>dumbest mistake in the history of warfare
as apposed to attacking Ukraine to begin with?
Uh, Russian Logistics were collapsing.
Russia would be shelling Kyiv with artillery instead of long range missiles now had it kept the small salient + Ukraine would have to keep a very large number of forces defending the city
oh right, because it was a feint. my bad, i'm new to /k/ and all this new terminology is hard to keep track of.
11 months ago
Anonymous
name one source that says russia had to withdraw from kyiv or else it would be counterattacked
just one
11 months ago
Anonymous
right, because they got routed.
11 months ago
Anonymous
https://i.imgur.com/O4nM7wq.jpg
So if they have no reasons to retreat, they did so due to being pussies?
>Inability to make progress Russia withdrew
Does it say anywhere they were counter attacked? No, they should have dug in and held Hostomel which was 5 fricking kilometers from Kyiv city center. So that now, having to evade patriots and use Tu-95s every time they want to hit a target in the capital they would be using howitzers
11 months ago
Anonymous
>were counter attacked
right, because they left Gostomel on their own power. they were not counter attacked at all. all good faith.
11 months ago
Anonymous
So if they have no reasons to retreat, they did so due to being pussies?
It would be interesting to read the reports, what prevented Ukraine from holding Isthmus of Perekop and the bridges over Dnipro in the first days of invasion. I've heard some talks about saboteurs and collaborators, but we'll likely never see the full picture at least until the war is over
Lviv push is the quick-win move.
CUT OFF THE SUPPLY LINES AND SIEGE THE INNER PART UNTIL IT COLLAPSES AFTER 3 DAYS.
Anything else is a waste of energy they blundered big and prolonged the war by many years.
Okay, but he doesn't command the Ukrainian divisions in that area, does he?
I still have not any credible in-depth analysis or even a historical record of events that allowed the Russian forces to sweep all that land from Kherson to Mariupol.
Only part of the country where the local government took the side of the invaders. Russia thought this would happen everywhere in eastern/central Ukraine, which is why the Kyiv convoys had riot gear and parade uniforms with them instead of rations or ammo. I assume this was the biggest shock and the most decisive moment of the early war, that regular people and politicians alike chose to fight the invaders in the north and the east. Few expected this to happen, western and russian glories included.
yeah
Gay unfunny yeahBlack person
yeah
Withdrawing from the north was the dumbest mistake in the history of warfare maybe ever
This
Daily destroyed columns was so fricking kino
Russia would be shelling Kyiv with artillery instead of long range missiles now had it kept the small salient + Ukraine would have to keep a very large number of forces defending the city
do you know the meaning of the word "rout"?
somehow there isnt a russian language version.
Yep, its what happened in kharkiv and kherson but no such thing took place in the north
oh right, because it was a feint. my bad, i'm new to /k/ and all this new terminology is hard to keep track of.
name one source that says russia had to withdraw from kyiv or else it would be counterattacked
just one
right, because they got routed.
>Inability to make progress Russia withdrew
Does it say anywhere they were counter attacked? No, they should have dug in and held Hostomel which was 5 fricking kilometers from Kyiv city center. So that now, having to evade patriots and use Tu-95s every time they want to hit a target in the capital they would be using howitzers
>were counter attacked
right, because they left Gostomel on their own power. they were not counter attacked at all. all good faith.
So if they have no reasons to retreat, they did so due to being pussies?
>dumbest mistake in the history of warfare
as apposed to attacking Ukraine to begin with?
Uh, Russian Logistics were collapsing.
Don't, my sides wouldn't be able to take watching it all fall apart for Puccia again.
It would be interesting to read the reports, what prevented Ukraine from holding Isthmus of Perekop and the bridges over Dnipro in the first days of invasion. I've heard some talks about saboteurs and collaborators, but we'll likely never see the full picture at least until the war is over
Lviv push is the quick-win move.
CUT OFF THE SUPPLY LINES AND SIEGE THE INNER PART UNTIL IT COLLAPSES AFTER 3 DAYS.
Anything else is a waste of energy they blundered big and prolonged the war by many years.
reposting this NG 1Y war map
https://images.nationalgeographic.org/image/upload/v1686661727/EducationHub/photos/ukraine-map-side-a.jpg
How did the Russians manage to take the south and create a landbridge between Rostov and Crimea so easily?
The governor(?) of Kherson Oblast was a collaborator.
Okay, but he doesn't command the Ukrainian divisions in that area, does he?
I still have not any credible in-depth analysis or even a historical record of events that allowed the Russian forces to sweep all that land from Kherson to Mariupol.
Only part of the country where the local government took the side of the invaders. Russia thought this would happen everywhere in eastern/central Ukraine, which is why the Kyiv convoys had riot gear and parade uniforms with them instead of rations or ammo. I assume this was the biggest shock and the most decisive moment of the early war, that regular people and politicians alike chose to fight the invaders in the north and the east. Few expected this to happen, western and russian glories included.