Best part?
When they finally got to the region where the Japs were, and after several other false alerts, they ran smack into a Jap torpedo boat, and fricking signaled to it that they were Russian ships hunting for the Japanese fleet.
Much like the irresistible draw the Salmon seeks out the fresh water of it's birth, or weeb feels towards e-girl dicky, the Anglo cannot help themselves but foil Russoid ambition on the waves.
Anywhere a Babushka floats in a tube floatie.
Anywhere a Mikhail or Yuri wishes to fish in peace.
Anywhere Evgeny wants to innocently fire cruise missiles at orphanages.
Britain is there, working in the shadows to prevent Russia from ever becoming competent around water.
>Anywhere a Babushka floats in a tube floatie. >Anywhere a Mikhail or Yuri wishes to fish in peace. >Anywhere Evgeny wants to innocently fire cruise missiles at orphanages. >Britain is there, working in the shadows to prevent Russia from ever becoming competent around water.
AND THAT'S A GOOD THING!
NATO should in fact get even more directly involved.
Zisters say NATO SOF are in Ukraine as if it is something bad. They are 100% there and even more should go there. Based NATO intervening where it should.
>NATO weapons
The drones were actually homegrown ukranian weapons. >NATO intelligence
Intelligence now belongs to someone? >NATO targeting priorities
"Any ship you can blow up" is now NATO priorities >NATO funding
Not really, the EU and the US aren't NATO, and they didn't fund it through NATO. >NATO reconnaissance assets
Let's go FORTE12 >NATO training
Not even true, NATO doesn't have training for sea drones.
At least he's actually accepting losses now instead of utterly embarrassing himself by saying 'lol $100 concrete will fox that' or 'it's only superficial damage
How can you say this with straight face
When all high ranked russian politicians said "Russia is not gonna invade Ukraine, lol" before russia invaded Ukraine?
Is this real? If yes, it's obvious he's taking the piss and is pretending to be moronic. No one could seriously write something like that, even the Russians on Telegrams are frustrated by or laughing at the non stop lies.
>copelord
Can you guys remind me what his angle is? Is he a pedo like Scott "Kid Diddler" Ritter, a moron like Hackson Jinkle, simply on Putin's payroll like Catturd and many others, or something else?
actually much more likely that copelord did nothing truly bad in his life, he was stuck in logistics in an artillery unit and never deployed even though he was in during GWOT, never promoted above O-3, he probably got super pissy about his go-nowhere career and spiraled down into terminal contrarianism
He never went beyond O-3 because he was a literal moron that absolutely noone liked according to those who knew him while he was in. Apparently he was as delusional back then as he is now.
actually much more likely that copelord did nothing truly bad in his life, he was stuck in logistics in an artillery unit and never deployed even though he was in during GWOT, never promoted above O-3, he probably got super pissy about his go-nowhere career and spiraled down into terminal contrarianism
At one stage his bio had him finishing as a Lieutenant, which would be O-2 after 9 years. Which would mean he failed every single board and had to be effectively thrown out under up or out? I don't know really how the US Army works.
The bio seems to have been changed recently
I just wonder how moronic someone has to be to never see deployment, given the moron officers who were deployed.
I think you're required to receive promotions/new commands within a certain period of time or else you're automatically removed from service (the idea to prevent someone incompetent or unambitious from staying on for too long).
I think it's the same thing in the enlisted ranks, you're not allowed to stay a private for 10 years, either rank up or get kicked out.
Nah he's one of many unlikeable weirdos who joined the military thinking they're gonna become cool and successful
Then they slam into the brick wall called reality and become convinced their lack of success is a proof the West has fallen so they become contrarians and use their dubious credentials to shill whatever dictatorship appears more like their dream idea of a military
>Is he a pedo like Scott "Kid Diddler" Ritter
yes. see: his book >a moron like Hackson Jinkle
yes. see: anything he posts not about the war >simply on Putin's payroll like Catturd and many others
I would hope he doesn't do it for hotpockets >or something else?
one can only imagine
he is simply coping and seething about his shitty existence tbh, some people become incels, some become trans, copelord became a russian shill, the root cause is the same
He did nothing of worth in his military career and showed no drive. Its really hard to not fail upwards in the military. Besides that he's just a dysgenic weirdo.
He's like Douglas MacGregor (only far less successful) in that his military career didn't pan out the way he wanted so now he shills for Russia because his contrarianism will bring him far more attention than whatever else he'd be doing otherwise.
