What is the reasoning behind a 30mm auto cannon on an IFV?

What is the reasoning behind a 30mm auto cannon on an IFV? Seems like it would add expense and decrease usable internal volume in order fill a role outside of the APCs jurisdiction. the remote operated .50 would be much cheaper and wouldn’t take up space inside the vehicle. Slap an ATGM on top for self defense against armored vehicles

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the reasoning behind a 30mm auto cannon on an IFV?
    I meant to say APC not IFV

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Because an IFV isn't an APC you silly goose.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      That’s what I’m getting at. The Stryker is not an IFV despite my fudge in the OP. It’s an APC and some of them have an unmanned 30mm turret

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It becomes an IFV when you add the 30mm. Unless you use something awful like a RARDEN and it can only feed from 3 round clips. Then it's just an apc with extra weight.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Hello anti warriortard false flag

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        the 30mm Stryker is a toned-down replacement for the Stryker MGS, which was terrible.
        It's organic fire support for Stryker brigades that fits in with their logistics chain.

        >slap an ATGM on top
        infantry brigades already carry ATGMs. What they don't have is something that can cheaply dismantle a brick building from 1000 meters away, quickly pop enemy APCs, or clear trenches out with airburst ammunition while still carrying hundreds of rounds.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Warriortard tries subtlety
    Kek why even bother.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I get that this is the standard insult nowadays but my thread has nothing to do with the warrior IFV. I’m asking why the Stryker got a 30mm cannon despite being an APC

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >have MGS, a 120mm cannon
        >soldiers absolutely love it but it's a pain in the ass to maintain and super expensive
        >get rid of MGS
        >soldiers now very sad
        >give them 30mm autocannon so they can at least get SOME dakka
        This complicated?

        Utility against light vehicles, low flying helis, and targets in defilade. 30mm is also large enough to utilize more exotic munition types such as airburst, and an explosive charge that is a bit more than just a firecracker.

        Dunno if Dragoon has it but M2s have APFSDS rounds for their guns. 30mm is about the point at which that becomes both feasible and worth investing in.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nigel what happened to you? We were having so much fun in the JASSM thread but you seemed to have gone quiet after your BTFOing

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know who you think you're talking to but all I do is call out your threads and lurk.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You need to work on your identification skills

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the dragoon is meant to add some fire support to a stryker brigade

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Utility against light vehicles, low flying helis, and targets in defilade. 30mm is also large enough to utilize more exotic munition types such as airburst, and an explosive charge that is a bit more than just a firecracker.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >30mm + ATGM
    >outside jurisdiction of an APC
    congratulations, you have figured out what an IFV is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      But it’s wheeled!

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        so?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          8x8 AFVs can and are used by some countries to fulfill the IFV role, but that doesn't make them a IFV. Pic related: Western (accepted) standard of IFV.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The entire point of that turret is that it doesn't take up interior volume

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The entire point of your mom is to get drunk off beer and fuel my burp fetish

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Stryker Dragoon is the pinnacle of dogshit. Look at it collapsing under its own weight at the back, how did the US frick up a fairly decent apc?
    I get they needed a more protected vehicle than the Bradley but this is a step too far.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's like 19 tons, the LAV III chassis can handle that and LAV IIIs with applique armor weight about that, maybe a bit more

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that one must be accelerating or something they sit level in every other pic I've seen. also why are you bring up the bradley? this is replacing the mgs strykers because they beat themselves to death and the dragoon can carry infantry as well

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >This post upsets me so I will cope with cope
    Yeah. Move along tourist.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The post had no basis in reality because you can’t tell that the Stryker is overtaxed by looking at the picture and the Bradley is far better protected than the Stryker

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Bradley is far better protected than the Stryker
        >Gets replaced in Iraq by Stryker because it kept getting rekt and posted on the Internet
        Yeah

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It was replaced by the MRAP for coin operations. Modern Bradley has better than styrker by a wide margin

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Stryker Dragoon is the pinnacle of dogshit. Look at it collapsing under its own weight at the back, how did the US frick up a fairly decent apc?
      I get they needed a more protected vehicle than the Bradley but this is a step too far.

      If you think a Stryker is more protected than a Bradley then you're the tourist.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off, Pierre.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >.50 (...)wouldn’t take up space inside the vehicle
    remotely operated 30mm autocanon wont take much internal space either

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *