>Begun and held at the City of Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania, on Monday, the second of December, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-three.
>An ACT to provide a Naval Armament.
>WHEREAS the depredations committed by the Algerine corsairs on the commerce of the United States render it necessary that a naval force should be provided for its protection:
>Sec. 1. BE it therefore enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be authorized to provide, by purchase or otherwise, equip and employ four ships to carry forty four guns each, and two ships to carry thirty six guns each.
>Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That there shall be employed on board each of the said ships of forty-four guns, one captain, four lieutenants, one lieutenant of marines, one chaplain, one surgeon and two surgeon's mates; and in each of the ships of thirty six guns, one captain, three lieutenants, one lieutenant of marines, one surgeon, and one surgeon's mate, who shall be appointed and commissioned in like manner as other officers of the United States are.
this establishes the purpose, and the US Navy's charter essentially. Wartime Powers ACT also allows the President to conduct operations to ensure US interests are protected. Free moving global trade is one of those interests.
The President doesn't need approval to defend the US and its military, he just needs to inform Congress. After that, he has 60 days of basically free reign until Congress either approves it to continue, or shuts it down.
The War Powers Act was simply to stop the president from entering LONG wars on his own, like Nixon in Vietnam and Cambodia.
Even if the Houthies hadn't admitted to directly attacking the US Navy, Biden would still have the authority to order strikes in Yemen in order to protect the shipping routes of the US and her allies.
>article written by a asiatic >quotes max-cliche line by fictional captain Kirk in the opening
I see now, you're just trolling
4 months ago
Anonymous
>upper right: ayy lmao level eye separation for wide field of view—clearly a prey animal not a predator >bottom: fat, anticipating the average American obesity levels a century later
>personifying nations means you're ESL
No it's a literary tool that's been used for centuries at the very least, probably even longer than that. You fricking moron.
Is this the best excuse you can come up with? Waxing poetic in no way fits the context of this thread or even the tone of the rest of his post.
kys, troon
Their pre-WW1 political cartoons were bangers, honestly.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Holy mother of B A S E D
4 months ago
Anonymous
So has Columbia traditionally been the nation while Uncle Sam has been the government?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Images of the Statue of Liberty largely displaced personified Columbia as the female symbol of the United States by around 1920, although Lady Liberty was seen as an aspect of Columbia.
yeah
>She is also known as "Miss Columbia", implying that she is unmarried.
hummina hummina *slide whistle* boioioing
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Columbia in an 1865 Thomas Nast cartoon asking the government to allow black soldiers to vote.
4 months ago
Anonymous
It's a duality, the masculine and the feminine, the pragmatic and the empathic. In a way, the central tension of American history revolves around the question "where is the practical limit to idealism?", and those two characters do a very good job of summing it up.
4 months ago
Anonymous
This. Columbia represented virtues and public sentiment (liberty, empathy, good will, righteous anger, etc.). Uncle Sam was the embodiment of the government as well as the citizenry.
So the government wants to frick the citizens?
What's patriotism other than the nation's love of their country? And obviously a patriot isn't going to think their homeland is anything other than beautiful. So how can you expect Uncle Sam not lust after Columbia when she's such a hot piece of ass?
4 months ago
Anonymous
I've never thought about it in those terms, but I think you're right.
https://i.imgur.com/EomH8tM.png
>Images of the Statue of Liberty largely displaced personified Columbia as the female symbol of the United States by around 1920, although Lady Liberty was seen as an aspect of Columbia.
yeah
>She is also known as "Miss Columbia", implying that she is unmarried.
hummina hummina *slide whistle* boioioing
>hummina hummina *slide whistle* boioioing
Uncle Sam agrees.
Is this the best excuse you can come up with? Waxing poetic in no way fits the context of this thread or even the tone of the rest of his post.
kys, troon
>falling graph shows the phrasing in question is an anachronism >posts it as a win
Talk about a self-own to match that of a vatBlack person, which is what you probably are
4 months ago
Anonymous
no one said it wasn't falling out of use. that's exactly why 2 digit-IQ morons like you don't know it. the point was that it's valid. it's still in use everywhere today, both in academia and media
4 months ago
Anonymous
Something can be valid yet inappropriate in a given context. I called out your ESL and now you're butthurt. PrepHole should really rangeban India and the rest of the shithole countries. >in academia
You gave an invalid example. Your phrasing is rare in legitimate publications outside of art/literature.
Now go asking for bob & vagene or evacuating your bowels on the designated shitting street
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Something can be valid yet inappropriate in a given context.
inappropritate in what context? PrepHole. lmfao. you ousted yourself as a moron. i don't know who you're trying to convince otherwise
4 months ago
Anonymous
That was answered already. Learn to read, Ahmed
Is this the best excuse you can come up with? Waxing poetic in no way fits the context of this thread or even the tone of the rest of his post.
kys, troon
4 months ago
Anonymous
Settle down Raj. You were wrong.
4 months ago
Anonymous
NTA anon but I've heard it before. Perhaps you should post hand?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Why stop there
4 months ago
Anonymous
how does it compare to "America and its"?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Do your own work
4 months ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/tZ4sRnU.png
Why stop there
how does it compare to "America and its"?
Ten thousand years in MS Paint.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Holy shit
4 months ago
Anonymous
its anachronistic
https://i.imgur.com/roXes9j.png
[...]
[...]
Ten thousand years in MS Paint.
the difference is more striking in more recent times (2000-2019)
4 months ago
Anonymous
>as common today as it was in 1802, 1882, 1980
Nice cherry picking though.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>as common today as it was in 1802, 1882, 1980
if your today is 2000, sure.
4 months ago
Anonymous
2019 actually
4 months ago
Anonymous
too bad you can't understand a graph
https://i.imgur.com/mXDex6P.png
4 months ago
Anonymous
That one doesn't go back to 1802, but does prove what I said about 1882 and and 1980
4 months ago
Anonymous
>but does prove something not relevant to my argument
Profound mental moronation
4 months ago
Anonymous
>forgetting your own posts
>as common today as it was in 1802, 1882, 1980
if your today is 2000, sure.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I didn't post that though
4 months ago
Anonymous
here's your 1802 and 1882, i don't see how they are as common as today.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Don't waste your time with him, you based autist. He might actually kys if he loses this Internet argument (even though he should do it because he's a turdie or p*ssian instead)
4 months ago
Anonymous
I think we're on the same side here.
4 months ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/roXes9j.png
[...]
[...]
Ten thousand years in MS Paint.
https://i.imgur.com/apwuHmT.png
its anachronistic
[...]
the difference is more striking in more recent times (2000-2019)
The president can deploy troops for 2 months without congressional approval. Although its been stated that Congress is pretty much behind bombing sand people, so its a none issue.
It’s been decades since the courts decided whether you could do this or not. Either way, threatening international shipping lanes is more than enough justification.
https://www.reu ters.com/world/anti-war-activists-new-york-city-washington-protest-us-uk-strikes-yemen-2024-01-12/
why are thirdies like "AHAHA take that evil zionists" then they find out and "UN HELP GENOCIDE AHAHAH" and why do white leftoids always simp for em
>The President is authorized to employ so many of the public armed vessels as in his judgment the service may require, with suitable instructions to the commanders thereof, in protecting the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions and depredations. (R.S. §4293.)
POTUS has limited authority for limited military operations without congressional approval. I don't remember the specifics but usually throwing some TLAMs at terrorists doesn't need congressional action.
BREAKING: YEMENI HOUTHI OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Mohammad Ali Al-Houthi
>We welcome direct confrontation with the Americans because they are the ones attacking our country and besieging our people for nine years.
>America is the great Satan, the enemy of peoples, and it is terrorism.
>We say to the American terrorist: return to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans and do not protect the "israeli" ships.
>Our stance is to support our brothers in Gaza and to protect humanity there, while the American stands against humanity and kills all who protect it.
>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation, but the American coalition is igniting the Red Sea, militarizing it, and threatening it, and the American is working hard to raise marine insurance prices.
>Before the American claims that he came to protect international law, let him protect the American Constitution which he violated by bombing and striking our country.
>The American claims to protect "israeli" ships or those heading to the "israeli" entity under the pretext of international law, which he tramples everywhere in the world.
>The American should underline several times the confirmation of the leader of the revolution that any attack on the Republic of Yemen will be met with a response greater than the previous operation.
>The operation with 24 drones carried out by our Armed Forces made the American soldiers targeted live in terror.
>The American claims to reserve the right to respond, even though we did not attack American shores or reach the American islands that are famous for raping children.
>The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis, and their strikes on our country are terrorist acts to kill our people.
>It is impossible for terrorists and perverts to achieve justice for humanity because they lack it.
(1/2)
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
>We say to the American terrorist: return to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans >We are the ones who protect maritime navigation >The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis
This was obviously written by someone at the FSB.
If you don't like military strikes you'd hate getting martial law declared on truckers, with a parliamentary vote only occurring after the operation was done and not even bothering to let the Senate finish voting.
thirdies a week ago: >jajajajaja usa weak, can't do shit hahaah go houthinis strikes those ships xDDD
thirdies today: >nooooooooo not my hecking islamerinos where the frick is the congress stop this nononon
I haven't looked at social media but I'm going to assume they've already switched from "how houthis got so good at SMOKING the us navy" to "this is genocide, CEASEFIRE NOW!"
I can't wait for the next wave of seethe theeads and Arma footage attempting to be passed off as actual video, surely shitting up /k/ will keep them from being bombed into oblivion.
I only wish they had chimped out next year instead so I could be on one of those ships. Frick this gay earth. Maybe I'll get to help start the second century of humiliation for China instead...
>Give the US a few weeks to send more ships to the region
No they'll try to pull a Russia but with more unsupported parachute landings.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Chinks are nowhere near as moronic as Russians.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Chinese paratroopers
Last time i heard about them they're still using soviet era prop plane in the majority with only few Y-20s
4 months ago
Anonymous
jesus fricking shit...... >Shijiazhuang Y-5B(T) – A para-dropping version developed for the PLAAF, with up-dated avionics including a GPS.[2]
4 months ago
Anonymous
a Shijiazhuang Y-5B(T) just flew over my house!
4 months ago
Anonymous
>pilots don't want to fly into the suicide zone of air defence >pop the green light to drop while over the ocean >millions of Chinese troops are dropped directly into the fricking channel
Would be kinda funny ngl
Every day they spend dicking around and not trying for possession is 9/10ths of the law, is a day that there is 10 more CSGs steaming closer towards Taiwan to make sure China doesn't get air superiority.
honestly with the massive purges the chinks had and the various flaws it showed in their military, I really doubt even winnie will be willing to do anything of note militarily for a few years at least
>cut out all the actually corrupt and not politically loyal generals >Put in place yes-men and tell them to fix all the issues ASAP >It's not possible but they are able ot say 'Yes' so Winnie thinks all the issues are fixed after a few months >Orders a full scale attack on Taiwan making use of amphibious landers/ROROs, helicopters and parachute landing >They all do their part under the assumption that the rocket force will be able to knock out the most troublesome bits before they land. >China sends a million men into the waiting Taiwanese troops as well a handful of Virginia class subs waiting to unload each of their 154 tomahawks on China's fleet.
BREAKING: YEMENI HOUTHI OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Mohammad Ali Al-Houthi
>We welcome direct confrontation with the Americans because they are the ones attacking our country and besieging our people for nine years.
>America is the great Satan, the enemy of peoples, and it is terrorism.
>We say to the American terrorist: return to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans and do not protect the "israeli" ships.
>Our stance is to support our brothers in Gaza and to protect humanity there, while the American stands against humanity and kills all who protect it.
>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation, but the American coalition is igniting the Red Sea, militarizing it, and threatening it, and the American is working hard to raise marine insurance prices.
>Before the American claims that he came to protect international law, let him protect the American Constitution which he violated by bombing and striking our country.
>The American claims to protect "israeli" ships or those heading to the "israeli" entity under the pretext of international law, which he tramples everywhere in the world.
>The American should underline several times the confirmation of the leader of the revolution that any attack on the Republic of Yemen will be met with a response greater than the previous operation.
>The operation with 24 drones carried out by our Armed Forces made the American soldiers targeted live in terror.
>The American claims to reserve the right to respond, even though we did not attack American shores or reach the American islands that are famous for raping children.
>The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis, and their strikes on our country are terrorist acts to kill our people.
>It is impossible for terrorists and perverts to achieve justice for humanity because they lack it.
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
Did they have a twitter leftist write this for them?
This is what intersectionality looks like. It's just an evolution of the old commie United Front concept. By linking all these random grievances together, it creates a much larger base of support than would otherwise exist. But the reality is these Arabs don't give a shit about international law and would eagerly abolish it if they were able.
Russian playbook. Russians really really really want to draw attention away from Ukraine by any means, hence all the shady shit and chimpouts of 2023/2024.
And yes, Russians fund and ideologically lead ultra-right(Q-tards, Tucker and Co and so on) and ultra-left(antifa, stand with palestine, BLM).
Beyond what the other anons told you, this whole Islamist shit started in the 1960s and 1970s when the Middle East was ruled by USSR backed Arab socialist and nationalist governments but when they were failing to destroy Israel and wipe out the israelites and go to war with the United States, many of the people involved became disilusioned and decided that Arab nationalism was wrong and a failure, so they went back to the drawing board and decided that it was Islam that could unite and destroy Israel and the United States and make the Middle East great and powerful not the farce of nationalism.
Other than the replacement of Arab nationalism with Islam nothing else really changed, its still a openly "anti-imperialist" and "anti-colonialist" revolutionary movement. Even the remaining Arab socialist and communists have joined forces with them in support like in Palestine and Syria. And why people like Judith Butler have openly said that Hamas and Hezbollah are "progressive social movements" and part of the "Global Left".
Russia aka the soviets did a number to middle eastern countries with their brown soviet plans since the 1940a operstion SIG. Americans are fighting a 7 front marxist war
>eturn to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans
LEL
the Houthis love St. George Floyd
truly the heroes brown /misc/ deserves
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
If yooo biden replied with a simple tweet of "cope and seethe" he'd have my vote.
[...] >NO YOU'RE THE TERRORISTS
frickin turdies lmao. We should glass yemen and be done with it.
[...]
if there's no maritime navigation there can't be any "accidents"
[...] >terror group that killed hundreds of thousands of their own countrymen to seize power and reinstituted chattel slavery is here to tell you that you have to let them stop the free trade that numerous countries depend on for food and medicine, because you're racist
It's the typical attempt at dialectics by a revolutionary party/movement.
"Houthis are terrorists" > "Americans bomb them because they're terrorists" > "Americans are terrorists"
This contrarian, duplicitous logic runs through the whole movement and worldview of these little never ending guerrilla armies. Its why they want you as miserable as they are.
"But its moronic and makes no sense", of course it doesn't its not meant for us, average people.
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
>NO YOU'RE THE TERRORISTS
frickin turdies lmao. We should glass yemen and be done with it.
>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation
Is it fricking opposite day?
if there's no maritime navigation there can't be any "accidents"
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
>terror group that killed hundreds of thousands of their own countrymen to seize power and reinstituted chattel slavery is here to tell you that you have to let them stop the free trade that numerous countries depend on for food and medicine, because you're racist
i am >the great satan >racist against african americans >the humanity-killer >working hard to raise marine insurance prices >the trampler of international law >famous for raping children >nazi >pervert >lacking in humanity >arrogant tyrant
Kinda fits Islam. >Great Satan
Well, they reject Christ's Divinity, so yeah. >racist against blacks
Muzzies were the first people to specifically target Africans for slavery >humanity-killer
Muzzies love spilling blood. >working hard to raise marine insurance prices
Houthis are the ones lobbing missiles at random ships. >famous for raping children
Muhammed. >nazi
1: links between Hitler and the Muzzies, especially Muzzie SS units.
2: don't Muzzies talk about gassing israelites at every riot they throw? >pervert
Muzzies frick goats and prepubescent children on a regular basis. >lacking in humanity
Muzzies are barbarous, murdering for the slightest offense, enslavers, rapists, with many quranic verses to justify such savagery. >arrogant tyrant
Muzzie leaders have been among the most arrogant tyrants in human history.
Because /misc/ is infested by communists and muslims.
https://i.imgur.com/mJbz3Ms.png
The President doesn't need approval from Congress to take action against non-state actors.
[...]
[...] >We say to the American terrorist: return to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans >We are the ones who protect maritime navigation >The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis
This was obviously written by someone at the FSB.
I think Russia manufactured the Isreal-gaza thing to district from his failure of a war t.bh
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
They should've just stopped, sit down, and stfu. Now they're going to get killed for no good reason other than being too prideful.
>>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation, but the American coalition is igniting the Red Sea, militarizing it, and threatening it, and the American is working hard to raise marine insurance prices.
What the actual frick bruh
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
>think about le Black folk
why are non-americans like this
>Totally legal according to the people ITT.
When people say "illegal action", they are suggesting the President lacks the authority to order these strikes.
