Was the hyperburst a good concept or a gimmick?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was fun in BF3 and BF4 so yeh

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    would've made sense in the hands of competent soldiers

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would climb through glass to get one of these rifles. Although I wonder why Russia never adopted it and instead went with the AK12

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Look at one disassembled

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      My guess: Too expensive, not as reliable, only small improvement in effectiveness.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It was never a serious contender and cost 3x as much as an AK anyway.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      they forgot the main users for these are high school graduates not engineers

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The mechanical complexity would be a motherfricker for a country with an actually functional MIC, let alone one that can't even build a competent AK anymore.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Total gimmick. Killing people or penetrating armor is a caliber concern. If one round didn't kill somebody or pen a plate, another round right behind it wont matter much; you should be using a different round. Hyperburst is an overcomplicated solution to having the wrong round for the job.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You tell me.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      link to publication?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        1982 ACR trials

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a video of Larry Snickers shooting one. The shots do seem to group within a couple inches, but he's only shooting at 20m. I doubt it would meaningfully affect your hit probability at longer distances.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot the link

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Was never about hit probability, it was a ghetto way to try and defeat early armor by putting two rounds extremely close to each other extremely quickly.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        It still sounds like a good way to frick someone up

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Modern armor is rated against multiple strikes within the same area, so not really.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >sounds like

          Gee, Wally, if it sounds good it must BE good so no need to bother reading those silly tests because feels are science.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Whelp, then it doesn't work anyway since even 20m leads to dispersion

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Within a couple of inches is close enough. NIJ standards specify that individual shots aren't within 2 inches of each other when doing testing for level 3 rating. Yea, it's useless at big distances, but for crude armor piercing in close quarters, where an instant stop matters for more, it's like it's creator, Gudenov, in theory at least.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            NIJ standards are intended for laboratory conditions that excluse any possible outliers and specify the minimum passing grade similar to milspec, not the actual perfromance of the armor or the situations it's used in.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Correct, but the fact that the AN-94 rounds are impacting within the distance specified by NIJ standards is strong evidence that it increases the odds of a penetration, especially against early armor which wasn't as well designed to withstand multiple hits.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it wasn't Black person.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it wasn't you fricking genetic deficit, it was for hit probability. Nobody back then was planning around body armor and even then stacking 2 shots on one point wouldn't do anything

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Absolute gimmick, but it's always fun in vidya.

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    When the FRICK are we getting an AN-94 Krink?

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    2 round burst is always highly sexual

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    No

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    i unironically think that m16 with full auto lower and long buffer tube and muzzle breake would perform very similiarly but without steel cables inside

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *