>Ukie forces have broken out of their beachhead across the Dnipro and have taken the town of Dachi forcing Russian forces in the area to fall back ...

>Ukie forces have broken out of their beachhead across the Dnipro and have taken the town of Dachi forcing Russian forces in the area to fall back behind the Konka River

what the FRICK is Russia doing?

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

LifeStraw Water Filter for Hiking and Preparedness

250 Piece Survival Gear First Aid Kit

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Twitter offensive. Wait for actual information and not social media experts' attempts at being the first to call it.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Its a semi feint

    Something to get the russians to panic and redeploy their defenses

    Could develop into slmething serious if the russian respknse isnt quick tho

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Its a semi feint
      I don't buy it. For a feint to be effective you need to be able to withdraw quickly and easily once it's accomplished its purpose. It doesn't seem like withdrawing will be easy with a huge river to cross, potentially under fire. If there really are significant Ukie troops on the left bank of the river the easiest way out is through at this point.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >For a feint to be effective you need to be able to withdraw quickly and easily once it's accomplished its purpose.
        Or you just need to send over troops you view as entirely disposable. That's pretty much all of them for Ukraine

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          leave vatBlack person

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There is no panic in Oleshky.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Seems like a win win either way. If it's fake and Russia doesn't react they can expand their hold, but if it's fake but Russia still reacts then that can enable them to push through Zaporizhia.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeahits a 100% win either way, just saying if this turns out to be a serious push that russia cant hold back then, wars gonna be over real soon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even if this isn't the main push, the fact that they might have been able to secure such a large beachhead on the Russian side is a serious achievement in itself and if they can fortify it against counter attack, it gives them another potential way of pushing south with out having to smash through the main Russian defences that they have been preparing for the last few months in Zaporizhzhia.
      With a lot of the elite Russian forces being bogged down assaulting Bakhmut, Avdiivka and Vuhledar, it'll be down to whatever's left of the regular army and the mobiks to fend off the Ukies in this direction for the next few days at least.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming what you're saying is true (probably not), it's the same as kharkiv, russia's defence once again is hollowed out from all the failed offensive

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >break through the Dnepr
    >now you're in the same position as the Russian were in Kherson
    >million waves of Russian backlimes rain down on you
    GENIUS PLAY FROM UKROPS HAIL ZELENSKY!!!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >break through the Dnepr
      >now you're in the same position as the Russian were in Kherson
      >million waves of Russian backlimes rain down on you
      >Start your offensive in the East now that Russia expended effort against a feint

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You do realize that Russia has enough forces to defend Kherson and crush the Ukie offensive, right?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Is this another gesture of goodwill in the making?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If they did, neither the Kherson retreat nor the Kharkiv collapse would have happened.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The Kherson retreat happened because they forces there were cut off and couldn't be reinforced anymore. They did have enough forces to defend it, they didn't have supplies. None of the othrr frontline areas have this kind of problem.
            Kharkiv was a consequence if the disastrous first part of the war, the Russian forces there were half-destroyed LDPR militias, both undermanned and underequipped. Since then Russia conscripted hundreds of thousands of people. They outnumber Ukrainians in every area.
            Neither of these two scenarios could happen again, and Ukraine is extremely disadvantaged in Kherson. They can't beat Russia there, it won't be good enough for a feint either. They are there for weeks now and Russia just shrugs and ignores them.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >They are there for weeks now and Russia just shrugs and ignores them.
              Why?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They don't see them as a threat? If Ukrainians really try to attack there then it's just some easy kills for the Russians.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Why isn't Russia defending its new borders?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Why?
                Because the ukrainians are only claiming to be there, without the difficulties of actually, you know, being there. Very ukrainian of them.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Because the ukrainians are only claiming to be there
                The first sources to share this news were Russian telegram channels lmao.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >the Russian forces there were half-destroyed LDPR militias, both undermanned and underequipped
              Ah yes. The 1st Guards Tank Army, the notoriously weak, undermanned and underequipped unit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, it was masterful tactician move to deploy the weakest unit to close the northern part of big Donbass salient.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not a vatnig, I don't care about these shitty memes. The 1st tank army was destroyed in Kiev, it was only in Kharkov in name. The Russians though Kharkov was an easy post where they could put their battered units, they were wrong.
                The point is, the Kiev feint didn't happen again, the casulties went down, the Russian army has been reinforced with meat since then, they are entrenched everywhere and a scenario like Kharkiv where they get blindsided like that cannot happen again. It's just how it is.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >The 1st tank army was destroyed in Kiev, it was only in Kharkov in name

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >stupid say it was only LDPR militia there
                >literally not a single LDPR unit was present at the Battle of Kharkiv
                >literally 2 (TWO) Guard Army units were there
                Lmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Then why were there all those T-80s that were captured in Kharkiv? Were they just parked there, waiting for new crews?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                zigger the captured tanks literally jumped by hundreds in kharkiv, frick off

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm not a vatnig
                And yet you continously talk like one.

                >The 1st tank army was destroyed in Kiev,
                1st Guards was never employed anywhere near Kyiv, you lying sack of shit.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Kyiv
                it's Kyeeeeeeeeeeeef chudlord! respect ukrainian pronouns!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Nooooo you can't call something by it's real name you have to use it's commie name

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm not a vatnig
                >"Kharkov"
                Sure thing, budski.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You're right. It's Harkov.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it was only in Kharkov in name
                They abandoned over 100 tanks around Izyum lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Exactly, it was only there in name cause they abandoned all their tanks

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >scenario like Kharkiv where they get blindsided like that cannot happen again
                Someone Screenshot this i ive it the vatnik-approved 2 weeks before he is proven wrong.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                From when is that? Now he looks much thinner!

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                1st guards tank has been ripped to pieces, it unironically is weak undermanned and underequipped.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it was punished by being reformed with T-64s instead of T-80Us
                and it probably lost the Guards rank, at least informally.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Ah yes. The famously undermanned and under-equipped 1st Guards Tank Army, 20th Guards Combined Arms Army, 6th Combined Arms Army and 14th Army Corps. There literally wasn't any LDPR units involved.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Honestly, they were undermanned, but definitely not underequipped. They left lots of cool stuff behind while running. Not so many artillery units, unfortunately, but enough tanks and IFVs in pretty decent condition.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >stupid say it was only LDPR militia there
                >literally not a single LDPR unit was present at the Battle of Kharkiv
                >literally 2 (TWO) Guard Army units were there
                Lmaaaaaaaaaaaaaaao

                >why yes I believe every single '"""fact"""" Ukrainian propaganda shits out

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yes anon that's why the 4th guards tank division was notable in that it mostly used t-80u tanks, one of the only units in the entire russian army at the time to use them an
                92 T-80U:(1, destroyed) (2, destroyed) (3, destroyed) (4, destroyed) (5, abandoned and later destroyed) (6, destroyed) (7, destroyed) (8, destroyed) (9, and 10, destroyed) (11, destroyed) (12, destroyed) (13, destroyed) (14, destroyed)(15, destroyed)(16, destroyed) (17, destroyed)(18, destroyed)(19, destroyed)(20, destroyed) (21, destroyed) (22, destroyed) (23, destroyed) (24, destroyed) (25, destroyed) (26, destroyed) (27, destroyed)(28, destroyed) (29, destroyed)(30, destroyed)(31, destroyed)(32, destroyed)(33, abandoned and destroyed)(34, abandoned and destroyed)(35, destroyed) (36, destroyed) (37, destroyed) (1, damaged)(2, damaged)(1, abandoned)(2, abandoned)(3, abandoned) (4, abandoned) (5

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >one of the only units in the entire russian army at the time to use them
                Proof?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the shill/shitposter is now denying common knowledge
                https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/russian-forces-in-the-western-military-district.pdf

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >the rusnig cries out ‘proof’ as he spews bullshit

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Ukies start using himars and artillery at increased rates on a front
              >Russia can't resupply like in Kherson
              >Forced to fall back
              Why do you think a river made that much if a difference? During mud seasons the mud acts like a river in between the road bridges for logistics anon.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              > the Russian forces there were half-destroyed LDPR militias

              The Russian forces there were FIRST GUARDS TANK ARMY.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >the Russian forces there were half-destroyed LDPR militias, both undermanned and underequipped
              objectively untrue, jesus christ is there a single vatnik who isn't a drooling moron?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >jesus christ is there a single vatnik who isn't a drooling moron?
                Well, the "PrepHole Shitposting Directorate" id staffed entirely by those juuuuuust smart enough to qualify as drooling morons. Those that are too weetodded to post here are assigned to advise Shiogu and Gerasimov.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Russia has enough forces to defend Kherson and crush the Ukie offensive
          We will have to see but so far Russia isn't making it look like it.
          The winter offensive was a failure that cost them large quantities of men, vehicles and munitions. Russia sources from Wagner to mil bloggers can't stop complaining about the shell famine. At the same time over the past weeks Russia has used every last of their diplomatic favors to get their friends from Lula to Lukashenko to the Chinese to start screeching about how the US mustn't allow Ukraine to go on offensive.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Don't forget the clear agitprop to the same effect. "Oh no NATO bros, Ukraine doesn't have enough of this that and another! We can't go on an offensive NOoooOW!"

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The russians have shown that with a bit of pressure that isn't a pitched battle of their choosing their lines will collapse into a panicky rout. Given that its been six months or so since their mobilization and they've chosen to send many of their best troops into the meat grinder at bakhmut for some reason I don't think it will be any different this time. This beachhead of theirs isn't even that remote, its right across the river from Kherson. The russians must have pulled nearly all of the troops to another sector after giving up kherson assuming that the river would be enough.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They had more than enough forces to stop the Kharkiv offensive as well.
          And instead managed to loose not just territory but an entire army corps.
          So we can't be absolutely sure about anything.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Didn't they have enough forces to take Kiev in 3 days? How did that work out for you? Just wait 61 more weeks!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Eyebrow status?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Everybrow knows everything

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Just slightly raised, gloves however are coming off

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Entering low earth orbit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They had enough forces to take the whole country a year ago but that didnt happen either

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Except that is either an ignorant statement, fascetious statement, or just moronic statement.

            Given how you shills operate, it's probably a mix of all three.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Fascetious. Moreso just repeating what the putin shills said at the time

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, Russian fanboys have plenty of tards too. Those who can actually think, knew 200000-400000 troops was going to be a risky bet.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          May we see them?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's obvious that the Ukrainian counter offensive will start with some sort of misdirection and then real assault will be in some other direction. This is actually not that crazy

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's obvious that the Ukrainian counter offensive will start with some sort of misdirection and then real assault will be in some other direction. This is actually not that crazy

        Russia doesn't have to rotate anything to defend a river crossing, Ukraine has spend a lot more resources than Russia for an operation like this, you can't tie down forces this way.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Depends on how many forces they have on the other side. Didn't they redeploy most of their better equipped units in the area after Kherson?

          >Its a semi feint
          I don't buy it. For a feint to be effective you need to be able to withdraw quickly and easily once it's accomplished its purpose. It doesn't seem like withdrawing will be easy with a huge river to cross, potentially under fire. If there really are significant Ukie troops on the left bank of the river the easiest way out is through at this point.

          Anon if it's just infantry they can cross back with helicopters/rafts.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >implying Russians aren't moronic

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          they literally sent a couple dozen dudes in a boat
          how much resources do they need for that?
          20 bodies and a boat?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah bro D-Day and Inchon were such failures.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, if that map shown in OP is accurate, then the Ukies control a beach head about 11km (6.83) miles long. You need more than a few bunkers and some machineguns to suppress that.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What's that pub like? I could go for a beer right now.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >john howard pub
            i hope the ruskies obliterate it

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >t. soft c**t

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not the same position. These are human beings, not russian pidor orcs.

        Frick man, I used to respect Russia, as an adversary, but all I can do now is shake my head. The rampant homosexuality of Russian men just blows my fricking mind. The West has NCOs, Russia has pimps and homosexual boypussy prostitutes. No wonder Russian women fantasize about Western men, and would rather marry a fat western man two three times their age making middle class low income than risk the HIV/AIDS and hepatitis the promiscuous coward homosex russian pidors are seething with.

        A nation of fetal alcoholism moronic homosexual slave people - I see more human dignity and potential in subsaharan africa than among muscovite pidor b***hboys.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Just go to Russia and get fricked by a gay already man. You obviously want it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Stay away from Russian women anon, their language doesn't even have a word for love. любoвь more accurately translates to "like." Both Belarussian and Ukrainian have a separate word for love, but since Russians don't understand the concept they just use "like" for all of it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Oh I have no intent or desire to stick my dick in HIV positive prostitutes with awful duckface lip injections. I'll stick with my Czech farmgirl thank you very much.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Its the men who have STDs in Russia thanks to prison/conscription and drug use, not the women. And the women don't have enough contact with men during their lives to get on their level.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I had a short on/off with a russian girl while she was for student exchange in vienna. b***h wad bipolar as frick when it came to politics. Sex was allright.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Hope you used a condom anon

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you on here spreading lies?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It's true, Anon. Russians use любить in the same contexts that English speakers would use both like and love. They don't have an equivalent of кoхaти (Ukrainian) or кaхaць (Belarussian), which in both of those languages is used in the way that "love" is used in English, and любити (Ukrainian) is used for familial love, or generally liking something.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Russians use любить in the same contexts that English speakers would use both like and love.

                In every language people use hyperbole to state they love something, even if they only like it. There is a separate word for liking in Russian, it's нpaвитьcя.

                >They don't have an equivalent of кoхaти (Ukrainian) or кaхaць (Belarussian), which in both of those languages is used in the way that "love" is used in English, and любити (Ukrainian) is used for familial love, or generally liking something.

                Just because some languages (Poles, Ukrainians, Belarussians) use two different words for family or partner (which don't even mean like or love, but regular love and a more passionate love), doesn't make Russian weird for not using two words. In fact English doesn't have the distinction either, but you're not up here propagandizing against the English speakers.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                English doesn't have the distinction between familial love and romantic love, but it does differentiate between love and like. Hpaвитьcя is more along the lines of "it pleases me/it gives me pleasure" than it is "I like it". English speakers use "I fricking love X" when they're dopamine depleted homosexuals who think hyperbole in everyday conversation is acceptable.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >English doesn't have the distinction between familial love and romantic love, but it does differentiate between love and like.
                Literally the same in Russian.

                Hpaвитьcя is more along the lines of "it pleases me/it gives me pleasure" than it is "I like it".

                Yea, you know how you say that more elegantly? "I like it." You can convolute phrases and idioms all you like, that's what the translation is going to be.

                The phrase is "ты мнe нpaвишьcя," which anyone can see is a common thing just by copying it into google.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Whats the Russian word for love then?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Любoвь.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yдoвoльcтвиe, кoгдa кoнчaют внyтpь

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Slava Ukraine
                t. spent 30 minutes studying Russian at university

                It's also the same word as 'hello' like Hawaiian

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's Ukraini, you fricking illiterate scum.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Having enough forces and having enough forces in the right spot commanded in the right way are two different things, and the reason the Kharkiv offensive was successful.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >now you're in the same position as the Russian were in Kherson
      You mean winning? Because no vatBlack person worth its salt would ever imply Kherson was lost.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Get across the Dnipro
      >Cut off Crimea
      >Push back so far artillery can do nothing to stop resupply
      I would laugh so hard anon you have no idea.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Fundamentally not true, because of the relative elevation of either bank.

      RF pretended they were as present on the left bank as Ukes definitely are on the right, and the right bank is higher, meaning arty support is easier for the Ukes. That's the whole reason the left bank has been sparse enough for a beachead or six. This shit writes itself.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      waves of Russian backlimes rain down on you
      and then the real attack launches somewhere else. ukraine is putting the russians into a strategic dilema. prevent the breakout, and thin the lines further east, making them vulnerable to the other wing of the attack. Or allow the breakout to develop. either option is bad.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >successfully cross river
      >just like the Rus- oh wait nevermind

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        am I moronic if this looks kinda comfy?
        I'd probably die in 2 seconds as a civilian if any kinda war broke out where I live

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          After the war children will have a blast playing here in every sense of the word.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          moronic isnt the right word, just completely desensitized to human suffering. Imagine if this level of exposure to a major war reached us without the last 2 decades of Liveleak and general violence we've seen on the internet. We'd all be completely scarred

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Hello where are proofs

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://nitter.net/machiavelli_gr/status/1650038661063352321#m

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        thanks for proving that it's a twitter offensive. very helpful.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This only shows the initial landing. There's not even a mention about capturing anything

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >forcing Russian forces in the area to fall back behind the Konka River
    to be fair, is there any proofs Russians actually had any troops in Dachi?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They've had recon/sabotage and artillery teams along that bank ever since they got pushed back across the river, there's plenty enough footage of them getting blown up from the past few months to establish that

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Look at a satellite map and tell me how they're going to get any vehicles from Dachi to Oleshky without using that bridge. Pro-tip: all that brown land is unsuitable for armour.

      I like how there's not a single fricking Russian speaker here, so none of you morons realize "dachi" is not a town, but refers to summer housing that were common in the USSR and are uninhabited during winter. And anyone with any knowledge of the region could see that immediately on the satellite image.

      So it's not a town, it's uninhabites garden sheds that likely are half-flooded in spring.

      "Town of Dachi". Goddamn, so that means all of the morons here only follow information spoon-translated to English. WOW, SO INSIGHTFUL, TAKEN FROM TELEGRAM 3 DAYS AGO, SIKRET SOURCES.

      Pathetic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Дypaк, дaчи бyдeт в дepeвнe c людьми a нe нигдe, go play the insightful slavaboo elsewhere

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The place's name is Dachi/Dachy, anon. Just because it's literally named after the dachas there, doesn't mean it isn't Dachi.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        John Yankee from Dakota autonomous region. I concur with anon we have many dachis around burger mine we toil during summers but not winters. We should immediately be of droppings support for israelite Zelenskyy and his foolish plans.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No you don't get it Dachi is an extremely long thin town of two buildings, in a marsh.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            moron here, can the Uki repair the bridge enough for use in an acceptable time or it is down for the rest of the war?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              no and even if they could it's within russian artillery/missile range

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                moron here, can the Uki repair the bridge enough for use in an acceptable time or it is down for the rest of the war?

                https://i.imgur.com/rvXMK4a.jpg

                >USA approves Ukraine's request for CRAM

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              If they have time and cover, but they'd basically need to force the local Russian forces to Crimea.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No you don't get it Dachi is an extremely long thin town of two buildings, in a marsh.

            Ok, I see. I stand corrected.

      • 1 year ago
        sage

        Its literally a suburbs and not "uniinhabited during winter" or "half flooded". Because you can go to the google maps and look the satelite images there.
        And you are lying vatnik piece of shiet.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anon the summer homes are aacha in russian, dunno about ukrainian but in russian its dacha

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          дaчи is the plural. дaчa is the singular. but yeah the guy you're replying to is moronic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Why the frick are you trying to make an etymological argument here when russians around Vuhledar had been boasting over and over again about advancing in Dacha area?

        Does it matter that much that the structures where soldiers can hide are empty?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I like how there's not a single fricking Russian speaker here, so none of you morons realize "dachi" is not a town, but refers to summer housing that were common in the USSR and are uninhabited during winter. And anyone with any knowledge of the region could see that immediately on the satellite image.So it's not a town, it's uninhabites garden sheds that likely are half-flooded in spring."Town of Dachi". Goddamn, so that means all of the morons here only follow information spoon-translated to English. WOW, SO INSIGHTFUL, TAKEN FROM TELEGRAM 3 DAYS AGO, SIKRET SOURCES.Pathetic!!!

        The De-cafe is in the pot with the blue lid.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        uhhh cool semantics bro

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The little island full of swamps is literally a big nothingburger. If Ukrainians manage to get a significant bridgehead into Oleshky, then it's looking real bad for Russians

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yes anon, the Antonovskiy bridge potentially being secure on both sides is a nothingburger. You are aware the two remaining rivers are 50 meters and 150 meters across, right? You can literally swim that shit or build a raft out of logs and paddle across.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Look at a satellite map and tell me how they're going to get any vehicles from Dachi to Oleshky without using that bridge. Pro-tip: all that brown land is unsuitable for armour.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You're the one being a self absorbed little shit about it anon, I know damn well you can't run tanks in swamps very well and the problems with getting vehicles across rivers under fire. Please tell the class how that invalidates the existence of Ukrainian infantry on the other side.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't, you just need to learn the meaning of the term nothingburger.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              A term started up by /misc/gays, yeah. There's a reason why I ignored it you uptight little frick.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lol get help mate

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                bump

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If vatniks have any sense they'll just blow the bridge where the red arrow is. Kind of a big "if" though.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, it's all cool, but it doesn't matter anymore. Russian JDAM now in operation almost around the clock, the "allies" have been so slow to deliver weapons that the Russians strengthen their lines and have managed to create weapons against which the ukrainians can do nothing! I don't know who can seriously expect this counteroffensive. Personally, I have set myself up for this to be a disaster so then i won't be upset!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Russian JDAM now in operation almost around the clock
      *In Belgorod

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yawn

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Russian JDAM
      Ahh yes, Russian “””””guided””””” weapons.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        glided weapons

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Even worse

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > Russian JDAM now in operation almost around the clock
      >400+ days in, the russian airforce now deploys the wunderwaffe "guided bomb", raising yet another eyebrow noone would believe could be raised

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >raising yet another eyebrow noone would believe could be raised

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The next two panels show that fat frick getting his eyes gouged out with that pencil, right?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            macgays are insufferable
            >yes, that's the "PC is like a BigMac, Apple is organic cuisine" homosexual

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Dobsonovich inflating numbers once again

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        guided bomb? what is this magical technology? we truly live in a sci fi world!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      One day I hope to be able to accurately type like a Russian, so I can get (you)s just by raising my eyebrow

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Russian JDAM now in operation
      yeah in Belgorod

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So far two Russian JDAMs have been used successfully on suspected areas of AFU future tactical defense positions. By the time Ukraine invades Belgorod, Russia will have destroyed and defensible structures. Regards, Z

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I just want you to know I appreciate your post.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There is a guy with a few drone 360 pictures on Google maps/earth right there. It's a fricking swamp. You can't do shit there. Pretty strange and difficult place to attack .
    My bet? Ukrainian disinfo to confuse Russians.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Did it occur to you that the Vatniks didn’t have that sector very well manned precisely BECAUSE it had the river in front of it, and they reckoned that the Ukies would not attack and have their MSR across it?

      It’s a risky move by the aUkies, we’ll have to see how it works for them.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's also because its hardest part of the front to supply.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukie land, breach and advance across the diepner
    If you told me that one year ago, I would have said bullshit. Now I'm not even sure that Russian can stop it.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >what the FRICK is Russia doing?
    Losing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not taking bahkmut.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    yawn, it's another ukie feint designed to draw russian out, they've been doing it for weeks now

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Operating across a river like that is uneconomical with forces, you are at a disadvantage logistically and risk getting stranded.
    We will see if anything develops here but I think this is just light infantry probing.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    SOF from both sides were harassing each other for months since Russians left the right bank of Dnipro. Most likely this is something like that. Enough to cause trouble, not enough to take over a city.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    it's just special forces homies on pontoons doing reconnaissance and shit because Russian positions are further back from the bank
    you're losing your mind over nothing again

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >what the FRICK is Russia doing?
    nothing good for ukrainians, do you think the russians are just watching?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >do you think the russians are just watching?
      I don't think they're capable of doing anything else.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >footage cuts
      >artillery falls on empty dacha 30 minutes later
      xaxaxaxa khokhol piggies destroyed like cheap prostitutes

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >implying the artillery didn't accidentally hit the right house, aiming for one 2 miles away

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think it's like the feint before the feint. That's clearly a moronic place to cross a river (marshy, urban areas on either side, maximum amount of eyes on your troops), so the Ukies 1) pretend to cross from Kherson; 2) Russians rotate forces in the area (like from Nova Kahovka); 3) Ukies actually cross the Dnipro for real with pontoons somewhere that it's more convenient; 4) Russians rotate force from other sectors to meet the new threat; 5) Ukie's launch the real offensive somewhere else in the north / east / south east

    Am I being a schitzo?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It sort of reminds me of the 'peaceful penetration' during the closing days of ww1, when the germans were overstrethed and exhausted. The aussies realized that they could just...occupy the german's outer defensive lines without much of a fight. The germans had the option of attempting to throw the australians out, which they were too under strength to do, or move their lines back incrementally and thus give up land.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It could be the real offense. If this area is lightly defended they could push deep into better ground where tanks they do cross the river can maneuver and breakthrough further.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As a rule, the banks of a river are going to be sandy/brushy/swampy and so on. So, can't avoid that. But because of the bridge, there's a nice firm road bed to exploit down. Think -- Market Garden.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Think -- Market Garden.

        A Blyat Too Far?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you look at the map that location is literally right across from Kherson and it's railheads. I think the relative ease of resupply there is most likely the main reason they chose that location, plus if/when they have to retreat they'll have an entire city as cover on the right side

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ISW citing Russian milbloggers said that the Ukies have been there for weeks relatively unmolested and have established supply lines
    That's a feint?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it was likely intended as one, then they realized no one cared that they were present and decided to build up

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >cared
        That's how the Izium operation happened. The Ukrainians noticed that their scouting parties were sneaking into hamlets only to find that there weren't any russians there, and after a month or so of this decided it might not be a trick after all.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hope the dollary doos I sent to ukrainian charity are having a good time

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >fall back behind the Konka River
    >distance 2.01 miles
    wow it's fricking nothing. get back to us when they've fallen behind the molochna river.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Russia has satellites too. Even the Chinese share theirs with them. They know what's going on, stop with these moronic feint memes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Okay, explain to me how they lost in Izum then

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How hard would it be to sneak into Oleshky right now?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      more or less impossible if russians are paying attention
      it's 3km of open swamp with multiple river crossings, except for one raised road cutting through it

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't they tunnel under the river and go across like that?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The mud is 100 meters deep

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm pro-Ukraine, but we need further confirmation.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    And people laughed at the Uke Rastafarians.
    Pass the Dachi down the left bank side

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    While most of the Winter offensive occurred in the East, there was a suspicious amount of videos of Russian SHORAD, EW, counter battery and towed pieces getting shredded in the south.

    Not really surprised this was possible. Now what will the ukies do with it? My bet, use SOF with loiter munitions and sabotage missions to needle Russian from the West.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Ukie forces have broken out of their beachhead
    Of course they have.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    guys, there is NO panic

    hohols are contained

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm going to bed soon, what are the chances that the Russians will have let the Ukrainians achieve something phenomenally moronic by the time I wake up in 9 hours time?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Well, that's settled

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lol they really came across in force? They'll find themselves in a firebag immediately, everyone in Kherson knows everything
    The Ukrainian ass is in the ass

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >firebag
      Shoo shoo vatnig

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >The Ukrainian ass is in the ass
      Where else would it be?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >M777 longer range
      >drones everywhere to spot mobiks' bent tubes
      >higher elevation on the Ukrainisn side
      please proceed

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ukies have been trained by the Pentagon, including AI simulations (for over half a year now) to perfect river crossings and combined arms assaults under enemy artillery fire

    Don't listen to vatnik FUD itt (don't know what they think they're accomplishing with it anyway)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      at the end of the day ukranians are still just slavs
      no AI training or whatever is going to elevate them above that
      they are the exact same trash as russians, and as such they will find a way to frick it up

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        damn, I guess both sides really are the same and we should stop supporting Ukrainians. Thank you for the demoralizations.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They are not the same, hohols manage to be an even dumber variant than Russians. Which is quite an achievement to be honest.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Thank you for the info Vasily, I will now stop laughing about Bakhmut

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Chinese Quantum AI enhanced Slavs are unstoppable, even HATO bioengineered supersoldiers can't compete.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Still just slavs
        >Mauling the Russians, that the oh-so superior west has been shitting itself over the last decade

        If the west was so much better, they would have given Russia a dicking back in 2008 when they began to get uppity. Instead they just bended over even harder.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        At some point you chucklefricks are just going to have to admit that training and doctrine really do make a difference

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No it doesn't, the foot soldier doesn't matter

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine is gonna feint South Kherson and blitzkrieg the entire Luhansk Oblast.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm a native English speaker, who speaks Ukrainian decently and Russian better than I'd like to.
    My wife is a native Ukrainian speaker who speaks fluent English and Russian.
    Several friends in Ukraine (Ukrainian speaking, who know English and Russian) also confirmed this for me.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >believing hohols
      Ngmi buddy

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Damn, this TEMPO will be a nightmare for every single existent vatnik

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If true.
    >imagine not being able to defend a river

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Apparently Ziggers are sleeping if UA can do this in broad daylight

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Looking at the region in Google Maps I can't help but note that there sure are a lot of docks down there

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So basically, besides the twitter offensive, we found out hoholshills like to lie and morons are yelling 'slava okraini' wrong.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So Russian artillery is either missing or its dead?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Barrels are so fricked they can't hit whatever they aim for

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't carpeting with arty a legitimate strategy?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          If your strategy is to maximize artillery shell output and not enemies killed

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You never maximize for "enemies killed" unless you're writing propaganda memes about an area being a meat grinder for the enemies
            The purpose of any weapon is to stop the enemy from fighting back, so you can take their position. Constantly being shelled will do that even without killing

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Constantly being shelled will do that even without killing
              Ah yes, I do remember this tactic worked very well in ww1, Brits shot several million shells on small section of the front in few weeks and when their troops advanced on trenches there were no German troops left to resist

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I don't give a shit homosexual, you're the one who thinks you win a war by killing 100% of all enemies

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wasting shells into field literally does nothing moron, only wastes your ammunition and gets your barrels warped faster

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          In WW1, yes. But that was more than 100 years ago

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It is. Area saturation is a thing. Besides that, those are probably grad strikes, not tube arty.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Besides that, those are probably grad strikes, not tube arty
            I like how pro-Russians never managed to show us satellite images of where Russian artillery works. Because it seems every single time any such image gets posted its always "Grad rockets", does Russian artillery even exist?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              You quote a video where you see where the strikes land, claiming Russians don't show how it works. Hoholshills really are masters of their own ironic situation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I've asked you for satellite images showing precision of artillery in numbers, you know, how Ukraine showed precision of their artillery in Vuhledar. Not cherry picked videos of few shots but where 20k shells per day go. Do you have anything of that kind?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nope, why would I? What do craters show? They show an accumulation of all sorts of rounds from god knows how long.

                Videos instead offer a better look at how things work.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I wouldn't wanna be this empty dirt path right now. They killed all that mud, with absolutely no remorse

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the mud was very evil

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Your point?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nope, why would I? What do craters show? They show an accumulation of all sorts of rounds from god knows how long.

                Videos instead offer a better look at how things work.

                I'm sure you meant this as some kind of sick burn or whatever, but to be honest with you this just comes across as sad and desperate. For real, setting aside the shitposting for a second. I have no idea why you people seem to think that showing pictures or videos from one single engagement is automatically some kind of gotcha. Maybe you're intentionally being dishonest or just really lacking common sense or whatever, but I'm telling you as honestly as I can that for those of us who exist outside of the russian propaganda bubble (IE 95% of the human race) everyone can see right through you and we genuinely think you're either stupid or crazy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I'm convinced all Zelensky supporters here are actually a false flag KGB operation, because they all act like such obnoxious morons it makes him look bad by association.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What do you mean by "Zelensky supporters"?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >brings up zelensky out of nowhere
                this is what I meant by you sounding stupid or crazy.

                I think the recent intel leak and the upcoming counteroffensive has really had a detrimental effect on vatniks recently. They been more unhinged than ever these last last two weeks.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yawn.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >doubles down on the exact same moronation
                It's past time for a new playbook, vatnik, because this shit isn't working for you and hasn't worked for the last 13 months.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Zelinsky
    Who? It says Zelensky in your screenshot

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    When will you understand that a """superpower""" running out of weapons is hilarious, while a smaller nation being invaded asking for gibs is not only understandable but also lets us finally use the weapons for the purpose they were intended for, /misc/?

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    He's so fricking manly he can pull this off. Can you imagine Putin trying this shit?

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    RUNNING OUT OF WEAPONS IS LE VATNIK PROPAGANDA!
    Oh, you simply can't read, got it. Go back to your newbie containment board

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Imagine being this angry at someone who lives a much better quality of life than the vast majority of your pathetic Russia.

    I bet he even has an indoor flush toilet, what a homosexual!

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >brings up pole smoking
    >stonetoss
    >illiterate

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Is Dachi the 21st century Cherbourg?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're dumb and haven't read the thread.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Wow that's a lovely picture, what does it have to do with this conversation?

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Nor do you, spamming images you downloaded this month
    https://desuarchive.org/k/search/filename/1679783848284340.png/

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Is this why we get a regular stream of homosex videos featuring the Russian armed forces?
    Methinks the vatBlack person subhumans doth protest too much.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    So you have no argument? Fifth columnists will hang

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Dnipro
    wut, I thought rivers were an insurmountable barrier

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ukros are using hyper-advanced HATO wunderwaffles called 'boats'

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Russian gay porn ends with a Ukie drone strike nine times out of ten, the other time it still ends with a dead russian, just one that hung himself
    Why wouldn't I watch that kino?
    >insert russian suicide note about Chechnyan rape squads I don't have unfortunately

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >hung
      Hanged himself. Hung only applies to inanimate objects. The man was hanged. The man hung the painting.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's even more specific than that, "hanged" only refers to the suicide/execution method
        So if someone sentenced a stick to death, it would be moronic, but you could still say the stick was hanged

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Hanged himself. Hung only applies to inanimate objects
        This is like the one part of the english language I get fricked up on, I just can't get it to click for whatever reason

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    How's the Russian recruitment going?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Poorly I’d imagine given they sent him

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just doing conscription via phone now.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    anon we aren’t the one with hundreds of images of gay people and transsexuals

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's the same person every thread. Stop giving the moron attention and they'll eventually go away.

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Because all you ever do is come here and scream for the ruination of America and western values while praise the east

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      He's just against whatever current thing happens to be anon, don't pay him any mind

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah that’s the meta reason obviously, contrarianism runs them harder than addiction does a meth addict

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Something is clearly happening based on the vatnik coping in this thread.
    This exact thing has already happened twice now with Kharkiv and Kherson, and I am enjoying every cope post.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ?t=1343
    Ukraine has been harassing the far side of the river with boats for months. They've even allowed news crews to get good shots of their operations, with details. I think the Russians eventually just got used to it, stopped treating it as a big deal, baking it into their plans, and stopped bothering to counterattack after it keeps happening and the Ukranians keep leaving. Eventually all this recon in force pays off not just with intelligence, or with killed enemy commanders, but with Russian complacency.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't this exactly what happened with Desert Storm?
      >Fly regular sorties near to Iraq for so long the Iraqis get complacent
      >Suddenly strike

      >SJWSTW

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        that webm is kino is there one with all the ground units?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What's that high-altitude bomber shown destroying the powerplant at 00:21?
        And man, this operation still beggars belief. Imagine being an Iraqi commander and trying to figure out which parts of your armed forces are still operative

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes. It's not a terribly uncommon tactic. It reminds me of WWI where one of the tactics for pushing through trench lines was to bombard the enemy trench every day for weeks so the enemy didn't know when the attack would actually land.

        What's that high-altitude bomber shown destroying the powerplant at 00:21?
        And man, this operation still beggars belief. Imagine being an Iraqi commander and trying to figure out which parts of your armed forces are still operative

        You mean the B-52?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >You mean the B-52?
          Yes, thanks. I guess it's being refuelled in the pic that's why I was confused

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I had a teacher in high school that flew apaches in desert storm. I showed him this video in class and he played it for everyone while pointing out which operations he was in, or at least what he remembered. Extremely kino. He would laugh about how easy it was to blow up t-62s(i think) there and in bosnia

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >there and in bosnia
          You're dumb.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Deliberate_Force

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              So he was an apache pilot that flew F-16s as well? Damn, what a hero! He also managed to transport T-62s into Bosnia just so he could bomb them! Fricking Chad as frick!

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >thread about war
    >"b-b-but muh troonys and gays"
    Can someone explain why these people are the only things morons like above wanna talk about?
    It's weird obsession to have tbh

  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >point proven
    >vatnik seething
    And it's only Monday

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >more troony images from the jerk off folder
    >this will show him *~~*~~

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >poltard derailing the thread
    >the morons feeding him
    behead all shitposters

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >cheap leftwing copy
    Typical.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If they have to make a copy of it instead of just ignoring it, you know it got under their skin

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    As an FtM this is very affirming anon, many thanks

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    E-3 is private first class, so not realy anything major.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but you can also get upgraded from shitty teardrop to location marker with a star inside
      That seems more significant, look at how much more detail it has

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I've never seen anyone deny ukraine being low on stocks. Thats basically been the situation since day 1

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >west
    >soldiers having gay sex in air conditioned barracks
    >east
    >soldiers getting assraped in muddy, corpse filled trenches
    We are not so different than you might think, vatnig.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Protecting freedom around the world
    He'll yea brother (gay)

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > Town of Dachi

    Dacha just means summer house you moron

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It’s an incredibly small village named after the housing that exists there. There are cities named after the type of housing present all over the world.

      https://www.city-facts.com/dachi-borodyansky-district-ukraine/population

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    even with an examples rightoids frick everything up

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Gay, yes
    But not moronic

    There is a difference 🙂

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Stop feeding the VPN troll and just report god damn it. When are you guys gonna learn?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *