>Tsar bomba was over 50 years ago
>1 bomb is enough to level a small country
What kind of new world ending bombs are they hiding from us?
>Tsar bomba was over 50 years ago
>1 bomb is enough to level a small country
What kind of new world ending bombs are they hiding from us?
None because small nukes are more effective than dumb huge ones
the only world that's ending is the fantasy one Putin made for them
He isn't talking about russoids in particular, war tourists are so fricking stupid.
>He isn't talking about russoids in particular
Oh right. All those other countries Tsar bombs, yeah?
moron.
/misc/ is calling. (You) can still raise the collective IQ of both /k/ and /misc/, right now, by going back.
So you made a moronic mistake, then accuse everyone of being a /misc/tard?
Post guns homosexual.
Oh wait, you can't, can you?
LMAO
Another rent free mentally ill war tourist trying to devolve an ACTUAL weapons thread into whatever shit mush his brain is... sad
Nothing
MIRV does the same thing but cheaper
>bomba
Add SEA and SA please.
Holy mother of god
now do the simulation where they dont have unlimited food and water and add war
Post childhood mortality rates.
The only thing supporting those population rates is Western money, Western food, Western medicine, Western education, Western military assistance.
And 2 or 3 thousand Chinese debt traps.
It's all going to fall apart "pretty soon." None of those support conditions can last, except the Chinese debt traps which will bankrupt nearly every country in Africa.
> "We are all Rhodesia now."
Don't forget about the fertilizer. There's a massive shortage, because Russia, Ukraine, Belorussia, and China had largely cornered the global market for different kinds of fertilizers.
This is why we need stuff like genetic engineering and neural link. Something needs to be done to stymie the IQ loss.
Neuralink is a hilariously shit idea
We need it to fight against AI.
>the AI needs a direct link to hack our brains
Cold, soulless processes composed this post.
I'm serious. Think about how much smarter you are when you have your phone. You have perfect memory via the camera. You can hold an infinite amount of numbers in your memory. You can get the answer to any question in seconds. Now imagine how much smarter than that you would be if you didn't need to talk to your phone with your thumbs. If you could just think the inputs and get the answers as if you had these abilities naturally.
Once AI is able to self improve itself it will control humanity, whether the AI is benevolent or not. AI will be making all the decisions, basically. It will design all our technology, plan our days and control the military. The only thing that can keep up with such processing power is billions of humans with computer chips in their heads.
Just purge the africans and force whites to breed, ez
>average IQ of the world less than 100
that's not how IQ works.
>What kind of new world ending bombs are they hiding from us?
So far, the main thing the Russians have hidden from us is their ineptitude in combat, their outdated and poorly maintained weapons, and their moronic battle tactics.
Other than that, it wouldn't surprise me if Vladimir has some sort of secret fetish for children.
Wow another fricking mentally ill moron. You guys are out on full force today hu? Re-read the thread imbecile. It's not about whether the Russians have an even bigger bomb today, it's whether modern governments can or secretly have bigger bombs.
>Thinks Tsar bomba will ever be used again
Oh my fricking god this site
_213017.jpg
w-where did you take this picture?
I collect pictures of silly looking dogs.
My gf thinks they are ugly as hell but I love them.
>My gf thinks they are ugly as hell
dump her
bro I can't wait for Russia to bring out the T-34s bro they do it in WWZ bro
Small nukes are as effective and can be carried in larger number
>1 bomb is enough to level a small country
once you get into certain megaton range, the explosion and damage won't get bigger, because most of the energy will escape into space
Most Nukes are less than 200kt, which is still huge but nowhere near the magnitude of ridiculous cold War hydrogen bombs. There's nothing in the realm of Castle Bravo or the Tsar Bomb in modern arsenals and there was never a way to deliver them anyway except strategic bombers.
>except strategic bombers.
*blocks your path*
Are the russian even capable of detecting B2, F117 or F22 in full stealth mode?
Probably not tbh. Isreal has been flying their F-35s into the russian SAM umbrella in Syria for years with complete impunity
F117 was detected and hit twice by serbs using ancient soviet sams, so yes
IIRC the b2 has a larger radar sig than the 117
The only reason the serbs were able to do that was because the Nighthawks kept reusing the same approach vectors and flew with bays open for way too long, and they also put two radars on it. If you're only able to shoot down a shitty old Nighthawk by knowing pretty much exactly when and where it's going to fly, and setting up 2 radars specifially to ambush it, your chances aren't great. This is corroborated by the fact the same shitty old Nighthawks were circling Baghdad for hours with no issues.
>detected and hit twice
Once
And only when it opened its bomb bay. And only when they knew its flight path. Only then did the detection value reach a point when they could throw a missile at it. And they only did it with a command guided missile, basically a drone, because automatic guidance might not have locked or it might have lost lock in flight.
And most importantly, stealth is never meant to be 100% perfect. You can certainly see it at point blank range for example.
Nah, people think the doritos are ayylmaos but really it's just that any modern stealth technology might as well be ayytech to Ziggers. Seeing as how they've regressed from 1960s tech and their men hide in bunkers made out of septic tanks, an actual stealth bomber must seem like magitech to them.
Tsar bomba was the only one of its kind though, after it was made the Soviets were scared shitless about it so they never made another one nearly of that magnitude
The reason Russians particularly loved moronicly huge bombs was that for most of the Cold War Soviet ICBMs were utter shit. That was mostly due to Stalin refusing to authorise/invest in developing computers after the war - meaning that Russian electronics were decades behind NATO for most of the cold war (and if you look at their military this is still a problem they're dealing with today). This meant that their missiles were incredibly inaccurate - so you wanted to make the bomb as big as possible so that your acceptable margin of targeting error was larger.
Once you can reliably land your missile on target you don't need a multi-megaton doomsday device, as a few kilotons will do the job just as well for a cheaper construction/maintenance cost (meaning you can have more of them) and while doing less indiscriminate damage to the surrounding area (meaning you can use them a little more liberally once the nuclear threshold has been crossed).
>tl;dr, they were a Russian cope made to help overcome their shit targeting
If you want to look for the next generation of WMDs they're going to be cyber-weapons. That might not sound as destructive as a mega-nuke; but they're a hell of a lot easier to use, potentially deniable, and can do absolutely horrific damage to any nation whose infrastructure is much more developed than it was in the 19th century.
>so you wanted to make the bomb as big as possible so that your acceptable margin of targeting error was larger.
MARGIN OF TERROR:
THE SHOCKING TRUE STORY OF THE COLD WAR'S MEGABOMBS
My dick
Tsar Bomba was a waste of valuable Plutonium. It was far more efficient to make a bunch of sub-megaton warheads than to make a single 50MT warhead. That's why it was never replicated, and even the Russians have mostly gone to sub-megaton warheads these days.
I want bigger.
once you have one kind of world-ending weapon do you really need a second?
what if you don't plan to use them on our world?
the Tsar Bomba was a test model for research and feasibility, a show piece in a way
The need for a big dumb singular bomb on the size of the Tsar Bomba is basically caveman logic in terms of nuclear weapons development. modern conventional ICBM warheads and more importantly MIRV warheads can do the job of the Tsar Bomba without putting all your eggs in one interceptable basket.
Anyone who tells you Russia has made any more after its usage is either delusional or lying to your face.
AM
>russia hiding terror-tech
kek, good one. the whole purpose of such a weapon is to tell everyone about it
>What kind of new world ending bombs are they hiding from us?
the only bomb that will trully change the war in general is a fusion bomb
and im not talking about a thermonuclear one but a pure fusion one
trans / BLM ideology bombs delivered by twitter - destroys your people's will to fight and divides them into separate privileged classes who expect everyone else to give them everything and throw tantrums when no-one listens.