Why aren't carriers like this?

Why aren't carriers like this?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine the weight

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine the smell

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because Black folk tongue my anus

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    weight, drag, helicopters takeoff/landing, fixed wing landings, and probably no real need for it.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The wind will catch it and turn it into an air force vehicle

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The wind will catch it and turn it into an air force vehicle
      I'd be surprised if it wasn't torn off by what is effectively the largest sail plan in history, as soon as the vessel got underway

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The Navy now has no use for the Chair Force

      UNLIMITED POWWWEEERRR

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    wind load. but they save a lot in sunscreen

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because it would interfere with radar systems.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You joke, but this would be very effective against small drones and debris. Hey, if it works, it works.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >image model thread
    I recommend suicide at the earliest possible convenience.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Easier to land and take off without it. A roof would make it harder to see the runway when landing and trap exhaust when taking off.

  10. 1 month ago
    synopticon

    Tis a fine barn, but sure tis no carrier battlegroup, english

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe because you can't fricking see

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >AI slop
    Kys

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Deck ninjas are afraid of rain.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because why? It's useless

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wind exists.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Where do you even start?

    the island in the middle of the runway blocking landings?
    the lack of catapults, with a flat deck?
    the perpendicular runway, so if you have a launch failure, you get dropped right in front of 80,000 tonnes of hull bearing down on you? And the same with the fact it prevents simultaneous launch and landings?
    the aerodynamic forces of a massive sail, the moment the wind's remotely off the bow?
    the structural forces on the matchsticks that it calls legs?
    I cant even begin to think what it weighs or does to the centre of gravity.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because that awning is going to get ripped off with a light gust.

    Might as well just build a second deck 25 feet over the first one and make the top one for landing and the bottom one for taking off.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I miss when American ships over in Asia had little sun bonnets during peacetime.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Having an island in the middle of the runway is normally a bad idea.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    carriers don't need a roof because the deck is the roof.

    now why we don't have double decker carriers idk.

    top deck for landing.
    bottom deck for take off.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just double?

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    are those fricking boats docked at the carrier? That AI generation creates some weird shit, I love how moronic that idea is, I want to see it in a game.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >are those fricking boats docked at the carrier?
      Seems to be.

      >That AI generation creates some weird shit
      It's seeing a resemblance between waves and the straight edge of the hull and given the scale, decided that it's some kind of wharf that should have naval-ish ships docked at it. Or maybe a scifi space station with ships docked. RNG can make some surreal stuff but it's not far removed from seeing shapes in clouds or interpreting dreams.

      carriers don't need a roof because the deck is the roof.

      now why we don't have double decker carriers idk.

      top deck for landing.
      bottom deck for take off.

      >now why we don't have double decker carriers idk.
      Flat tops aren't super far removed from that, marine Expeditionary Sea Bases are sort of similar. They're double decked because the top deck is for helos and the bottom one is for marine cargo with the ship being able to lower the bottom deck to sea level for cargo loading/offloading and in theory hovercraft RORO from open water but I don't know if that has ever been done in practice.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is that a Carrier Cope Cage?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No, it's a roof so pilots don't get wet when it rains.
      Although it needs some protection from leaves and runoff.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just drive the carrier around the rain clouds, problem solved

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would have difficulties with docking in a warm water port.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *