The USSR was the Allies you dickhead. Katyusha was far better than nebelwefer due its it far better mobility.
The Soviet Union was clearly distinctly separate from the Western Allies. They had their own goals, didn't share technology, co-ordinate military operations or anything. Just took gibs and fought on one same enemy.
The Soviet Union was clearly part of the allies. Stalin attended conferences, had regular correspondence with allies, and Britian and US were constantly being pushed to open a second front to help the soviets.
Your arguments apply more to the Chinese, who still fought a common enemy and the allies supplied via the Burma Road, and they did coordinate.
>Your arguments apply more to the Chinese
No, the Chinese were more so in the Allied camp since they did coordinate (Chinese divisions in Burma and Allied airbases in China). Such a thing would have never happened with the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.
Britain and France had planned to bomb the Baku oil fields in 1940 and Churchill tried to start WW3 in 1945. They knew they were making a deal with the devil by working with the commies.
If they were ALLIES then why did Russians spies have to steal the atomic bomb designs, hmm? While Brits and Americans were working together on it. Your arguments are shit (no offense).
Just to help you along the way a bit, why didn't Britain and America send their air forces to Russia to bolster them up when they were getting their shit kicked in in 1941-1942, huh?
Because the fricking Russians wouldn't allowed it even if such an offer had been made. Yeah. Fricking ALLIES.
it's very much a meme weapon, meant for either super massive and wasteful bombardment with hundreds of trucks or a sophisticated light show and fireworks that might help illiterate starving conscripts amass another human wave with more confidence
Even a moron should see that this was meant to optimize shrapnell so it detonates a few inches above ground where a traditional location would have a much smaller shrapnel range
That and also xylophone on truck chassis, lsm-r ships, bong towed land mattress, all of that was used in combat by allies just not as much as soviet mlrs
neither in practical sense
both are only usable at all against very static targets that are not hiding under bunkers
they have terrible accuracy and barrages dont mean shit if its not actually displacing any infantry or equipment, theyre elaborate noise makers that scare people at that point
russia was part of the allies
/thread
The Soviet Union was clearly distinctly separate from the Western Allies. They had their own goals, didn't share technology, co-ordinate military operations or anything. Just took gibs and fought on one same enemy.
The Soviet Union was clearly part of the allies. Stalin attended conferences, had regular correspondence with allies, and Britian and US were constantly being pushed to open a second front to help the soviets.
Your arguments apply more to the Chinese, who still fought a common enemy and the allies supplied via the Burma Road, and they did coordinate.
>Your arguments apply more to the Chinese
No, the Chinese were more so in the Allied camp since they did coordinate (Chinese divisions in Burma and Allied airbases in China). Such a thing would have never happened with the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.
Britain and France had planned to bomb the Baku oil fields in 1940 and Churchill tried to start WW3 in 1945. They knew they were making a deal with the devil by working with the commies.
If they were ALLIES then why did Russians spies have to steal the atomic bomb designs, hmm? While Brits and Americans were working together on it. Your arguments are shit (no offense).
What fricking crack are you smoking, or are you just a contaraion moronic
Just read my arguments and Think bro.
Yes, they fought on the same side but calling Britain and America + The Soviet Union THE ALLIES is a joke.
Just to help you along the way a bit, why didn't Britain and America send their air forces to Russia to bolster them up when they were getting their shit kicked in in 1941-1942, huh?
Because the fricking Russians wouldn't allowed it even if such an offer had been made. Yeah. Fricking ALLIES.
Just accept you're a moron. Russia wasn't an ally of the West in any meaningful sense of the word. Anything else is just Cold War Soviet propaganda.
>didn't co-ordinate military operations
except when they let the RAF sink German capital ships from their own air bases
The USSR was the Allies you dickhead. Katyusha was far better than nebelwefer due its it far better mobility.
Katyushka was very inaccurate though. By '45 it had become largely ineffective.
It was, but it was cheap and mobile enough to field in large numbers to make up for its accuracy, so it was an effective weapon.
it's very much a meme weapon, meant for either super massive and wasteful bombardment with hundreds of trucks or a sophisticated light show and fireworks that might help illiterate starving conscripts amass another human wave with more confidence
Nebelwerfer rockets are pure German autism.
>behold meine raketen designen Hans. I haff put ze rocket motor in front of ze warhead. Tis gut ya?
Even a moron should see that this was meant to optimize shrapnell so it detonates a few inches above ground where a traditional location would have a much smaller shrapnel range
And it worked so well they used conventional non-moronic rockets for their follow on designs.
Because we were massively superior
>why didn't the allies have anything on par?
What, like the Sherman Calliope?
Was that ever actually used.
That and also xylophone on truck chassis, lsm-r ships, bong towed land mattress, all of that was used in combat by allies just not as much as soviet mlrs
One of those is still in use
neither in practical sense
both are only usable at all against very static targets that are not hiding under bunkers
they have terrible accuracy and barrages dont mean shit if its not actually displacing any infantry or equipment, theyre elaborate noise makers that scare people at that point
The USN had a dozen arsenal ships with 300 rocket rails apiece to support amphibious landings.