The President WOULD have the authority to order troops into Mexico, under US law, whether Congress impeaches him or fails to authorize it after 60 days is another matter. It's also another matter whether such an act would be considered "legal" under international law and treaties, but that's not what people are screaming about when they talk about strikes on Yemen.
[...] >Our country
Anon, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Yemen is in fact nowhere near the US, if that's where you claim to be from. Refugees won't be fleeing here unless they get plane or boat tickets somehow regardless.
But more importantly, the strikes are only targeting military assets so there isn't any need for civilian evac plus brownoids are already used to getting diaspora'd weekly so they'll just go shit up some other Arab area like they always do.
Because A) All previous posts get deleted when the b& hammer comes down hard enough and B) That person was probably caught ban evading from the last time he spammed bait threads
>Our country
Anon, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Yemen is in fact nowhere near the US, if that's where you claim to be from. Refugees won't be fleeing here unless they get plane or boat tickets somehow regardless.
But more importantly, the strikes are only targeting military assets so there isn't any need for civilian evac plus brownoids are already used to getting diaspora'd weekly so they'll just go shit up some other Arab area like they always do.
Maybe General De Marcus Rolex and Admiral Becky forgot some of the targets last night.
The USA is a joke. I'm sure lowering standards and more affirmative action will help.
>won't bring back your F5 turdie
Oh well, it was not muh F-5, so I don't care.
Obviously you have not seen the USA. It is a shithole filled with useless low IQ third world scum. Import the 3rd world, then become the 3rd world. Soon enough the USA will collapse and all of the military junk in the US Military will be rusting trash, just like what happened to the USSR.
You don't seem to understand how this works.
When the stupid little shit that's been antagonizing you for ages finally gets his shit stomped in, you don't just do it all at once.
You grab him by his stupid towel hat, smash his face into the concrete, and ask "had enough?"
Repeat until he yields, or cannot respond at all.
Let's see how many times they can taste some pavement until they decide it's not worth it :^)
Sure, sure the useless c**t as the US Navy's CNO got there the same way the soul brotha commanding the whole US Military got there.
The other soul brotha in the hospital also got there through affirmative action too.
At least none of the morons have managed to sink their own ships, yet. You know the US Navy's record with getting hit by cargo ships.
You don't seem to understand how this works.
When the stupid little shit that's been antagonizing you for ages finally gets his shit stomped in, you don't just do it all at once.
You grab him by his stupid towel hat, smash his face into the concrete, and ask "had enough?"
Repeat until he yields, or cannot respond at all.
Let's see how many times they can taste some pavement until they decide it's not worth it :^)
So as long as houthis have 1-10 missiles ready to be fired on the ships in the strait, ships would still avoid going through. And you can't achieve complete destruction of all houthi missiles without ground operation. If previously houthis were targeting just israely ships, now they target american and uk ships. So strait is officially dead for anglos and israel. unless they somehow manage to succesfully capture shore
Check the destinations. They're all waiting to go through Suez or to port in Saudi Arabia so have already passed the straits, or they're in transferring their armed guards while in international waters
Seems like an artifact due to MarineTraffic's data gathering techniques. If you look at them in the app the ones in that cluster have all details, while most enroute are only satellite tracked. There may be an AIS > IP relay in operation at that location for some reason.
Its illegal to deploy federal troops at the border, moron. The federal military, by law, can't interfere with domestic policies. The only exception is either an insurrection, invasion by an enemy state. The national guard is also exempt by this law since they are controlled by the state.
we constantly hear about US intercepting drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles fired by houthis. What do you think is being used for intercept? CIWS all the time?
>wrong
The Saegheh (English: "Thunderbolt") is an Iranian turbofan/piston-powered flying wing unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) produced by Shahed Aviation Industries.[2] It is based on, but smaller than and substantially different from, a Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel UAV that was captured by Iran in 2011 and then reverse-engineered.[5] It is one of two Iranian flying wing UAVs based on the RQ-170, along with the Shahed 171 Simorgh, a larger version.
This isn't relevant to your post, but I'm gonna mentioned it anyway: >The Saegheh ("Lightning" or "Thunder" in Persian) (also spelled Saegre, Saeghe, Saeqeh, etc.) is any of at least eight completely separate Iranian weapons systems: a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) warhead, an anti-tank guided missile family, a surface-to-surface rocket, a target drone family, an air-to-air missile, a claimed stealth unmanned aerial vehicle, a fighter jet, and an anti-ship cruise missile.
Did people legit think that the US was going to crumble over Houthis attacking random ships with their dinky ass missles? Almost EVERYBODY in the UN voted against the Houthis and told them to cut that shit out because NOBODY likes having their international trade fricked with by PIRATES.
the third worlders have this missile spam fantasy. For years they creamed themselves over the thought of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iran and Syria spamming missiles at Israel and then over running it. They also have a missile spam fantasy of the same people plus China and Russia spamming missiles at U.S carriers and other American military targets and destroying them
Oh, so random attacks on shipping in a corridor that US flagged vessels typically pass through isn't aggression against them because the Houthis haven't managed to find the right ship to shoot at?
>say something dumb >get told to frick off for being a moron >le epig trolled, umadbro, 420 on the haterz
I'm impressed to run into someone who's so moronic they failed to understand a fricking 3 panel rage comic and yet can operate a keyboard even if the fact that you're using caps in a greentext betrays you're using your thumbs for it like the filthy phoneposting scum you are.
where will this lead? is south yemen going to see that the houthis are weakened by airstrikes and attack them? is iran going to come to the houthis aid? american marines invading houthi yemen?
>devolving to telling people to cope and seethe like the buzzword spewing moron you are isn't an implicit admission of trolling
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here that you're not so dumb as to actually believe what you said so I don't have to go down a bottle of Jack and wonder where everything has gone so wrong that you weren't aborted.
So somehow this isn't asking for clarification by your definition
[...]
Oh, so random attacks on shipping in a corridor that US flagged vessels typically pass through isn't aggression against them because the Houthis haven't managed to find the right ship to shoot at?
? Glad to see you're sticking with the true moron strength of refusing to engage with any uncomfortable questions.
>Houthis are intentionally avoiding shooting at US flagged merchant ships when shooting indiscriminately at shipping >but they almost blew up a Russian tanker despite being an Iranian proxy just for the lulz since they have such good ISR
>I-It doesn't matter cause Iran will just keep giving us st- >bombed airports >bombed ports >bombed railways and hubs
Is Iran gonna bring drones through trucks? We'll just crater every highway. All they had to do was respect international trade LOL.
In order for a cargo vessel to go from one US port to another without leaving the country between them it has to be US flagged. If the Houthi's are firing at any random vessel though it's obviously unsafe for US vessels to traverse and thus that needs to be rectified.
>The Houthis said they targeted a US ship on Tuesday providing support to Israel. It was the 26th attack on commercial shipping in the Red Sea since 19 November.
>The US military said Iranian-designed one-way attack drones, anti-ship cruise missiles and anti-ship ballistic missiles were launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen at around 21:15 local time (18:15 GMT). >Eighteen drones, two cruise missiles and one ballistic missile were shot down by F/A-18 warplanes from the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D Eisenhower, which is deployed in the Red Sea, and by four destroyers, the USS Gravely, USS Laboon, USS Mason and HMS Diamond. >HMS Diamond shot down seven of the Houthi drones using its guns and Sea Viper missiles, each costing more than £1m ($1.3m), a defence source said.
>Later, Houthi military spokesman Yahya al-Sarea confirmed its forces had carried out an operation involving "a large number of ballistic and naval missiles and drones". >"It targeted a US ship that was providing support for the Zionist entity [Israel]," he said. >"The operation came as an initial response to the treacherous assault on our naval forces by the US enemy forces," he added, referring to the sinking of three Houthi speed boats and killing of their crews by US Navy helicopters during an attempted attack on a container ship on 31 December. >Helicopters from nearby US warships responded to a distress call - and, after being fired upon, sank three boats "in self-defence".
There's really no way to know where these attacks are coming from. Anyone could've fired those bullets and then launched those drones and missiles.
War requires two parties. Considering they can't fight back, we don't have to go to war. We can just keep bombing them for as long as we feel like, and they can't do anything about it.
Technically the Houthis aren't Yemen. It's like how fighting ISIS isn't fighting Syria.
The Yemenese government is still fighting the Houthis for control.
Are you moronic, or just autistic? They don't have to be intentionally targeting US ships to hit one, or are you unable to comprehend that waving a knife around in a room full of balloons is a problem for anyone who owns a balloon in that room and how this metaphor might apply to that statement? You aren't a moronic thirdie who's unable to comprehend a colloquial usage of the word "right", right?
Well anons, I'm heading to bed, I'll look forward to seeing the board covered in /misc/troon and actual shill excrement tomorrow when they desperately try to block missiles by shitting up the board lmao
Keep it up, surely if you keep saying the US is out of missiles it will come true :^)
>either is correct
Oh sweaty, I already addressed this
Something can be valid yet inappropriate in a given context. I called out your ESL and now you're butthurt. PrepHole should really rangeban India and the rest of the shithole countries. >in academia
You gave an invalid example. Your phrasing is rare in legitimate publications outside of art/literature.
Now go asking for bob & vagene or evacuating your bowels on the designated shitting street
>Only 4 Eurofighters, a destroyer and refuelers took part >HMS Diamond can't strike because she has no land attack missiles >Only one RN destroyer in the Red Sea
God I want defence spending to be 5% of GDP bros.
That's just what was in theatre at the time (normal smol red sea CAG plus the air defence detachment of RAF Akrotiri). The RAF has expeditionary airwings designed to air bridge in several squadrons of Typhoons or F-35s, tankers and transports for ground crews and munitions within 72 hours.
But what the frick is the point of flying hundreds of men to Akrotiri and Dhekelia when the threat is crazy shias hucking spears at oil tankers and you can bomb them with impunity because they have no air defence against medium level aircraft?
/k/ comrades... I thought US Carrier Groups are unstoppable against drones and third world missiles... Nah, just kidding, I know it's just typical terrorist-sympathizing cope. Just what other refutes would you have against the "cheap drone swarms kill Carrier" talking point?
>Just what other refutes would you have against the "cheap drone swarms kill Carrier" talking point?
Guns do a good job. And bullets are still cheaper than drones. Lasers are being tested now.
Houthis tried to drone swarm some ships an HMS Diamond shot them all down. If 1 destroyer can defeat a drone swarm then the whole "drone swarms will down carriers" looks increasingly moronic.
>American Captain >Reminds his crew that they have loved ones back home, keeps everyone in good spirits. >Houthis >THERE IS NO GREATER HONOR THAN TO BE KILLED BY AN AMERICAN AIRSTRIKE
I wish these people were capable of critical thinking.
Anyone else has had a Mr. Jake Shields appear in their goddamned Twitter feeds ever since the October 7 2023 meme started. I swear ever since October 7 2023 this has been MMA fighter and some obviously left wing Dutch Nurse and their shitass takes have always been appearing in my feed. And I do not even follow MMA shit yet this "former MMA" fighter keeps appearing simply because he hates israelites and probably takes PrepHole /misc/ memes seriously.
Just do pic related. Twitter's algo struggles to differentiate between /misc/troons and other right wingers if you don't manually mute people.
Anyone else has had a Mr. Jake Shields appear in their goddamned Twitter feeds ever since the October 7 2023 meme started. I swear ever since October 7 2023 this has been MMA fighter and some obviously left wing Dutch Nurse and their shitass takes have always been appearing in my feed. And I do not even follow MMA shit yet this "former MMA" fighter keeps appearing simply because he hates israelites and probably takes PrepHole /misc/ memes seriously.
Jake shields, keith woods, lucas gage. Theyre all thirdworldists who dont do anything pro White, maybe woods for a but, but most are just shilling for low iq third worlders
That and I guess being constantly punched and hit on the head does damages your IQ and reasoning skills. Thus making you more susceptible to third world antisemitism propaganda.
But hey, surely all that israelite hating posts Shields and other pro-palestine people have made will surely not backfire or haunt them in the future the moment they have to get off of Twitter and find employment from a israeli employer... Right?
It probably wont actually, they can also use their clout for something or grift to thirdworlders. I remember keith woods made a post when the algerian killed 3 kids about how ireland should have no immigration and all his fans turned on him
Well okay sure, washed up celebs like Woods and Shields likely will live comfortably in luxury for the rest of their lives by grifting leftwing-wise along with them still being filthy rich and wealthier than most people. But the regular nobodies, the regular literal whos who got little to no clout or influence to back them up are the ones who'll be haunted by their past. Especially the moment their antisemitic pro-terror posts eventually gets them into trouble when looking for eventual employment because background checking.
And still, people like Shields and Woods aren't safe from being cancelled by the very people they align with because remember. Leftists seem to always cannibalize each other simply from not being leftist enough or saying the wrong set if words. So people with some form of clout like Shields may not be cancelled by their antisemitism, but from being cannibalized by the very type of people he supports because he said a triggering No-no word or is not leftist enough.
As a third worlder its so fricking stupid for someone like that to get with the typical Pro-Palestine crowd, who are and have always been fricking capital S-Socialists. Doesn't he know they hate him? In most of the world where communists and marxist socialists are actually influential someone like Woods would be fricking laughed at by leftists and right-wingers alike as some bizarre cook who might as well think the sky is green and the water yellow.
His gay followers turning on him once they realize he doesn't like arabs immigrating to Europe is absolutely expected if you only have a basic superficial view of the Pro-Arab, Pro-Palestine movement. You have to be an American and live in complete ignorance of actual marxists to get shocked that the people that are actually relevant and opposed to Israel support mass immigration into not just Europe but just about anywhere including in Latin America. They're internationalists for frick's sake.
There must be so many tanned white men with beards doing spook shit in Sana'a right now
golden hk416 and mcx rattlers going braaap with their pistons
>Allahu Akbar bro, could you point me to the nearest radar station? Thanks Moe.
Holy fricking reddit. You have to go back.
So we're just going to continue to perform military strikes without congressional approval?
i thought you hated congress
The Navy can protect itself without congressional approval. This has been the precedent since before the Constitution was even ratified.
> Tonkin Gulf II
Worked great last time.
Meant for
>thinks the military needs congress to approve strikes
lmao.
We're not at war, this is pest control
You don't need congressional approval to bomb non-state actors
what's congress gonna do about it? cry on twitter?
I saw like 2 house members crying. No one else cared lmao
Which two? Please I need to see Islamist tears.
It's not a war. They have no country.
it's a special millitary strike operation
yeah the US navy have since the very inception sacked entire villages in Muslim localities without congressional approval
it is quite literally what the navy is for.
>THIRD CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
>AT THE FIRST SESSION
>Begun and held at the City of Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania, on Monday, the second of December, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-three.
>An ACT to provide a Naval Armament.
>WHEREAS the depredations committed by the Algerine corsairs on the commerce of the United States render it necessary that a naval force should be provided for its protection:
>Sec. 1. BE it therefore enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be authorized to provide, by purchase or otherwise, equip and employ four ships to carry forty four guns each, and two ships to carry thirty six guns each.
>Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That there shall be employed on board each of the said ships of forty-four guns, one captain, four lieutenants, one lieutenant of marines, one chaplain, one surgeon and two surgeon's mates; and in each of the ships of thirty six guns, one captain, three lieutenants, one lieutenant of marines, one surgeon, and one surgeon's mate, who shall be appointed and commissioned in like manner as other officers of the United States are.
so it is congressional approval but they don't need to request it again to do their mission? interesting
this establishes the purpose, and the US Navy's charter essentially. Wartime Powers ACT also allows the President to conduct operations to ensure US interests are protected. Free moving global trade is one of those interests.
AUMF
Why even bring that up? It will be well within the limits of the War Powers Act through March.
I am the Congress
The President doesn't need approval to defend the US and its military, he just needs to inform Congress. After that, he has 60 days of basically free reign until Congress either approves it to continue, or shuts it down.
The War Powers Act was simply to stop the president from entering LONG wars on his own, like Nixon in Vietnam and Cambodia.
Even if the Houthies hadn't admitted to directly attacking the US Navy, Biden would still have the authority to order strikes in Yemen in order to protect the shipping routes of the US and her allies.
>the US and her allies
>her
ESL homosexual
ESL moron.
>no, you
You've outed yourself as a turdie shitskin
Yes, you dumb homosexual. That's how people refer to America, the beautiful, on occasion. It has been this way for nearly 300 years.
Not in Standard English, you cretinous imbecile
Actual moron. "America and her X" is extremely common. I found this after a single good search.
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2033&context=jil
>article written by a asiatic
>quotes max-cliche line by fictional captain Kirk in the opening
I see now, you're just trolling
>upper right: ayy lmao level eye separation for wide field of view—clearly a prey animal not a predator
>bottom: fat, anticipating the average American obesity levels a century later
The personification of America is Columbia.
My dude, every country in history has been referred to as a her with the exception of when they are ruled by despotic tyrants with Mummy Issues.
It's been this way since the Roman Empire.
Calm down. It's the US and the victims of its hegemony
>victims
That's what a israelite Black person homosexual would say. Now go seethe, cope, dilate, etc.
>personifying nations means you're ESL
No it's a literary tool that's been used for centuries at the very least, probably even longer than that. You fricking moron.
Is this the best excuse you can come up with? Waxing poetic in no way fits the context of this thread or even the tone of the rest of his post.
kys, troon
URRAH, MOTHERLAND
Except unironically, you fricking moron.
What, can't stand the sight of a strong lady?
Puck made so many based illustrations.
Their pre-WW1 political cartoons were bangers, honestly.
Holy mother of B A S E D
So has Columbia traditionally been the nation while Uncle Sam has been the government?
>Images of the Statue of Liberty largely displaced personified Columbia as the female symbol of the United States by around 1920, although Lady Liberty was seen as an aspect of Columbia.
yeah
>She is also known as "Miss Columbia", implying that she is unmarried.
hummina hummina *slide whistle* boioioing
>Columbia in an 1865 Thomas Nast cartoon asking the government to allow black soldiers to vote.
It's a duality, the masculine and the feminine, the pragmatic and the empathic. In a way, the central tension of American history revolves around the question "where is the practical limit to idealism?", and those two characters do a very good job of summing it up.
This. Columbia represented virtues and public sentiment (liberty, empathy, good will, righteous anger, etc.). Uncle Sam was the embodiment of the government as well as the citizenry.
What's patriotism other than the nation's love of their country? And obviously a patriot isn't going to think their homeland is anything other than beautiful. So how can you expect Uncle Sam not lust after Columbia when she's such a hot piece of ass?
I've never thought about it in those terms, but I think you're right.
>hummina hummina *slide whistle* boioioing
Uncle Sam agrees.
So the government wants to frick the citizens?
fricking weebs with their boat girls
Based because he drew "her" face androgynous as frick and not the least feminine? You must be a homosexual to like this image.
moronic AND blind?
simping incels on my /k/? say it aint so
>I am loyal to the United States and his allies!
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/its
ESL moron.
Street-shitting poojeet
But we already established this previously
you're a smooth brain.
>falling graph shows the phrasing in question is an anachronism
>posts it as a win
Talk about a self-own to match that of a vatBlack person, which is what you probably are
no one said it wasn't falling out of use. that's exactly why 2 digit-IQ morons like you don't know it. the point was that it's valid. it's still in use everywhere today, both in academia and media
Something can be valid yet inappropriate in a given context. I called out your ESL and now you're butthurt. PrepHole should really rangeban India and the rest of the shithole countries.
>in academia
You gave an invalid example. Your phrasing is rare in legitimate publications outside of art/literature.
Now go asking for bob & vagene or evacuating your bowels on the designated shitting street
>Something can be valid yet inappropriate in a given context.
inappropritate in what context? PrepHole. lmfao. you ousted yourself as a moron. i don't know who you're trying to convince otherwise
That was answered already. Learn to read, Ahmed
Settle down Raj. You were wrong.
NTA anon but I've heard it before. Perhaps you should post hand?
Why stop there
how does it compare to "America and its"?
Do your own work
Ten thousand years in MS Paint.
Holy shit
its anachronistic
the difference is more striking in more recent times (2000-2019)
>as common today as it was in 1802, 1882, 1980
Nice cherry picking though.
>as common today as it was in 1802, 1882, 1980
if your today is 2000, sure.
2019 actually
too bad you can't understand a graph
That one doesn't go back to 1802, but does prove what I said about 1882 and and 1980
>but does prove something not relevant to my argument
Profound mental moronation
>forgetting your own posts
I didn't post that though
here's your 1802 and 1882, i don't see how they are as common as today.
Don't waste your time with him, you based autist. He might actually kys if he loses this Internet argument (even though he should do it because he's a turdie or p*ssian instead)
I think we're on the same side here.
All combined.
Non-moron version.
>her
Indeed
>Normal looking Western woman seems alien to anon
BROWN
>BROWN
>no u
I accept your concession, Pudoo Patel
>whiteknighting over a fricking sketch
i thought this was /k/ not /PrepHole/
Well now you know
Most correct is "United States and their allies". Washington would do well to remember this once in a while.
The president can deploy troops for 2 months without congressional approval. Although its been stated that Congress is pretty much behind bombing sand people, so its a none issue.
Here's your congressional approval.
*unzips*
Yes. Get fricked on moron. I'm going to vote for biden twice after this.
>gets limited to 5 round clipazines and shark fin grips nationwide.
wow, thanks biden!
>Spot the tourist.
>we
I really hate when people say this. There is no we.
He might be a schizo and talking about the voices in his head
It’s been decades since the courts decided whether you could do this or not. Either way, threatening international shipping lanes is more than enough justification.
Hostis humani generis b***hes
>Look at me. I am the Congress now
Does anyone really object to blowing up shitskins and dune coons?
https://www.reu ters.com/world/anti-war-activists-new-york-city-washington-protest-us-uk-strikes-yemen-2024-01-12/
why are thirdies like "AHAHA take that evil zionists" then they find out and "UN HELP GENOCIDE AHAHAH" and why do white leftoids always simp for em
>The President is authorized to employ so many of the public armed vessels as in his judgment the service may require, with suitable instructions to the commanders thereof, in protecting the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions and depredations. (R.S. §4293.)
Pest control needs congressional approval?
POTUS has limited authority for limited military operations without congressional approval. I don't remember the specifics but usually throwing some TLAMs at terrorists doesn't need congressional action.
That's POTATUS
MOOTW, b***h.
The President doesn't need approval from Congress to take action against non-state actors.
>We say to the American terrorist: return to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans
>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation
>The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis
This was obviously written by someone at the FSB.
It has been that way since 1950.
>Fun fact: both Korea and Vietnam were officially never wars, but police actions.
you mean as outlined by the War Powers act that has been upheld by the Supreme Court on multiple occasions? Yes
If you don't like military strikes you'd hate getting martial law declared on truckers, with a parliamentary vote only occurring after the operation was done and not even bothering to let the Senate finish voting.
thirdies a week ago:
>jajajajaja usa weak, can't do shit hahaah go houthinis strikes those ships xDDD
thirdies today:
>nooooooooo not my hecking islamerinos where the frick is the congress stop this nononon
why are they like this?
It's a repeat of hamas.
>why are they like this?
Because they're actually stupid. That's really it.
Are Israelis thirdies?
B-but /misc/ told me that the based houthis took down an F22 and sunk a US frigate with all hands.
I haven't looked at social media but I'm going to assume they've already switched from "how houthis got so good at SMOKING the us navy" to "this is genocide, CEASEFIRE NOW!"
Pretty much yeah. But also it's Yemen now, not Houthis
Obligatory /k/ino of the year post. Bend the knee and apologize
Weirdest Vatnik Clowns carousel so far. What kind of Bradley is that?
I'm sorry Bradley!
SECOND TO NONE!
How many F-22s and US Navy super carriers are they going to sink this round?
all f22 sir
six million
All 10000 F-22s, 200 carriers, and at least a dozen super spoopy nazi alien artifact attack UFOs
>NOOOOO, WE JUST CLOSED THE RED SEA TO YOU, I SAID RED SEA IS CLOSED, WHY ARE YOU BOMBING US REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>On all levels except physical, I own the Red Sea.
>*explodes*
I can't wait for the next wave of seethe theeads and Arma footage attempting to be passed off as actual video, surely shitting up /k/ will keep them from being bombed into oblivion.
Closed?
WAR WERE DECLARED
>post yfw
I only wish they had chimped out next year instead so I could be on one of those ships. Frick this gay earth. Maybe I'll get to help start the second century of humiliation for China instead...
>anmie
>homosexual sailor
Makes sense. God speed anon
My wife Suisei
If china is starting something big it's going to be Q4 this year.
>China launching an amphibious assault on Taiwan after October
I hope so, the strait can get pretty rough in the winter.
They need weeks of air superiority before any assault can start.
>Give the US a few weeks to send more ships to the region
No they'll try to pull a Russia but with more unsupported parachute landings.
Chinks are nowhere near as moronic as Russians.
>Chinese paratroopers
Last time i heard about them they're still using soviet era prop plane in the majority with only few Y-20s
jesus fricking shit......
>Shijiazhuang Y-5B(T) – A para-dropping version developed for the PLAAF, with up-dated avionics including a GPS.[2]
a Shijiazhuang Y-5B(T) just flew over my house!
>pilots don't want to fly into the suicide zone of air defence
>pop the green light to drop while over the ocean
>millions of Chinese troops are dropped directly into the fricking channel
Would be kinda funny ngl
Every day they spend dicking around and not trying for possession is 9/10ths of the law, is a day that there is 10 more CSGs steaming closer towards Taiwan to make sure China doesn't get air superiority.
How do you figure
honestly with the massive purges the chinks had and the various flaws it showed in their military, I really doubt even winnie will be willing to do anything of note militarily for a few years at least
>cut out all the actually corrupt and not politically loyal generals
>Put in place yes-men and tell them to fix all the issues ASAP
>It's not possible but they are able ot say 'Yes' so Winnie thinks all the issues are fixed after a few months
>Orders a full scale attack on Taiwan making use of amphibious landers/ROROs, helicopters and parachute landing
>They all do their part under the assumption that the rocket force will be able to knock out the most troublesome bits before they land.
>China sends a million men into the waiting Taiwanese troops as well a handful of Virginia class subs waiting to unload each of their 154 tomahawks on China's fleet.
Holy fricking Sneed
https://nitter.net/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1745978476979528032#m
BREAKING: YEMENI HOUTHI OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Mohammad Ali Al-Houthi
>We welcome direct confrontation with the Americans because they are the ones attacking our country and besieging our people for nine years.
>America is the great Satan, the enemy of peoples, and it is terrorism.
>We say to the American terrorist: return to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans and do not protect the "israeli" ships.
>Our stance is to support our brothers in Gaza and to protect humanity there, while the American stands against humanity and kills all who protect it.
>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation, but the American coalition is igniting the Red Sea, militarizing it, and threatening it, and the American is working hard to raise marine insurance prices.
>Before the American claims that he came to protect international law, let him protect the American Constitution which he violated by bombing and striking our country.
>The American claims to protect "israeli" ships or those heading to the "israeli" entity under the pretext of international law, which he tramples everywhere in the world.
>The American should underline several times the confirmation of the leader of the revolution that any attack on the Republic of Yemen will be met with a response greater than the previous operation.
>The operation with 24 drones carried out by our Armed Forces made the American soldiers targeted live in terror.
>The American claims to reserve the right to respond, even though we did not attack American shores or reach the American islands that are famous for raping children.
>The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis, and their strikes on our country are terrorist acts to kill our people.
>It is impossible for terrorists and perverts to achieve justice for humanity because they lack it.
(1/2)
>We are indifferent to the American and the British; we have faced them for nine years, and yesterday's raids are the same as those we have been bombed with since 2015, with the same plane and the same weapon.
>We will remain alive, God willing, in the face of our enemies, whether we achieve martyrdom or continue to confront them on the battlefronts.
>We do not see confrontation with the American or the British as anything but life, for life is in confronting these tyrants and arrogant ones in the world.
>The American has not brought anything new, but it is us who will bring something new, and we will bring your punishment, God willing.”
(2/2)
Did they have a twitter leftist write this for them?
Nope. Standard Russian shit.
>but whatabout muh black people?!
gives it away.
It definitely reads like it was witten by some Californian non-CIS-heteronormative personthing.
Calls them Nazis and mentions African Americans. 110% written by Russia
I'm sure the Houthis are grateful for Russia's support during this time of need.
Theoretically speaking, how hard would it be to strike a Russian shit or ten in the red sea and pin it on the Houties?
Asking for a friend.
The smarter move would be to target Chinese ships, Russia will never go against Iran.
This is what intersectionality looks like. It's just an evolution of the old commie United Front concept. By linking all these random grievances together, it creates a much larger base of support than would otherwise exist. But the reality is these Arabs don't give a shit about international law and would eagerly abolish it if they were able.
Russian playbook. Russians really really really want to draw attention away from Ukraine by any means, hence all the shady shit and chimpouts of 2023/2024.
And yes, Russians fund and ideologically lead ultra-right(Q-tards, Tucker and Co and so on) and ultra-left(antifa, stand with palestine, BLM).
Beyond what the other anons told you, this whole Islamist shit started in the 1960s and 1970s when the Middle East was ruled by USSR backed Arab socialist and nationalist governments but when they were failing to destroy Israel and wipe out the israelites and go to war with the United States, many of the people involved became disilusioned and decided that Arab nationalism was wrong and a failure, so they went back to the drawing board and decided that it was Islam that could unite and destroy Israel and the United States and make the Middle East great and powerful not the farce of nationalism.
Other than the replacement of Arab nationalism with Islam nothing else really changed, its still a openly "anti-imperialist" and "anti-colonialist" revolutionary movement. Even the remaining Arab socialist and communists have joined forces with them in support like in Palestine and Syria. And why people like Judith Butler have openly said that Hamas and Hezbollah are "progressive social movements" and part of the "Global Left".
>And you lynch Black folks
Why is this always the first cope from non Westerners
Russia aka the soviets did a number to middle eastern countries with their brown soviet plans since the 1940a operstion SIG. Americans are fighting a 7 front marxist war
the soviets must have seen the same thing hitler saw in the muslims of the middle east.
Blame the chinese they started it first
>eturn to your country to protect it from racism against African Americans
LEL
the Houthis love St. George Floyd
truly the heroes brown /misc/ deserves
Hmm for some reason I think bombing houthis is a good thing now
Maybe we should glass all those homosexuals in Yemen and make another Liberian colony for all our Blacks that hate America there
If yooo biden replied with a simple tweet of "cope and seethe" he'd have my vote.
God I wish anyone but him was in office right now but at this point I'm just happy to see the US remind who is on top.
>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation
Is it fricking opposite day?
It's the typical attempt at dialectics by a revolutionary party/movement.
"Houthis are terrorists" > "Americans bomb them because they're terrorists" > "Americans are terrorists"
This contrarian, duplicitous logic runs through the whole movement and worldview of these little never ending guerrilla armies. Its why they want you as miserable as they are.
"But its moronic and makes no sense", of course it doesn't its not meant for us, average people.
>NO YOU'RE THE TERRORISTS
frickin turdies lmao. We should glass yemen and be done with it.
if there's no maritime navigation there can't be any "accidents"
>terror group that killed hundreds of thousands of their own countrymen to seize power and reinstituted chattel slavery is here to tell you that you have to let them stop the free trade that numerous countries depend on for food and medicine, because you're racist
>The Americans do not defend themselves; they are Nazis
This shit was 100% written by an FSB intern.
>protect it from racism against African Americans
Even Houthis kneel to St Floyd.
Honestly think the world would be much better off if the mideast was glassed and repopulated solely by autonomous oil extractors.
i am
>the great satan
>racist against african americans
>the humanity-killer
>working hard to raise marine insurance prices
>the trampler of international law
>famous for raping children
>nazi
>pervert
>lacking in humanity
>arrogant tyrant
none of you get any of the credit
Kinda fits Islam.
>Great Satan
Well, they reject Christ's Divinity, so yeah.
>racist against blacks
Muzzies were the first people to specifically target Africans for slavery
>humanity-killer
Muzzies love spilling blood.
>working hard to raise marine insurance prices
Houthis are the ones lobbing missiles at random ships.
>famous for raping children
Muhammed.
>nazi
1: links between Hitler and the Muzzies, especially Muzzie SS units.
2: don't Muzzies talk about gassing israelites at every riot they throw?
>pervert
Muzzies frick goats and prepubescent children on a regular basis.
>lacking in humanity
Muzzies are barbarous, murdering for the slightest offense, enslavers, rapists, with many quranic verses to justify such savagery.
>arrogant tyrant
Muzzie leaders have been among the most arrogant tyrants in human history.
Remind me why /misc/ cums buckets over these dudes?
Because /misc/ is infested by communists and muslims.
I think Russia manufactured the Isreal-gaza thing to district from his failure of a war t.bh
Because /misc/ IS these dudes.
Simple as.
/pol/tards support anyone, and I mean anyone, who is against the West. No matter how evil or stupid they are.
They should've just stopped, sit down, and stfu. Now they're going to get killed for no good reason other than being too prideful.
>other than being too prideful
No, anon. The reason is "Iran told us after Russia asked Iran to". They can't say no. It's like mafia rules.
>>We are the ones who protect maritime navigation, but the American coalition is igniting the Red Sea, militarizing it, and threatening it, and the American is working hard to raise marine insurance prices.
What the actual frick bruh
>think about le Black folk
why are non-americans like this
Don't care, expect more dead towelies.
>Totally legal according to the people ITT.
When people say "illegal action", they are suggesting the President lacks the authority to order these strikes.
The President WOULD have the authority to order troops into Mexico, under US law, whether Congress impeaches him or fails to authorize it after 60 days is another matter. It's also another matter whether such an act would be considered "legal" under international law and treaties, but that's not what people are screaming about when they talk about strikes on Yemen.
