You guys keeping tabs on how much is expended to take a treeline trench/foxholes?
In approx 8v8 the 8 attackers
the ifv 30mm salvo
At least 8 grenades
At least 4 magazines of just spraying lead per soldier
A machine gun for even more lead carpet
Drone scout
4 drone drops
Thats just the weapons
Just think about all that monies that could be used to fix problems here! What a waste. That's just the *concern*.
Yes give homeless Bradley's and 5.56 boxes
Idk a wall would be nice instead of going back to BAE
Yeah but the thing is, all the people pretending to believe this for the Republican equivalent of good boy points don't actually believe it, and vote consistently against using American tax dollars to fix issues in America.
Consider that a bunch of largely untrained slavs with limited capacity for communication and zero air support aren't capable of doing things as quickly and efficiently as possible.
I am not judging. I can totally see why it is done this way, especial the belligerent firing.
Frick of, we're trained alright. Try to come here with your buddies and take a treeline without a CAS and overwhelming air bombing. You homosexuals don't realize in what conditions we're fighting and that our enemy is a fricking behemoth
Getting a 3 day course from some limp dick American ex infantryman via a translator is not what I would call sufficiently trained for large scale warfare
Never met a foreigner in the army. All our instructors have been war-hardened vets, some of them have been to Britain and Germany though
>we're trained alright
I hate to break it to you, but no, you aren't. It's not an insult bro, it's just a fact. And no, it's not a matter of assets. Even without assets, an Australian infantryman would completely surpass you.
I'm not talking about the ammo expenditure, though. That amount is completely reasonable. It's about aggression and maneuverability. Nobody seems to get on fricking line.
Watch any footage of your own operations back and study them HARD to see where you're fricking up. Send the ones you can to foreign guys to get pointers, and choose whether to take or lead them.
*take or leave them
oh wow, can I see your trained ass wiping trench in hd of course?
You may not, because you're taking this personally.
Who and why did color correction of this gif to yellow?
Are we talking about the same Australians that cucked to the mandatory experimental vax as soon as some old b***h told them to?
Is that the legendary aggression you're talking about?
Please stop watching the news.
Any protests got snuffed out quickly and the general populace was very hostile towards the tiny minority of anti-vax/free-choice people in Australia. Additionally, there were close to zero instances of military people refusing the goyvax. Australia has completely lost their right to being seen as badass after the chinese coof hysteria.
Thank you for your opinion. How's the border going? How's the President? How's the school situation? Opioids? Money to Israel? ASVAB scores?
I trust you guys have sorted all of that. I mean, you must have. You wouldn't be so silly as to neglect the log in your own eye, would you? This is all so very relevant to weapons and military capability.
Russians pouring over the border, Zelensky is a cuck!
>Opioids?
Pretty good, you wanna try some?
I'm really health conscious, so unless you have some organic grown opium I'll have to pass
>I'm really health conscious, so unless you have some organic grown opium I'll have to pass
I got chu senpai
The International Legion is mostly sent to quieter sections of front and some of them said a chunk of legionnaires were leaving after the first times being shelled heavily
>unit filled with random glory-seeking shitbags folds under pressure
>more news at 8
https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/1684213269601345537
Yes I am using a phonk edit as sourcing for Australian superiority
Yeah, man. War is expensive.
Yeah, the trained Americans would call in an airstrike from an f-35 first, which would save so much money
>which would save so much money
Much better to lose men, da?
American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan spent even more ammo in simple infantry vs infantry firefights. This gay jerk off fantasy over individual marksmanship in actual war needs to end.
>limited capacity for communication
Come on now, even Ukrainians are capable of speaking to each other. In Ukrainian I assume. And they have plenty of radios. They're even capable of guiding grenadiers with drones (or so they claim).
Not surprised that an animegay doesn't know how much ammo is expended in war. Real life isn't like your cartoons moron
Correct. This is what's required to take a position, and especially one that's fortified. War is expensive, either in bullets or men. So you gotta pick between paying in brass or blood.
Israel has dropped at least 65,000 tonnes of high explosives on gaza since the war started
that's the equivalent of at least three "fat man" nuclear bombs (or between 0.01 and ~20 B61 variable yield nuclear gravity bombs)
You now realize why suppressive fire matters, professionals study logistics, and militia are hapless cannon fodder.
A bargain at twice the price
- a gun owning us taxpayer