Would the USA use nukes if Russia and/or China conventionally attacked Alaska?

Would the USA use nukes if Russia and/or China conventionally attacked Alaska?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Any excuse to nuke Canada is a good one

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course, the Japs attacked the Aleutian Islands and we nuked them.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    China would invade Alaska
    The US would annex Canada
    And the European Commonwealth would dissolve into quarreling, bickering nation states.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Get this irl but instead of cool robot suits and lasers it's just shitty drones

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think I heard this story before, anon. It usually ends with someone getting shot in the head and buried outside Vegas.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Turns out geopolitics were rigged right from the start.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    why the frick wouldn't we, it'd give us all the reason we need to turn our enemies into radioactive grease stains

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Three different rifles in a 5-man group

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I was going to say the same. The indians don't give a frick about their logistics train apparently

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Would the US irradiate it's own land with the boring nuke option instead of having it's kino, SOVL wet dream come true of demolishing a hostile invader with unheard of firepower after so long?
    moron question.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The US would go full Belka if it was under war invasion

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Don't be silly. The US wouldn't nuke itself, but it would nuke an invader, and then save some weapons to genocide the survivors.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It absolutely would if it was losing to said invasion

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >It absolutely would if it was losing to said invasion
            Not possible.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wouldn't need to. Probably wouldn't need to muster much of the actual military. I imagine there'd be more trouble stopping the locals from skinning screaming slant-eyes alive and hanging them in the trees.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, why would they? They are attacking the US mainland of which the US Airforce operates from. What ever navel supply route they thought they would have will cease to exist within 2 hours and without supplies the invasion force is going to have a real bad time... frick, we might just leave the mop up to Canada.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, it's fricking Alaska. They may not even need to mobilize a relief force, the natives, crazies, and wilderness will just do the work for them. Do you understand how big and inhospitable Alaska is anon? I'd rather invade the fricking Sahara.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Alaska has a larger military than canada hehe it's a 10.24

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I was waiting for the transplant moron or lower 48 slug to chime in with this comment. Stfu, moron. You don't know anything about Alaska beyond what you've seen on TV or your guided tour bus. Kys, moron.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Crazies. My thought exactly. Every eco grifting social dropout with a pair of snowshoes would be going into axe attack mode due to the littering.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They'd just deploy T-45 suits moron

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would love to see any modern military try and invade north America through Alaska. Its about the most primordial undeveloped place imaginable. Every high volume paved road would be blown by the end of day 2. By day 3 Invaders would start eating pot shots from 1000 yards from. Every elevation. It would only get worse as they move south into Canada. Northern and coastal British Columbia would be pine tree vietnam. Theres no development there, the infrastructure to support an invader doesn't exist.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Alaska is also home to the F-22, and the B-1 is on standby.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    FAFO. You stupid children just post slide threads without thought. Initial response would of course be conventional but Russia has no conventional power projection and neither has a logical reason to attack AK.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Erm, actually when all this kicked off there were a lot of noises about "taking back" Alaska.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        There is this. Supposedly it says first Ukraine then Alaska.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          "we returned Crimea, now (it's your turn to) return Alaska"

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actually, yes they do. Alaska is important to US aerial transportation and oil reserves. When traveling to parts of East Asia it is actually a shorter and less dangerous route to travel through AK. You bypass the storms of the Pacific and don't have to fly over as much water.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why nuke Alaska when the US can just use guerilla tactics and special forces to deal with the invasion. Invading Alaska is the worst place to invade.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nope. We'd sink their asses before single chink ice Black person ever made it to shore.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don't be so sure, pedo Joe the dickhead is still president

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The president does not matter and whining about one is a trap stupid people fall into by design.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Probably not, because Alaska itself would probably deliver an 80% casualty rate. I mean frick, the U.S. doesn't really know what an actual map of the state would look like. There is basically a dividing line through the State where troop transport would have to be almost entirely via aircraft. Or they'd have to sail the coast and get fricked by the Navy and Airforce because they would be within strike distance of every USN/USAF base along the West coast.

    Alaska is a bad idea and they should know it. Could they go and take over a few chunks of Alaska? Sure. But what would that do? They're sitting in barren areas where seal an whale are the only two food sources.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      All the US needs to do is intercept any supply ships and wait for the problem to disappear

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the absolute kino of intercepting chang in the fricking klondike
    >gun battles in gold rush ghost towns
    >using the Carl G to trigger avalanches from miles away and burying entire columns

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No.

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. No. Maybe. I don't know.

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes.
    We would plant them in a fault line across alaska and sink it into the ocean.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He was talking about Alaska, not California.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What if they attacked Mexico?
    Just drove straight up through the border?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I for one, think that would be a hilarious way to start world war 3.

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its not like they'd need to

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Alaska has a large TDF that rivals the national guard

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Fun fact: Most of the Chinese live on their coast, reducing their population by 60% would take the afternoon.

    Russia's already a wasteland so I can't imagine nuking them would have any effect aside from irradiating some perfectly good trees and mountain ranges

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, they could easily destroy them conventionally.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They wouldn't have to.
    >https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Conventional_Prompt_Strike

    They could do openly declare war, do decapitation strikes in Beijing and Moscow, take out electrical/farming infrastructure to create a crisis, use the CIA to start civil unrest and then mop up any foreign troops on U.S. soil using masses of overwhelming firepower.

    This could be done within 48 hours.

    That being said in a universe where this was even a remote probability the ships/aircraft transporting the troops would be eliminated the moment they enter U.S. jurisdiction.

  26. 11 months ago
    ALL FIELDS for slide threads

    They can attack all the snow and ice they want and freeze in it when they have no rations to eat. The Pacific will eat what little maritime lift capability they have before the USN and USAF has a field day sinking anything that looks Russian or Chinese at sea.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *