900 tanks gone baayybyyyyy

As we near 5000 confirmed Russian losses, we just hit 900 tank losses.
I'm surprised there have been more T90M losses than T62's

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How many t90s

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Over a hundred and a shitton of T-72s
      Including a lot of modern T-72B3

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Just 25 to go. I really hope we see a frigate go next.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >5000
      I've to say that this is the most meme tier-ist war in the last 20 years of a supposed superpower country.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, after studying Russian history, this is pretty much par for the course for them, sans a short period in the 18th century. Once the world moved to the industrial period, Russia was literally slower than Japan to adopt technology.
        The Nigeria with snow meme really isn't that far off.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    T62s are mostly rusted solid thats why

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Do they even have an air arsenal? I really don't understand why they continue with the armor strategy when it's obviously not working

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      they're probably really low on munitions for their air force.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They're too afraid of Stingers and Iglas to fly low and can't suppress Ukraine's meager AAA + can't aim because they don't have shit for guided munitions.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      russians are too moronic for a combined forces approach

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Russia has planes and pilots, but they haven't been giving them a lot of flight time for quite a while now. They spend considerably less time flying than a western counterpart, and are consequently going to be less capable, and more prone to getting shot down. The last thing Russia needs now is a lot of go-pro footage of flaming Migs falling out of the sky

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    US lost more in Vietnam.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Over twenty years, not five months.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What will russia have left if this goes on for 20 years?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Motorcycles with rocket pods/maxim MGs mounted on the sides

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Now that sounds fricken groovy
            But didn't The Brotherhood of Nod do it first?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Crippling debt and cannibalism, so overall a net improvement

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If they've already started to use T-62's and BMP-1's in the span of 5 months, they'll be back to using muskets, not Mosins, muskets, in about another 9 months. Reminder that we're talking about a nation that claimed it was the most powerful nation in the world; with its horde of fanatic loyalists and endless tanks able to overrun all of Europe when in reality I doubt they could have even crossed that far into West Germany.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >with its horde of fanatic loyalists
            >with its horde of FANFIC loyalists
            FTFY

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The one tank factory Russia has can produce something like 300 tanks a year when it has access to western markets to buy all the tools and equipment they need.
          Even at the best of times Russia would need three years to recover from the tank losses it suffered so far. With the sanctions nobody can tell you how long it will really take. Maybe decades. Maybe never. Maybe they'll shit out barely working barebone tanks instead.
          Such is life when your military production is depended on your arch enemy.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            China is probably gonna sell them some tanks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Best part of this cope, it's not even true.
      >According to official US data, 343 M48s were delivered to the ARVN up to March 1975. The US lost at least 123 M48 tanks (non-repairable) during the war. As a result, the US and ARVN lost about 500 M48 tanks total

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Copers just can't seem to get a break today

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      post timelines for both conflicts for comparison

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A single death is a tragedy - a million is a statistic. In other words, WE WUZ SOVIETZ IN SHIEET.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    God imagine the full force of nato when it's finally unleashed, the armies of America, France, Britain, Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain, Turkey, the Netherlands, Greece, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Portugal, Denmark, the Baltic States, Canada, Czechia, Slovakia, Croatia, Hungary, Romania. One giant fist of brutal ceaseless firepower, 800 million people, the single largest concentration of wealth, industry equal to China, and the absolute apex of military doctrine and logistics
    I want Russia to attack us so bad its fricking unreal, the mass rape they would suffer would be so intense they would have mongol flashbacks

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      NATO's combined manufacturing capacity is easily double that of China, though. That doesn't even count non-NATO allies.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia's output being slightly larger than leafland

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Russian manufacturing beat out by Mexico and Indonesia
        how in the everloving frick, russia?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Mexico unironically has been on a warpath on unfricking their industrial base for a few decades now.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Russian manufacturing beat out by Mexico and Indonesia
        how in the everloving frick, russia?

        >Eh Vatnik you need some help building them tanks?
        >Nevermind, you can't afford me meng

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Nevermind, you can't afford me meng
          They currently cannot afford even Russian labor.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ok lets make a deal, London, Berlin, Madrid, Paris and New York get nuke and crumble to ashes.
      Then you can go to russia with all your nato friends and do what ever you want
      mmm deal hu ?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nothing of value lost.
        And it was not like Russia would have not fired its nukes anyway if not stopped.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. But I'm taking Freikorps, Misanthropic Division, Atomwaffen Division, Dirlewanger and Kraken pre-Kraken (if you know you know) to Moscow and we're having a week of free reign there.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          they're gonna be Kraken some skulls

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Can someone please post the cartoon of Russia getting a thumbsup by NATO in response to threatening nukes?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        if that's it then yea honestly I'd kinda take it, because in exchange Russia and Russians will be a footnote in history, the West will make sure of that if such a thing came to pass. The end of the Mongol Horde.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >we can nuke you and you can't nuke us
        Why does every Russian have this same delusion. It's bizarre.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          They're not saying you can't nuke us. They say they're going to cleanse the earth, and there's nothing you can do about it. :^)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >nuke festering cities full of israelites, homeless, and nig nogs
        deal

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Implying that these moronic mongol Black folk who can't even store a tank properly still have a single operational nuke

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        PLEASE I FRICKING BEG YOU I WILL GLADLY TAKE THAT TRADE. WHY don't Vatniks understand that no-one gives a shit about corrupt big cities and if the trade was the elimination of the Vatnik race from the face of this Earth for the rest of human time that kind of trade would be a once in a lifetime opportunity.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >sure, you can shoot me but if you do I'll remove your cancer before I die
        interesting threat

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        uhhh can we swap Madrid for Amsterdam?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        If it means that the world will finally be free of Russian subhumans? Gladly.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >London
        Eh not a bad city but I'll take it
        >Berlin
        Awful place
        >Madrid
        Nobody cares really, even the city is bland
        >Paris
        Shittiest city in the western Europe
        >New York
        Some redeeming qualities but even Burgers seems to hate it

        Overall I say let's go.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Sure and then we do the same to EVERYTHING from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok. Deal?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          You gentlemen have the right idea, but listen. We need to nuke every large city on earth regardless, nothing will be lost. It's all shit anyway.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        literal jihadi mentality, youre saying this as if moscow alone wouldn't be targeted by 400+ warheads
        cope and have a nice day vatBlack person

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        why would anyone want to go to russia after the entire continent is glassed?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          That's not the question. The real question is:
          Who is supposed to go to Russia after they glassed the entire world?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >few Big capitals destroyed mean the entire continent is destroyed

          Kys

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nuke Brussels and Stockholm while your at it

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        acceptable

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >degenerate garbage cities are destroyed and we get to buttrape russians

        Of fricking course
        Is this even a question ?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ironically, it won't need the full force of NATO. It would be a special military operation.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Oryx
    yeah no

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >oy gevalt don't believe your eyes goy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Never gonna tire of posting this at vatniks who try to b***h about Oryx.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Prove him wrong, you have a couple of thousand examples, shouldn't be too difficult.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    A one-off prototype, we've seen a couple already (like the T-80U with Drozd APS)

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    T-34

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    T-sar tank

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      DING DING DING

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Seconding t34. Russia literally has a couple dozen of them that were known to be functioning a few years ago for propaganda purposes. The dream is real.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      T-34

      I think I need to remind you, for the billionth time, that Russia does not have T-34s for combat, only for making films and parades.
      >Russia: 30 obtained from Laos in 2019 for ceremonial purposes and use in films
      Russia DOES have retired T-55s and T-62s in storage. In large numbers I might add.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, and Laos was using them for theoretical combat. They aren't demilled. Russia has literally already dragged out museum pieces. Those 34s are statistically on the high end of tanks that exist in Russia since they haven't been stored in a bog for 60 years like some of the other ones they're already sending to the front.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Russia has T-55AMVs that their naval infantry stopped using only a decade ago.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Russia has T-55AMVs that their naval infantry stopped using only a decade ago.
            So we might see them next on the battlefields, they will be certainly in a better state than the rusted to shit t72

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Those can be tanks 801 to 999, then. I kinda assume they've still been stored in such a way that making them combat capable involves a dive team and a sump pump.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    hey look its a destroyed russian tank

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Your cope is weak, vatBlack person.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      899 tank losses then
      Yikes

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    These numbers are fake. Ukraine uses very same tanks type. We cannot discern the two losses naturally.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      LMAO. That's not how that works, vatBlack person. Also, most of those tank types are only used by Russia.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I am not a vatBlack person. I am an american. Ukraine has stolen many russian tanks as all the Ukrainian knows is thievery. They are the eastern israelite.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Ukraine has stolen many russian tanks

          So in other words Russia lost those tanks and the numbers are right. Thanks for admitting you're full of shit, vatBlack person.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Ukrainian has stolen many tanks through USSR. We have not lost those tanks. Ukrainian has.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >We

              So now you also admit you're a vatBlack person.

              Also, how many T-90 and T-72obr.2016 did the Ukrianians steal? How many T-80U and T-80BVM. Come on, don't be shy, provide some numbers.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You are a mad hohol. I have mistyped, I am an american from newyork. Ukrainan has stolen many tanks ,those you have listed included.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                LOL
                LMAO even

                Stay mad about the hundreds of tanks you lost, vatBlack person.

                Also, how many T-90, T-80BVM and T-72obr.2016 did the USSR build before it collapsed?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I think you are vatBlack person. I am not. USSr had good tanks Russian federation has many good tanks. Ukrainian stole them and is faking HIMARS like african fake AIDS

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >USSr had good tanks Russian federation has many good tanks.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >african fake AIDS
                Funny. And here I thought they were faking cures for AIDS.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Asking again: How many T-72B3 did the USSR build for the Ukrainians to steal? How many T-80BVM? How many T-90?

