I mean, they’re purpose designed fire and forget anti vehicle weapons. In the 03 iraq war, they killed like 50 vehicles for 100 rounds fired, without needing anyone lazing the target
What are the capability of Excalibur with mrsi systems, would it be possible, to mag dump a archer, say 6 or 12 rounds? And have them all hit separate armoured targets assuming at 1m cep, but in how big a radius? 10km radius at 50km range. One single unit of high speed wheeled system like archer rolling in range, for the enemy nothing but the birds singing, then msri deleting a btg in one salvo. Seems like the bottleneck on this would be feeding enough target data for it destroy so it has decent utilisation.
If one system puts out 100-200 guaranteed kills per day with just Excalibur, doesn't that one system delete the world's 2nd army by itself?
Excalibur can only hit a tank that's been sitting still for way too long. Someone has to spot the tank and tell an artillery unit the tank's exact GPS coordinates, then the artillery unit has to program and load the shell, fire it, and wait for it to hit.
Javelin is just point-and-shoot. Onboard video processing will track a vehicle no matter how it moves.
NLAW is point-and-shoot, with the disadvantage that if the tank suddenly changes its direction before the missile passes overhead, the missile will miss, because it has no active guidance. It just flies over its course and fires when its magnetic sensor detects a big mass of metal underneath.
The German SmaRT shell is probably the most underrated tank-killer -- fire it anywhere near a column of tanks, and its two submunitions will target whatever is in view of them when they're ejected.
What's that, your mother's dildo?
That literally was sent last.
The combination of drones spotters, keypoints and normal arty is highly lethal.
The need to make one with blades that come out, for taking out a single guy and leaving everybody else in the room intact and alive.
already done
Why does the missile have to shot out its blades before impact?
so i doesn't hit innocent birds on its way
Minimizes drag I'd assume
>slapchop hellfire
Nah, pic rel is the best weapon
Idk, I wouldn't kick her out of bed
Yeah, I'd splatter her cervix.
>EKKKSUUUKAAAARRRRIIIIIBAAAAAA shell
>not actually made by the British
what the frick
>Sherman, Grant, Lee, Stuart
>all named by Britain
wtf
This things are scary. But kinda expensive
These*
SADARM was superior in the AT role. A modern SADARM shell with a PGK fuze would be even nastier.
>SADARM was superior in the AT role
How?
I mean, they’re purpose designed fire and forget anti vehicle weapons. In the 03 iraq war, they killed like 50 vehicles for 100 rounds fired, without needing anyone lazing the target
An inert guided artillery shell?
What are the capability of Excalibur with mrsi systems, would it be possible, to mag dump a archer, say 6 or 12 rounds? And have them all hit separate armoured targets assuming at 1m cep, but in how big a radius? 10km radius at 50km range. One single unit of high speed wheeled system like archer rolling in range, for the enemy nothing but the birds singing, then msri deleting a btg in one salvo. Seems like the bottleneck on this would be feeding enough target data for it destroy so it has decent utilisation.
If one system puts out 100-200 guaranteed kills per day with just Excalibur, doesn't that one system delete the world's 2nd army by itself?
Intelligence on targets and actual targeting are the issue. Brimstone can pull the shit you're talking about due to the self-guidance.
Nah bruh.
Excalibur can only hit a tank that's been sitting still for way too long. Someone has to spot the tank and tell an artillery unit the tank's exact GPS coordinates, then the artillery unit has to program and load the shell, fire it, and wait for it to hit.
Javelin is just point-and-shoot. Onboard video processing will track a vehicle no matter how it moves.
NLAW is point-and-shoot, with the disadvantage that if the tank suddenly changes its direction before the missile passes overhead, the missile will miss, because it has no active guidance. It just flies over its course and fires when its magnetic sensor detects a big mass of metal underneath.
The German SmaRT shell is probably the most underrated tank-killer -- fire it anywhere near a column of tanks, and its two submunitions will target whatever is in view of them when they're ejected.