>A company of Russian T-90s, up to 10 tanks, was destroyed by a HIMARS strike at night.
>Petrivsky district of occupied Donetsk. They were probably supposed to take part in the assault on Maryinka, which is nearby.
How do you legally defend your tanks from being destroyed overnight?
Also, I am pretty sure I've seen numerous posts about russia being able to shoot down GMLRS missles.
How is NATO Intel so good ...
1. NATO has sattelites.
2. Ukraine has those little quad copters they fly around everhwere.
Combine those and they know everything.
Plus an advantage in HUMINT.
>know everything
where is their ass?
Ass is in ass
>they know everything
Eyebrow status?
In orbit
Ah, the fabled Russian anti-sat eyebrow weapon system
>they know everything
So Russia was telling the truth. Eyebrows raised.
>they know everything.
Satellites.
Lots of satellites. Enough to where live feeds of a battlespace can be maintained around the clock. Having several nations with space programs in your military alliance has its advantages.
they don't look destroyed
No aftermath photos yet
No
Show me your (destroyed patriots) first
May i see them?
>Petrivsky
Oh yes, bombing peaceful civilian towns/cities 100 miles from the frontline is the best way to win! First Lugansk, now Donetsk of course. Which other Russian cities will brave ukrainian warriors bomb next with HIMARS, huh?
Noo, not Granny's T-90..The ookraina will pay for this...
BORN TO SMOKE
DONBABWE IS A FUCK
鬼神 Bomb Em All 2023
I am HIMARS man
410,757,864,530 DEAD CHILDREN
More like 20 km and just the tanks.
Were those T-'s90 the house of some Babushkas?
Yours
lol "100 miles form the front line" isn't even inside occupied territory anymore, that's well inside Russia
>Ukrainian flag on the van
moron, are you even trying anymore?
They were moving innocent Donbabwe children with those T-90’s, those Ukrainian bastards will pay for this reprehensible crime!
i've seen this post before
Me too, they must really be pissed about something
What part of "I need 5 billion rockets to bomb donetsk children" didn't you understand?!
Hopefully yours moron
That's impossible. Russian jamming has made it so that GMLRS can no longer be used on the battlefield.
They still have INS
And to be tbh, the recent himars strike I've seen are a bit off. Earlier they were pinpoint precise, now they usually fall about 5m from target
lol the CEP of GMLR M30 is 10m.
I remember them being more precise last year
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1658032248031985666
This is a strange video to use to demonstrate how precise they supposedly are because you can clearly see it miss by at least 8-10 meters
Bro, your reading comprehension could use some work
Sorry my bad, I just assumed you were linking a video from last year, I didn't read the date XD
I think it's more likely that last year when HIMAR fever was really hitting strong, a lot of kills that were actually 155mm systems like Excalibur or Bonus were miss-attributed to GMLR
>GPS jammer works all the way in a ballistic trajectory
retard.
>>GPS jammer works all the way in a ballistic trajectory
The russians dont use GPS jammers, they use GPS spoofers, so if they are successfull with their electronic attack, the rocket miss by a lot thinking its spot on.
Anon, do you know what a "ballistic trajectory" is? Unless the Russians have GPS jammers/spoofers that can reach the where the missile was launched from, they're not affecting its flight.
The Russians can't even jam a $200 hobby store drone.
What the fuck convinces you they can effectively jam a layered guidance system?
>The Russians can't even jam a $200 hobby store drone.
Very far from the truth, unfortunately. Not only they jam commercial drones, they also jam US-donated military drones. The amount of EW equipment is not enough to cover everything 24/7, but when it's there, you definitely have issues
Even the Ukrainians have said they've been jamming stuff. The issue is that the jamming doesn't discriminate and jams the Russians' stuff too.
sure, whatever you say
>zoom in
>no Z's
Thats a COPE.
Who has more?
Dude just buying a bunch of patches or something
imagine all the dead Russians
Those are okrainian patches though.
yes, now imagine all the thousands of dead Russians it took to gather those pieces of fabric
>2 american flags
nice cope post.
More than just two Americans have already died there (former green beret recently).
And one guy could carry more than one flag patch.
>Multiple police patches
So are these all purchased from surp stores or have the Russians just been shooting that many cops?
What are cops doing on the front line?
Better image.
Just google "Ukrainian police patch".
Either looted museum/exhibition or some base in destroyed Mariupol.
in the early days of the war there were videos of cops with RPGs before lines were stabilized.
>all completely brand new
yeah I'm not sure I'm buying this one vatty
buying them from aliexpress doesn't count
>Pretty sure the FFL is not in this theater.
> Neither US patch is milspec
> Police badge - wow so brave capturing civilians
> Morale patches
lol
Out of curiosity, if you were fighting in a war and caught an enemy dude with a bunch of patches from your guys, what would you do?
Patches are probably in the rear. Who's going to carry all that shit?
Take them all from him, and then take his uniform's patches.
Am I supposed to believe that Russia can assemble an entire coherent company of t90s at this point?
No one said they were all runners, anon.
This represents a pretty embarrassing failure of opsec at this point in the war, doesn't it? HIMARS is not a saturation weapon and T-90s aren't exactly falling out of Putin's ass any more. Is it too much to hope for the crews getting killed or maimed too?
I need a video of it, so I can masturbate furiously while wathing it.
4chan currently has like 4 threads up about "we took blackmutt zisters!" even when pidorozhin himself said the opposite
was wondering why the ziggers were coping and derailing this time, might be this then
"Legally"?? Fuck off, kid. This is war.
I have the sudden, inexplicable urge to reinstall Close Combat V.
How strong is a singular rocket nowdays? I get that the roof is the weakest part of the vehicle but surely a tank should provide some protection from artillery weapons? Assuming no direct hits which shouldn't happen to moving targets and sufficient dispersal and camouflage when stationary 10 tanks down in one barrage seems really dubious.
The warhead is ~90kg and +20kg of explosive, is roughly 2.5 times larger than an 155mm shell.
The shrapnel would destroy any sight, track close enough. Even the gun. Any thin side could be penned.
But better just show how effective is a 155mm in real tests:
https://tradocfcoeccafcoepfwprod.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/fires-bulletin-archive/2002/NOV_DEC_2002/NOV_DEC_2002_FULL_EDITION.pdf
>page 9-11
>9-11
8* - 11
neat.