1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Saudi

    Big deal.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      These Houthi rebels man, I remember they also shot down Saudi F-15s, F-16s, Mirage 2000s, and Tornados using Iranian supplied SAMs

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Did they? I thought some of those got knocked out through general failure, I know a few got killed via SAMS tbf

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          What I tell ya, watch your cock around these desert people

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            CAZZATA ZELENSKYY

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, when the opponents are as incompetent and corrupt and all around useless as the Saudi military you could give them the best gear and they'd still be blown away.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Houthi rebels
        It is disingenuous to say this when these 'rebels' are also include literally the entire INTACT Yemenis Armed Forces with the country's entire arsenal of modern-ish Western, Russian and Chinese equipment which became the 'rebels' overnight when the legitimate(*) government was declared to be illegitimate by the ~~*West*~~. The conflict is straight up a conventional war between Yemen and Saudi Arabia and both's supporters. Western Govs and Media just refuse to frame it as such because it freaks out investors and also doesn't fit the Narrative.

        Yemenis Forces are completely capable of knocking out any Western Armor with their capabilities, which most likely include now American military aid that has been resold to Yemen and Iran. Just wait for the first leak of a Saudi Air Power or Armor asset knocked out by a Javelin or Stinger to hit the Intel community.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Iranian claws typed this post

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            US Intel actually. And I have to explain all this to policy makers who don't understand the nature of the situation and why the Saudi's aren't able to simply steamroll Yemen with US supplied gear and advisors. The Arabs can't fight meme is fact. They can buy all the shit we'll sell them, doesn't mean they can use it to even half its potential because they are more concerned with petty politics instead of accomplishing any policy goal. Neither can the Iranians but they are pretty good at terrorism at least. Guarantee you one of the consequences of Ukraine is that IRGC, Hezbollah, etc will end up with gear we'd really REALLY not wish they had gotten. Just the fact that they end up with any at all means down the line everything has to be planned assuming they might actually use it, even if they are just going to sit on the asset forever because it is too valuable to otherwise use.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Okay so I'm reading into this because frankly I didn't care a lot about Yemen previously but I can't see how the Houtis aren't at least 80% the bad guys here, even if the Saudis are incompetent and malevolent m

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I never said they weren't the bad guys. In a perfect world we would have just nuked the entire Middle East a long time ago (yes including Israel). All I am saying is the politicians and press label them the "Houthi rebels", which denotes sandal-clad rag heads with AKs. While half the rebels are just as such, the other half is the completely intact Yemen Regular Army. The story behind the conflict is way to complicated to explain here and who fucking cares anyways, fuck all of them. But you should recognize what is what and just call them the fucking former Yemeni military, complete with modern military assets, including fucking TBMs (the legit stuff, not just shitty Iranian buzzbombs although they have plenty of those too). Which is why the Saudis got fucking curbstomped, they weren't facing citizen insurgents but a modern conventional military fighting in their homeland.

                The point being that way you aren't so fucking surprised when we are going to start seeing our own export models getting torn apart by our own fucking weaponry very soon.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >geopolitics is about good guys and bad guys

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >my side
                >good
                >your side
                >gay, bad and retarded

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            He's right tough. If you filter unnecessary 4chan buzzwords his assessment is correct.
            The civil war was initially orchestrated by Saudis for various geopolitical reasons and Iran could not resist opportunity to have some proxy war against their main regional opponent.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >if a piece of equipment is destroyed it must be bad!

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      reminder that there is only 1 superior tank design of all time

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        New Zealand Chads, I kneel.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >you will never touch the corrugated side armor of a Heavy Semple MBT
        Why live?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >Why live?
          Because three words: Bob. Semple. II.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >the answer is Semple. Bob Semple

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >None were lost
        Name a better record. You can't.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    This has probably been discussed

    Want to discuss it again?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Wait do that picture isn’t from Ukraine? Lmao

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Nope. It's one of the raghead ones.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Half the time it isn’t no, and when pressed they will just move the goalposts. There is or was a thread up on pol right now of a destroyed truck that’s not actually a himars though claimed to be and another of an abrams in Ukraine that’s actually a video from 2021 where the same style of posting was used. Just spam the site all day for .02 rubles per post is all these people do.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      the point was that it's not invulnerable as claimed.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Who the fuck is claiming that a lightly armored IFV is invulnerable?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Except that we know since the Bradley was created what it's protection values are
        Inital variants vs 14.5mm
        A2 and later vs 30mm

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        the only one claiming brads are invulnerable are vatnigs, simply so they can be smug at pictures of damaged/wrecked brads saying how they're not so invulnerable after all.
        everyone with even half a brain knows of the relatively low armor of a naked brad

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It's amazing projection tbh. They think like this becuse turd worlders genuinely believe their T-90s and shit were invincible

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Post a single (1) destroyed HIMARS

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          umm sorry sweaty but all of them have been destroyed so there's no more to post.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think anyone on PrepHole thinks it's invincible.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Are you maybe retarded?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >the point was that it's not invulnerable as claimed.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Nobody in the history of mankind has ever made such a claim.
        Props for the straw man bait.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >it's not invulnerable as claimed.
        Keep fighting the good fight, Anon. Someday you'll prove to those voices in your head that you were right all along!

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The most common claim about the Bradley is that it's a horrific death trap, usually made by people who thought Pentagon Wars was a documentary

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        god i hate russians so fucking much, it's unreal

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          My hate would honestly be less if they were competent or actual fearsome. Instead what I see is
          >'We just destroyed this super modern western super weapon!'
          with a mix of lies (it wasn't destroyed) and cargo cult (it's actually 40-50 year old equipment).

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >the point was that it's not invulnerable as claimed.
        Anon, it's an armored vehicle.
        No armored vehicle is invulnerable.
        Doesn't matter who produced it, if you hit it with a big enough explosive, it's toast.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        post iraqi tanks that met this very vulnerable system

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Slit your effeminate subhuman wrists you slant eyed gay

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        NATO lives in every corner of your head.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        (You)

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        By who? Your whore mother?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          No, yours (she does anal, btw).

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            the point was that it's not invulnerable as claimed.

            Dropped out of school already huh? Or were you kicked out?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Why did they use a 3d render of the RPG-7? It's not like it's hard to find a picture of one. It's the AKM of anti-tank weapons.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >antitank weapons can kill IFVs
            ok

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Only thing there can kill it reliably are the tanks and the atgm's though. The AT mines won't even kill reliably, but it'll track it at least

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              The single-warhead RPG-7 also shouldn't penetrate if it hits ERA

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                That was included in the "not a tank or atgm" statement

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Never heard about PG-7R warhead for RPG-7, or Kitolov 122mm and Krasnopol 152mm artillery shells
                The latter two have been the main killer of tanks, IFVs, APCs and fortifications of this war since they outrange the main gun and ATGM mounted on any ground vehicle except other artillery

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                It's PG-7VR, but those have a laughably short range. 100m is the expressed maximum effective range kind of short. It would be handy in city fighting but that's about it

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >100m is the expressed maximum effective range kind of short.
                that is far closer than I would ever like to be to an armored vehicle

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah well soviet doctrine is to have 5 guys with RPGs so maybe one can get close enough to get a shot off before the thermal equipped 25mm cannon rips them to shreds

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >The latter two have been the main killer of tanks, IFVs, APCs and fortifications
                you again
                show any prove krasnopol is used in larger number

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Anti-armour munitions fuck up armoured vehicles
            Who could've FUCKING predicted this?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            ITS OVER FOR THE TANK
            WW1BROS WE'RE FUCKING BACK

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Can RPG-7 really knock out Bradley?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Let's post something that can kill T-90m

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous
          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            That pic makes me wonder if there is any ifv that can survive all of that?? Next gen ifv maybe?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Namer with Trophy

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            This picture does put up a good question: where the fuck did all of Russia's RPGs go? You hardly see any being used by mobniks or even VDV.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        These bros are goal post in front of my fucking eyes. Holy shit. How much is Gerasimov paying you for this?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        32 years ago, in a desert far, far away ......

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          nice reddit repasta gay

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Who the fuck claims that Bradley is invulnerable? Are you retarded?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      nah I'm good Agent Smith. Have a nice night!

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >he tries to save face by using THAT defense
        <in this context

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Henry krinkle
        Id point out the fact that you cropped out the source but this is even worse than having no source

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Dennis, get some sleep

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't know things were green in wintertime

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't count, it's a monkey model without all the upgrade packages. Domestic versions are easily 3 to 5x more combat effective.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >They got all 50 of them already?
      Actually, they got all 5,000 of them. 25 HATO generals were in each one. Absolutely devastating setback. No way to recover, so we're giving them Poland as a Gesture of Good Will.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Shit. Sorry. Obviously clicked on the wrong post to reply to this one

        They got all 50 of them already? It's over NATObros. We should consider peace.

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They got all 50 of them already? It's over NATObros. We should consider peace.

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    RIP Toyota Landcruiser

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      it's a Jeep!

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        My estimation of Ukraine intel services fucking plummeted when I found out they didn't kidnap and execute this worthless homemade FSB propagandist like the shills were saying.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          to be fair, they got a lot of the other ones, they just decided that murdering lira wasn't worth it

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Actual rightwing death squads hunting down commie subversives
            Wait, why doesn't 4chan like these guys again?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              They have been subverted years ago.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Contrarian NPCs with no ideals or values beyond "current thing bad"

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                This, if the world decided to vote Republican they would choose to vote Democrat is to be brainlessly contrarian.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                They aren’t even that. They’re effeminates acting like women bitching at you to “do something!” When in reality they mean
                >”do what I want! Who cares if I’m/what I want is retarded!”
                or worse, they effeminate 5th columnists who are doing the same thing but knowingly and purposefully to the detriment of all that is good in this world and to the “benefit” of their irrelevant subhuman shithole.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              4chan isn't the same place or the same people it was in 2014 buddy, you should have gotten the memo months ago

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              gnomish

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Polmorons became subverted by trump and literal Russian psyops circa 2016. Remember manafort? He was balls deep in supporting the old regime of pro Russian Ukrainians. Nowadays pol does whatever Russia or china says and opposes whatever democrats like

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Because reddit likes Ukraine.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              4chan today is full of boomers who don't want National Socialism, but rather, want muh yankee-doodle apple-pie conservatism and have no problem being ruled over by oligarchic garden gnomes as long as free markets and garden gnome-on-a-stick worship are preserved.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          they probably just dismissed him as the mentally ill loser he is

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          I'm still hoping some Banderite saws his head off.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          They pulled him in for investigation but found out no - he is not a kremlin shill. In fact he does it for free.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          He does more harm to Russian side being alive than dead

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Guess the SBU glows figured him for a special needs and let gonzo be

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          This -->>

          He does more harm to Russian side being alive than dead


          >He does more harm to Russian side being alive than dead
          Ukraine intelligence knows what they're doing in this case.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          This guy does nothing more than argue with people with Pig avatars on youtube, he's not worth the bullet

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Bradleys are going to wreck T-72s and T-62s in Ukraine. Some number of Bradleys will probably be lost. It's an IFV, not a tank, anyone pretending it's invincible is retarded.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Pajeets genuinely think their Arjun tanks are invincible kek

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Bradleys are going to wreck T-72s and T-62s in Ukraine. Some number of Bradleys will probably be lost. It's an IFV, not a tank, anyone pretending it's invincible is retarded.

      Some? Just about every anti tank missile in Ukraine will punch trough the armor.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Someone should tell that to all the BMPs with even thinner armor and no thermals

        to 14.5mm to the side.
        >This was not even true for the first variants

        Resistant against full caliber 14.5 mm AP, not against subcaliber APDS.

        How available do you think subcaliber APDS is in a force that struggles to supply food and 5.45?

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Unsurprising, since even small arms penetrate their "armour".

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >vulnerable to 14.5mm to the side.
      This was not even true for the first variants

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        to 14.5mm to the side.
        >This was not even true for the first variants

        Resistant against full caliber 14.5 mm AP, not against subcaliber APDS.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          there is no 14.5mm APDS that was in service in the 80s

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >there is no 14.5mm APDS that was in service in the 80s

            Precisely! But the world has changed. And worse, 30 mm APDS should go straight trough the turret front at ranges below 1000 meters. And any anti tank missile, at any range. Applique armor can help a bit with anti tank missiles, not by blocking penetration, but by reducing post penetration effects by siphoning away explosive gasses. And the Bradley is a perfectly average modern IFV, which means that this entire class of vehicle was and is obsolete upon introduction.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >30mm APDS
              Pretty sure all the ammo i've seen on both sides has been 30mm AP
              UBR8 APDS and UBR11 APFSDS are vapour like 90% of Russian stuff.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >X isn't invulnerable so it's obsolete
              humans have been obsolete since the invention of the spear

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              moron the war is currently being fought mainly by BMP-1s and BMP-2s in the IFV category. The Bradley is a fucking spaceship in comparison. Stop playing War Thunder or at least shut the fuck up if that is your only source of knowledge on the matter

              https://i.imgur.com/ISi7ygF.jpg

              No, yours (she does anal, btw).

              Cool now compile the list for infantry. While you do it, maybe consider suicide

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >And any anti tank missile, at any range.
              Just a few weeks ago, a video showing an NLAW failing to punch through a thinner-armored BMP-2 just dropped. In reality, you need multiple to reliably take out any half-decent IFV, and in that time the Bradley can mog you with its bushmaster.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >failing to punch through a thinner-armored BMP-2
                then plese tell me why it never moved after the hit

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Keep spreading this outdated infographic so it gets mobiks killed kek, please.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Why the fuck would you ever aim at the launcher? If you're at the distance you can pick that out the fuckin 242 is going to turn you into meat after it detonates. Just put the round in the hull and actually kill it. Also your entire advise is 'shoot it in the sides and rear' as if that isn't literally the standard for dealing with armor

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I'd say they must be confusing the Bradley with the bmp, but that's already self evident with they want they never called it anything else

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        BMP just means IFV in slavrunes, it'll be really funny when Ukranians start calling Bradley "the best BMP"

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Is this one of those "delete Sys32 folder" advice thing?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Classic. Excellent 20th anniversary Hall of Fame memes.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    And? It clearly drove over a anti tank mine ment to shread a MBT what did you expect to happen. What's next?
    >Oh no body armor bros!
    >Picture of a grunt cut in half via 35mm auto cannon
    Maybe I should start making threads going with pictures of migs that got atomised by 2000lb JDAMs in their hangers in order to prove that they can be shot down

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    SECOND TO NONE
    https://streamable.com/66i2l2

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    bradley is such a gay name

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It's know among adorant fans as the chadley

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why is this picture so weird? Something just isn't right.

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It just means Russians are bad as Arabs at fighting wars.

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Looks recoverable to me.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      As a trophy

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Escape hatches open
    Crew is safe, vehicle did its job

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Ruskies already prepared trophy for first confirmed Bradley kill.
    It's like big game hunting expedition in Africa only more ethical one where you don't hunt down lions and rhinos but Bradleys.

  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Another NATO wunderwaffen has mystique shatter.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *