Why havent we seen any brimstone action? Its been a year Posted on May 9, 2023 by PrepHole Contributor Why haven’t we seen any brimstone action? It’s been a year
As usual, there isn't a recording device able to do it, there isn't always time to do it, there isn't always something to post to prove it was a success. Lots of shit doesn't get recorded. You don't get images of every Javelin or NLAW or AT4 or CG kill on a vehicle either.
Brimstones are basically 'fire and forget' missiles, so you don't really record that shit. Just fire it and hope it hits. Also since Ukraine has been using them disguised as civilian trucks, it probably is bad to show that as that's a war crime.
because it shit
look at this cope lol
Ukrainian government keeps asking for more of them. Based on that alone I assume it's at least reasonably effective.
Eh, there's probably drone footage of them hitting columns. I don't know why it's not leaking out.
>Ukrainian government keeps asking for more of them.
Prove it in your reply to this post or I don’t believe you
Is this a warriortard thread?
It certainly is.
Find a new angle already you shill coping gay
>implying they did not ghetto rig brimstones to frogfoots
Thats the only way to make low level sorties somewhat survivable and successful since brimstones only need to know the general area the target is at. And considering the fact that they did not post anything else about them apart from brimstone technical but get constant supply of brimstones makes me think that they they are fairly effective at hunting armor if you know that its operating in the general area
>but get constant supply of brimstones
Show us with sources
UK MoD military support for ukraine announcements....
You wouldn't be happy even if they provided sources armatard.
2 months into the war 2022 April/May Original mk1 Brimstone (Assumed what was left of Bong stock of mk1's) >Hundreds
Jan 3 2023 - >600 Brimstone mk2's - https://mil.in.ua/en/news/uk-to-hand-over-brimstone-2-missiles-to-ukraine/#:~:text=Britain%20plans%20to%20transfer%20600%20Brimstone%20missiles%20to,to%20Ukraine%20during%20a%20conference%20on%20military%20assistance.
I can only imagine they're going to send more, the UK is often slow to update on what they've sent.
We've had a couple of videos.
Post them. If it’s that one grainy one I can’t wait to laugh
Terrible quality and a moto pic
salvo fire 6 Brimestone at a suspected convoy of tanks and trucks. all missiles hit the same vehicle since you do not have a FCS. KWAB
I like making up stuff too
What do you think
I noticed you couldn’t prove this statement
>Ukrainian government keeps asking for more of them.
show us. The clock is ticking
>make stuff up
blind firing brimstones without a FCS is a waste m8, it just is okay
Because it doesn't need any spotting, that's the whole point.
>respond to OP with unintelligible nonsense
Not sure if based or cringe
The missiles aquires a target on it's own.
Therefore it needs no spotting.
>he doesn't know
total miss and failure to detonate.
That clearly hasn't been fired
>total miss and failure to detonate.
it's in awfully good condition for a missile that's buried nose first into the ground, oh wait...
Russian propaganda is awfully sloppy these days
>Russian propaganda is awfully sloppy these days
It always has been. You don't remember the NLAW fired in territorial army training in the UK and sold as a collectable and the Chinese air rifle and deactivated bong comblock stuff?
Isn't Brimstone suppose to self-destruct after some time, just like Javelin?
Literally Russian fake propaganda image sourced from another place anon
JASSM thread is online. Anons just dispelled the myth that the JASSM isn’t capable of low altitude flight
I don’t know who needs to hear this but the Patriot missile system is the only air defense system to shoot down an air launched hypersonic missile in combat.
I’m sorry patriot
Iskander isn't a real hypersonic weapon just because it gets launched from the air but i'm happy Russian shit gets destroyed.
Hypersonic is a measure of speed, not launching platform but ok. In fact, Air launched can be more dangerous because it can be launched from unsuspected angles and closer than you may expect them. Also potentially easier to track before it's launched, I guess, if you happen to have intimate knowledge of what every bug in the sky has for a payload (seems unlikely). Please explain your odd air-launched cope. A better view would've been to suggest it wasn't in it's terminal phase. No idea what you're on about, though.
I hope PrepHole knows that while shooting down a hypersonic ballistic missile is a feather in Patriot's cap, it dose not mean patriot will preform well against potential future hypersonic glide vehicles or hypersonic cruise missiles, with the latter two being what the US DoD usually means when they use the term hypersonics.
I strongly doubt our adversaries will produce either until they have a design to copy off of.
Not saying they will, but I absolutely know that for at least the next 5-10 years this incident will get brought up as a reason to abandon hypersonic programs.
>A missile that has a radar seeker fired at areas with constant EW jamming
I wonder why
Are you purposefully retarded.
What does this autist have against bongs? He's been seething at british equipment daily for months at this point.
>What does this autist have against bongs?
There is a very simple answer to that question:
>Warriortard=one of Armatards sock puppets