why were the brits still using outdated WW1-era junk by the time ww2 rolled around? just look at this shit.

why were the brits still using outdated WW1-era junk by the time ww2 rolled around?

just look at this shit. absolutely laughable, they're still wearing the goof wide-brimmed helmets. no wonder the krauts pushed their shit in without any resistance whatsoever.

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    British logistics had more trucks than the Germans who were still using H O R S E S in 1939 for most of their logistics.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      so? in every other way the british forces were hilariously antiquated. the churchill tank looked like something from WW1 LOL

      >Mechanized Logistics
      >A not shit main service rifle
      >An actual navy
      Kys op

      >island nation has a strong navy
      oh wowee what a surprise. it still got i's shit pushed in by uboats lmfao

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is what the Germans had at the beginning of WW2 kiddo. Also Churchill wasn't around properly in force until Africa/Italy and it was a brick shithouse of a tank that could absorb a lot of German fire.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Forgot my picture, anyways the heavier French tanks actually mogged what the Germans had. Germans had to rely on maneuver rather than superior technology.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Having trucks is vastly more important than having good infantry kit. Especially since German commanders loved to over extend their supply lines

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the churchill tank looked like something from WW1
        And yet its performance did not. Maybe you should worry more about performance and less about aesthetics.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well, how else are they supposed to look cool 80 years in the future featured in some phonk edit!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Germany used shit rifles and a good MG
      America used good rifles and a shit MG
      Brits used a shit rifle and a shit MG
      But is right, at least they had good logistics, that's their one over the germ.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        the bren at the same tier as BAR

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Mechanized Logistics
    >A not shit main service rifle
    >An actual navy
    Kys op

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >why were the brits still using outdated WW1-era junk by the time ww2 rolled around?
    lots of countries still used WW1-era equipment throughout the early war, solely because they just got out of the depression and needed whatever they had on hand
    some WW1 gear was good enough to last the whole war, in fact

    >US marines used the springfield due to lack of M1 garands for everyone
    >germans use K98 the entire war
    >FT-17s used by practically all sides for garrison duty because good tanks were destroyed as fast as they could build it

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    still managed to rape the autistic master race

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      nope, brits didn't do shit. the western allies were hopeless until the ameircans showed up, and even then the soviets did the majority of the raping

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The Soviet War Economy was run on American trucks

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Battle of Britain? Africa campaign? Keeping the german navy bottled up in their harbours the entire war? We might not have been able to beat them, but until the yanks and russians kicked their shit in, we were pretty good at fighting the krauts to a standstill.

        Anyway, it''s beside the point. The allies beat the fascists, proving that it doesnt matter how you dress, it's the quality and number of troops you can train, equipe and field that matters.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The Americans bailed you out in Africa. The Germans stopped the Battle of Britain and focused on terror bombing and other countries

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            As far as I'm aware America was the only belligerent in world war 2.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >The Americans bailed you out in Africa
            i mean the tanks were nice but how exactly?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              He actually thinks the Brits were losing until op torch. Americans actually believe this, they know nothing about Crusader.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                wasn't the crusader kinda shit for the desert?
                i mean i've loved the goofy thing since i was 12 but all i've heard about it is that it was fairly fast and not a great deal else

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Proving the point, I'm talking about Operation Crusader anon.
                Crusader gets an unfairly bad reputation though, the ship with all the spare parts got sunk by the Italians, so they developed a reputation for being unreliable because they were literally impossible to maintain. Later in the war they served perfectly well as the base for support vehicles, but the reputation for being junk had already set in.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm talking about Operation Crusader anon
                ah sorry. i may be moronic

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Operation Crusader might not be the best example since it was such a chaotic clusterfrick for both sides. It reminds me of that quote from Generation Kill "I want them to know we fought moronic"

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        You were one of the paler kids in your classroom, weren't you?

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    money

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They were smart enough to know that small arms and helmets don't win wars.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the krauts pushed their shit in without any resistance whatsoeve
    That was the French OP, the British left server because the Frogs were trash.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What if i told you the americans used those helmets in ww2 too?

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well it worked didn't it?

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >t. warriortard's grandpa.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You mean the exact same helmet USA used until 1942?

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    the brodie helmet is SOVL as frick c**t what are you talking about?

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Complete twaddle.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >just look at this shit. absolutely laughable
    This anon wouldn't know kino and sovl if it slapped him in the face.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because it worked. Wasting steel on designing and making new helmets, instead of just refurbishing an old design would have impacted on other vital war production, like artillery and motor transport.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    US forces were using WW1 and interwar stuff too, one of the main reasons they lost the Philippines was using old ass gear.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why are they still using outdated 2003 era junk when it's already 2023.

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    they look silly but ww2 era helmets were kino with each participant having their own distinct design.
    now they all look the same

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *