Umm bros I've been tasked with making this out of wood. It will be two layers, the grey and the orange. Probably 6mm mdf
Now here's the problem, I'm a moronic. How do i figure out the angles and the width and all that shit? The only measurement i know is from bottom to top must be 100cm
Scale the image to height = 100
Measure the width and angles
???
Profit
This was my thinking too tbh, seems like a pain in the ass. Was hoping the was a pencil and paper way to do it
Well you can also print it to roughly 10cm height and then use a ruler and protractor, but it's obviously far easier to do on PC.
>How do i figure out the angles
It’s an equilateral triangle. All the angles are 60deg.
> and the width and all that shit?
Make a stencil out of cardboard to see what looks visually appealing, you could also count pixels and then scale upwards to 100cm height. Basically print the frickin thing then do math with a ruler.
>all the angles are 60deg.
You sure about that, boss?
>do math
>Was hoping the was a pencil and paper way to do it
ngmi
All triangles have 180 degrees in them. An equilateral triangle will have 60 degrees between each leg. 60+60+60=180.
Thank you Professor Science, now do parallelograms like pic related taken directly from OPs image.
It's a rectangle with two right angle triangles attached. The top and bottom are the same length, just cut the correct angle
>It's a rectangle with two right angle triangles attached.
Holy kek, the cope here is absurd.
Again, there are NO right angles anywhere in the original image or the paralellogram shown.
Any "rectangles" or "right angle triangles" are purely imaginary a d in support of attempts at backpedalling...not to mention that if they weren't then those too would lay bare the moronation behind the claim that
> All the angles are 60deg.
One could claim that the parallelograms are made up of two identical scalene triangles aa shown in picrel and they would be no less imaginary than your rectangle and right angle triangles.
PS even if you accept that cope, two out of the three angles in those imaginary right angle triangles would not be 60° angles.
You are unfathomably moronic just so you know
Those are parallel with the outside triangle. I'll leave it as an exercise for you to guess what the angles will be that are parallel to a known angle. Holy shit you're moronic.
KEK
None of your blather changes the fact that this-
>All the angles are 60deg.
-is a factually incorrect statement regarding the image in question which is made up of three parallelograms and one six sided polygon.
They are certainly arranged to resemble a (truncated) equilateral triangle but there are quite literally NO equilateral triangles in that image.
> I'll leave it as an exercise for you to guess what the angles will be that are parallel to a known angle.
I don't need to guess because I know that the sum of the angles of a quadrilateral like the paralellograms in the OPs image always adds up to 360°, and 4×60 does not= 360...not even when two of the angles in question actually *are* 60°.
Sorry this is happening to you.
I can almost smell the autistic rage from this post. The parallelograms are at a 60 degree angle.
Literally every angle in OPs pic is either 0 or 60 degrees. Imagine acting this smug and autistic over such a moronic topic. Real high IQ you got there bud
*Every angle that matters
>Literally every angle in OPs pic is either 0 or 60 degrees
>literally
>0 degrees
I can almost smell the seething moronation coming off this post
The concept of zero is a pretty old idea anon. I'm sure even if you have the touch of tism you can still understand it if you try hard enough. You still suck at trolling though. I'm not even mad. I'm laughing.
Please post an illustration of a 0° angle
If you can figure out how to draw a line that is at 10 degrees then you should be able to draw a line at zero degrees.
Angles are formed by two lines meeting at a common endpoint, not one line.
That's why they draw the little dot or circle at the end of it, for morons like you
Still waiting for that illustration of a 0° angle.
Shouldn't be hard for a smart guy like you to come up with one.
Bonus points for showing where the 0° angles lie on the OPs image.
what now loser?!
_
Draw a 1800 line and cut it in half
180 degree
Well as know the height and we know the bottom left angle, so we can figure the left hypotenuse, we can do the same for the left. With those figured we know the bottom length too. Now just cut everything to size
another fine example of diy.
Do it yourself
I'd say just get in touch with Rilion Gracie and ask them for the specifications for their logo since you've apparently been asked to reproduce it.
https://www.riliongracie.com/
Here autismo...
Thanks. What about lengths and widths too? :^)
Oh so you want me to do it for you in its entirety? Nah, get fricked.
Do one section of it start me off
cad that image
Cardboard assisted design
Imagine if there was a device to measure and draw angles.
Miss me with that shit
This whole thread hurts my brain. Drop the in image file in your fav laser, press start
What the frick are you talking about
My advice, is to take this picture, and import it into a cad software. Then scale it to 100cm from top to bottom, and trace everything into the cad software from the stencil.
From this, you should be able to work out the angles, and then work on a 2nd draft that corrects for everything with appropriate constraints.
Good luck moron.
Bottom layer
I drew it onto the table as a rough guide, so angles are 60 so i set the saw to 30
Layer 2, 15mm small each side
Now to join the bottom right pieces, sand, champer and paint
I'll do the rest tomorrow
I'll update if thread alive
wow, OP wasnt a gay today and actually competently did a project
:^)
I frick up the center top and bottom. I centered for full triangle but forgot the tip was cut off the top. But i glued it on like a c**t so that's that.
Very nice for your first try, anon. Now get back in there and fix the blunders so you can sleep at night.
It's actually too low ffs arrrrrrrh!
Frick it i told him I'm going in tomorrow to cut a few inches off the top, i can't let anyone see that
That's better anyway. Thanks for the help getting started
That's better anyway. Thanks for the help getting started
Definitely looks better
Looks cool dude
Lol, it would look better with the top margin identical to the pic you posted that had the actual top cropped out of the frame.
Now it looks too low with the top and bottom margins identical and that panel area with nothing in it
Yes but i fricked up, i couldn't cut the desk any lower either.
Cheers
Not that anyone cares but it went down well, everyone very impressed with it, they didn't realise it would look so good
What does the G stand for?
Gracie
More like gaycie, right?
Seems so simple but it looks so good. Very nice. It's good to see some projects on this board again
I like it
When making a sign or layout like that it's actually better to have slightly more space on the bottom than the top because the extra visual weight creates a more stable look than dead centering. Same principle is used when cutting mats for framed pictures...
it's not a hard and fast rule, but usually looks better and especially so when a graphic element's visual weight is less evenly distributed and not vertically symmetrical like that symbol or a capital A.
Looks good.
It looks better than the logo they gave you
Speed square, saw, pencil, cut. Be a big boy.