>affix laser to drone
>acquire capacity of easy blinding (temp or perm, singular or wideband, the wattage required to inhibit or destroy the human eye is insanely cheap and you can become permanently blinded before the p300 wave even kicks in) for incredibly low cost, incredibly high reliability (i know you lads are MEs and not EE's but you cannot, possibly frick with solid state weapons)
so we're in agreement then, energy weapons are the future?
it's simply a matter of the humanity of the thing that it hasn't been utilized yet?
we're in agreement that me fricking your mom the future
>jams your shit with a generator, radio transmitter, and pringles can
better go crying back to the fcc drone boy
>heh i'll just use EMPs
at that point society has completely fallen apart and the nukes are long since detonated you spaz
He's talking about jamming, but we also have high-power microwave EM weapons that shit on small drones.
now consider how insanely fricking cheap it is to cobble together a drone and a sufficiently high power laser
remember that modern ML algos that can identify a human and the area of their face now run on a 10$ chip
That's really cool anon, why don't you go and do it yourself and post back here.
i'm a whitehat/theoryhatist, i'm not interested in proving such things can be made at a given intersection of economic forces, just give caution that they may come to exist
perhaps mirrored spectacles in public places would be the counterance to this armament.
>theoryhatist
in other words you've never done anything and have no practical knowledge of the topic.
so many sentences to say you're a navelgazing homosexual. riveting
>navelgazing
sorry, not up on my ebonics, what's that in whitespeak?
Drone RC freqs get jammed by a cordless telephone set people give away at yard sales
>he thinks a well made singular-purpose drone requires C&C
they're moronic
they're efficient
they're autonomous
how much electronics experience do you have lad
>a well made singular-purpose drone
Yeah, this is the point. You are equating military-grade drones and AI with something widely available that any idiot can make and deploy.
If the point of the thread is "we're fricked if USG wants to be dicks and blind us" then yes you are correct. If you are worried because you think the incel version of Tony Stark wants to build some shit in his garage to frick with you then you are being stupid.
mate it's way easier than you think
this is an aussie shitposter who welds garbage together with humor for views and he made effectively the same thing you'd need to put on a drone with a bunch of scrap
>effectively the same thing you'd need to put on a drone with a bunch of scrap
that weighs 20 pounds and is hooked to a laptop
yeah no way anyone who put any effort into it couldn't reduce the expense(weight or dollar) that a fricking aussie shitposter put into a meme video
Kind of like how there's no way anyone who was seriously concerned about this attack vector couldn't figure out a way to counter it
how do you defend your eyes economically and still see?
From a purely passive standpoint? Cheap Chinese lasers are defeated by cheap Chinese glasses, they aren't running one branch of the tech tree over there
White people also make actual PPE for lasers, ask laser lab dude up above
In a situation where people could actually fly this shit around without getting buttfricked by USG, you should have already bought and built what you need to counter it actively. Microwave generator, appropriate reflector/dish, power supply. If you want to get fancy with it you can ask your Australian youtube buddies to come up with a program to track drones in the air and since your system is ground-based it's a hundred times easier to develop, mount, and power.
Personally, for me it's a long-barrel 20-gauge
>thinks physics is a race thing
oh anon
remember that madman in vegas?
killed 50?
now imagine he blinds 1000.
OP, are you trying to say that the FBI has deactivated assets available to harm American citizens on demand for political purposes, namely to support a ban on consumer lasers? I guess wear your glasses in public? What do you want out of this thread
Oh no not the nukes.
No. you're a moron too.
>permanently blinded
And dazzling are orders of magnitude apart, the usual blindness is temporary.
don't look up the damage a 1W laser directly into your eye does you fricking mong
we had morons playing around with chinese 400mW lasers permanently blinding themselves OFF REFLECTIONS
>off reflections
at 2 feet. now check what the real range is?
