Why is the US of America ditching the indestructible Direct Impingement?

Why didn't they just come up with something new like Medium-Stroke?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tax payer money burning a hole in the defense budgets pocket.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    di is stinky dirty and causes too many issues

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not with quality AR-15's
      >muh Vietnam memes
      The issues were addressed by 1967

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Don’t post that grifting homosexual

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Where else might I find video of an unsuppressed AR-15 with a minimum cyclic rate of 900 RPM, its thirty-round magazine expended in one trigger pull?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >remote camera
            Youtube boomers can't handle someone might be able stand off angle downrange, breaking the 180 slightly and still be safe.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >medium-stoke
    >gun starts talking to ghosts during a battle

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    because we're too busy fighting the last war(s) and GWoT made suppressors look way more useful than they actually are and DI doesn't get along great with suppressors

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >suppressors not useful
      >Reduces DB
      >Increases muzzle velocity
      Lol

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >not == more

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Massively homosexual obsession with battle drill 6. Anything done at range needs be HE. They more light cheap semi auto GL.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Grenade launchers will never take a rifle or SAW's place. Even with an XM25, you won't be able to employ it effectively at range. You would need something bordering on an autocannon to stretch a grenade's range enough to make it applicable in most engagements. That would greatly increase weight of the gun, and more importantly the weight of ammo. Grenade launchers will always be niche until we can find a way to make airburst munitions fly 500m at a minimal arc, which can be fired out of a launcher no heavier than 6 pounds with the grenades weighing no more than one pound a piece and having a 10 meter kill radius. We're not even close to that tech yet.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Having folding stocks is worth ditching Direct Impingement.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t. Sigger

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stoner invented the AR180/18 to fix his prior inventions, the M16, AR10, and AR15.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No it's because his employer, Armalite, sold the IP to Colt, and they had to find a way around it. I guarantee the AR-18 would've been gas impingement, had they held onto the rights.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There's a few things going on with it.
    >Piston is unironically better if doing some combination of a short barrel, full auto, or suppressor
    >Doing multiple of these things was not really an issue until somewhat recently, and even then, DD figured out how to do a DI shorty well
    >Military also has a bunch of old, clapped out rifles that could use replacing
    >Not an immediate crisis but could be in some number of years
    >Beancounters won't deal with it until it's a crisis
    >OKAY, FRICK YOU, THEN. WE'RE ADOPTING ENTIRELY NEW RIFLES IN THIS NEW SYSTEM SO WE CAN GET NEW SHIT THAT'S ALSO BETTER FOR WHAT WE PLAN TO BE DOING.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is it, and do they make one with fixed irons?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *