WHY ARE THE CHALLENGERS NOT BEING DEPLOYED?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They aren't pushing. Duh. They are probing.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      At this point, why not assume op indicates the challys have turned up somewhere?

      Like fricking Donetsk city.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's not the right time. They are still in the second slow. Slow slow quick. Once they have the Russians tired, spread out, leaderless and thinking it's over then the Ukrainians will throttle down. Slow to recon, slow to probe, quick to attack. Once those come out they will be flying not stationary.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >At this point, why not assume op indicates the challys have turned up somewhere?

        Rheinmetall headquarters to take revenge for all the shit posting over the years

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          A challenger just flew over my house!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Post the picture from 5 days ago

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        The left can't meme.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hahaha russians cannot into meme...
        Not organic
        Repurposed
        Mixed messaging
        Not creative

        This meme is a failure.

        russians are pussies and dieing in droves

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fascists cannot create, they can only corrupt...

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Kys

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Which one are you?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              nobody looks like any of these. meds NOW

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Fascists is what dumbass lefties on Reddit call people they don't like
          You got a better quote, hon?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm gonna repost this meme just to make russian meme abilities look even worse

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They have about six chally wallys. They're just going to sit in Kiev forever.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because there's a grand total of 14 of them. They're being picky about when and where they deploy them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They will never be deployed. Having a separate supply chain for a small number of tanks that aren't much better than the ones they're using now is pointless.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Same reason the marders, strykers and other vehicles haven't been used yet, let alone the array of veteran Mechanized and Armored divisions.. 93rd is waiting for their chance alongside all the other big boys.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Brigades*, there are quite a few in rest or in reserve at the moment.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There aren’t enough challengers to make a difference. 33 leopards aren’t enough either. They should have 200 western tanks and 500 western IFVs

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Same as with all those Leopard 1s, Anon. Why do you think the pro-Russian shitposters and Telegram channels have sounded increasingly nervous over the past week of advances, despite 5-6 AFU brigades not having entered the chat yet?

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They don't have enough Boris Johnson clones to crew them all.
    ...yet.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >everyone in the world get's replaced by a Boris Johnson clone
      BJs for every man, woman, and child.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Right now Ukraine is still finding out how the Russians are set up and how to counter it. If they just yeeted in all their Chally Wally's right now they would get killed by Russian aviation.
    So establishing SHORAD will probably have to happen before they fully commit.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    both sides are very anxious and holding back their main forces/reserves. presumably Challengers are considered more valuable than the Leopards.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not even close. Leopards are seen as much more valuable

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        not him but are you basing this assertion on warthunder BR or a real life source?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Just public information about each tank. Challengers haven’t been upgraded in a long time

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They have far more leopards and are likely to get more in the future. You can't fight a war with a dozen weird tanks nobody else uses.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        more valuable can also mean "don't have as many so don't want to lose them and have wasted the crews time training on them", since they have way more Leo's available to them

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Leopards are seen as much more valuable
        Challengers are more valuable because the crew are better trained

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          desperate

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not an argument, MOD had a very thorough and intesive training the Challenger crews and began training in January as opposed to April for Leopard. They're just better trained, don't be mad about it.,

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Leopard crews were drawn from the most combat experienced. Challenger crews weren’t the focus because of the small amount of challengers in Ukraine.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Leopard crews were drawn from the most combat experienced.

                Source

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >b…but consider this Forbes opinion article making this claim
          kek no

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >ad homs

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      other way around, challengers are considered 2nd-line shit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Leopards are more versatile, hence more useful to Ukraine.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are, just none of them have been destroyed so no vatniks posting pics of em
    Better luck next time, Krauts

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No chance challengers are extremely vulnerable to mines and atgms

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Jamie, pull up that one story of a challenger taking 20-something PG-7s and a Milan ATGM and still rolls away
        Challenger is no more or less significantly vulnerable to mines and ATGMs than any other MBT

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Challenger is no more or less significantly vulnerable to mines and ATGMs than any other MBT

          Laughs in dozer blade

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Got penned frontally by a kornet

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Through the floor.
            Yeah

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              It was an RPG 29 and it went through the floor/lower glacis joint when cresting a crater. I talked to a guy from their unit who said it glanced/ricochet off the ground first and hit the tank when going upwards. Hence the driver only losing a toe - although they took the whole foot off due to infection.

              Penned.
              >but I talked to a guy in the unit
              kek desperate

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            It was an RPG 29 and it went through the floor/lower glacis joint when cresting a crater. I talked to a guy from their unit who said it glanced/ricochet off the ground first and hit the tank when going upwards. Hence the driver only losing a toe - although they took the whole foot off due to infection.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Challenger is practically invincible to enemy projectiles. Watch and learn.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They’re edging us so we cum harder when Challengers roll into Moscow

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine has 30 reserve divisions for the assault, 14 full of western tech.

    Only 2 have been committed to combat so far.

    Also we've seen drone pictures of challenger already but not in combat.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ukraine has 30 reserve divisions for the assault, 14 full of western tech.
      >Only 2 have been committed to combat so far.
      >Punching through South Donetsk at high speed anyway
      it CANNOT be this straightforward
      Surely they have committed more to the offensives thus far than you purport

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        There are other forces involved but they were at the front anyway, the reserve is still being held back. I imagine it'll be weeks before we see major assaults. You'll know when it happens because the Ukrainians will be flying again and the Storm Shadow attacks will ramp up.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        why do you question, you a batnik or something?
        no questioning

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty sure only 9 western divisions are ready atm. Also pretty sure we've seen like 4-5 divisions already.

        My standing answer until proven otherwise is that the real target is Luhansk, not Zaporiznia, as they are unlikely to cut the land bridge but the liberation of the better part of the Luhanks oblast would be politically unconscionable for the Kremlin

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Luhansk
          Seems like a waste of time. The Russian people are totally buckbroken and wouldn't care even if Belgorod city fell, you can't say "If the Kremlin loses x they will be overthrown", it's just not gonna happen.
          South Donetsk, pushing for Mariupol, is a serious alternative to Zap. But other than those two approaches the others are all feints, or at least they should be. Only cutting the Russian army in two has strategic military significance, taking some town or city would just be Battle of Bakhmut 2.0 - a lot of lives for something that doesn't especially matter, except this time it would be the Ukrainians grinding out an offensive.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Capturing melitopol/mairiupol creates 2 million Russian hostages in Crimea. Not even the Kremlin can ignore that.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Armatard seethe thread

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    My guess is that they are letting the Zap and Bakhmut offensive cook for a while and draw all Russian reserves in.

    Before rushing Troitske and encircling Svatove.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They won’t use challengers for that

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why wouldn't they?

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    they're probably sitting in a unit that guards kyiv or something. a dozen tanks is not worth forming a brigade around.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Since they only have 14 it's probably more of a pain to deploy them and keep them maintained than to just not use them. I imagine the Brit government knows this, and the real purpose of the tanks was to guilt other countries in to donating leopards that can be deployed in significant numbers.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bingo. Even the UK is only fielding something like 120 challenger 2 tanks.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bingo. Even the UK is only fielding something like 120 challenger 2 tanks.

      Cool samegay there bud. I'm demoralized.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Not samegayging and you only attacked me personally because you can’t refute what was said. 14 challengers is not a respectable force at all. Then again neither is 33 leopard 2s

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lol what about that is meant to "demoralize" you? Do you think the 14 challies are the only thing that can win the war for Ukraine and without them they're fricked? They're fine and will win without them anon.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Strawman

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            14 tanks. Haven’t seen combat in Ukraine yet.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              You mad.

              Well explain then, what was supposed to demoralize you about explaining that it was all part of a plan to get other NATO members to donate tanks?

              Esl

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Concession

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Of what? You're the one making dumb claims

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                My claim was that Ukraine only has 14 tanks and that’s not a useful amount.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why would 4 troops of tanks not be useful? You can advance across a front many miles across with that.

                You think this is war thunder?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Do you think this is war Thunder? What would keep the challengers from throwing tracks on AT mines?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What would keep the challengers from throwing tracks on AT mines?

                Following a full width mine blow in the wake of a python mine clearing rocket. There's a reason 14 is an unusual number of Challengers to be given when a platoon is 4 troops of three.

                Plus Ukraine has many other potential systems that it could use with the Challengers.

                However in all likelyhood the challenger, marder, stryker unit isn't for breaching it's for the breakout. That's why it's troops are elite airborne infantry and not generic mech riflemen. That's why it has such a high ratio of those infantry and why so many are in wheeled vehicles with towed guns that they can take with them into the Russian rear.

                Do you want to discuss combined arms manovere warfare or do you wana show eveyone how upset brits make you?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                82nd troops aren’t elite

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                They are air assault forces, Ukrainian VDV equivalent. Along with their marines they are the best infantry Ukraine has. They've been using them as firefighters all over Ukraine to respond to threats.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Show me proof of everything you just said.
                >Forbes
                Fricking kek

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                They were formed from the 80th air assault brigade. Who have been everywhere.

                >The brigade took part in the defense of Ukraine during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, fighting around Voznesensk.[40]

                >By September 2022, elements of the brigade were also identified via social media posts to be taking part in the southern counteroffensive.[41]

                >Members of the brigade were seen reaching the outskirts of Kupiansk alongside SBU Alpha Group, 92nd Mechanized Brigade, and the 25th Airborne Brigade. That same day, the Kyiv Post announced the liberation of the city, despite the Ukrainian Armed Forces operational silence.[42] The UK Ministry of Defence commented, suggesting that the capture of the city dealt a "significant blow" due to Russian supply nodes routing to the Donbas region.[43]

                >In February 2023 the brigade took part in the Battle of Bakhmut.[44]

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Ukraine only has 14 tanks
                moron alert

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Well explain then, what was supposed to demoralize you about explaining that it was all part of a plan to get other NATO members to donate tanks?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Challengers have never been defeated in combat. They could sweep Russian lines latterly without taking any casualties. When challengers win the day you will stop posting here warriortard

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Holy fricking schitzo

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    2000 T90s vs 14 Challys, who wins?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      1960 t-90s would be left

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The main drawbacks of the challenger are its slow speed, rifled main gun, two piece ammo, and the fact that it stores ammo in the hull with the crew.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      1. Like 5mph cross country difference vs leo 2
      2. Not a factor vs russian tanks
      3. Not a factor at all, slower theoretically but because the charges and shells are separate they are easier to handle in the fighting compartment so similar RoF can be sustained
      4. So does the leopard

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anon you're arguing with a shill.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also it exists in so few numbers. And with Britain mothballing most of its tanks this probably the end of the line for the challenger 2. Very mediocre tank

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They'll be in the area because there was footage of Strykers advancing today and they're both assigned to the 82nd.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Those brigades don’t seem to be concrete. Bradleys weren’t supposed to be attached to leopards but that’s what we’ve seen.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They may have changed things up since the thug shaker incident.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Challengers would be a better tank to use for when the inevitable Russian counterattack begins. Rifled guns and heavy armor means sniping assaulting Russians l

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. Dig those fat fricks in and cover them with an insane amount of air defense.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How much AD do you think Ukraine has?

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          A frick load. NASAMS leapfrogging behind the assaulting force would stop further ka-52 attacks

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    because it's only been one week and we don't have enough footage or know enough about what's happened
    then again you knew that, you spamming homosexual

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    the heavier brigades have yet to be committed

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      33rd is the heaviest and has been committed

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Challengers were only ever intended as an icebreaker. The UK was tired of Europe fricking around sending helmets and comfy blankies.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Source

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Storm Shadow opening the door to JASSM
        UK funding F-16s opened the door to Aussie F-18s

        Basically the UK sends a type of weapon first, the rest of the world can then send other variations. It works because the Russians are still mad about the UK kicking their ass in Crimea.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The US isn’t going to send JASSMs. Storm shadow is good enough. If they really wanted to send a along range missile they could send old non sensitive block tomahawks

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I would refuse to take burger equipment based on their names alone.
            acams, nacams, himars, jassms. Jesus christ how fricking boring.

            Send only cool shit with cool names like "storm shadow" and "russian baby slaughterer mk.III" pls

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >t. Gay moron

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              C'mon,just the "Oh Himars" memes make it cooler than whatever tryhard name euroshit has.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              nasams is norwegian

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sold on the black market

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where is half of the shit that was sent actually?

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There was an article saying the UK no longer has the ability to manufacture tank gun barrels. So if they deplete their existing tanks, then technically they won't be able to finish making new ones.

    The UK has to get its domestic manufacturing in order before they field their existing ones in Ukraine in any significant number.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >So if they deplete their existing tanks, then technically they won't be able to finish making new ones.
      Challenger 3 will use the Rheinmetall L55 so it doesn't make much difference

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They were waiting for Boris Johnson to retire as an MP so he could lead the Challenger squadron in to battle.
    He’s done that now, so expect them imminently

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They were allegedly Khinzaled in a warehouse few weeks ago when the Russians spammed missiles and drones to be able to get trough the Patriot just after the Ukrainians practically ran out of S300.
    Could be made up though who knows.

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because we only have around fifty of them and most of them are broken.

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >The challengers are tearing through Russian positions as we speak
    >G*rman equipment is littering the field, abandoned and burnt

    ISN’T IT FUNNY?

    WHEN THE CHALLENGER FIRST ARRIVED IN UKRAINE 3 MONTHS AGO AND WE SAID IT WOULD TURN THE TIDE IN THE WAR TO TAKE BACK CRIMEA AND DONBASS, YOU ALL LAUGHED!

    WELL, I HAVE TO SAY, YOU’RE NOT LAUGHING NOW, ARE YOU?

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sold on the black market.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe covering in case of a successful Russian counterattack, they rush the heavy hitters in to blunt the push and then counter with Leopards, Bradleys etc. Or they're somewhere else entirely.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russia has them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Shittiest photoshop possible. Zero effort made.
      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/18/britain-sending-right-tanks-ukraine-need-protection-mobility/

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/18/britain-sending-right-tanks-ukraine-need-protection-mobility/
        fake link

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Go frick yourself with a cheese grater

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *