900 tanks gone baayybyyyyy

As we near 5000 confirmed Russian losses, we just hit 900 tank losses.
I'm surprised there have been more T90M losses than T62's

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How many t90s

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Over a hundred and a shitton of T-72s
      Including a lot of modern T-72B3

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just 25 to go. I really hope we see a frigate go next.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >5000
      I've to say that this is the most meme tier-ist war in the last 20 years of a supposed superpower country.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, after studying Russian history, this is pretty much par for the course for them, sans a short period in the 18th century. Once the world moved to the industrial period, Russia was literally slower than Japan to adopt technology.
        The Nigeria with snow meme really isn't that far off.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    T62s are mostly rusted solid thats why

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do they even have an air arsenal? I really don't understand why they continue with the armor strategy when it's obviously not working

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they're probably really low on munitions for their air force.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're too afraid of Stingers and Iglas to fly low and can't suppress Ukraine's meager AAA + can't aim because they don't have shit for guided munitions.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      russians are too retarded for a combined forces approach

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia has planes and pilots, but they haven't been giving them a lot of flight time for quite a while now. They spend considerably less time flying than a western counterpart, and are consequently going to be less capable, and more prone to getting shot down. The last thing Russia needs now is a lot of go-pro footage of flaming Migs falling out of the sky

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    US lost more in Vietnam.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Over twenty years, not five months.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What will russia have left if this goes on for 20 years?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Motorcycles with rocket pods/maxim MGs mounted on the sides

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Now that sounds fucken groovy
            But didn't The Brotherhood of Nod do it first?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Crippling debt and cannibalism, so overall a net improvement

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If they've already started to use T-62's and BMP-1's in the span of 5 months, they'll be back to using muskets, not Mosins, muskets, in about another 9 months. Reminder that we're talking about a nation that claimed it was the most powerful nation in the world; with its horde of fanatic loyalists and endless tanks able to overrun all of Europe when in reality I doubt they could have even crossed that far into West Germany.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >with its horde of fanatic loyalists
            >with its horde of FANFIC loyalists
            FTFY

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The one tank factory Russia has can produce something like 300 tanks a year when it has access to western markets to buy all the tools and equipment they need.
          Even at the best of times Russia would need three years to recover from the tank losses it suffered so far. With the sanctions nobody can tell you how long it will really take. Maybe decades. Maybe never. Maybe they'll shit out barely working barebone tanks instead.
          Such is life when your military production is depended on your arch enemy.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            China is probably gonna sell them some tanks

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Best part of this cope, it's not even true.
      >According to official US data, 343 M48s were delivered to the ARVN up to March 1975. The US lost at least 123 M48 tanks (non-repairable) during the war. As a result, the US and ARVN lost about 500 M48 tanks total

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Copers just can't seem to get a break today

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post timelines for both conflicts for comparison

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A single death is a tragedy - a million is a statistic. In other words, WE WUZ SOVIETZ IN SHIEET.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God imagine the full force of nato when it's finally unleashed, the armies of America, France, Britain, Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain, Turkey, the Netherlands, Greece, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Portugal, Denmark, the Baltic States, Canada, Czechia, Slovakia, Croatia, Hungary, Romania. One giant fist of brutal ceaseless firepower, 800 million people, the single largest concentration of wealth, industry equal to China, and the absolute apex of military doctrine and logistics
    I want Russia to attack us so bad its fucking unreal, the mass rape they would suffer would be so intense they would have mongol flashbacks

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      NATO's combined manufacturing capacity is easily double that of China, though. That doesn't even count non-NATO allies.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia's output being slightly larger than leafland

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russian manufacturing beat out by Mexico and Indonesia
        how in the everloving fuck, russia?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Mexico unironically has been on a warpath on unfucking their industrial base for a few decades now.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russian manufacturing beat out by Mexico and Indonesia
        how in the everloving fuck, russia?

        >Eh Vatnik you need some help building them tanks?
        >Nevermind, you can't afford me meng

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Nevermind, you can't afford me meng
          They currently cannot afford even Russian labor.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ok lets make a deal, London, Berlin, Madrid, Paris and New York get nuke and crumble to ashes.
      Then you can go to russia with all your nato friends and do what ever you want
      mmm deal hu ?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing of value lost.
        And it was not like Russia would have not fired its nukes anyway if not stopped.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. But I'm taking Freikorps, Misanthropic Division, Atomwaffen Division, Dirlewanger and Kraken pre-Kraken (if you know you know) to Moscow and we're having a week of free reign there.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          they're gonna be Kraken some skulls

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can someone please post the cartoon of Russia getting a thumbsup by NATO in response to threatening nukes?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if that's it then yea honestly I'd kinda take it, because in exchange Russia and Russians will be a footnote in history, the West will make sure of that if such a thing came to pass. The end of the Mongol Horde.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >we can nuke you and you can't nuke us
        Why does every Russian have this same delusion. It's bizarre.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They're not saying you can't nuke us. They say they're going to cleanse the earth, and there's nothing you can do about it. :^)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >nuke festering cities full of garden gnomes, homeless, and nig nogs
        deal

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Implying that these retarded mongol morons who can't even store a tank properly still have a single operational nuke

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        PLEASE I FUCKING BEG YOU I WILL GLADLY TAKE THAT TRADE. WHY don't Vatniks understand that no-one gives a shit about corrupt big cities and if the trade was the elimination of the Vatnik race from the face of this Earth for the rest of human time that kind of trade would be a once in a lifetime opportunity.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >sure, you can shoot me but if you do I'll remove your cancer before I die
        interesting threat

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        uhhh can we swap Madrid for Amsterdam?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If it means that the world will finally be free of Russian subhumans? Gladly.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >London
        Eh not a bad city but I'll take it
        >Berlin
        Awful place
        >Madrid
        Nobody cares really, even the city is bland
        >Paris
        Shittiest city in the western Europe
        >New York
        Some redeeming qualities but even Burgers seems to hate it

        Overall I say let's go.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sure and then we do the same to EVERYTHING from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok. Deal?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You gentlemen have the right idea, but listen. We need to nuke every large city on earth regardless, nothing will be lost. It's all shit anyway.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        literal jihadi mentality, youre saying this as if moscow alone wouldn't be targeted by 400+ warheads
        cope and have a nice day vatmoron

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why would anyone want to go to russia after the entire continent is glassed?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's not the question. The real question is:
          Who is supposed to go to Russia after they glassed the entire world?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >few Big capitals destroyed mean the entire continent is destroyed

          Kys

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nuke Brussels and Stockholm while your at it

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        acceptable

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >degenerate garbage cities are destroyed and we get to buttrape russians

        Of fucking course
        Is this even a question ?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ironically, it won't need the full force of NATO. It would be a special military operation.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Oryx
    yeah no

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >oy gevalt don't believe your eyes goy

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Never gonna tire of posting this at vatniks who try to bitch about Oryx.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Prove him wrong, you have a couple of thousand examples, shouldn't be too difficult.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    A one-off prototype, we've seen a couple already (like the T-80U with Drozd APS)

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    T-34

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    T-sar tank

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      DING DING DING

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Seconding t34. Russia literally has a couple dozen of them that were known to be functioning a few years ago for propaganda purposes. The dream is real.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      T-34

      I think I need to remind you, for the billionth time, that Russia does not have T-34s for combat, only for making films and parades.
      >Russia: 30 obtained from Laos in 2019 for ceremonial purposes and use in films
      Russia DOES have retired T-55s and T-62s in storage. In large numbers I might add.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, and Laos was using them for theoretical combat. They aren't demilled. Russia has literally already dragged out museum pieces. Those 34s are statistically on the high end of tanks that exist in Russia since they haven't been stored in a bog for 60 years like some of the other ones they're already sending to the front.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia has T-55AMVs that their naval infantry stopped using only a decade ago.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia has T-55AMVs that their naval infantry stopped using only a decade ago.
            So we might see them next on the battlefields, they will be certainly in a better state than the rusted to shit t72

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those can be tanks 801 to 999, then. I kinda assume they've still been stored in such a way that making them combat capable involves a dive team and a sump pump.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hey look its a destroyed russian tank

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your cope is weak, vatmoron.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      899 tank losses then
      Yikes

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These numbers are fake. Ukraine uses very same tanks type. We cannot discern the two losses naturally.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO. That's not how that works, vatmoron. Also, most of those tank types are only used by Russia.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I am not a vatmoron. I am an american. Ukraine has stolen many russian tanks as all the Ukrainian knows is thievery. They are the eastern garden gnome.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Ukraine has stolen many russian tanks

          So in other words Russia lost those tanks and the numbers are right. Thanks for admitting you're full of shit, vatmoron.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ukrainian has stolen many tanks through USSR. We have not lost those tanks. Ukrainian has.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >We

              So now you also admit you're a vatmoron.

              Also, how many T-90 and T-72obr.2016 did the Ukrianians steal? How many T-80U and T-80BVM. Come on, don't be shy, provide some numbers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are a mad hohol. I have mistyped, I am an american from newyork. Ukrainan has stolen many tanks ,those you have listed included.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                LOL
                LMAO even

                Stay mad about the hundreds of tanks you lost, vatmoron.

                Also, how many T-90, T-80BVM and T-72obr.2016 did the USSR build before it collapsed?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think you are vatmoron. I am not. USSr had good tanks Russian federation has many good tanks. Ukrainian stole them and is faking HIMARS like african fake AIDS

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >USSr had good tanks Russian federation has many good tanks.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >african fake AIDS
                Funny. And here I thought they were faking cures for AIDS.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Asking again: How many T-72B3 did the USSR build for the Ukrainians to steal? How many T-80BVM? How many T-90?

                Also, why is it that the Ukrainians somehow only operated T-64s, old T-72s and old T-80s before the start of this war? While Russia lost hundreds upon hundreds of new T-72s and new T-80s?

                Oh yeah, that's becuase you're a braindead vatmoron who can't even make up a decent lie.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They have made many but the Ukrainian has stolen. Exact count is unknown due to issue being unclear naturally. Hohol has been stealing many things over their history.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >faking HIMARS like african fake AIDS
                Too funny to be bait

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Then stop them from stealing your equipment. Stop being pathetic.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They are not pathetic as you may state eastern garden gnome. They stop stealing when dead. The HIMARS is not working on tank or bridge, in fact, it isn't even there in UkraineOтpицaть эффeктивнocть HIMARS

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                well you are just not hiding it anymore

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hiding what? I have nothing to hide sneaky Hohol.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if I pretend the HIAMRS isn't there, it cannot hurt me

                That's not how it actually works, Vanya. What are you, a 5-year-old? Hint: The monster under the bed will eat you even if you tell it it doesn't exist.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I do not pretend the HIMARS not exist. It is real, but not in ukraine. BM30 is a stronger systems

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so now that russian arty ran out of ammo when is ukraine going to take kherson?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sure thing, American from New York autonomous oblast

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                satire is dead

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >we

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          bad bait

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes fellow comrade. I am from Texas Oblast and all the evil garden gnomekranians know is theft. We must tell chancellor Brandon to end support of agenda

          Praise Hojo!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I am trueblood american. I eat burgers and am robbed by moron daily. I go to job and have garden gnome boss me around and take money. Homeless also shit on house steps. You may laugh but know this, the day will come when america burns, ukrainian garden gnome has already lit the fire for ukraine.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ok borat

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              lol
              lmao
              cope and seethe fellow american, as you well know even our poorest most violent american minority lives like a king compared to the subhuman apes called russians, am i yes correct?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                America does not give a good life for anyone. Russia is good for people and looks after citizens. Only subhuman russia have are chinese

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            texans as some of the biggest gays that we produce

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    22, although there's almost 200 "unknowns" so very likely more.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love the argument of “Ukrainians are stealing tanks so we don’t know who is piloting them!”

    So you are saying the following:
    1. The Russians are letting their equipment be captured by the enemy

    2. The Russians are destroying their own equipment

    You make your side out to be a group of incompetent losers who spend their time losing their own tanks, only to destroy them when in the hands of the enemy. Even if you were right, it’s still a total loss for Russia.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      These are the same people who would rather the Moskova sunk by its own stupidity than have been struck by enemy action.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The Moskova was sunk due to bad weather environment. Enemy action was not taken against the ship. Naturally, the west will take this as a win despite not doing anything. We win

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Losing the flagship of the Black Sea fleet because of bad weather is somehow less humiliating than having a honourable death by combat.
          You vatniks are truly something

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          10 knot winds and 3 foot seas. I could take my 18 foot fishing boat out in that. There was a storm down by Georgia, but Moskva sank between Snake Island and Sevestopol.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >a wave hit it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Is that common?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              out there on the sea? chance in a million..

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          k

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            To be fair this is probably considered difficult weather for any puccian vessel.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >flagship in such a terrible state that it sinks in a mild storm
          makes you wonder about the absolute state of the rest of the russian navy

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/Pz8odyS.jpg

          k

          The burning caused by the sea is somewhat abnormal.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    According to?

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every time a Russian threatens nukes if the west gets involved militarily my hatred for them grows larger. Their delusion of being on equal footing is completely negated and they don’t even acknowledge it
    >we could take on all of NATO at once, our military might is unmatchable
    >Ukraine is only doing so well because evil nato is giving them weapons
    >if you use one of your decades old air superiority fighters to blast one of our brand new wunderwaffen fighters we’ll end the world
    Fucking disgusting country that’s gained every last bit of it’s completely unmerited industry and technology through treachery and thieving. Continuing to hide behind its (in all likelihood from what we’ve seen of the conventional forces, rusting, decaying and sold for vodka and drugs) nuclear arsenal to avoid righteous judgement for being a blight on humanity. I hate them so much.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the US uses nukes twice to end a war that it already comprehensively won
      >gets shit about it forever
      >everyone else threatens to use nukes to end wars they're losing
      >for the rest of all time
      >with zero repercussions
      I hate the antichrist

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Soyuz nerushimy respu-ACK!

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >confirmed losses

    still blows me away knowing that this is just the bottom most number and the real loses are substantially larger

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    S

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wow i'm so excited

Your email address will not be published.