                Also, why is it that the Ukrainians somehow only operated T-64s, old T-72s and old T-80s before the start of this war? While Russia lost hundreds upon hundreds of new T-72s and new T-80s?

                Oh yeah, that's becuase you're a braindead vatBlack person who can't even make up a decent lie.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They have made many but the Ukrainian has stolen. Exact count is unknown due to issue being unclear naturally. Hohol has been stealing many things over their history.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >faking HIMARS like african fake AIDS
                Too funny to be bait

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Then stop them from stealing your equipment. Stop being pathetic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They are not pathetic as you may state eastern israelite. They stop stealing when dead. The HIMARS is not working on tank or bridge, in fact, it isn't even there in UkraineOтpицaть эффeктивнocть HIMARS

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                well you are just not hiding it anymore

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Hiding what? I have nothing to hide sneaky Hohol.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >if I pretend the HIAMRS isn't there, it cannot hurt me

                That's not how it actually works, Vanya. What are you, a 5-year-old? Hint: The monster under the bed will eat you even if you tell it it doesn't exist.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I do not pretend the HIMARS not exist. It is real, but not in ukraine. BM30 is a stronger systems

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                so now that russian arty ran out of ammo when is ukraine going to take kherson?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Sure thing, American from New York autonomous oblast

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                satire is dead

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >we

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          bad bait

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Yes fellow comrade. I am from Texas Oblast and all the evil israelitekranians know is theft. We must tell chancellor Brandon to end support of agenda

          Praise Hojo!

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I am trueblood american. I eat burgers and am robbed by Black person daily. I go to job and have israelite boss me around and take money. Homeless also shit on house steps. You may laugh but know this, the day will come when america burns, ukrainian israelite has already lit the fire for ukraine.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              ok borat

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              lol
              lmao
              cope and seethe fellow american, as you well know even our poorest most violent american minority lives like a king compared to the subhuman apes called russians, am i yes correct?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                America does not give a good life for anyone. Russia is good for people and looks after citizens. Only subhuman russia have are chinese

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            texans as some of the biggest homosexuals that we produce

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    22, although there's almost 200 "unknowns" so very likely more.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I love the argument of “Ukrainians are stealing tanks so we don’t know who is piloting them!”

    So you are saying the following:
    1. The Russians are letting their equipment be captured by the enemy

    2. The Russians are destroying their own equipment

    You make your side out to be a group of incompetent losers who spend their time losing their own tanks, only to destroy them when in the hands of the enemy. Even if you were right, it’s still a total loss for Russia.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      These are the same people who would rather the Moskova sunk by its own stupidity than have been struck by enemy action.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The Moskova was sunk due to bad weather environment. Enemy action was not taken against the ship. Naturally, the west will take this as a win despite not doing anything. We win

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Losing the flagship of the Black Sea fleet because of bad weather is somehow less humiliating than having a honourable death by combat.
          You vatniks are truly something

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          10 knot winds and 3 foot seas. I could take my 18 foot fishing boat out in that. There was a storm down by Georgia, but Moskva sank between Snake Island and Sevestopol.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >a wave hit it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Is that common?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              out there on the sea? chance in a million..

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          k

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            To be fair this is probably considered difficult weather for any puccian vessel.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >flagship in such a terrible state that it sinks in a mild storm
          makes you wonder about the absolute state of the rest of the russian navy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/Pz8odyS.jpg

          k

          The burning caused by the sea is somewhat abnormal.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    According to?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Every time a Russian threatens nukes if the west gets involved militarily my hatred for them grows larger. Their delusion of being on equal footing is completely negated and they don’t even acknowledge it
    >we could take on all of NATO at once, our military might is unmatchable
    >Ukraine is only doing so well because evil nato is giving them weapons
    >if you use one of your decades old air superiority fighters to blast one of our brand new wunderwaffen fighters we’ll end the world
    Fricking disgusting country that’s gained every last bit of it’s completely unmerited industry and technology through treachery and thieving. Continuing to hide behind its (in all likelihood from what we’ve seen of the conventional forces, rusting, decaying and sold for vodka and drugs) nuclear arsenal to avoid righteous judgement for being a blight on humanity. I hate them so much.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the US uses nukes twice to end a war that it already comprehensively won
      >gets shit about it forever
      >everyone else threatens to use nukes to end wars they're losing
      >for the rest of all time
      >with zero repercussions
      I hate the antichrist

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Soyuz nerushimy respu-ACK!

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >confirmed losses

    still blows me away knowing that this is just the bottom most number and the real loses are substantially larger

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    S

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    wow i'm so excited

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *