Why doesnt the F-5 get much love despite serving in over a dozen wars and for over 60 years?

Why doesn’t the F-5 get much love despite serving in over a dozen wars and for over 60 years?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The MIC hates it because it's cheap

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      frick off pierre

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    because dog fighting was a thing that happened before the advent of BVR missiles, if the f-5 existed in WW2 or Korea it would be the thing, but it wasn't.

    too little, too late.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Limited range.
    Day fighter most of its life.
    Its landing gear limited its payload.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    lazy copy of the mig-28

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it was the star of sideshows without a lot of primetime compared to other US planes

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It gets plenty of love. It's arguably the second biggest jet aircraft star after the F-14 thanks to it's appearance in Top Gun, along with its real-life use in the actual Top Gun program, and among military enthusiasts it's super well known for its wide use, like you note.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eternal reminder that the F-20 was the chosen one

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      All of the people who orgasm over the Gripen being some sort of amazing achievement of Swedish ingenuity and practicality seem to forget the F-20 ever existed.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The freedom fighter gets tons of love for how little it actually did.
    It's a cool jet, a plane nerd cult classic and that's just about right.
    I like it, you like it. It's a beautiful piece of equipment.
    That doesn't mean it needs to stand shoulder to shoulder with legends like the F-15.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      For decades now experienced Aggressor pilots in F-5s have been training new pilots in far better aircraft by humiliating them in dogfights. That's a very useful role in it's own way. It ensures those pilots being schooled have the experience and smarts to avoid a similar outcome in the real world. Imagine getting shot down by something like an ancient MiG-21 because you were doing something stupid a new pilot might. Like getting overly-focused on a turning fight. It doesn't matter if you can out-turn them if the MiG-21's wingman you weren't tracking cuts in and takes you out.

      >dogfights no longer happen
      Yeah I know but you still have to train pilots for the possibility they could somehow end up in that situation.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I don't disrespect it's role it plays. It's a Lotus of fighter jets. And being a capable, cheap trainer and aggressor is valuable.
        All I'm saying is the view here is a bit nearsighted.
        He's a good plane, he served and serves well. But being sexy, sleek and a great dancer doesn't mean he deserves or even really needs the limelight.
        I suppose it and the F-20 are painful to know the story of and that's part of what drives this kind of romantic procurement revanchism among it's devotees.
        Not everything you love needs to be a superstar known in every home.
        and that's alright.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Damnit, Anon here is right even through the double punch of Tigershark and Ontos references. The F-5 series was awesome but they served their purpose for the United States and should be remembered fondly for what they did, full stop.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no longer happen
        when everybody has stealth it will be the only thing happening.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I mean to be fair, the T-38 got massive love being a trainer aircraft, so even if the fighter/attack variants didn't get appreciation I'm pretty sure the vast majority of living Air Force pilots flew a T-38 at some point so I'd say it's still a successful plane platform (chassis?) T-20 would have been cool but I also understand why it didn't work out

        Also this
        it might not have killed as many brown/yellow people as you wish but It's done it's time and pulled it's own weight

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how many kills does it have?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is the the most advanced version of the F-5?
    >F-5TH Super Tigris
    >An upgraded version of the F-5E of Royal Thai Air Force by Israel's Elbit Systems and Thai's RV Connex, it has a new glass wienerpit and head-up display upgrade and equipped with EL/M-2032 radar, RTAF-developed Link-T/TH tactical datalink, Sky Shield jamming pod and are capable of firing the AIM-9M, IRIS-T, Python-4 and beyond visual range air-to-air Derby missile.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If only you could do something like replace the two J85s with a single F404 that could provide something like 70% more thrust than both J85s combined.
      The unlucky guys at Northrop really did come up with the F-20 two decades too early. The market for it wasn't there in the 80s when it was directly competing with the F-16.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Such a lewd little plane..

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *