posthumously awarded the Hero of Ukraine medal? He deserves one for last year's Vuhledar offensive alone.
They're already coping by having people go
>Well he's gone missing/AWOL before, so he's totally fine and Russia went OTT to disprove Streklov was dead
The issue, being obviously, that Streklov Weekend At Bernie'd was immediately forgotten and he hasn't been seen since. This is the ultimate thing about all the guys claimed to be whacked. We've not seen them since outside of Russia going 'he is totally alive, here is phonecall of him'. Nothing else. Months past and we never see them again. It's ignored by both sides and memory holed. But their point of Kremlin going OTT to say Streklov wasn't dead lands credence to the theory Gerisamov isn't... Or there would have been more attempts to disprove it like every other high ranking thing. Now, of course, this doesn't mean he is uninjured or not in a coma... Hell it doesn't even mean he is not dead. Russia might simply be avoid mentioning he is dead/injured because they don't want to reinforce the idea that Ukraine is successfully hitting their high command AND to make it less likely Ukraine will try to whack them again. After all, they're already dead, right?
There's a video
Thousands of missiles. Hundreads of thousands of soldiers. Random chance.
I'd rather ask how much ammo has been wasted uselessly or done damage to ground if they do this often enough to finally score a hit and what other wasteful practices they dont irradicate while asking for gibs.
>cost of Kh-101
>13 million dollars
>cost of .50 cal ammo
>3 dollars
so unless they "waste" 4 million .50 cal ammo to shoot down one rocket it sounds like good trade
This is the new troll posting meta right? Or is everyone genuinely moronic? I can't even tell anymore
if anyone makes moronic post about "wasting" .50 cal ammo shooting down Shahed drones and rockets they fricking deserve such moronic answer
turdie cope meta
>my shit missile was worth less that your expensive interceptor
>therefore I win if you shoot it down
the onon you're replying to just turned that on its head.
Do we know it was an X-101?
You’d also have to factor in the cost of gun barrels, .50 bmg returning to the ground and ruining something, etc
You also want to compare the price to the reduction in damage dealt by the X-101 as opposed to its price. Russia loses the X-101 either way, the “gain” is from destroying ukrainian targets
In every conflict since men stopped standing in the open waiting to get shot, the number of bullets fired is always comically higher than the number of bullets that actually hit something they're supposed to.
Trying to shoot down missile that are aimed at your cities isn't a wasteful practice you fricking moron.
Turdies don’t value human life the way westerners do, anon
Thank you sar
fire a lot hit critical part by skill luck and random chance.
maybe they flew the same corridor like the f117 at that point you can just spray and pray
With the power of MA DEUCE of course.
And luck. Lots and lots and lots of luck.
I always see people say "y not gib soldiers 12g shodgums to just shot down drone???", which is moronic for reasons people reply with every time, but I do wonder if you could take that idea and scale it up to a vehicle-mounted automatic shotgun to actually make it practical. IIRC western nations are developing airburst weapons specifically for fricking up drones, but it seems like a cheap, (by military procurement standards), mounted gun firing dirt cheap 12g shells to just put up a wall of pseudo-flak against incoming drones or missiles might have some use alongside it since cheap FPV drones would be disabled by even a single pellet of buckshot clipping a rotor and Saheds are slow as frick (by missile standards)
This is called flak.
Fun fact, soviets had a shit-ton of high-caliber, radar-directed flak cannons errywhere. But then Burgers started flying over their frozen swamp with impunity with superior high-altitude planes so the soviets put all research points into missiles.
To give you an actual answer, no, because buckshot isn't aerodynamic enough. It loses energy way too fast when attempting to fire it at distant targets, and scaling up the gun doesn't help the problem much.
See: Tanks that have a canister shell munition. Their effective range typically tops out at 750 meters on a good day. That's nowhere near enough to be effective AAA.
To solve the problem you need an aerodynamic spinning projectile, and at that point you have a rifle, and if you're building a rifle to shoot at flying shit you may as well make it a fused shell.
modified m2s are unironically the answer here.
>he doesn't believe in the boars of chernobyl
>he doesn't believe in the bees of kherson
>he doesn't believe in the goat of kiev
>How the frick is this possible?
Good shooting
>warfare in 2016+8
>it's just Duck Hunt HD
Anything's possible in the fantastical land of imagination called Ukraine. If you can't prove it didn't happen, it happened. What are you, an anti-Semite?
bet you're feeling kinda stupid now, huh?
I see a drone asploding and a conscript shooting at it, but nothing to link the two things. Just like a chimney and a gas chamber.
Take a look and choke on it
How does it feel to talk shit and then immediately get proven wrong? It stings a little, huh?
>It stings a little, huh?
Lmao, you absolutely fail to understand the zigger mindset.
The only thing this is missing is the Russian saying 'everyone eats shit, what about about America?'
>How the frick is this possible?
maybe...
>How the frick is this possible?
Not the first time it happened.
>My car can fly thanks to the power of lies!
>show flying_car.mp4 to zigger
>n-no that's fake
i mean everything is fake if your ego doesn't allow it to be true zigger, video is in the thread if you dare to look at it.
It's obviously theoretically possible.
Extremely unlikely, though, because human reaction speed and precision cannot match a machine's.
This is just really stupid and lucky CIWS.
Skill + Luck + Russian equipment being shit.
if you have infinite chances everything is possible
so possible? - yes
does it mean now half of missiles will be shot this way? - no
possibly more missiles were lost in collisions with birds...
>possibly more missiles were lost in collisions with birds...
HATO BIOLAB ATTACK BIRDS WITH ANTI-RUSSIAN VIRUSES confirmed.
They make up shit like this a few times a year to nuke their own credibility. Reminds me of this story
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11181503/Ukrainian-pensioner-shoots-74million-Russian-Su-34-jet-RIFLE-awarded-medal.html
lol
As this war goes on the more I 100% believe that story more and more.
You know 100% that those pilots were barely flying treetops that early in the war over a ton of residential area's, and those things are frickhuge and can't take bullets for shit.
>Puccia claims to do X
>the only proof is a brown twitter account posting a screencap of zigger Telegram channel
>a few weeks later fighterbomber or rybar starts doomposting and casually mentions that people who still believe in X are moronic shills
>Ukrainie claims to do X
>15 minutes later HD footage is posted
Why does this pattern repeat so often bros?
STOP noticing things RIGHT NOW. STOP IT.
Ukraine has the good sense to realize that truth is the best way to combat zigger lies, and therefore make it a priority to substantiate their claims.
If hollywood was that good, they might manage to squeeze out a decent movie now and then.
They're too busy producing bradley kino and suicidniks.
Do missiles phase out of existence now? They're still physical objects, and the things typically designed to shoot them down are also fast moving.
Assuming it happened, then it'd be a classic example of the "golden BB". If you fire rifle-caliber bullets at low-flying aircraft, some of them will hit. If you fire enough bullets at enough aircraft, eventually one of them will hit something important; i.e. you are not immune to groundfire.
>Assuming it happened
There is LITERALLY videos in this thread proving it happened. You didn't even bother to check.
They downed something in that video. What was it though?
It was a large explosion. So...
It also seemed to be moving very slowly, though it might have just been a low deflection shot.
>They downed something in that video
There's at least 3 videos ITT of a munition flying over ukraine being downed by men with AKs and/or M2s
>What was it, though.
Some are clearly Shanseeds being illuminated by searchlights, but if you want to go full BUT WHAT WAS IT clown-mode, we can play that game and say it is possible an Iskander was downed by an AK.
Shaheds aren't cruise missiles.
What's it lacking? an air-breathing engine?
Apparently the radar and visibility is too shit to hit anything
Ukraine was modernising them prior to 2022, sadly I imagine they didn't get many of the new versions finished.
cruise missiles travel at less than 600 mph and often low to the ground, so it doesn't seem outrageous to me that someone shoots it down with a machine gun
Is just propaganda for people who doesn´t know the different between a drone a rocket and a missile.
/k/ is a weapon board, whoever believe this is just a tourist.
Testing testing