I dunno, it's just what I found
note that the text itself shows that this was during Zelensky's flying-around stage, not during the first couple of months when he famously said he wasn't going anywhere
he's just moronic, look at his book and look at his history in the US military. he's incredibly fricking stupid, it would actually be sad if it wasn't hilarious.
I would just like to add on to what the rest of the Anons have said and explain to everyone who doesn't know, that this one man through some sort of divine provenance has become one of the best sources on the war with the caveat that whatever he states to be the truth is in fact the opposite.
Whenever he says that Russia is doing well in one thing, they will then catastrophically suffer in this one specific thing instead. It's a truly remarkable skill he has here.
They're obsessed with Britain in general, Russia is mentally stuck in the 19th century so of course they think the Great Game never ended and Britain to this day is responsible for their woes alongside Americans/Jews/Nazis/whatever
SAS does actually run circles around FSB. They used to deploy to Russia and Russia-adjacent shitholes regularly before the war and I can only imagine a good chunk of those smoooker accidents are their work.
t. knower
more or less. they're all the same line of SAM so in true Brit fashion they just replace parts of it bit by bit and tweak the name
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's a fairly cost effective development process for this missile family anyway
The best part is that Shorts eventually went on to be part of the group that made NLAW. Ukraine has been such a playground for bong weaponry, one can almost forgive the Russians their Anglo complex
It's the follow on from the blowpipe missile program, the precursor missile to starstreak/Martlet, the general design is the same just larger but less effective missiles than the newer martlet.
It wasn't too effective, but it did better than blowpipe so it was fieldable in small numbers, and did well enough that they kept trying to make it better and upgraded it to the current smaller design systems.
I feel the next stage of monetising warfare would be to re-issue Blowpipes, but instead of having a human try and guide the missile, you use a robot operated by Twitch Chat instead.
It would be just as effective as it was the first time around, but you can make some decent dosh out of it at the same time. Maybe we could get a Vtuber to narrate the shots as well for extra simp points?
There's a few, but they're all ww1/2 memorials. Pretty much all bodies are burnt here in the UK unless you have a ton of money to get buried at a church.
It's incredibly expensive to do that though since high population low space etc etc.
There's certainly not a specific military grave anyway.
That's not what they mean by cemetery though anon. The point is the source this guy has about 33 magical bongs dying in Ukraine is as thin and stretched as his mom's gaping butthole.
I have known ukranian people who’ve moved to the UK, they integrate very fast. The UK has been training and equipping them, soon the angloization will be complete and there will be a second UK right on Russia’s doorstep. The next step is to normalise clock towers that chime constantly every hour, bongs will resound throughout the border regions. The crumpet is in the toaster, the phone box is being painted red, soon the world will see mate
Did you know that you cam get non-toasted crumpets its you go to a fancy another Cafe?
They cook them using batter and everything, blew my frickimg mind when I first heard about it
Kek
I support the anglicisation of the Ukrainian peoples, all it takes is crumpets and BigBongs, that's all you need and they're corrupted forever.
Did you know that you cam get non-toasted crumpets its you go to a fancy another Cafe?
They cook them using batter and everything, blew my frickimg mind when I first heard about it
There's one such cafe in my city that I know about but they are literally always fully booked when they do crumpets, you have to sign up like six months in advance to have a chance of getting in
Shit dude my hair is a mess but at least I have the decency to shave my sides. Though I kinda wish it would just go so I didn't have to bother with that. I don't mine the baldness as such, it's just a hassle.
is a pathetic, miserable, and useless laughingstock
correct
it just means puccia is even worse
I am allowed to want TZD and make fun of bongistanis for needing a spoon license, they are not mutually exclusive.
Napoleon burned Moscow and Reagan and Clinton humiliated Gorbachev and Yeltsin, but why are France and USA less hated by vatnigs than fricking Bongland? Is Operation Declare a real thing and not just spy fiction? Did MI6 really give SMERSH the ole Jamesburger? What's the fricking deal?
Russians have been seething about Anglos for centuries. >Anglos wiener-block Russia in the Great Game, preventing them from taking either the valuable parts of central asia or the Ottoman empire >Humiliate them in the Crimean War >Bootstrapped the IJN, leading directly to Russia suffering the most embarrassing naval defeat in history and losing all credibility in the pacific >Hate the USSR from the word go, participates in several efforts to restore the monarchy and stymie their expansion >Signs a non-aggression pact with Germany, which the soviets feel is a knife in the back >Churchill viewed Stalin as an untrustworthy psychopath and Churchill's influence is mostly what stops FDR from giving Stalin everything east of the Seine >The UK is the center of anti-Soviet espionage in Europe during the cold war and joined at the hip with the US in defense and intelligence matters >Has loudly opposed all of Russia's post-Soviet Black folkhines since then and participated in proxy wars against them
I fail to understand why our navy hasn’t been reformed around cucking the Russians in the North Sea, it’d make way more sense than trying to project power as a blue water navy.
>it’d make way more sense than trying to project power as a blue water navy.
yeah, because the major threat to international trade RIGHT FRICKING NOW is the Russians and not somewhere rather hot, sandy, and distressingly familiar
It’s almost like we’re keeping an artificial nation of hypochondriac accountants afloat in a hostile desert full of sand people that want them all dead.
Pretty funny, the US was debating on quietly removing them with divers. The UK just rolls in no fricks given and blows them up. With this kind of attitude in mind, the UK for sure blew up the pipeline.
Bongoloides are not very smart. They just go in there like soccer hooligans doing target practice.
The US Navy probably wanted to capture those and see what level tech the Ruskies had.
The timeframe was somewhere between Mariupol and Bakhmut so I'll give him half a point
But the claim about mild losses was wrong even then, and is fricking hilarious in hindsight
When he starts calling chief monke a moron, just like girkin
Until then, he'll probably be allowed to doom and gloom. As long as he only ever complains about not enough being done rather than questioning whether the war was a good idea, that is.
>NATO is a british operation
Can someone explain to me, an American, the excessive and absurd hateboner Russkies have for England over all other countries? I find it difficult to believe they're still malding over the Great Game worse than Operation Barbarossa
Napoleon burned Moscow and Reagan and Clinton humiliated Gorbachev and Yeltsin, but why are France and USA less hated by vatnigs than fricking Bongland? Is Operation Declare a real thing and not just spy fiction? Did MI6 really give SMERSH the ole Jamesburger? What's the fricking deal?
Napoleon burned Moscow but was still forced to flee Russia with his tail between his legs.
As for the US, the Russians generally conflate them with the UK anyways due to Anglo pride and the more schizo ones believe the UK still secretly controls the US.
USA is considered a son of Britain so to speak, being anglo, an ex-colony, and sharing interests; also the US has been openly defeated by Soviet proxies so they have that to comfort themselves with
France of course was trounced hard in WW2 and then in Vietnam and then in Algeria, so once again the Soviets have that
Napoleon burned Moscow but was still forced to flee Russia with his tail between his legs.
As for the US, the Russians generally conflate them with the UK anyways due to Anglo pride and the more schizo ones believe the UK still secretly controls the US.
for centuries Russians have looked at the British Empire and thought >I coulda been a contender!!1!
then the British defeated the Russians at Crimea
then the British humiliated the Russians on their way to Tsushima
then the British helped the White Russians fight the Soviets
then the British suppressed international Communism, which made them Enemy Number One to the nascent Soviet state
then Hitler claimed that the British were wilfully unbalancing the Continental powers at every turn, which Stalin believed and retransmitted to his followers
then the British allied with the USA against the Soviets throughout the long Cold War
and hasn't stopped countering nu-Russian expansionism in the 21st century
add that all up, and the bonus multiplier: Russia has never defeated the British, and London has never fallen to an external enemy ever since William the Conqueror, nearly a millennium ago
Despite everything the Nazis did, Russia actually don't hate them much, in their eyes the only bad thing they did was attacking Russia
In comparison the Anglos for them are responsible for every bad thing that has ever happened to Russia, it's their israelites
I mean just look how under Putin their version of events is that Poles and Anglos basically twisted Nazi Germany's arm into invading. Actual wehraboo talking points
I love that Russians kvetch about us, it makes it funnier because Bongland is finished as a country, it’s like someone being terrified of a leukaemia patient
The Iron Curtain -- cutting contniental Eurogay power in half -- was the Zero Sum Game strategic wet dream of Perfidious Albion since time immemorial. That led directly to nuclear proliferation (e.g. suggesting Klaus Fuchs for the Manhattan Project without vetting) and the shitstain Iron Age morons of all sorts having strategic glassing capability. It's a bit of penance in light of that, and Manchurian Corn Pop TAKING office properly scaring non-pinkos outside the United States.
It's like when the British gave some medieval rice farmers some vessels and they inflicted the most brutal beatdown in naval history at that point in time against Russia.
>Commercial satellites >Some Limey/ French missiles >Ukrainian sea drones >moronic Russians that cannot maintain a Navy >moronic Russians' failure to understand that the Black Sea is indefensible.
Copetard crying about the British misses the whole point of reality.
This should be a lesson to morons everywhere: a small body of water is indefensible from nearby land based missiles, sea and air drones. Even in WW2 the Black Sea would be very very difficult to defend with ships due to aircraft.
If the USA gave Ukraine a few C130 with rapid dragon, then the Black Sea fleet would be destroyed in a few days at most.
Revenge for the Dogger Bank incident
>On the Russian side, one sailor and a Russian Orthodox priest aboard the cruiser Aurora were killed by friendly fire.
These guys were always moronic
>mfw this shit happened in the north sea, expecting a jap attack
I thought this would've happened in the indian ocean or closer to japan, damn they're moronic.
Best part?
When they finally got to the region where the Japs were, and after several other false alerts, they ran smack into a Jap torpedo boat, and fricking signaled to it that they were Russian ships hunting for the Japanese fleet.
>2:2 K/d ratio
>Against unarmed fishermen
>this scares the vatBlack person
>Norf F Sea
I see Copelord has inherited the endless Russian seething about the perfidious albion
Where has the eternal bong touched puccia and the copelord?
The vatniks? In the crimea.
Copelord? On the top of his head.
>On the top of his head.
Man, you can say a lot of thing about WC, but it Albinos stole my hair I would be pissed too.
Crimea is literally Russia's balls.
Was the motherland trans all along?
You mean figuratively
No, literally, why do you think they get so outraged any time something there gets hit?
Imagine getting HIMARS'd in the balls every other month.
>In the crimea.
God I love that song.
UK hosted Litvinenko when he exposed Putin's pedophilia.
Source? Genuinely interested to read up on Putin dirt
Armchair Warlord is a British shill.
>copelord
I didn’t know the Moskva was sunk by NATO Neptune missiles.
Much like the irresistible draw the Salmon seeks out the fresh water of it's birth, or weeb feels towards e-girl dicky, the Anglo cannot help themselves but foil Russoid ambition on the waves.
Anywhere a Babushka floats in a tube floatie.
Anywhere a Mikhail or Yuri wishes to fish in peace.
Anywhere Evgeny wants to innocently fire cruise missiles at orphanages.
Britain is there, working in the shadows to prevent Russia from ever becoming competent around water.
Everyone will sup on the salmon of knowledge and know everything.
Even now Gerasimov is measuring all the roe. The cloaca is in the cloaca.
>Anywhere a Babushka floats in a tube floatie.
>Anywhere a Mikhail or Yuri wishes to fish in peace.
>Anywhere Evgeny wants to innocently fire cruise missiles at orphanages.
>Britain is there, working in the shadows to prevent Russia from ever becoming competent around water.
>The first line
Truly the perfidious Albion. Actual warcrime.
But please don't change.
the boris johnson clones will never rest until Russia burns in ruins
>When we're winning in one regard we beat all of HATO
>If we're losing its the British running a shadow war on us
I'm starting to think that copelord might be the dumbest zigger shill (which is saying something)
AND THAT'S A GOOD THING!
NATO should in fact get even more directly involved.
Zisters say NATO SOF are in Ukraine as if it is something bad. They are 100% there and even more should go there. Based NATO intervening where it should.
Imagine the kino of Ukies didn't scuttle their fleet.
Then again them fricking over the Russian Navy would be less hilarious.
Why is he angry? Those sailors were old and due to be replaced anyway.
They were Ukrainian Russian sailors, therefore their discussion is all part of plan Z
>NATO weapons
The drones were actually homegrown ukranian weapons.
>NATO intelligence
Intelligence now belongs to someone?
>NATO targeting priorities
"Any ship you can blow up" is now NATO priorities
>NATO funding
Not really, the EU and the US aren't NATO, and they didn't fund it through NATO.
>NATO reconnaissance assets
Let's go FORTE12
>NATO training
Not even true, NATO doesn't have training for sea drones.
>Intelligence now belongs to someone?
Meme answer: Russia doesn't have intelligence
Real answer: US satellites are playing a huge role
>NATO Training
I cant believe Hato is Training suicide drones
May those drafted drones rest in peace for they didnt want this war
At least he's actually accepting losses now instead of utterly embarrassing himself by saying 'lol $100 concrete will fox that' or 'it's only superficial damage
How can you say this with straight face
When all high ranked russian politicians said "Russia is not gonna invade Ukraine, lol" before russia invaded Ukraine?
It won't last, he'll say something phenomenally moronic again tomorrow
Is this real? If yes, it's obvious he's taking the piss and is pretending to be moronic. No one could seriously write something like that, even the Russians on Telegrams are frustrated by or laughing at the non stop lies.
>No one could seriously write something like that
You should try reading his book.
>No one could seriously write something like that
First Copelord thread?
If Copelord is accepting losses, that means the Russians have lost enough men to give a moderate a brief pause. Good Lord.
Someone should tell him who designed all those "russian" weapons...
A NATO just flew over my house
>copelord
Can you guys remind me what his angle is? Is he a pedo like Scott "Kid Diddler" Ritter, a moron like Hackson Jinkle, simply on Putin's payroll like Catturd and many others, or something else?
professional cannon polisher
actually much more likely that copelord did nothing truly bad in his life, he was stuck in logistics in an artillery unit and never deployed even though he was in during GWOT, never promoted above O-3, he probably got super pissy about his go-nowhere career and spiraled down into terminal contrarianism
He never went beyond O-3 because he was a literal moron that absolutely noone liked according to those who knew him while he was in. Apparently he was as delusional back then as he is now.
At one stage his bio had him finishing as a Lieutenant, which would be O-2 after 9 years. Which would mean he failed every single board and had to be effectively thrown out under up or out? I don't know really how the US Army works.
The bio seems to have been changed recently
I just wonder how moronic someone has to be to never see deployment, given the moron officers who were deployed.
Terminal promotion upon separation is common, so he gets to retire as an O-3 after spending his entire career at O-2
I think you're required to receive promotions/new commands within a certain period of time or else you're automatically removed from service (the idea to prevent someone incompetent or unambitious from staying on for too long).
I think it's the same thing in the enlisted ranks, you're not allowed to stay a private for 10 years, either rank up or get kicked out.
I assume the Russians have him on video fricking some e-girl or some shit like that.
Nah he's one of many unlikeable weirdos who joined the military thinking they're gonna become cool and successful
Then they slam into the brick wall called reality and become convinced their lack of success is a proof the West has fallen so they become contrarians and use their dubious credentials to shill whatever dictatorship appears more like their dream idea of a military
>Is he a pedo like Scott "Kid Diddler" Ritter
yes. see: his book
>a moron like Hackson Jinkle
yes. see: anything he posts not about the war
>simply on Putin's payroll like Catturd and many others
I would hope he doesn't do it for hotpockets
>or something else?
one can only imagine
he is simply coping and seething about his shitty existence tbh, some people become incels, some become trans, copelord became a russian shill, the root cause is the same
He did nothing of worth in his military career and showed no drive. Its really hard to not fail upwards in the military. Besides that he's just a dysgenic weirdo.
He's like Douglas MacGregor (only far less successful) in that his military career didn't pan out the way he wanted so now he shills for Russia because his contrarianism will bring him far more attention than whatever else he'd be doing otherwise.
>Catturd
Now there's a moron i havent heard from in a while
>catturd
Seriously? Cat turd?!
>Ukraine war literally doesn't exist
Please tell me that date was photoshopped and this is from February 24, 2022.
I dunno, it's just what I found
note that the text itself shows that this was during Zelensky's flying-around stage, not during the first couple of months when he famously said he wasn't going anywhere
Why does this guy get boosted so much, I’d understand if his humor was at least good
He might just pay for it to make himself seem bigger than he is.
>why does a site overrun by bots,grifters and pay-to-shitpost people boost a shitposter
The world wonders, anon
>Is he a pedo like Scott "Kid Diddler" Ritter, a moron like Hackson Jinkle, simply on Putin's payroll like Catturd and many others, or something else?
he's just moronic, look at his book and look at his history in the US military. he's incredibly fricking stupid, it would actually be sad if it wasn't hilarious.
I would just like to add on to what the rest of the Anons have said and explain to everyone who doesn't know, that this one man through some sort of divine provenance has become one of the best sources on the war with the caveat that whatever he states to be the truth is in fact the opposite.
Whenever he says that Russia is doing well in one thing, they will then catastrophically suffer in this one specific thing instead. It's a truly remarkable skill he has here.
I noticed ziggers are obsessed with the SAS
Is it because of cowadooty?
I think if you are too sassy in russia you can get sent to prison now
Underrated.
They're obsessed with Britain in general, Russia is mentally stuck in the 19th century so of course they think the Great Game never ended and Britain to this day is responsible for their woes alongside Americans/Jews/Nazis/whatever
>cowadooty
nah its because of counter strike
it's half the first crimean war and half marxism
Ruskies have been bosessed with England being behind everything bad ever since the Great Game in the Czarist times.
Perfidious Albyon is always scheming against honest Russia
>Ruskies have been bosessed
MI6 and the KGB had an intense rivalry as well.
SAS does actually run circles around FSB. They used to deploy to Russia and Russia-adjacent shitholes regularly before the war and I can only imagine a good chunk of those smoooker accidents are their work.
t. knower
>British-made MANPADS
I'm sorry Starsteak, Starburst, Blowpipe and the other Javelin.
>the other Javelin.
???
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javelin_(surface-to-air_missile)
>the Javelin at home
someone took 3 blowipes and stuck them into a starstreak CLU?
more or less. they're all the same line of SAM so in true Brit fashion they just replace parts of it bit by bit and tweak the name
It's a fairly cost effective development process for this missile family anyway
The best part is that Shorts eventually went on to be part of the group that made NLAW. Ukraine has been such a playground for bong weaponry, one can almost forgive the Russians their Anglo complex
javelins were better than blowpipes but still pretty terrible. SACLOS instead of fully manual
It's the follow on from the blowpipe missile program, the precursor missile to starstreak/Martlet, the general design is the same just larger but less effective missiles than the newer martlet.
It wasn't too effective, but it did better than blowpipe so it was fieldable in small numbers, and did well enough that they kept trying to make it better and upgraded it to the current smaller design systems.
I feel the next stage of monetising warfare would be to re-issue Blowpipes, but instead of having a human try and guide the missile, you use a robot operated by Twitch Chat instead.
It would be just as effective as it was the first time around, but you can make some decent dosh out of it at the same time. Maybe we could get a Vtuber to narrate the shots as well for extra simp points?
>you use a robot operated by Twitch Chat instead
Kek
If its anything like ss13 deadchat it's going to miss everything but the thing they're aiming at.
>it's going to miss everything but the thing they're aiming at.
sounds wonderful then
>military cemetery in the suburbs of London
There's no such thing.
There's a few, but they're all ww1/2 memorials. Pretty much all bodies are burnt here in the UK unless you have a ton of money to get buried at a church.
It's incredibly expensive to do that though since high population low space etc etc.
There's certainly not a specific military grave anyway.
There's a clock tower in Hereford where the names of the dead are inscribed...
That's not what they mean by cemetery though anon. The point is the source this guy has about 33 magical bongs dying in Ukraine is as thin and stretched as his mom's gaping butthole.
I have known ukranian people who’ve moved to the UK, they integrate very fast. The UK has been training and equipping them, soon the angloization will be complete and there will be a second UK right on Russia’s doorstep. The next step is to normalise clock towers that chime constantly every hour, bongs will resound throughout the border regions. The crumpet is in the toaster, the phone box is being painted red, soon the world will see mate
Did you know that you cam get non-toasted crumpets its you go to a fancy another Cafe?
They cook them using batter and everything, blew my frickimg mind when I first heard about it
Sounds too rich for my blood
Kek
I support the anglicisation of the Ukrainian peoples, all it takes is crumpets and BigBongs, that's all you need and they're corrupted forever.
I need to try that I had no idea.
There's one such cafe in my city that I know about but they are literally always fully booked when they do crumpets, you have to sign up like six months in advance to have a chance of getting in
>TOP SECRET WARBURTON DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW!
crumpets are just pancakes with a shitload of baking powder
This is photoshopped right? No one has this kind of hairline
A true warrior's hairline, svperior yvgo genes
Bro out here looking like a Samurai.
Chairman Mao had more hair than that.
Shit dude my hair is a mess but at least I have the decency to shave my sides. Though I kinda wish it would just go so I didn't have to bother with that. I don't mine the baldness as such, it's just a hassle.
I'm pretty sure if I looked up "malding" on wikipedia I'd find that exact picture.
Agent Harris?
He loses one hair every time he gets proven wrong?
>britain is a pathetic, miserable, and useless laughingstock
>britain is singlehandedly ruining everything for russia in ukraine
choose one
is a pathetic, miserable, and useless laughingstock
correct
it just means puccia is even worse
I am allowed to want TZD and make fun of bongistanis for needing a spoon license, they are not mutually exclusive.
I need to see more crab threads, cmon brits.
They sure keep seething about something the Anglos did.
Russians have been seething about Anglos for centuries.
>Anglos wiener-block Russia in the Great Game, preventing them from taking either the valuable parts of central asia or the Ottoman empire
>Humiliate them in the Crimean War
>Bootstrapped the IJN, leading directly to Russia suffering the most embarrassing naval defeat in history and losing all credibility in the pacific
>Hate the USSR from the word go, participates in several efforts to restore the monarchy and stymie their expansion
>Signs a non-aggression pact with Germany, which the soviets feel is a knife in the back
>Churchill viewed Stalin as an untrustworthy psychopath and Churchill's influence is mostly what stops FDR from giving Stalin everything east of the Seine
>The UK is the center of anti-Soviet espionage in Europe during the cold war and joined at the hip with the US in defense and intelligence matters
>Has loudly opposed all of Russia's post-Soviet Black folkhines since then and participated in proxy wars against them
*sigh*
guess the Ajax AFV devblog is being put on hold
AGAIN
>They were good at it, and they were aggressive.
>The British Royal Navy just didn't mind confronting the Soviets.
I fail to understand why our navy hasn’t been reformed around cucking the Russians in the North Sea, it’d make way more sense than trying to project power as a blue water navy.
Well, you no longer have to with Sweden and Finland in NATO now.
>Swedes and Finns get to frick with the Russians in the Baltic/North Sea
>bongs have to bomb Yemenis for Israel
Cursed timeline
>it’d make way more sense than trying to project power as a blue water navy.
yeah, because the major threat to international trade RIGHT FRICKING NOW is the Russians and not somewhere rather hot, sandy, and distressingly familiar
It’s almost like we’re keeping an artificial nation of hypochondriac accountants afloat in a hostile desert full of sand people that want them all dead.
Pretty funny, the US was debating on quietly removing them with divers. The UK just rolls in no fricks given and blows them up. With this kind of attitude in mind, the UK for sure blew up the pipeline.
Those were twilight of the Empire days. The bongs speak softer now, because the stick is smaller. But it's still pretty big.
I say, jolly foundational show, old chap.
Bongoloides are not very smart. They just go in there like soccer hooligans doing target practice.
The US Navy probably wanted to capture those and see what level tech the Ruskies had.
Why is he seething about it I thought it was a land war?
Now that the dust has settled, was he right all along?
He is always wrong by default, so yes.
The timeframe was somewhere between Mariupol and Bakhmut so I'll give him half a point
But the claim about mild losses was wrong even then, and is fricking hilarious in hindsight
Russia had to send several divisions of its reserves to reinforce Avdiivka so hell no.
Russia won, but at what cost?
the cost of worthless convicts and ethnic minorities along with ancient tanks
>using up surplus military stock
>using up surplus churkas and buryats
wtf i love Russia now
Murz would disagree.
>And you, soldiers... die in silence.
Kino
>And you, soldiers... die in silence.
Like tears... in rain.
When is this gay getting gulaged?
When he starts calling chief monke a moron, just like girkin
Until then, he'll probably be allowed to doom and gloom. As long as he only ever complains about not enough being done rather than questioning whether the war was a good idea, that is.
>14 october 23
jesus fricking christ
bro our navies to autisitc to let carriers leave port TF you blaming us for
Be the British that Russian propaganda thinks you are
>NATO is a british operation
Can someone explain to me, an American, the excessive and absurd hateboner Russkies have for England over all other countries? I find it difficult to believe they're still malding over the Great Game worse than Operation Barbarossa
The Soviets got vengeance when they took Berlin, but the Russians have never had a clear victory over the British.
Napoleon burned Moscow and Reagan and Clinton humiliated Gorbachev and Yeltsin, but why are France and USA less hated by vatnigs than fricking Bongland? Is Operation Declare a real thing and not just spy fiction? Did MI6 really give SMERSH the ole Jamesburger? What's the fricking deal?
Napoleon burned Moscow but was still forced to flee Russia with his tail between his legs.
As for the US, the Russians generally conflate them with the UK anyways due to Anglo pride and the more schizo ones believe the UK still secretly controls the US.
USA is considered a son of Britain so to speak, being anglo, an ex-colony, and sharing interests; also the US has been openly defeated by Soviet proxies so they have that to comfort themselves with
France of course was trounced hard in WW2 and then in Vietnam and then in Algeria, so once again the Soviets have that
Damn, Russians really are pathetic lmao
>last night i james bond burger your sister
someone explain this one for me please
You're not reading it correctly, when you finally get it you will feel like an idiot for not understanding right away!
I secret agent meat pattied your sister.
I will feed you this one time newbie
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/james-bond-burger-last-night-i-x-y-your-sister
The Russians aren't salty about the French because they got to parade through the streets of Paris.
Ah, a classic.
for centuries Russians have looked at the British Empire and thought
>I coulda been a contender!!1!
then the British defeated the Russians at Crimea
then the British humiliated the Russians on their way to Tsushima
then the British helped the White Russians fight the Soviets
then the British suppressed international Communism, which made them Enemy Number One to the nascent Soviet state
then Hitler claimed that the British were wilfully unbalancing the Continental powers at every turn, which Stalin believed and retransmitted to his followers
then the British allied with the USA against the Soviets throughout the long Cold War
and hasn't stopped countering nu-Russian expansionism in the 21st century
add that all up, and the bonus multiplier: Russia has never defeated the British, and London has never fallen to an external enemy ever since William the Conqueror, nearly a millennium ago
that's A LOT of seethe to work through
Not to mention they don't like to admit that they readily accepted British money during WWII to keep them financially afloat.
They and tankies in general don't like to admit the russian war machine was built on the resources of lend lease.
Despite everything the Nazis did, Russia actually don't hate them much, in their eyes the only bad thing they did was attacking Russia
In comparison the Anglos for them are responsible for every bad thing that has ever happened to Russia, it's their israelites
I mean just look how under Putin their version of events is that Poles and Anglos basically twisted Nazi Germany's arm into invading. Actual wehraboo talking points
> Ukrainian operators
Bullshit. It was pic related
Brits don't deserve this reputation. They should work more for it
He said in English
I love that Russians kvetch about us, it makes it funnier because Bongland is finished as a country, it’s like someone being terrified of a leukaemia patient
Why do the Russians and their supporters get so rustled by the Brits?
God that took me back to jimmies general however many million years ago that was
?si=z-PfmJfZXAyITLkR
Genetic memory
Why are the Houthis so effective at sinking British ships despite not even wearing shoes?
They didn't sink a British ship
That's unironically an Iranian ship lmao
Also it was scuttled, not sunk
Same reason that Russians use /k/ to whine and shit their pants over British equipment.
The Iron Curtain -- cutting contniental Eurogay power in half -- was the Zero Sum Game strategic wet dream of Perfidious Albion since time immemorial. That led directly to nuclear proliferation (e.g. suggesting Klaus Fuchs for the Manhattan Project without vetting) and the shitstain Iron Age morons of all sorts having strategic glassing capability. It's a bit of penance in light of that, and Manchurian Corn Pop TAKING office properly scaring non-pinkos outside the United States.
It's like when the British gave some medieval rice farmers some vessels and they inflicted the most brutal beatdown in naval history at that point in time against Russia.
How many Boris Johnson's have been lost in this conflict so far? What genetic improvements will the English apply to the Boris Johnson Mk II?
>Commercial satellites
>Some Limey/ French missiles
>Ukrainian sea drones
>moronic Russians that cannot maintain a Navy
>moronic Russians' failure to understand that the Black Sea is indefensible.
Copetard crying about the British misses the whole point of reality.
This should be a lesson to morons everywhere: a small body of water is indefensible from nearby land based missiles, sea and air drones. Even in WW2 the Black Sea would be very very difficult to defend with ships due to aircraft.
If the USA gave Ukraine a few C130 with rapid dragon, then the Black Sea fleet would be destroyed in a few days at most.