>how would they even begin to try?
It is cheaper and better to say that it has been done and one is destroyed, who will know if it is the truth really, you? No one will know. President Putin will be happy, the people who support him who would believe it will be happy, those Ukrainians and westerners will be unhappy and say it is a lie and it will make them angry that Russia lies, as angry as if it had been destroyed., Everybody wins. Russians will know it is a lie, you will know it is a lie, Russians will pretend it is not you will say it is, those who would be unsure will be unsure. It is as good as destroying one. To make a point then shoot down an airliner or something to distract after. No one will care.
Russia, in theory, should have total air supremacy and plenty of precision strike aircraft. On paper Russia should be able to hunt HIMARS with Fullbacks while simultaneously suppressing Ukranian air defense.
In practice, they shoot down their own Fullbacks and fire S-300s at cities.
theres literally been confirmed video evidence of a destroyed himars from a few days ago. did ya'll just wipe that from your memories or something as some bizarre psychosis/cope?
>But the highlight of our discussion among the fighters was the alleged destruction of HIMARS yesterday, where in reality a timber truck was destroyed that was carrying logs to the frontline of UAF for strengthening of their positions. And generally, for the future, if you see glued up frames, low-quality filming from an UAV (we don’t have others yet), where nothing apart from pixels and something smouldering can be seen, which requires you to fantasise – consider the information to be untrue. If we really managed to locate the position of a HIMARS and then destroy it, believe me there would be plenty of shots, ours wouldn’t miss an opportunity to play it in the media for a few weeks in the daily news.
Right, the video with a logging truck and a pile of logs, where vatniks tried to claim the logs were "a pile of HIMARS rockets", in complete ignorance of the rocket pod concept? That log video?
imagine avatar/signature posting on PrepHole
how would they even begin to try? tochkas?
the real answer is strike aircraft. except all the flight avionics were sold to finance villas
SF infiltration teams
drone scout + tactical missiles
local collaborators + tactical missiles
spetsnaz? that's what american special forces did before both iraq invasions.
>how would they even begin to try?
It is cheaper and better to say that it has been done and one is destroyed, who will know if it is the truth really, you? No one will know. President Putin will be happy, the people who support him who would believe it will be happy, those Ukrainians and westerners will be unhappy and say it is a lie and it will make them angry that Russia lies, as angry as if it had been destroyed., Everybody wins. Russians will know it is a lie, you will know it is a lie, Russians will pretend it is not you will say it is, those who would be unsure will be unsure. It is as good as destroying one. To make a point then shoot down an airliner or something to distract after. No one will care.
Russia, in theory, should have total air supremacy and plenty of precision strike aircraft. On paper Russia should be able to hunt HIMARS with Fullbacks while simultaneously suppressing Ukranian air defense.
In practice, they shoot down their own Fullbacks and fire S-300s at cities.
>Russia, in theory, should have total air supremacy
theres literally been confirmed video evidence of a destroyed himars from a few days ago. did ya'll just wipe that from your memories or something as some bizarre psychosis/cope?
May I see it?
no
Mm, I see
Well anon, you are a weird fellow, but you shitpost a good thread.
Vatnik! The ammo dumps on fire!
No, Vladimir, that's just the Donestk orphanage.
>confirmed
yeah, thy got that logging truck real good
if it's that log truck again I will die laughing
The only threads i've seen about it were pointing out how it was just another russian lie. Talking about some bizzare psychosis/cope, heh.
>But the highlight of our discussion among the fighters was the alleged destruction of HIMARS yesterday, where in reality a timber truck was destroyed that was carrying logs to the frontline of UAF for strengthening of their positions. And generally, for the future, if you see glued up frames, low-quality filming from an UAV (we don’t have others yet), where nothing apart from pixels and something smouldering can be seen, which requires you to fantasise – consider the information to be untrue. If we really managed to locate the position of a HIMARS and then destroy it, believe me there would be plenty of shots, ours wouldn’t miss an opportunity to play it in the media for a few weeks in the daily news.
ZOOM IN
visual confirmation of genetically engineered hohol super soldiers destroyed
someone needs to tell this boomer that dinosaurs are feathered, now
https://wartranslated.com/wagner-group-on-himars/
https://t.me/grey_zone/14362
This is their actual Telegram, with 280k subscribers. Cope harder
not only destroying one HIMARS wouldn't make a difference since ukrs already have 12 of them + 9 M270, you can't even prove that one small victory.
To more days.
You call this destroyed himars, despite the fact that these are obviously logs?
Right, the video with a logging truck and a pile of logs, where vatniks tried to claim the logs were "a pile of HIMARS rockets", in complete ignorance of the rocket pod concept? That log video?