Why is he so bad at turret tossing?

Why is he so bad at turret tossing?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    blowout pannels, instead of turret toss, only produces loud brap before crew leaves embarrassed to get another tank

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Definitely not cooked alive

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Definitely not cooked alive
        Pretty much

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Abrams too fat. Cannot throw turret. True Amerikan tank.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ammo in turret bustle
    Less likely to be hit in the first place since enemy point of aim is the center of the tank
    Less likely to be ignited because its protected by the thickest armor on the front arc
    Less likely to kill the crew because it can vent its explosion upwards away from the crew through the blowout panels

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    XXXL Aybrap crewmen fed on a steady diet of corn syrup, burgers and synthetic bugmeat too heavy to lift turret, so is safe

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Americans see their own lives as valuable while russians and thirdies are worthless to their own leaders

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's an overweight, fuel guzzling logistical nightmare that performs very well only when everything is going perfectly. It's the modern equivalent of a WW2 Char B1

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >fuel guzzling
      yes
      >logistical nightmare
      nope, it's mechanically more reliable than a Leo2, that's the whole point of a turbine on top of being more powerful for the same weight

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >It's an overweight, fuel guzzling logistical nightmare that performs very well only when everything is going perfectly.

      Peru tested the Abrams against the Leopard 2, T90M, Oplot-M, K2 and MBT 2000 a few years back and the Abrams was more simple to maintain than all but the Oplot-M and MBT2000.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And the MBT2000 was rejected because chink tanks are that terrible in terms of quality even for thirdies.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          China made it but they don't even use it for themselves can already tell something.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The MBT2000 procurement was cancelled because the Chinese openly were trying to bribe politicians and the army caught them. The K2 was the first choice but thr Oplot-M was deemed the best value.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The one lost most recently lost it's turret

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      we may see it? A continous video of an Abrams in combat being it and blowing up with no cuts?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, you can see it. Just give me five minutes

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's so fat and heavy it can't make a jump.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bcause it has that magical reddit compartment and no autoloader.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Best tank name ever.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Too chubby 🙁

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its so poorly designed that a 60m mortar could blow it up
    Whats so difficult about putting blowout panels at the bottom the turret bustle instead of the top?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >its so poorly designed that a 60m mortar could blow it up
      Proofs?

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I see many people online claiming blowout panels (mostly specifically the Abrams') save the crew in pretty much any case of ammo detonation, but logically they look relatively useless in real life scenarios, especially tank on tank combat with KE munitions.

    Consider these examples:

    Turret is hit on the back from the rear arc: any modern missile or KE would destroy the armor between the turret and the bustle.

    Turret is hit on the side (weak KE protection) from the frontal arc: again, high chance of destroying the relatively thin armor.

    In other words, the only way I see blowout panels working as intended is if the bustle is hit from basically 90 degrees side on or top down.

    Additionally, how would the blast doors stop detonations of HEAT warheads inside the bustle?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >how would the blast doors stop detonations of HEAT warheads inside the bustle?
      They don't. HEAT rounds are stored with the warheads facing out.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    america didn't send too many of them so it's curious that this happened so many times

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hori shit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >happend so many times
      Yeah, the 5 times it happened.
      Also,
      >posts Soviet tank.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *