>shill A >shill B
neither. MRAPs are designed to survive IEDs, yes. but it's still a mission kill and why you use those things for patrols rather than armored assaults.
They don't stop being useful. They make for better light infantry taxis than soft utility vehicles. Almost up there with some older APCs in terms of protection.
But IFVs they are not, and Ukraine has been forced to use them as such by their equipment situation.
>Who's actually in the right here?
Both.
The NAFO dog sees the value of the men inside the MRAP as being more important than the machine, if the machine protects them it has done its job.
For the Russian the machine is a tool to bring up the meat, if the meat is lost they have more, if the machine is lost the meat can't be brought up and it is a failure.
the NAFO troon is objectively right because it's western doctrine and a western vehicle. arguing otherwise would be equivalent to a westerner pretending that russian soldiers are equivalent in value to human ones.
How is Anatoly Karlin doing these days btw? Didn't that midwit zigger predict on February 25 that Kyiv would be liberated in a matter of days or so, and then wanted to NOOOOK the sky over Ukraine because he thought it would disable Starlink and that will somehow make Russia win? And then, after Kherson glorious retreat, he suddenly stopped posting about the war altogether iirc
What mine?
A UAZ-452 with a 'Z' spraypainted on the side would survive a PFM-1 mine.
You could build a Panzer-Bagger-288-Maus and I could bury its weight in explosives in the ground and atomize it.
An MRAP can survive mines better than anything else pretending to be a light tactical vehicle, that doesn't mean it's immune to them, nothing is.
>shill A
>shill B
neither. MRAPs are designed to survive IEDs, yes. but it's still a mission kill and why you use those things for patrols rather than armored assaults.
the idea that MRAPs suddenly stop being useful in a real war has always been one propagated by midwits
They don't stop being useful. They make for better light infantry taxis than soft utility vehicles. Almost up there with some older APCs in terms of protection.
But IFVs they are not, and Ukraine has been forced to use them as such by their equipment situation.
so you are saying neither is right but the top guy is righ?
resistant != immune
RWA is clinically moronic.
>Be russian
>Move to dutchland
>Refuse to integrate
>Still spout moronic russian shit
Sounds about right.
Isn't he literally israeli? His name is Kamenets or something.
Got a full name?
bratty russians need correction
>alt-right contrarians know nothing about the soldiers and military equipment they claim to idolize
it's all so tiresome.
>rwa
>alt right
AHAHAHAHA
>alt-right
Using phrases that you're unsure the meaning of is a very good way to look moronic, anon.
>Who's actually in the right here?
Both.
The NAFO dog sees the value of the men inside the MRAP as being more important than the machine, if the machine protects them it has done its job.
For the Russian the machine is a tool to bring up the meat, if the meat is lost they have more, if the machine is lost the meat can't be brought up and it is a failure.
the NAFO troon is objectively right because it's western doctrine and a western vehicle. arguing otherwise would be equivalent to a westerner pretending that russian soldiers are equivalent in value to human ones.
>Russians with autism
Does anyone know what moron Big Serge is up to? He blocked me on twitter.
How is Anatoly Karlin doing these days btw? Didn't that midwit zigger predict on February 25 that Kyiv would be liberated in a matter of days or so, and then wanted to NOOOOK the sky over Ukraine because he thought it would disable Starlink and that will somehow make Russia win? And then, after Kherson glorious retreat, he suddenly stopped posting about the war altogether iirc
he's gone mad and now believes global LGBTQIA+ is the one true authoritarian super power destined to rule.
Average /misc/troon knowledge of war and the military.
>Russians With HIV
>meme arrows on twitter
Can we glass Pidoristan already
What mine?
A UAZ-452 with a 'Z' spraypainted on the side would survive a PFM-1 mine.
You could build a Panzer-Bagger-288-Maus and I could bury its weight in explosives in the ground and atomize it.
An MRAP can survive mines better than anything else pretending to be a light tactical vehicle, that doesn't mean it's immune to them, nothing is.