>The PzH 2000 has automatic support for up to 5 rounds of Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact (MRSI)
Why not just multiple cheaper howitzers to get the same effect?
>The PzH 2000 has automatic support for up to 5 rounds of Multiple Rounds Simultaneous Impact (MRSI)
good idea, better scrap all the pzh 2000s
Because all those howitzers need crews that need training, pay, transportation, supplies, retirement gibs. And will get massacred by the first counter battery fire
>Why not just multiple cheaper howitzers
It's more expensive to train multiple crews to man cheaper equipment than it is to train one crew on more expensive equipment. Each crewmember trained is hundreds of man hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent. And if you lose him, all your time and money is lost. Better to put him in a big-frick off armored box that can do some fancy shit.
>1 fcs vs 5 spgs
I'll let you do the math
Tbh with that distributed fire system the ukies have (and frankly any decent army should have had long ago, but I digress) you really can do that. It means you can't do several MRSI strikes at once but that seems like a rare occurence anyway.
That said, MRSI capability is mostly about quick loading and a tiny bit of software that's not really an expense. So why not have it when you might need it.
>tiny bit of software that's not really an expense
tiny bit of software that feeds into a targeting computer that controls motors that control a 2 ton barrel with mm accuracy
Im sure its really cheap
>targeting computer that controls motors that control a 2 ton barrel with mm accuracy
You need all of those anyway.
fun fact did you know greece is the only user of it that bought krasopol rounds to be fitted on it?
>Lol, why would you need a machinegun if you can have just five guys with bolt-action rifles
I would like to point out how someone actually made a thread about it here probably 1 year ago.
>t. average British commander in 1914
Multiple modern howizers that can shoot far are not exactly cheap either
Oh come on anon, shut up, I don't care if it's bait I am just killing time in between sets, let me enjoy my leg day >:(
Same.
I hate leg day
Stupid question but why isn't there a system like this for artillery?
how the frick would you elevate the barrel 45° upward, as would be necessary for artillery?
I'd just mount the barrel 45° upwards roughly?
how can I do a 360 noscope with it
Recoil could frick with the hydraulics
North Korea has had the same thought.
>>Lol, why would you need a machinegun if you can have just five guys with bolt-action rifles
memes aside gicven what we have seen with Russia how much Best korean stuff even works? How much of their artillery is just shot out decorative crap? I mean whenever you see any pictures leaked from inside best korea their solders look malnourished. Just how much of best korea is actually functional? Could South Korea actually conquer them in a weekend?
You’d need 40 guys
Also machineguns are cheap
Yes. They poured everything into nukes, the regular army doesn't really exist at this point.
So what? Their nuke launch sites can be seen from orbit? Why not just destroy them?
>Their nuke launch sites can be seen from orbit? Why not just destroy them?
Can all be seen from orbit?
This thread is full of tourists.
Hello Mr German Salesman. Your reverse psychology doesn't work here. Prepare to lose against K9 (like in the rich Norway of all the places...)