they should absolutely buy the CV90
BAE (which owns Hägglunds, the designer of the CV90) is even British
other option would be the Lynx, just have it produced by RBSL
Protectionism. If you were an MP and supported buying vs. manufacturing, you could end up being forced to wear the anti-labor jacket. You could trying to license build them, but I think that's already an impossibility for the Bradley.
unlike leapords, you cant lose them if they never get deployed and kept as a show trophy instead. just like the british challengers. lol >ha, take that putin >i cant believe they never destroyed a single one! >how are russoids so incompetent? >they breached all lines in my mind
Why don't the British buy this or Bradley?
Pride I think.
That or corruption.
Both CV90 and Bradley are going to be pretty dated in a few years when OMFV rolls out and the other euro next gen IFVS
they should absolutely buy the CV90
BAE (which owns Hägglunds, the designer of the CV90) is even British
other option would be the Lynx, just have it produced by RBSL
Protectionism. If you were an MP and supported buying vs. manufacturing, you could end up being forced to wear the anti-labor jacket. You could trying to license build them, but I think that's already an impossibility for the Bradley.
Shut the frick up warriortard.
Jfc Nigel
>Flash
>Thunder
Armatard confirmed.
Ffs armatard
Does IED's not count anymore?
Doesn't count as "lost" if it's recovered and repaired.
True. There’s a few warriors that were unrecoverable and completely destroyed but I haven’t found any evidence of a CV90 that was unrecoverable
But it wasnt? It got blown up, towed back and "retired" because of the damage
has it been used though?
No not really
It seen light combat in Afghanistan, used by either Norwegian or Danish soldiers (I forget which).
unlike leapords, you cant lose them if they never get deployed and kept as a show trophy instead. just like the british challengers. lol
>ha, take that putin
>i cant believe they never destroyed a single one!
>how are russoids so incompetent?
>they breached all lines in my mind
that's not true though
Dardo hasn’t seen near as much combat as the CV90
and? it did see combat indeed and none has been lost
so your statement is false
>The CV90 is the only western IFV that has never been lost to enemy action
Not true or a sign of quality.
Very true and it’s seen a fair amount of combat without suffering any losses
>Combat
>Afghanistan
It participated in a policing action where there was total air-land dominance.
Barely used in combat and nobody outside of Scandinavia gives a shit about them.
>only western IFV to never see any real combat
FTFY