I've had big ass blue and green lasers shot at me when flying at night. guess who's eyes still work despite being in the most vulnerable possible state?
what was the wattage and duty cycle of said lasers?
you cannot legally acquire the good shit, it's basically as locked down as u235 except that more physicists can acquire it
>you cannot legally acquire the good shit
what lasers have you acquired for work or pleasure?
>how much electronics experience do you have lad
how many laser labs have you worked in? I've worked in 3, not including the instruments I've had to register lasers for.
my background builds all the shit around the laser. knowing that there was a scandal in america years ago about grey market shitty chinese lasers i know that your entire field lacks any pragmatic regulations or protections and thus can be discounted.
curious how your questions appear to be something the court might ask a person though. little bit of me to accuse a laserman of glowing, we all know lasers aren't technically radioactive
weird how you've never worked with or even purchased a laser before. I'll reference my previous assertion that you don't know what you are talking about, because you have no experience with lasers whatsoever.
keep cope posting, though.
i don't need to know the specifics of a type of caliber of bullet to design the apparatus which fires them.
you don't even draw significant wattage lol, a 5G chip takes more battery
>i don't need to know the specifics of a type of caliber of bullet to design the apparatus which fires them.
this is the most summit of Mount Stupid post on the board.
>White people also make actual PPE for lasers, ask laser lab dude up above
totally depends on the threat. most non-visible light lasers can be thwarted by visually optically clear assemblies. visible light laser protection requires significant ODs in visible light, which is a pain in the ass because it makes shit darker for the end user. the real trump card for all this is end user optically detached vision systems, like CROWS weapon mounts, and the helmet mounted AR systems. while they are not completely immune, electro-optical systems are significantly (like, thousands of times) more resistant to laser damage than eyeballs. To defeat those systems your output power has to get very, very high.
>the real trump card for all this is end user optically detached vision systems, like CROWS weapon mounts, and the helmet mounted AR systems. while they are not completely immune, electro-optical systems are significantly (like, thousands of times) more resistant to laser damage than eyeballs. To defeat those systems your output power has to get very, very high.
you realize this is about against civvies, right?
like 9/11?
lol imagine thinking
1. this would be on a warfront
2. NATO would pay for it (all warfronts are slavoffs)
>lol imagine thinking
you should give it a try.
>acquire capacity of easy blinding
Weapons that exist solely to blind people are (probably) illegal under the Geneva Convention. The aim is to avoid war becoming any more of an endless carnival of horrors than it already is. It's why we agreed that chemical weapons are a no-go.
obviously, but the geneva convention is just a convention, one which will be thrown away immediately when the powers that be see fit to do so
also that's why i said "simply a matter of the humanity" in my OP. we've collectively agreed not to escalate to this level, but nothing speaks against the raw physics of the thing being disproportionally effective
>anon thinks a laser's power does not decrease with distance
wow what an amazing world anon lives in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar
Are you strapping a pulsar to your drone and firing it through the vacuum of space? At what point are you going to take the L on this thread topic
>he doesn't understnd physics
if we can easily measure a neutron star that far away it should teach you something about directional propagation.
unfortunately you appear to be nuamericanizzed.
>unfortunately you appear to be nuamericanizzed
Yes, only a stupid American would be unable to appreciate that a pulsar is the same as a laser strapped to a drone. Does your country even have drones? Or lasers?
>wants to opine about "things get weaker with distance"
>gets btfo'd cosmologically by the fact that quasars, which are even less directional than lasers, exist
yeah.
OP when are you just going to admit that this was a stupid topic and move on to the next shitpost
how do you think LIGO's 4km lasers stay focused
you fricking mong c**t halftard
>how do you think LIGO's 4km lasers stay focused
>you fricking mong c**t halftard
By literally putting them in a vacuum!
This will be my last (You), your thread sucks and you derailed what might have actually been an engaging conversation about the current state of drone tech and countermeasures by being OP and thusly a gigantic homosexual
shant be doxxing that hard lad
I thought they put Alaskan lazer schizo in jail, did he get out?