Was this real or was it just a concept?

Was this real or was it just a concept?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Deploying this would immediately legitimize targeting civilian infrastructure so I certainly hope nothing came of it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      As if the US doesn't already engage in total war.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        God, i fricking wish

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          god damn this

          america hamstrings its self so fricking hard not to look mean on the global scale.

          we should total war or nothing so we can be the sleeping giant

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine believing this. Say what you will about our conventional military, but we have completely lost the propaganda war, and the proof is the fact that there are Americans that belive this.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >we
          You got a mouse in your pocket?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            *The* mouse.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >propaganda war
          Echo chambers form easily and places like this attract stunted, primarily white/mixed/indian/anglosphere, primarily male, primarily mid 20s, primarily single or in unstable relationships individuals. I wouldn't take anything here seriously. The people from /misc/ (who are at best fricking weird) coming here to raid make it even harder to discern real posters as half of them are fake.

          Try and CWIS a volley of ASMs at close range.

          Motherfricker if you knew anything you'd know that a 5 inch gun can blow straight through the hull of a modern US warship. You do not need cruise missiles, just pack an artillery piece (say a ex-soviet D-20) in a container and fire when the ship comes alongside.

          That being said, you're moronic because US ships don't fricking do that. You are being called stupid for a reason.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >a 5 inch gun can blow straight through the hull of a modern US warship
            Try a fiberglass drone.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I mean it makes sense, making ships giga-armored would make them slow as frick. How the drone managed to get there in the first place is another question.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Echo chambers
            Go ask your average college student what they think of America's war policies right now. Echo chambers are everywhere, and almost everyone is in one. That's how we lost - defeat in detail.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >we have completely lost the propaganda war
          Propaganda was best during the ‘speak softly and carry a big stick’ era.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          how is it propaganda when the US routinely targets civilians just to lower morale?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Targetting civilians != total war. No industrial nation engaged in total war since WW2

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >american education

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >ROE in GWOT
        >"Dont fire unless fired upon."
        >As if the US doesnt already engage in total war.

        Get checked for brain amoebas.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You think? Let me check. Seems that chinkland and vatnikistan still exist, huh. I guess not yet.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you're still able to connect to the internet with a computer powered by your local electric grid so I don't think we're at that stage yet moron-kun

        When the US decides its time for total war you're going to know in about 30 minutes or less.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I wish

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The ones weve seen are probably real, but theyre also probably the only ones that existed. Honestly its a smart idea, people meme on the pallets thing but having your missile systems straight up built into containers is logistically sold and will probably be copied.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Palletized missile boxes are a smart idea, concealing them as civilian shipping containers is moronic turdie mentality

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed-martin/rms/documents/naval-launchers-and-munitions/Mk70_Product_Card.pdf

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This would probably cause even more justification on destroying enemy shipping.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Would be neat to see one that can launch horizontally when they are broadside a US Navy ship attempting to world police stuff.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what a massively moronic idea

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Try and CWIS a volley of ASMs at close range.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're massively moronic.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        A dhow could probably launch a torpedo or two and would make the navy a lot more paranoid about getting anywhere near congested waters.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Is this the designated shitskin fantasy thread or something?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >glug glug glug

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Aiieeeeeee

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >females
              >the most destructive force in the known universe

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Shitskins are really into the whole "Attack you while I'm dressed as a civilian" thing.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Sean Naylor has entered the chat

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Yes they are subhumans with no morals who think that international laws or treaties are signs of weakness

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Boarding actions are done by helicopters or small boats you dumbass.

          https://i.imgur.com/7hvbdyS.png

          >a 5 inch gun can blow straight through the hull of a modern US warship
          Try a fiberglass drone.

          I hope they try. Not this bullshit one ballistic missile at a time stuff, a proper attack.

          >Echo chambers
          Go ask your average college student what they think of America's war policies right now. Echo chambers are everywhere, and almost everyone is in one. That's how we lost - defeat in detail.

          Bro half of the people here are not American and American politics, despite being the majority of online discussion, do not actually matter that much. Some college kid in the US discovering that Yemen has a insurgent problem and Iran likes to fund said insurgents is not a big event. It happens, and has happened, continuously for all of history.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >helicopters

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Ok, you've shot at the helicopter and attracted the attention of US navy. What now, genius?

              You're so fricking stupid even inbred shitskin IQ doesn't cut it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Impossible. American helicopters are invisible.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >more moronic ESL babble

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >American politics, despite being the majority of online discussion, do not actually matter that much
            Domestic opinion matters a LOT to military effectiveness. The next foreign war the U.S. is involved in, like all wars fought by democracies, is going to be won or lost by the public's desire to fight it.
            Since it falls on the shoulders of the U.S. to deal with the Houthi problem and protect the global economy (and all those national economies that depend on it), and because combat effectiveness was never in question and the only questionable factor is the aforementioned public will, American public opinion is in fact THE deciding factor in how this conflict plays out.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >protect the global economy
              Shipping companies were asked not to pass if they are in transit to Israel.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                What does this have to do with indiscriminate attacks on commercial shipping?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >indiscriminate

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. Now seethe, shitskin.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Bro you didn't have a fricking clue what was going on in this region or the various factors at play before this became a major news topic. The US has been murdering terrorists in this area for the last 2 decades, more if you include the stuff before 2001. This is not something that can be changed by the angry tweets of some people, and you need to seriously reexamine your thinking if you believe this is the case.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >This is not something that can be changed by the angry tweets of some people
                Angry tweets are a symptom of public opinion, which politicians take into account when deciding on policy, especially when a major election is coming up. Once a topic becomes a talking point, it does in fact start to influence policy. I don't see the Houthi issue specifically there yet, but general topics like non-interventionism are hugely popular right now and stand to make a difference in our handling of that conflict.
                >Bro you didn't have a fricking clue what was going on in this region or the various factors at play before this became a major news topic.
                Correct. See above.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Angry tweets are a symptom of public opinion, which politicians take into account when deciding on policy
                Holy frick no.

                >I don't see the Houthi issue specifically there yet, but general topics like non-interventionism are hugely popular right now and stand to make a difference in our handling of that conflict.
                This is straying dangerously into political shit.

                >Correct.
                Thank you. You should research what CENTCOM and AFRICOM have been doing for years. These types of attacks on various insurgent groups are handled by the military and lower levels of government and are apolitical, they aren't something (with a few exceptions) that the President is actively involved in. A serious change in this would involve political frickery so extreme that cries of treason would begin to be thrown around. Even Trump would be unable to do it.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're thinking too short term. The lower-level day-to-day low-intensity shit that goes on right now is a result of a long-term policy implemented by previous administrations, based on longstanding political and military realities. If this kind of shit starts happening in a new region, or if the conflict in this region escalates further, the president may at some point need to approve whatever new action is taken, and those political and military realities may have changed in the preceding decades.
                It's the job of the democratic government to set overarching strategic goals for the military, and in the future those goals may no longer include "protect global shipping" or "stabilize the middle east."

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >It's the job of the democratic government to set overarching strategic goals for the military, and in the future those goals may no longer include "protect global shipping" or "stabilize the middle east."
                Oh, I wasn't aware I was talking with a /misc/ poster. No anon the US government is not going to stop protecting international shipping. Stop coping. I assume your claims that the "public opinion" in the US is turning towards non-interventionism comes from /misc/ also?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It took me under a minute to google this and make this graphic. Please don't be so confidently wrong about things that are so easily verifiable.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I see you failed statistics.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Care to elaborate?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                NTA but data is trash and series too short.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >implying they wouldn't just do that anyway

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    K-club? who knows.
    Mk-70 VLS? yes.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Okay, you've achieved absolutely nothing and your sailors are meeting mohammed in hell, what's your next move?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Sorry would you like me to condense it into a tiktok with a black girl twerking you disgusting zoomer frick?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      no cap fr

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    With Russia it's always a meme.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No women are still just hypothetical technology.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it was misunderstood by morons. intermodal transport is convenient, it was never about
    >oh ehm gee were gonna super sneaky a
    >FRICKING UNARMED MERCHANTMAN INTO COMBAT
    it was about being able to buy 5 53' intermodal containers and have an anti-ship battery that you can move around with shit you already have and people you already have trained.
    the problem is that nobody online has a fricking brain.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You know what's even more convenient than a shipping container? A traditional TEL with wheels and an engine so you can just drive it around. Those caught on half a century ago, and the anti-shipping container exists only in promotional material. Huh.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the turdies that Russia advertises to don't have TELs you fricking stupid monkey moron.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Denmark has a couple of smaller versions on paper. They also have a vorking minelayer container which if anything is even sneakier.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't this part of the plot in Ace Combat 7?

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >heh what if we disguise our military personnel as civilians
    China brags about doing the same shit too. And the entire middle east of course. Theres a reason everyone else considers its a war crime, all it does is force your enemy to slaughter civilians to survive, and no nation that actually cares about its people would intentionally make them targets. Though i guess the loss of face they'd suffer in exchange for a few meaningless civilian lives would be an acceptable exchange for Russians, Chinks, and muslims.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >justifies getting your entire trade fleet clapped
    5d chess wizard move

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Thirdies are obsessed with the idea of The Big Sucker Punch. They think that if they can just do one big surprise attack, then they will completely break the will of these soft, decadent westerners who will be too demoralized to fight back. Problem is, that idea is moronic.
    For one, it's been tried before. The Japanese were the only ones who came anywhere close to succeeding, and all it earned them was two nukes to the face and being permanently occupied by the US military. As for the best case scenario, look at the 9/11 attacks. All that does is get you killed, tens of thousands of your own countrymen killed, and your nation occupied for two decades. That's only a fair trade if you value the lives of Americans at twenty times the value of your own (which, to be fair, we do too), but in that case you've lost before you even started.
    Second, it just doesn't make sense on its face. Even if you did succeed in a massive attack, you'll never be able to get more than a tiny fraction of the US's military power. Are you going to take out all of their allies too? Why would the US with its literal trillions of dollars worth of military equipment say "These broke brown people are just too strong! We'll never be able to beat them after this one-off surprise attack that they definitely can't do again! Better just let them get away with it I guess"? Why wouldn't they immediately respond with an overwhelming retaliation like they've done literally every time this has been tried in the past?
    Basically, the Big Sucker Punch only makes sense if you're a low IQ thirdie with no knowledge of the past and no concept of the future. They'll keep doing it too because they don't learn. Even now they still talk about it like it'll work. Hypersonic meme missiles, these surprise spicy shipping containers, or what have you. They're all just the next Big Sucker Punch that will totally break the will of the west and not just get several thousand tons of high explosive shoved up your ass.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You have to consider at first only those nations who have an ability to make tactical nukes and then subsequently install such devices in either small ballistic missiles or cruise missiles.

    All of those nations with such a capability have absolutely tested and tried out that kind of option. Come on, it's just a simple engineering project with a budget of, say 2 million USD, if coming from national defense funding.

    The launcher is already there, the missile is already there, control and command is already there. Now fit it all in a standard 40' foot ocean container.

    Absolutely they all tried it. I would have tried it if I was in that position.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *