Letting SEN kids design aircraft is valid imo >British industrial design is just ugly af.
This is true, tbh. Compare British planes, ships, cars, basically anything with American, German or Italian. Spits and the few other aesthetic "icons" of British design are really the exception that proves the rule.
Bro all of those companies you mentioned save McClaren aren't British, and McClarens are built like shit. The UK doesn't have anything.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Well you see they aren't British right now so everything they ever made is not British
You got absolutely blown the frick out. Stop trying to get the last word in, like a petulant child, accept that you didn't consider something and move on with your life.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Seething Brit can't handle that his nation produces nothing of quality or beauty.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Brit
No.
>Seething! Can't handle!
I'm not the one saying teh Jaguar E type, circa 1961 or the Aston Martin circa 2003, are not "British" because Jag got bought in 2008 and AM in 2007.
Also
[...]
2 years ago
Anonymous
ARM processors are British and are vastly more efficient that anything Intel or AMD have ever made, to the point that a fricking fanless MacBook Air processor is now faster than Intel’s top of the line chip. Granted Apple is American but they’re using British architecture.
Come to think of it, Brits and Americans do some of their best work together.
2 years ago
Anonymous
> to the point that a fricking fanless MacBook Air processor is now faster than Intel’s top of the line chip.
Lol no, Alder Lake shits on M1 and AchMeD is dogshit.
2 years ago
Anonymous
They aren’t British-owned now. They were when they made all those beautiful cars. They are still designed by Brits even under their new owners. The point is that Brits can’t make things look pretty, you have lost.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Those shit built McLarens still shit on Porsche tho lmao
>Spitfire
Do NOT look up how it would’ve looked like before Supermarine bought the He 70. Nontheless wtf are you on about, Brits easily made good looking planes, ships and cars.
Letting SEN kids design aircraft is valid imo >British industrial design is just ugly af.
This is true, tbh. Compare British planes, ships, cars, basically anything with American, German or Italian. Spits and the few other aesthetic "icons" of British design are really the exception that proves the rule.
There's a reason the Eternal Anglo is so often compared to the israelite, and not even favorably
It looks interesting and unique. It's like how every car these days look exactly the same, so you gotta root for the ones that dare to stick out, even if they're not conventionally pretty. So to speak, they've got soul
The reason cars look the same is because general aerodynamics and engineering requirements due to fuel efficiency standards you fricking speds.
Its hard to account for “soul” when you have legal restrictions on top of the market asking for it.
This isn’t fricking vidya gaems you zoomer moron, shits designed the way it is for various reasons besides “looks güd”.
It's unironically pretty reliable, but it's like a trike motorbike, you can flip it if you're moronic and yoink the steering wheel hard to the side with all the weight at speed (You are the weight). Notice how he always rolls onto the side with his fat arse in.
I love the little thing, I want one shipped over the Atlantic.
Current studies indicate that 17% of Bongs have some level of FASD.
https://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2018/november/first-uk-prevalence-estimate-fasd.html
Anglos and beauty don't get along. The difference between old cities in every western, southern or northern European country that wasn't bombed to shit and rebuilt compared to british cities is a true eye-opener.
the frick are you talking about homie, the entire island is made of creaking ancient buildings and roman roads and shit. 500 year old churches and pubs are fairly common
The guy is literally just shiposting bullshit don't respond.
If you make literally any positive post he will shit on it like his life depended on it with nonsense that would makes no sense if you actually lived here.
The challenger was an epic tank, but didn't see much conflict outsiders of Israeli and Vietnam (Australia). Other than that I don't think the Brits ever used them?
Britain invented the "tank" but France invented the tank as we know it (with a fully rotating turret). If it weren't for the French, the British would still be lumbering around in pill-shaped death traps with guns sticking out the sides.
wtf?
woah... powerful...
What do you think is wrong with the centurion?
British industrial design is just ugly af. Everything they produce is fricked looking. It's a reflection of their soul.
Wrong
KEK
Damn, those are some mighty fine sky buns.
L O N D O N
Frick you
Letting SEN kids design aircraft is valid imo
>British industrial design is just ugly af.
This is true, tbh. Compare British planes, ships, cars, basically anything with American, German or Italian. Spits and the few other aesthetic "icons" of British design are really the exception that proves the rule.
Yes, if you exclude Jaguar, Aston Martin, Rolls Royce, Bentley, Mini Cooper, McClaren, Lotus, MG and Noble.
BTFO
Cope however the frick you must.
Look at this cope
>No u
Take the L like a man.
Bro all of those companies you mentioned save McClaren aren't British, and McClarens are built like shit. The UK doesn't have anything.
>Well you see they aren't British right now so everything they ever made is not British
You got absolutely blown the frick out. Stop trying to get the last word in, like a petulant child, accept that you didn't consider something and move on with your life.
Seething Brit can't handle that his nation produces nothing of quality or beauty.
>Brit
No.
>Seething! Can't handle!
I'm not the one saying teh Jaguar E type, circa 1961 or the Aston Martin circa 2003, are not "British" because Jag got bought in 2008 and AM in 2007.
Also
ARM processors are British and are vastly more efficient that anything Intel or AMD have ever made, to the point that a fricking fanless MacBook Air processor is now faster than Intel’s top of the line chip. Granted Apple is American but they’re using British architecture.
Come to think of it, Brits and Americans do some of their best work together.
> to the point that a fricking fanless MacBook Air processor is now faster than Intel’s top of the line chip.
Lol no, Alder Lake shits on M1 and AchMeD is dogshit.
They aren’t British-owned now. They were when they made all those beautiful cars. They are still designed by Brits even under their new owners. The point is that Brits can’t make things look pretty, you have lost.
Those shit built McLarens still shit on Porsche tho lmao
May that b***h thatcher burn in hell for what she did to this country
>Not a single one of those buyouts happened under Thatcher
>One of them even happened 50 years before
Anglo moment
>Spitfire
Do NOT look up how it would’ve looked like before Supermarine bought the He 70. Nontheless wtf are you on about, Brits easily made good looking planes, ships and cars.
Patently false
"This ship isn't ugly!"
>HMS Repulse
more like HMS Repulsive lmao
here's a REAL sexy ship (I considered IJN Kongo post-refit but the ugly ass funnels detract from the sexy pagoda mast)
now post their loose anime azur lane adaptations
There's a reason the Eternal Anglo is so often compared to the israelite, and not even favorably
It looks interesting and unique. It's like how every car these days look exactly the same, so you gotta root for the ones that dare to stick out, even if they're not conventionally pretty. So to speak, they've got soul
The reason cars look the same is because general aerodynamics and engineering requirements due to fuel efficiency standards you fricking speds.
Its hard to account for “soul” when you have legal restrictions on top of the market asking for it.
This isn’t fricking vidya gaems you zoomer moron, shits designed the way it is for various reasons besides “looks güd”.
OP asked why they look ugly, I simply said I don't hate how they look. No one is saying anything about funciton
>implying
>theyc called it the "reliant"
lmao
It's unironically pretty reliable, but it's like a trike motorbike, you can flip it if you're moronic and yoink the steering wheel hard to the side with all the weight at speed (You are the weight). Notice how he always rolls onto the side with his fat arse in.
I love the little thing, I want one shipped over the Atlantic.
This was the dumbest British tank by far. Flat turret, bolts not welds, had a lawnmower engine.
Current studies indicate that 17% of Bongs have some level of FASD.
https://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2018/november/first-uk-prevalence-estimate-fasd.html
Brits try out all the ideas so they know which ones are good and which ones are shit.
Britain was never really a land power
Anglos and beauty don't get along. The difference between old cities in every western, southern or northern European country that wasn't bombed to shit and rebuilt compared to british cities is a true eye-opener.
im sorry your parents fruit picking visas were recalled Petkovo
It's actually kinda sad that that's the best you have to offer, anon.
thats not an impressive reply at all
Every old British city was bombed to shit.
Wrong.
In most major cities in the UK there are large swathes of pre ww2 buildings.
the frick are you talking about homie, the entire island is made of creaking ancient buildings and roman roads and shit. 500 year old churches and pubs are fairly common
wrong. nazi wienersuckers bombed it all to hell. frick the germans!
The guy is literally just shiposting bullshit don't respond.
If you make literally any positive post he will shit on it like his life depended on it with nonsense that would makes no sense if you actually lived here.
the seethe in this thread is fricking delicious. Stay mad, stay forever mad.
nah i really like the look of the Challenger series
The challenger was an epic tank, but didn't see much conflict outsiders of Israeli and Vietnam (Australia). Other than that I don't think the Brits ever used them?
Please do not be stupid.
Ok then homosexual prove me wrong.
Take your meds homosexual.
Challenger seethe 2 looks better.
The centurion looks rad, you're just a homosexual
The chally on the other hand is butt ugly and overrated
I'm not a bong or a huge centurion fan and I think OP's argument makes no sense and he's just a homosexual
>in a basement
More like in a shed. The amount of bong inventions that came out of some autist's shed is impressive
We don't design ugly things.
If you can't appreciate that aesthetic there is something wrong with you.
Makes me want to vomit.
Looks like a fricking 80s anime.
Wow not seen an anti-UK weapons/tanks thread for a few days, you're slacking.
Laughs in *invented the tank*
Britain invented the "tank" but France invented the tank as we know it (with a fully rotating turret). If it weren't for the French, the British would still be lumbering around in pill-shaped death traps with guns sticking out the sides.
If it wasn't for the British the French wouldn't exist
That's the strongest argument against Britain I've ever heard.
Because they were
>Rifled gun in 2022
For WW2 Crusader and Comet were great looking.
(later) Matilda, A13 series, Cromwell and Churchill looked okay
Valentine and Matilda Mk 1 looked like shit
This dumb motherfricker hating on the Centurion of all tanks
Probably a mad vatnik. The Centurion b***hslapped commie armor in warzones across the globe.
The Centurion is the ultimate tank aesthetic
They look pretty conventional for early post-war tanks when the stowage bins are off
It took shekel hands to make the centurion a legend, an aesthetic vehicle, and keep it running well in to the 21st century