Why mods delete?
Just low effort shitposting, probably because it got banned for other shillposts in other threads.
>Just low effort shitposting
Well then stop being the single easiest board on this entire God forsaken website.
Anon, you didn't just admit to being one of the people doing shill posts and making bait threads, did you?
Mass-replying
Because A) All previous posts get deleted when the b& hammer comes down hard enough and B) That person was probably caught ban evading from the last time he spammed bait threads
>Our country
Anon, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Yemen is in fact nowhere near the US, if that's where you claim to be from. Refugees won't be fleeing here unless they get plane or boat tickets somehow regardless.
But more importantly, the strikes are only targeting military assets so there isn't any need for civilian evac plus brownoids are already used to getting diaspora'd weekly so they'll just go shit up some other Arab area like they always do.
welp,guess were gonna frick yemen in the ass drones now.
Maybe General De Marcus Rolex and Admiral Becky forgot some of the targets last night.
The USA is a joke. I'm sure lowering standards and more affirmative action will help.
won't bring back your F5 turdie
Aw man, the F-5 got destroyed?
>Several Explosions reported at the Houthi-Controlled Al-Dailami Air Force Base in the Yemeni Capital of Sana'a.
Anon, I...
Not like this.
Pretty sure she's dead Jim, we're not known for being nice to parked jets.
>won't bring back your F5 turdie
Oh well, it was not muh F-5, so I don't care.
Obviously you have not seen the USA. It is a shithole filled with useless low IQ third world scum. Import the 3rd world, then become the 3rd world. Soon enough the USA will collapse and all of the military junk in the US Military will be rusting trash, just like what happened to the USSR.
Sure, sure the useless c**t as the US Navy's CNO got there the same way the soul brotha commanding the whole US Military got there.
The other soul brotha in the hospital also got there through affirmative action too.
At least none of the morons have managed to sink their own ships, yet. You know the US Navy's record with getting hit by cargo ships.
>Coping this hard over sandBlack folk getting what they asked for.
that's SOP anon
>HAHA DIE GREAT SATAN
>gets hit
>UN IT'S A WAR CRIME TO KILL US
You don't seem to understand how this works.
When the stupid little shit that's been antagonizing you for ages finally gets his shit stomped in, you don't just do it all at once.
You grab him by his stupid towel hat, smash his face into the concrete, and ask "had enough?"
Repeat until he yields, or cannot respond at all.
Let's see how many times they can taste some pavement until they decide it's not worth it :^)
BBC confirms Sanaa is the target.
So as long as houthis have 1-10 missiles ready to be fired on the ships in the strait, ships would still avoid going through. And you can't achieve complete destruction of all houthi missiles without ground operation. If previously houthis were targeting just israely ships, now they target american and uk ships. So strait is officially dead for anglos and israel. unless they somehow manage to succesfully capture shore
>If previously houthis were targeting just israely ships
lol
>the red sea is CLOSED because it just IS OK.
doesn't look closed
why they bundled up like that then?
Check the destinations. They're all waiting to go through Suez or to port in Saudi Arabia so have already passed the straits, or they're in transferring their armed guards while in international waters
Seems like an artifact due to MarineTraffic's data gathering techniques. If you look at them in the app the ones in that cluster have all details, while most enroute are only satellite tracked. There may be an AIS > IP relay in operation at that location for some reason.
anon they said they were going to target any ship that was flagged by a Country other than the owner which is like 90% of international shipping
Its illegal to deploy federal troops at the border, moron. The federal military, by law, can't interfere with domestic policies. The only exception is either an insurrection, invasion by an enemy state. The national guard is also exempt by this law since they are controlled by the state.
What are the chances advanced Western missiles don't explode after impact, giving Houthis and Iran intact advanced missile technology to copy?
Paveways and Tomahawks aren't advanced. Well maybe to Iran.
anti-air interceptor missiles can also misfire, fall into the water and end up ashore
Why would the US expend AAMs? The Houthis aren't even trying to send aircraft up
they did try to hit USN vessels but, I don't think they got close enough to them.
we constantly hear about US intercepting drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles fired by houthis. What do you think is being used for intercept? CIWS all the time?
They still haven't copied the RQ-170, so the more pertinent probability is their chance of success.
>wrong
The Saegheh (English: "Thunderbolt") is an Iranian turbofan/piston-powered flying wing unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) produced by Shahed Aviation Industries.[2] It is based on, but smaller than and substantially different from, a Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel UAV that was captured by Iran in 2011 and then reverse-engineered.[5] It is one of two Iranian flying wing UAVs based on the RQ-170, along with the Shahed 171 Simorgh, a larger version.
This isn't relevant to your post, but I'm gonna mentioned it anyway:
>The Saegheh ("Lightning" or "Thunder" in Persian) (also spelled Saegre, Saeghe, Saeqeh, etc.) is any of at least eight completely separate Iranian weapons systems: a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) warhead, an anti-tank guided missile family, a surface-to-surface rocket, a target drone family, an air-to-air missile, a claimed stealth unmanned aerial vehicle, a fighter jet, and an anti-ship cruise missile.
They aren't going to Independence Day this shit anon
lol seething.
houthi inbred morons dont need you to cheerleader for them cuck.
>I'm not coping, moron
If you weren't your post would have stopped there.
Do you think terrorist attacks on commercial shipping isn't piracy just because they're attacking to sink instead of steal?
Did people legit think that the US was going to crumble over Houthis attacking random ships with their dinky ass missles? Almost EVERYBODY in the UN voted against the Houthis and told them to cut that shit out because NOBODY likes having their international trade fricked with by PIRATES.
the third worlders have this missile spam fantasy. For years they creamed themselves over the thought of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iran and Syria spamming missiles at Israel and then over running it. They also have a missile spam fantasy of the same people plus China and Russia spamming missiles at U.S carriers and other American military targets and destroying them
Oh, so random attacks on shipping in a corridor that US flagged vessels typically pass through isn't aggression against them because the Houthis haven't managed to find the right ship to shoot at?
>say something dumb
>get told to frick off for being a moron
>le epig trolled, umadbro, 420 on the haterz
I'm impressed to run into someone who's so moronic they failed to understand a fricking 3 panel rage comic and yet can operate a keyboard even if the fact that you're using caps in a greentext betrays you're using your thumbs for it like the filthy phoneposting scum you are.
where will this lead? is south yemen going to see that the houthis are weakened by airstrikes and attack them? is iran going to come to the houthis aid? american marines invading houthi yemen?
We're just going to blow up everything capable of leaving Yemen's borders and let Saudi Arabia deal with it or ignore the mess.
if the houthis back down the west will leave it at that
if the spergout intensifies I could see regime change in the cards, but not yet
>devolving to telling people to cope and seethe like the buzzword spewing moron you are isn't an implicit admission of trolling
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here that you're not so dumb as to actually believe what you said so I don't have to go down a bottle of Jack and wonder where everything has gone so wrong that you weren't aborted.
So somehow this isn't asking for clarification by your definition
? Glad to see you're sticking with the true moron strength of refusing to engage with any uncomfortable questions.
>Houthis are intentionally avoiding shooting at US flagged merchant ships when shooting indiscriminately at shipping
>but they almost blew up a Russian tanker despite being an Iranian proxy just for the lulz since they have such good ISR
Aside from military ships are there any US vessels in the area?
>I-It doesn't matter cause Iran will just keep giving us st-
>bombed airports
>bombed ports
>bombed railways and hubs
Is Iran gonna bring drones through trucks? We'll just crater every highway. All they had to do was respect international trade LOL.
USS Carney responsible. More tomahawks used.
Wrong if it’s not safe for US merchant vessels then the President can send the navy to make it safe thus protecting them in the future
Houthi's are firing at anything that moves because they are moronic, see them firing at a Russian ship earlier today
Panama flagged, which you'll note isn't Israel either.
In order for a cargo vessel to go from one US port to another without leaving the country between them it has to be US flagged. If the Houthi's are firing at any random vessel though it's obviously unsafe for US vessels to traverse and thus that needs to be rectified.
By their targeting of allied vessels, and they're just generally being pieces of shit.
>The Houthis said they targeted a US ship on Tuesday providing support to Israel. It was the 26th attack on commercial shipping in the Red Sea since 19 November.
>The US military said Iranian-designed one-way attack drones, anti-ship cruise missiles and anti-ship ballistic missiles were launched from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen at around 21:15 local time (18:15 GMT).
>Eighteen drones, two cruise missiles and one ballistic missile were shot down by F/A-18 warplanes from the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D Eisenhower, which is deployed in the Red Sea, and by four destroyers, the USS Gravely, USS Laboon, USS Mason and HMS Diamond.
>HMS Diamond shot down seven of the Houthi drones using its guns and Sea Viper missiles, each costing more than £1m ($1.3m), a defence source said.
>Later, Houthi military spokesman Yahya al-Sarea confirmed its forces had carried out an operation involving "a large number of ballistic and naval missiles and drones".
>"It targeted a US ship that was providing support for the Zionist entity [Israel]," he said.
>"The operation came as an initial response to the treacherous assault on our naval forces by the US enemy forces," he added, referring to the sinking of three Houthi speed boats and killing of their crews by US Navy helicopters during an attempted attack on a container ship on 31 December.
>Helicopters from nearby US warships responded to a distress call - and, after being fired upon, sank three boats "in self-defence".
There's really no way to know where these attacks are coming from. Anyone could've fired those bullets and then launched those drones and missiles.
We're definitely at war with Yemen now, right?
This is not war, this is pest control.
War requires two parties. Considering they can't fight back, we don't have to go to war. We can just keep bombing them for as long as we feel like, and they can't do anything about it.
Technically the Houthis aren't Yemen. It's like how fighting ISIS isn't fighting Syria.
The Yemenese government is still fighting the Houthis for control.
Are you moronic, or just autistic? They don't have to be intentionally targeting US ships to hit one, or are you unable to comprehend that waving a knife around in a room full of balloons is a problem for anyone who owns a balloon in that room and how this metaphor might apply to that statement? You aren't a moronic thirdie who's unable to comprehend a colloquial usage of the word "right", right?
That's what they've been doing since they started going after ships. Don't even start the Israel ship cope either. No one believes that lie
Well anons, I'm heading to bed, I'll look forward to seeing the board covered in /misc/troon and actual shill excrement tomorrow when they desperately try to block missiles by shitting up the board lmao
Keep it up, surely if you keep saying the US is out of missiles it will come true :^)
where videos of round 2
strikes on Houthi and the blowfish would make a good plot for Top Gun 3.
>ragheads getting nae nae'd on
Lmao nice. Also, al Qaeda has a history of operating out of Mukallah. So we've been in and out of there before
So either is correct, but one of them is being used more than the other you morons can stop arguing about it now
>either is correct
Oh sweaty, I already addressed this
No, that's wrong. Don't forget to do the needful sir!
he’s a moronic sperg proving a point that was never made
>moronic, low iq finds out that america and her ally is a phrase
>sperges out
you love to see it. go read a book or something
It's weird that Indians think they're native English speakers when they can't speak English for shit.
I really hope the dude is a vatnig or something cause if he's an American then I'm embarrassed for my entire country rn.
A leaf, actually. We speak the King's English
ohhh, so half Indian, half Chinese. Got it. That's fricked up man, but keep studying and you'll almost fool people into thinking you're Anglo!
I'm not that guy; he's larping as me
Why are you lying like an 8 year old on an anonymous messageboard? Take the L.
>calling a win a loss
>projecting his samegayging onto others
Definitely a vatBlack person
>a leaf
Yeah this dude is Indian. No one would admit to being Canadian unless they had something to hide.
I'm Australian and you're just moronic.
>Only 4 Eurofighters, a destroyer and refuelers took part
>HMS Diamond can't strike because she has no land attack missiles
>Only one RN destroyer in the Red Sea
God I want defence spending to be 5% of GDP bros.
It's ok bro, we're just glad you're still down to bomb shitheads with us
Best i can do is cutting another ship out of your fleet in exchange for some sodomy.
Why?
That's just what was in theatre at the time (normal smol red sea CAG plus the air defence detachment of RAF Akrotiri). The RAF has expeditionary airwings designed to air bridge in several squadrons of Typhoons or F-35s, tankers and transports for ground crews and munitions within 72 hours.
But what the frick is the point of flying hundreds of men to Akrotiri and Dhekelia when the threat is crazy shias hucking spears at oil tankers and you can bomb them with impunity because they have no air defence against medium level aircraft?
>https://twitter.com/jsalat40/status/1739001782339080440
/k/ comrades... I thought US Carrier Groups are unstoppable against drones and third world missiles... Nah, just kidding, I know it's just typical terrorist-sympathizing cope. Just what other refutes would you have against the "cheap drone swarms kill Carrier" talking point?
Also:
>https://twitter.com/Almutawakkil560/status/1745582316309643353
You heard that folks. Houthis can't be defeated because they don't know who SpongeBob SquarePants is.
>Just what other refutes would you have against the "cheap drone swarms kill Carrier" talking point?
Guns do a good job. And bullets are still cheaper than drones. Lasers are being tested now.
Houthis tried to drone swarm some ships an HMS Diamond shot them all down. If 1 destroyer can defeat a drone swarm then the whole "drone swarms will down carriers" looks increasingly moronic.
>They love death as much as you love life, if not more
So everybody wins!
Lmao, the captain of the ship the houthis have said to have bombed is posting pictures of his crew eating cookies on twitter
https://twitter.com/ChowdahHill/status/1745764487121023428?t=vDZHysi6wrtFOk9bbimwSg&s=19
>American Captain
>Reminds his crew that they have loved ones back home, keeps everyone in good spirits.
>Houthis
>THERE IS NO GREATER HONOR THAN TO BE KILLED BY AN AMERICAN AIRSTRIKE
I wish these people were capable of critical thinking.
Just do pic related. Twitter's algo struggles to differentiate between /misc/troons and other right wingers if you don't manually mute people.
If you're going to be killed by a missile regardless, you might as well turn it into a virtue.
The could have simply not attacked shipping. Or stopped after any of the multiple warnings.
That's surprisingly wholesome.
>They are natural-born fighters, really, no kidding.
Literally just built different
Can i see a results of any attack? Or it is missed like and have no impact?
>https://twitter.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1745870545928028345
Anyone else has had a Mr. Jake Shields appear in their goddamned Twitter feeds ever since the October 7 2023 meme started. I swear ever since October 7 2023 this has been MMA fighter and some obviously left wing Dutch Nurse and their shitass takes have always been appearing in my feed. And I do not even follow MMA shit yet this "former MMA" fighter keeps appearing simply because he hates israelites and probably takes PrepHole /misc/ memes seriously.
Jake shields, keith woods, lucas gage. Theyre all thirdworldists who dont do anything pro White, maybe woods for a but, but most are just shilling for low iq third worlders
That and I guess being constantly punched and hit on the head does damages your IQ and reasoning skills. Thus making you more susceptible to third world antisemitism propaganda.
But hey, surely all that israelite hating posts Shields and other pro-palestine people have made will surely not backfire or haunt them in the future the moment they have to get off of Twitter and find employment from a israeli employer... Right?
It probably wont actually, they can also use their clout for something or grift to thirdworlders. I remember keith woods made a post when the algerian killed 3 kids about how ireland should have no immigration and all his fans turned on him
Well okay sure, washed up celebs like Woods and Shields likely will live comfortably in luxury for the rest of their lives by grifting leftwing-wise along with them still being filthy rich and wealthier than most people. But the regular nobodies, the regular literal whos who got little to no clout or influence to back them up are the ones who'll be haunted by their past. Especially the moment their antisemitic pro-terror posts eventually gets them into trouble when looking for eventual employment because background checking.
And still, people like Shields and Woods aren't safe from being cancelled by the very people they align with because remember. Leftists seem to always cannibalize each other simply from not being leftist enough or saying the wrong set if words. So people with some form of clout like Shields may not be cancelled by their antisemitism, but from being cannibalized by the very type of people he supports because he said a triggering No-no word or is not leftist enough.
As a third worlder its so fricking stupid for someone like that to get with the typical Pro-Palestine crowd, who are and have always been fricking capital S-Socialists. Doesn't he know they hate him? In most of the world where communists and marxist socialists are actually influential someone like Woods would be fricking laughed at by leftists and right-wingers alike as some bizarre cook who might as well think the sky is green and the water yellow.
His gay followers turning on him once they realize he doesn't like arabs immigrating to Europe is absolutely expected if you only have a basic superficial view of the Pro-Arab, Pro-Palestine movement. You have to be an American and live in complete ignorance of actual marxists to get shocked that the people that are actually relevant and opposed to Israel support mass immigration into not just Europe but just about anywhere including in Latin America. They're internationalists for frick's sake.
On the second day of Christmas my Navy gave to me
Two legs in trees
One destroyed airbase
And a crying Arab on CNN TV
Here comes the turdie cope
>Everything bad happening is a US conspiracy, except for the US which is a israeli conspiracy
I see the weeping and gnashing of teeth about israelites and americans is happening. This means they're doing a good job.